Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about Congress Hunts
interdimensionals. That's correct.
Congress Hunts interdimensionals.
We're talking, of course, about Congress starting to finally
view these UFOs, this phenomena as possibly being
interdimensional, especially Congresswoman Luna.
We're going to get into that. It seems to me as though she's
really gone over Grush's testimony with a fine tooth
comb. And maybe based on some of the
verbiage in that sworn testimony, she's able to connect
a few dots that a lot of us have been doing for a long time.
And that's that. These things could in fact be
interdimensional, interdimensional craft that
people are seeing. And that goes so far as to say,
even with some of this UFO meta material that's left behind,
sometimes it seems as though it's coming here from another
dimension. Maybe it's coming in the form of
pure energy and then transmutating into something
physical that we can recognize. And we're going to go over a
case from Claraton, western Iowa, that happened back in
1977. See what's going on even today
with some of the material that was left behind from that UFO
sighting and what many believe are interdimensional beings or
craft coming here from some other place, not a physical
place so much, but as an extra dimensional place.
Now this article here, the first one comes to us from
foxnews.com. It says close encounters of
Congressional kind lawmakers struggle to grasp alleged
interdimensional nature of UFOs. Written by Chad Pergram, it says
there's been an uptick at bipartisan hearings, briefings
and legislations on UAPS over the past few years due to
suspicions the government is hiding information.
Well, you'd have to be not a very smart person to think that
the government wasn't hiding information.
That's what the government does. It hide information about
everything. We've talked about this, you
know, at nauseam on this program.
Information is knowledge. Knowledge is power.
And people, just human nature, don't want to collect and
control through the use of knowledge because humans want
the power. Power can lead to all kinds of
cool things. Power can lead to wealth.
Power can lead to getting things that you want.
So yes, the more power you have for a lot of people, the better
off you are because they don't care about the responsibility
that goes along with that power. The article goes down here a
little bit. It says what happened on a gross
What happened on the grassy Knoll at Dealey Plaza in Dallas?
Does a mysterious Serpentine beast glide through the icy
waters of Loch Ness? It is their life on other
planets. Perhaps it's only natural.
Congress is now probing whether the government is covering up
possible evidence of UFOs. That's kind of some lazy writing
right there. And this author throws in three
different notions that people have questions about and some
people have been ridiculed about quite a bit, and he just kind of
puts them in there with with the whole UFO phenomena.
You can tell right there where he's coming from.
He's come from a position that where he doesn't really respect
the the beliefs of people who recognize UFOs and he certainly
doesn't believe in UFOs. And from what I can tell in this
first paragraph then it has this really kind of janky looking old
1950s type illustrations of of flying sausages that have been
digitally generated here. This is looks like something
that that a 10th grader would have done for their weekly
expository writing class. It goes on down here, says the
time for this type of congressional inquest into this
mystery is only right. Suspicions about the origins of
the pandemic and conspiracies about the safety of vaccines
couple that with skepticism about the media.
The veracity of election returns around the government in
general. See, so they're trying to.
Obviously this person comes from a certain political perspective
where they think that it's OK for the government to demand us
under penalty of law or imprisonment to put things in
our body that they won't tell us what the ingredients are.
Now they think that it's illegal for one party or the other to
question election results. I questioned the results with
the Bush Gore. I questioned a lot of results
such as human nature doesn't mean that we're bad or
conspiracy theory. It says it's not a stretch for
people and now lawmakers to seek more answers about not
identified aerial phenomena. Are we alone in the universe?
Well, of course people have questions.
That's the difference between a human and and you know, a plant.
I suppose we can ask questions. I mean, that's one of the big
differences. If not, some in Congress believe
they've been left in the dark. Well, anyone in Congress that
doesn't understand they've been left in the dark hasn't opened
up their eyes to see that there are no lights on.
It says a cohort of lawmakers suspects there is mounting
information. Government agencies and the
military aren't playing straight with Capitol Hill, and that's
how he uses the word cohort, Kind of like these cloak and
dagger, possibly bad people asking questions.
And if the truth is out there, they're not getting it.
That's why there's been an uptick of bipartisan hearings,
briefings and legislation on UAPS over the past few years.
And look, you're not getting the truth.
John Kennedy, President Kennedy was killed, what, 1963?
So it's been over 60 years now and we still know that there's
documents under seal and we've had president after president,
you know, from Clinton to Obama to Trump to Biden.
Oh, we're going to release those records.
Nothing ever happens. What does the deep state have on
these people that prevents them from releasing 60 year old
documents? We've talked about it probably
100 times in this program. Greenwald request FOIA
information about a reported down UFO and recovery in Korea
back 70 years ago. And he gets a page, go on his
site and look it up and it's completely blacked out with
maybe a couple sentences on it. What are they hiding?
I mean, they're hiding stuff from World War 2, probably stuff
from World War One, and says whatever people are seeing could
be something from the ground. It could be something from the
great beyond. But there appears to be
discomfort with federal officials divulging to lawmakers
what they know. Hence the disappointment for
Schumer. And frankly, there may be
evidence that different silos, quote UN quote, of the federal
government might not know exactly what the other feds do.
Well, you can call that silos or you can call it the deep state,
and that is a court silo. Or the deep state does know
what's going on. Everybody else is on the
outside, and within that silo of deep state actors, there
probably are compartments or other silos to you get to you.
Very evil black heart of that thing where maybe five or six
people know what's going on in total.
That's not called democracy, OK says.
Granted, some things spotted in the skies might be spatial
proprietary advanced technology, The different agencies or the
intelligence community guard with the utmost confidentiality.
And some of the stuff out there might just be unexplained.
OK, this is another straw man. Might be unexplained
proprietary, advanced technology.
Well, if it's so important that they keep this stuff secret, why
are they parading it out in public where everybody can see
it goes on and says? No wonder this fuels conspiracy
theories. Once again, very insulting
language, asking a question about your government quitting
crimes. It's not a conspiracy theory,
OK? It's just common sense
questions. Such was a case when
Intelligence Committee Inspector General Thomas Monheim appeared
for a closed door classified briefing from members of the
House Oversight Committee last week.
Nothing to hide here. We'll just have a secret
meeting. Some responses were predictable
stonewalled once again, complained Representative Tim
Burchett, Republican of Tennessee.
I just wasted time, said Representative Raja Krishna
Maruthi, Democrat, Illinois. I'm more concerned than I was
going in. So there he knows he's been
stonewalled, just like Burchett said, not being told anything
more concerned than I was going in.
There's a concerted effort to conceal as much information as
possible, alleged Representative Andy Ogles, Republican
Tennessee. Well, it's not being alleged.
I mean, fact, they have a they have a meeting where they're
asking our employees questions, and the employees refuse to tell
the boss what's going on. Lawmakers contend.
They aren't hearing from people who really know what's out
there. They send us bureaucrats who
don't know on purpose, said Representative Glenn Grotham,
Republican Wisconsin. But at night, it might not be as
sinister as some suspect. Well, I'm assuming that it's
more sinister than some suspect This meeting, unlike the one we
had previously, actually moved the needle, said Representative
Jared Moswowski, Democrat Florida.
This is the first time we kind of got a ruling on whether what
the IG Inspector General thinks of these claims.
Yeah, there's some gobbledygook there.
The claims Masquet speaks of stem from allegations former
military intelligence officer and UAP whistleblower David
Gresh made at an open house hearing last summer.
Grush contends the military has possession of a spacecraft from
someplace else, as well as something else.
Do you believe our government has made contact with
intelligent extraterrestrials? Representative Nancy Mays,
Republican South Carolina, asked at that hearing last July.
That's something I can't discuss in a public setting, Grush
replied. However, Grush implied the US
may have some sort of life form that isn't understood.
He termed them biologics at the summary hearing.
Human or non human biologics. Mace Ask non human.
Gresh answered without hesitation.
Lawmakers demand transparency, but due to the sensitivity of
the material, even they aren't quite ready to yet publicly
share what they're learning. Well, no, because they'd lock
them up. This is the first real briefing
that we've had, that we've now made, I would say, progress on
some of the claims Mr. Gersh has made, said Maskowitz.
As upset as he was in the briefing, Burchett signaled the
same. Well, it's a limited hangout,
nothing more. We've got some pretty definitive
stuff, said Burchett. It just verified what I thought.
Well, I think what he thought was that he was being lied to
and probably verified that, if I was going to make a guess.
But it's unclear what definitive stuff lawmakers heard about
little alone. What was verified, And we don't
know what Burchett thought. Lawmakers are trying to dissect
Gresh's allegations. Let's step back for just a
moment, it says. As a longtime congressional
observer, this is the author speaking.
I have learned to pay attention to precisely what Senator
Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican says decades are
reporting on. McConnell taught me that you'll
know exactly what McConnell's planning to do or pondering if
you flay his words with the perfection of Against Sue Knife.
I I find that, you know, hard to believe this person is assuming
that any of these politicians are really doing their own
bidding. I mean, at the lower levels,
yes, probably. But when you get to the level of
the gobbler, I don't think he's probably doing anything other
than what his handlers are telling him to do.
And that doesn't matter if he's Republican, Democrat, or in the
other category. My opinion, my opinion, only
language and framing is paramount in politics.
The same is true in intelligence circles.
And apparently it's true when it comes to explaining the
unexplained like UFOs. So let's focus on the language.
Representative Anna Paulina Luna, Republican Florida,
questioned Grush about why he referred to potential beings as
non human intelligence and not extraterrestrials.
At that 2023 hearing, Grush suggested that what the
government is reportedly has is very complex, very complex.
Not just a not just a biological creature from some other planet,
something way more complicated. After the House briefing last
week, Luna noted that Grush previously referred to such
entities as interdimensional. Yours truly asked Luna what
interdimensional means when it comes to UAPS.
Is this something that bends time and space?
This reporter asked. Luna, The Florida Republican
didn't respond directly. He said interdimensional, he
refused to use certain terms, said Lena.
But back to our political message box analysis.
So he just you see what the author did here.
The meat of the story is that one representative in Florida
has caught this guy. He this, this, this author wants
to talk about what an expert he is at flying Mitch McConnell's
words and how he can just protect whatever Mitch is going
to do based on his super intelligent ability To listen to
Mick, to listen to Mitch, and to somehow decipher his mumblings
that seem like that of a stroke victim more than anything and
tell the world this is what Mitch intends to do because this
author's such a smart person. But when he talks about
Representative Luna dissecting the words of David Gresh under
testimony and how important this notion of interdimensional is,
she's on to something. But what's the author do?
She doesn't give her any credit. He just asked her a couple
questions, claims she didn't completely answer his question,
and moves on to the next thing. This is, this is how they this
is how they do you friend, they they get the story And this is a
big story that congressman and these are people who've been
briefed by these deep state reps are now starting to understand
that these things aren't biologic.
They might it might be non biologic.
They're not human. OK, there's something and
there's something beyond the scope of little green men.
They're beyond the so they're beyond the scope of probably
even AI. They're interdimensional that
that theme that keeps coming up is interdimensional.
Just another word for spiritual. We don't know.
It's so complicated it might as well be.
It goes on and says could it be that extraterrestrial or alien
means specific things in the intelligence or military
communities when trying to atomize what the government
knows about uaps. You know I really don't trust
these guys. It says the term N dimensional
pertains to the theory there are multiple dimensions of space and
time coexisting at once. The long standing theory about
UFOs is that what we may see on Earth isn't even something from
another planet, from across the Galaxy.
Could it be something which broke across the plane of the
dimension where we reside from this location and another
dimension? After the briefing, another
reporter asked Representative Kirsch Marathi about Gresha's
claim of biologics. I can't get into the Pacifics,
the Illinois Democrat replied. I didn't get the answers that I
was hoping for. Fox asked Luna if maybe what
they're dealing with is so thorny and beyond the norm that
conventional science and physics could struggle to grasp this.
Grasp this. I think we can understand it,
Linda said, without hinting what lawmakers are trying to
understand. We've used this quotation before
when writing about UFOs, but it bears repeating.
And Shakespeare, Hamlet tells Horatio, there are more things
in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
In other words, there's the penalty of possibilities.
People haven't even found them yet.
The truth may be out there, but it could be impregnable for mere
mortals. It doesn't have to be totally
understood in order to be used. I mean, there's things that we
use it. I mean, a lot of us turn the
lights on to our house every day.
We don't maybe actually know all the nuances of how electricity
works. You might have a kind of a
childlike version of it, but we still use it.
And the deep state can be doing the same thing.
They could have. They could have stumbled on some
sort of interdimensional knowledge that they're not aware
of how it works or what it is, but they're able to use it and
use it to their advantage. Now this article was kind of in
one of those things where it brought us some pit points, also
brought up a lot of silliness. We'll finish up with the second
article here from dailygrill.com.
It says researchers analyze material from an unsolved UFO
case with modern scientific equipment.
This is written by Greg on Saturday, February 19th.
This is another one of these articles where they get into the
surface and what they don't say, I think says as much as what
they do say now, the article begins.
It says how do you, how do you do scientific research on the
topic of UFOs and get it published in a journal without
shredding your reputation? That was the thought that
crossed my mind when I read a recent paper that has managed to
navigate that difficult route, with the how being neatly
answered by its wordy title, Improved Instrumental
Techniques, Including Isotopic Analysis Applicable to the
Characterization of Unusual Materials with Potential
Relevance to Aerospace Forensics.
That's quite a title. That's how make it about the
science, improved instrumental techniques, and make it relevant
to aerospace forensics. And he goes on here and talks a
little bit, he says. As such, a team of researchers,
including Gary P Nolan. Remember, that's the guy that
blocked me on Twitter, and I think only because I made jokes
about Louis Elizondo's tattoo. A highly respected Stanford
University scientist who has a side interest in anomalies
research and legendary UFO investigator and author Jacques
Valet. Jacques Valet.
He's old school to spend the first selection of the paper
reviewing common modern mass spectrometry techniques applied
to the analysis of unknown materials across many fields,
and give an overview of improvements made to these
technologies in recent years. In other words, we're just going
to talk, talk, talk, talk, talk, talk, talk.
And in there somewhere we're going to drop a little nugget of
truth. And here's that truth.
On the evening of Saturday, December 17th, 1977, a luminous
red mask, quote UN quote, was observed by two residents of
Council Bluffs, IA, falling from the sky near the northern city
limits. Quote.
A bright flash was seen, followed by flames 8 to 10 feet
high. When they reached the scene, the
witnesses found an area covered by molten metal that glowed red
orange, igniting the grass. Police and a fireman arrived
within 15 minutes and saw the mass with estimates ranging from
35 to 55 lbs running boiling down the edges of the levee in
an area of about four to six feet.
So imagine this four to six feet square area of running, boiling
molten metal is what it looks like.
The central portion remained warm to the touch for
approximately 2 hours. No cratering was noticed.
After ascertaining that the material was not radioactive,
two chemical analysis were rapidly conducted, one at the
Iowa State University Laboratory and the other at Griffin Pipe
Products Company. Now there's AI think these guys
were the foundry that was nearby there.
Hence some people said, well, somehow this pile of slag must
have magically made its way, you know, several 100 feet from the
foundry to the site. No way you're hauling the stuff
in a wheelbarrow or anything else, then it says.
Both agreed with the determination that the material
was a metallic alloy, chiefly iron, with small amounts of
nickel and chronium. The report indicated that the
microstructure suggested the study sample was carbon steel
that was cast, subsequently reheated to about 1000° and
cooled at an intermediate rate so that it resembled wrought
iron. Since wrought iron is an alloy
containing low carbon content in the .08% or less levels, no
pictures of the microstructure were provided in the historical
report. The problem with that
determination was that nothing accounted for the way a large
amount of that very heavy and extremely hot material could
have been deposited in that area in a molten state following the
clear observation of a luminous object in the sky, the purported
source of the material which remained unidentified.
So you have this UFO show up. Boom.
It drops this molten lava type metal, iron, I guess it turns
out to be onto the ground and then disappears.
It's phasing into our dimension. Something's happening where this
is a byproduct of fuel or whatever.
This whatever happened, happened where it seems like pure energy
has turned into iron. That's what it seems like,
because it, as far as we can tell, it came out of nothing.
Just drop there, left there. And by the way, whatever did
this didn't care a lick about whether or not somebody was
standing below that machine or whatever it was that dropped
this stuff. So that didn't seem to me like
they came here for a kumbaya moment.
They didn't stop to see who wanted to sit around.
The campfire just blasted into our dimension, took a big old
poo on our front lawn of molten iron, and then left.
Investigators were afterwards able to gather testimony from 11
witnesses in all in separate groups to the incident.
Notably, two of those witnesses said that they saw the object in
the sky. It was hovering near the
treetops, not falling, and they described it as round with red
lights blinking and sequencing around their periphery.
So they see the UFO. 11 witnesses with the amount of
detail given the consistency of the observations and the
material evidence on the ground, investigators considered 5
hypothesis to explain the incident re entering satellite
debris, meteoric impact fall equipment from an aircraft.
A hoax perpetrated using thermite, A hoax perpetrated by
pouring molten level on the ground.
Moreover, none of these explanations seem to provide a
decent answer. No, because they're all silly.
The first three were dismissed due to the lack of cratering and
the molten state of the material, while the two hoax
explanations left too many questions unanswered.
What was the object that was seen falling?
How was the melt? How was the molten metal
transported? What was the material on the
ground, investigators wondered, Actually ejected from the
hovering object? Yeah, well, yeah, pretty, pretty
obvious. Yeah.
I'm wondering if that UFO did that.
We have 11 people say they saw this UFO.
They described what it looked like.
They said it was hovering near the tree trops, not falling.
And they described it as round, with red lights blinking in
sequence around the periphery. So I saw a flying saucer drop
this big chunk of molten metal out of the sky.
High enough, you know, where they could see it, but not so
high that it left a big hole in the ground.
Huh. I wonder how it got there.
The paper then notes the results of both the original analysis of
the material, as well as their new analysis using more advanced
equipment, performed on a sample of the material retained by
Jacques Valet all the way, all the way from France to Iowa.
Jacques Valet from his original investigation from all these.
It found that the material is composed of chiefly iron, with
less than 1% of alloying metals such as nickel and chromium.
The slag was a foam material containing metallic iron and
aluminum, with smaller amounts of magnesium, silicon, and
titanium. This elemental makeup was highly
suggestive that the material was not meteoric in origin or from a
piece of man made space hardware that's just too junky to be used
for space. The more recent isotopic
analysis also led to an initial conclusion that sample
components were consistent with a terrestrial origin, and
further advanced analysis using multiplexed iron beam imaging
confirmed the isotope ratios did not differ from expected
terrestrial values, although significant differences were
noted in the homogeneity of the elements across samples.
Yeah, In other words, this stuff wasn't the same all the way
across. It was all mixed up and
splotchy. Nothing like a human would do.
Finally, researchers speculated on all possible explanations for
the incident. One hypothesis was that it might
be related to the crash of a Soviet reconnaissance satellite
just five weeks earlier. However, it was decided that
there was no connection between the two events.
That's called grasping for straws.
Another suggestion, based on the eyewitness report that the
object was hovering, was that the molten mass might have been
ejected from a UFO, though the researchers did not explicitly
say that in a paper. However, the researchers know
even in such a speculative area, the scientific steps to be taken
are not fundamentally different from those we have outlined.
One would have to ask, Does the catalog of elements found in the
material cause us to believe it does not come from our planet?
The materials from Council Bluffs show no evidence of
suggesting it was engineered or designed.
This is important. The materials from Council Bluff
show no evidence suggesting it was engineered or designed.
Oh, I guess it just happened on its own.
The material would not be expected to form naturally and
as shown, does have unusual in homogeneity.
OK, now this is what you call double talk.
First off, they say the Council Bluffs sample here it shows no
evidence suggesting it was engineered or designed.
So if it's not engineered or designed, that means it must
have just occurred naturally. But then the next sentence, it
says the material would not be expected to form naturally.
Well, how would it not be expected to form naturally if
there's no engineer or design to it, If nobody mixed the stuff
together, If no human hand was involved, then it would have had
to have been form naturally. But now you're telling me that
it would not be expected to form naturally.
And it does show that it has unusual in homogeneity.
I mean, in other words, it's splotchy.
It's not all mixed together nice and smooth like we would do.
While we cannot define the purpose, this does not mean it
cannot be created by methods, even extent in the 1970s.
I'm sorry, and I'm sorry that Jock Valley signed his name to
this. I would expect this out of
Nolan. I mean, he gets all kinds of
money from the, you know, government studies and this and
that, and they've got to protect a precious, precious reputation.
But to sit here and tell me that the materials from Council Bluff
shows no evidence suggesting it was engineered or designed,
that's the first sentence. Nope.
No engineering, no designing. Well, that tells me then that it
must have occurred naturally. But what's the next sentence?
Say? The material would not be
expected to form naturally. Well, if it's not expected to
form naturally, then wouldn't it have had to be engineered or
designed? I mean, why are you putting this
in here? Why are you trying to cover your
your rear ends? This is a problem with all the
funding that's done with these big universities.
They have to get grants from someone to do their funding.
And the people that they get funding from in large part
either don't believe in UFOs or don't want you to believe in
UFOs because they already know they're real either the
government. So if these guys would happen to
go out and blow the whistle and tell the truth and say, wow,
this thing doesn't look like it occurred naturally to me.
You got a big chunk of slag Eye and I are here in the in the
pasture and we don't see how anybody could have brought this
thing out here. It was super hot when we got
there. It would have melted.
Anything that you were able to bring it out here with, there
aren't any tracks so it couldn't have occurred naturally.
So the assumption would be that it would have had to have been
engineered or designed. Can you see, can you see how the
obvious the truth is and how these two quote UN quote
respected scientists and I don't know how much that Valet had in
writing this saying. He seems like a pretty good guy
to me, but at least with Nolan, and this is, and this is the
assumption that we end up with, come on.
The researchers do note, however, that liquid metal has
been identified by some scientists as possibly being
useful part of some propulsion or power generation system.
Though they are clear that no such device has been reported to
date, such ideas remain highly speculative.
Nevertheless, they do mention speculation that is such a
system, depleted fuel might need to be occasionally ejected.
Yeah, like when the 11 people at Council Bluffs looked up in the
sky and saw a flying saucer, you know, with lights all around the
edge of it when they saw it drop a big chunk of metal, Molten
metal out of its bottom end? Yeah, taking a dump on your
front lawn? Don't care.
Wow. So we're supposed to ignore that
evidence and just sit here in stun Stupidity.
As we look at these pieces of the slide, it looks it almost
looks like it's got holes in it. They talked about it being
foamy. This is not how you would
normally make iron, and it's not really good for anything it
doesn't have. Apparently doesn't have a high
enough carbon content in it, it says.
In doing so, the paper sets up a rationale for further
investigation along the same lines as has been carried out
with the Council Bluffs material.
While their analysis did not solve this particular mystery,
in their final summary, the researchers do feel compelled to
discuss that there have been numerous cases over the last
several decades of reports of material being dropped from or
rejected by unknown aerial objects.
It has not been impossible or financially feasible to date to
bring all the full range of current materials analysis
capabilities to bear deep metallurgical analysis by
specifically trained analysts will need to be consulted for
each different material as warranted.
Recently news reports have suggested the presence of other
aerial craft of unknown Providence witnessed by Navy
pilots currently detected with electronic sensors and visual
identification goes on. Talks a little bit about that
kind of finishes up with this case, this this is my problem
with Nolan. They put him out here as part of
this UFO mafia, as I call them, these celebrities, apparently
friends and associates with Louis.
Elizondo got obviously was upset that I would poke fun at Louis
and blocked me before I had ever left a comment on his Twitter
feed. So you get this rare material,
this obvious UFO meta materials, what it is, it was witnessed
falling out of a UFO. They're accountable files back
in 1977. They get a piece of the stuff
and they find out the materials on the face of it is not that
unusual. It just kind of a really low
quality wrought iron. And it seems like it's kind of,
it's not homogeneous. I mean, the ingredients kind of
vary from one piece of the iron to the other piece.
It's not something that that humans would ever have made.
They tell us that it doesn't look like it was designed or
engineered and then in the next sentence they tell us, well,
it's not naturally occurring, more than likely.
Well then what is it? It can only be a one or two
things. Anything you look at from the
rock in your front yard to the computer on your desk, it's
either been engineered and designed or it has occurred
naturally. Some would argue designed by a
higher power. Either way, it's either man made
or it's not and what they're saying and it's a very cloudy
language. By saying that it's not
engineered or designed, they're saying it's not man made.
And then in the next sentence, they're saying it's not
naturally occurring, which means that it is man made or made by
some intelligent entity. This notion of these things not
just being some biological creature from another planet or
maybe, maybe not even AI. There's these things, this UFO
phenomena, it's starting to shape up as an interdimensional
phenomenon. We're seeing that Congress is
catching on to that by the words that people like David Greshi is
when they're under sworn testimony.
And the scientists see this, but they don't want to admit it, and
they didn't want to let the cat out of the bag.
When they're seeing these ships craft, whatever they are, just
appear out of nowhere into our dimension.
Often times these things are changing shape.
They're almost as if they're using pure energy to transmutate
into different things. And occasionally they leave
something behind, what we call UFO meta material.
And occasionally that material looks like it's from somewhere
else. And occasionally it looks like
it's just common, yet peculiar a material that it could have been
left here by someone or something, but probably not.
And they won't tell us they won't.
They won't make us. They won't make a final judgment
on it. Even though we have 11 people in
1977 see a UFO drop a chunk of molten level out of the sky.
They go out there, they wait for it to cool down, they get a
sample of it, they send it to you, they send it to Iowa State
University. They say, yeah, this stuff is
iron, some kind of crappy wrought iron material.
It's kind of foamy in nature. You kind of see the little
spaces inside the iron when you take the piece apart.
It's not homogeneous like a normal iron would be.
It doesn't look like it's been designed by anybody, these guys
tell us, but it's not natural either.
So they leave you right there in the valley of indecision because
they don't want to admit what they know is the truth.
These things are interdimensional.
They're coming and going into our reality at will, and they
are able to manifest themselves as physical objects and probably
even as human beings. Until next time.
This is UFO warning over now.