Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode, we're talking about the devil blocking
disclosure. That's correct, the devil
blocking disclosure. At least that's what one
congressman saying. Now this article comes to us
from polico.com. It says, quote, the devil has
been in our way. GOP lawmaker accuses Biden
administration of covering up UFO's.
We've run into roadblocks from members of the intelligence
community, the Pentagon Representative Tim Burchard
said. Interesting verbiage he uses
there. The devil has been in our way.
Now does he mean that literally or figuratively?
A Republican congressman on Wednesday accused the Pentagon
and the intelligence community of hiding what the government
knows about UFO saying, quote, the devil has been in our way.
During a House Oversight Committee hearing on the issue,
Representative Tim Burchard said the government's lack of
transparency surrounding unidentified aerial phenomena
amounts to a cover up. The devil has been in our way
through this thing. We've run into roadblocks from
members of the intelligence community, the Pentagon, said
Berchard, who has been the subcommittee's most vocal
advocate for investigating UFO's.
Berchard cited an example of when he proposed an amendment to
the Federal Aviation Administration that would have
made pilot reports of UFO's available to Congress, but the
bill was never advanced. There you go.
Nip it in the bud. Don't let any of this
information percolate up through the channels.
The amendment, he said, would have required the FAA to report
sightings by commercial pilots to Congress.
Representative Glenn Grotham, Republican Wisconsin Share of
the panel's National Security Committee, also accused the
Biden administration of not being transparent on the subject
of UFO's, citing the Chinese spy balloon incident in February.
We are not just debating the existence of UAP's.
We're deliberating on the principles that define our
Republic, which is a commitment to transparency and
accountability, he said. Now look, you can start to see
this very clear division between the elected members of Congress
who haven't been paid off or bought off or compromised and
this deep state that we're always talking about.
And we're going to get into that in just a little bit.
This underlying culture, this group of people that has taken
control of our government through various branches and
departments and whatnot and really override the decisions of
a Congress who holds their purse strings.
Lawmakers didn't provide any concrete examples of a Biden
administration cover up, instead criticize the Pentagon for
overclassifying information and raising what they viewed as a
lack of information over the spy balloon instead of incident
multiple times. Now you see the bias of the
reporter here, almost like these guys all seem to be lap dogs for
the deep state, he says Lawmakers didn't provide many
concrete examples. These guys have been providing
concrete examples from day one. Concrete example, 3UFO shoot
downs, you've got UConn, Lake Huron and Alaska.
They won't show the video from the shoot downs.
And these congressmen have been complaining about that.
Those several questions early in the hearing revolved around the
possible existence of extraterrestrial activity.
Witnesses and lawmakers emphasize the importance of
investigating UF O's as a national security matter.
Rather than spaceships operated by aliens, unidentified craft
could be drones or aircraft operated by adversaries.
I think they're getting off path a little bit.
They should investigate this phenomena.
Is a vehicle a technology, a means of world domination that
could be in league with the very deep state that's keeping them
from seeing the information? I mean, think about it.
Why are they hiding this stuff? Well, because it benefits them,
doesn't benefit them. It does not benefit the
Department of Defense to hide UFO information and data.
If it's simply the Russians or the Chinese, that would be to
their advantage because then they could say, hey, we need
more money to protect against this stuff.
Now, on the other hand, if those same people actually had access
to these things, or were working in collusion with the operators
of these things, then it would be to their advantage not to let
us know about it, because they would be able to gain a huge
technological and monetary advantage over the rest of us.
By controlling this new technology, they could, in
effect, control the entire economy, And by controlling the
entire economy, they could control you.
Representative Robert Garcia, Democrat California, the ranking
Democrat on the subcommittee, stressed the need for
bipartisanship on the issue, which has struggled to achieve
credibility among lawmakers on both sides of the aisle.
Rather than dismiss claims, Republicans and Democrats must
work together to cut through information, misinformation,
rather, and to look at the facts in a serious and thoughtful
manner, he said. I I see this a lot, and I hate
and it shouldn't be political, you wouldn't think.
But here we have somebody from the opposite side of the aisle
is Berchard coming in and saying, oh, we need to work
together. You can't work together with
somebody while they're actively trying to abuse you.
They're covering up everything from cattle mutilations to UFO
sightings. How can we work together with
them to cover that stuff up? In other words, shut up and go
back to bed. It's got to the point where it's
not armed conflict, but it is definitely conflict on a
political level. And the conflict is between the
elected congressmen who represent the public and want
disclosure, who want the truth, who want this knowledge shared
with the public. And it's conflict between them
and these unnamed, unknown people in this deep state.
Like they're like the old mafia. They pretend as though they
don't exist. So this allows them to just act
at will, do whatever they want. And in the meantime, they've got
allies that are just outside of that cloaked group here.
Representative Garcia, Democrat, California.
He says, you know, we we need bipartisanship on the issue.
Well, I don't know if you've got one party protecting the deep
state and one party demanding disclosure.
It used to be the Democrats were demanding disclosure and then
the Republicans were protecting the deep state.
Now it seems like it switched roar reversals for some crazy
reason. Now it's the Republicans, just a
few of them, demanding disclosure.
And the majority of Democrats, with the exception of like
Senator Sienna or Hildebrand or whatever, we've got a few out
there. They're trying a little bit, but
I'm just saying in general, so this working together notice is
not working at all at this point.
We need accountability. If you got a teenage kid and
they take your car without permission, they go out, they
get drunk, and they wreck it. Your past working together with
that kid, at that point, that kid has brought you into
conflict, where now you're requiring accountability.
Big difference. You can't work together with
somebody who's actively working against your interest, OK?
Working together only only works is when you're both working
towards the mutual goals. If the other person's mutual
goal is to destroy you, rob you, commandeer your wealth and
enslave you, working with that person may not be in your best
interest. Now, if you're in some, you
know, North Korean country somewhere where they've got a
gun pointed at your head, you may be limited to what you can
do. But this is still the United
States, and we have a few elected Congressmen here who are
heroically, in my opinion, seeking disclosure.
So it's not we're we're past working together at this point.
We're at at the point where these congressmen, the guys in
control of the purse strings, they're demanding
accountability, OK, accountability.
The ones that need to be working together are the American people
and their representatives, the people on the other side who are
doing illegal things, who are hiding information from us, who
are over classifying, they need to be held accountable.
They're not going to work with us, OK?
They haven't been working with us for probably 70 or 80 years
now. The article goes on here.
It says Congress held his first public hearing on UFOs in
decades last year, with Pentagon officials speaking before
lawmakers. Wednesday's hearing was the
first public, unclassified testimony from witnesses who
have reported sightings. Ryan Graves, a former Navy pilot
and current executive director for the Americans for Safe
Aerospace, testified Wednesday alongside David Grush, who made
public claims about a secretive government retrieval program,
and David Fraver, a former Navy pilot who, like Graves, claim to
have spotted unidentified aircraft.
Look, man, they've got photographs of them.
Okay. You can see here what the
author's doing. They're trying to they're
they're trying to downplay what this guy's brought to us.
While Birchard and others have called for more transparency,
other lawmakers have scoffed at any notion that there are aliens
hiding in the Pentagon's basement.
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, when asked two weeks ago if he
believed the aliens provided the tongue and cheek response quote.
I think if we had found a UFOI think the Department of Defense
would tell us because they would probably want to request more
money. With all due respect to Kevin
McCarthy, they already have an enormous black budget where even
Congress is not allowed to know where they spend the money.
So that's not a very good defense against that argument.
It's been a hot button issue as witnesses and commercial
advocates for the increased transparency plea for lawmakers
and the public to take that matter seriously.
Despite the pushback, Today is just the start of it.
It's not the ending, Butcher told Fox News before the
hearing. Well, kudos to Mitchell
Bertrude. There's another article I want
to take a look at real quick here.
As we're talking about the devil in disclosure, it does seem like
it does seem like we're up against the devil sometime
because these guys are just so obnoxious.
I guess you could say this article says apnews.com.
The title of the article is Whistleblower tells Congress the
US is Concealing Multidecade program that Captures UF O's and
this is something we thought about for a long time.
Imagine the amount of knowledge and technology that they could
have accumulated over fifty 60-70 years, it says.
Washington AP the US This is written by the gnomen merchant.
the US is concealing A longstanding program that
retrieves and reverse engineers unidentified flying objects, a
former Air Force intelligence officer testified Wednesday to
Congress. The Pentagon has denied his
claims. Retired Major General Grush
Grush's highly anticipated testimony before a House
Oversight subcommittee was Congress's latest foray into the
world of UA P's, or unidentified aerial phenomena, which is the
official term the US government uses instead of UF O's.
While the study of mysterious aircraft or objects often
invokes talk of aliens and little green men, Democrats and
Republicans in recent years have pushed for more research as a
national security matter due to concerns that sightings observed
by pilots may be tied to US adversaries.
And that whole argument sounds to me like a limited hangout.
The UFO activity has become, I mean just so commonplace and and
with cell phones and so many more people traveling, you know,
by air, there are so many more reports of this stuff that they
can no longer just write it off as swamp gas.
So they had to create something, another boogeyman to be
responsible for these things and the course, the quickest,
easiest, simplest answer would be China or Russia.
It's a limited hangout. Gress said he was asked in 2019
by the head of a government task force on UAP Student to identify
all highly classified programs relating to the task force
mission at the time, Gresh was detailed to the National
Reconnaissance Office, the agency that operates at US spy
satellites. Look, the spy satellites can be
turned on your backyard. So this guy was in a he was in a
program that just spies on everything.
So I understand where he's coming from and says I was
informed in the course of my official duties of a multidecade
UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program, to which I
was denied access, he said. Asked whether the US government
had information about extraterrestrial life, Crush
said the US likely has been aware of nonhuman activity since
the 1930s. Of course he's talking about
that UFO crash reported over there in Italy just prior to
World War Two, maybe just at the start of it.
The one in Italy. The Pentagon has denied Gresch's
claims of a cover up. In a statement, Defense
Department spokeswoman Susan Gal, why she comes up again,
said investigators have not discovered any verifiable
information to substantiate claims that any programs
regarding the possession or reverse engineering of
extraterrestrial materials have existed in the past or exists
currently. I wonder if you had to write
that if I just came off the top of her head.
The statement did not address UF O's that are not suspected of
being extraterrestrial objects. Gresh says he became a
government whistleblower after his discovery and has faced
retaliation for coming forward. He declined to be more specific
about the retaliatory tactics, citing an ongoing investigation.
And my advice to Gresh would be to get it all out there before
he has a terrible car accident or a plane crash.
Just saying it was a very brutal and very it was very brutal and
very unfortunate. Some of the tactics they used to
hurt me, both professionally and personally, he said.
Once again, don't cover for these guys.
It's like a it's like a person who's a victim.
I mean, don't blame yourself, grush.
Just come out and tell us what happened.
People will identify with you a lot more.
That's what I would say. Representative Glen Groth and
Republican Wisconsin shared the panel's hearing and joke to a
packed audience. Welcome to the most exciting
subcommittee in Congress this week.
But members of parties asked Grush about his study of UFOs
and the consequences he faced. I take it that you're arguing
that we need, that what we need is real transparency and
reporting system so we can get some clarity on what's going on
out there, I said. Representative Jamie Raskins,
Democrat, Maryland Some lawmakers criticize the Pentagon
for not providing more details in a classified briefing or
releasing images that could be shown in the public.
In previous hearings, Pentagon officials showed a video taken
from an F18 military plane that showed an image of 1 balloon
like shape. Pentagon officials in December
said they had received several hundreds of new reports since
launching A renewed effort to investigate reports of the
UFO's. These things are common as dirt
man. All they got to do is just open
the spigot and you'll have so much information coming in, they
won't be able to handle it all. At that point, we have not seen
anything and we're still very early on that would lead us to
believe that any of these objects that we have seen are of
alien origin, said Ronald Moultrie, the Under Secretary of
defense for Intelligence and Security.
Any unauthorized system in our airspace we deem as a threat to
safety. Here's the problem, Mr.
Moultrie, If these things have been around longer than we have,
maybe they view us as unauthorized.
Just a thought. Now as far as there being a deep
state, as far as this notion that that everything is well and
good within the Department of Defense and that and that the
only secrets being kept from us are the ones that have to be
kept from the Russians or the Chinese, I would beg, I would
beg to differ. There has been a thread of very
dark, deep deception and one might even say devilish
character in the Department of Defense.
In our deep state for a long time, we might have to go back
to 1945. And at the very end of of the
World War Two, when large numbers of German scientists
began to be discovered, special sections, subdivisions set up
the Enemy Personnel exploitation section to manage and
interrogate them. So they found all these high
level scientists and they're like, man, we can't let the
Russians to get them. A lot of them probably have
committed war crimes. But you know what?
They can help us. And who was doing that?
Well, that was the US Army in charge of that.
The enemy Personnel Exploitation section established.
A detention center is called Dustbin, first in Paris and
later in Cransburg Castle outside Frankfurt.
That's Germany. The US Joint Chiefs of Staff
established the first secret recruitment program called
Operation Overcast on July 20th, 1945, initially to assist and
shortening the Japanese war into aid in our postwar military
research. So imagine you had a kid that
was killed in World War Two and then you find out that some of
the very people that were part of the organization that that
killed your kid in the war are now going to be brought to the
United States to live a happy life working for us because we
still have to defeat the Japanese and they might be able
to help us. Well, we were whipping up on the
Japanese pretty good at that point.
But no, they brought in these people.
Nazis. These are people with, I think
we can all agree, had a very evil, devilish outlook on life.
They committed terrible, terrible, almost unspeakable
crimes. And here we are giving refuge to
these scientists that brought a lot of that to the people of
Germany and the people of the world.
The term overcast was a name first given by German
scientists, family members for the housing camp where they were
held in Bavaria. That'd be down in southern
Germany. They call it Bayern, I think.
And late summer 1945, the JCS established the JIOAA
subcommittee of the Joint Intelligence Committee to
directly oversee Operation Overcast and later Operation
Paper Clip. That's the one we've probably
all heard of. The J.
I/O A representatives included the Army's Director of
Intelligence, the Chief of Navy Intelligence, the assistant
Chief of Air Staff, and the representative from the State
Department. So you're tying in all the all
the people, including on this from the White House through all
the branches of service, and they're colluding to bring over
these Nazi scientists. So now we got Nazis on board,
and we're not talking about it. It's a secret.
It's devilish. In November 1945, Operation
Overcast was renamed Operation Paper Clip by Ordinance Corps
officers, who would attach a paper clip to the folders of
those rocket experts whom they wish to employ in the United
States. The project was not initially
targeted against the Soviet Union.
Rather, the concern was that German scientists might
immigrate and continue the research in countries that
remain neutral. During the war, much US effort
was focused on Saxony and Thuringia, which on July 1st,
1945 became part of the Soviet occupation zone.
Of course, that would have been East Germany.
Remember, the Russians had come in from the EAT, had come in
from the East. They ended up in half the
country. Many German research facilities
and personnel have been evacuated to these to these
states before the end of the war, particularly from the
Berlin area. The USSR then relocated more
than 2200 Nazi specialists and their families, more than 6000
people with Operation Ozakov Akim during one night on October
22nd, 1946, and a secretive directive circulated.
On September 3rd, 1946, President Truman officially
approved Operation Paper Clip and expanded it to include 1000
German scientists under temporary limited military
custody. So you see, our military started
it with or without Truman's knowledge and then after it's
been gone for a while, they they're like, hey, look, the
Soviets do the same thing, man. So he understandably says, well,
I got to sign off on this thing. He probably didn't want to, but
he did. And not only did he sign off on
it, but. He added some more.
I guess you're in for a penny, in for a pound.
Once you make that deal with the devil, you're just going down
that road, right? News media revealed the program
was early as December 1946 Osenberg list in the later part
of the World War 2, Germany was at was at a logistical
disadvantage having failed to conquer the USR with Operation
Barbarossa. It's basically you've got these
guys are starting to flee to us anyway.
These Nazi rats, they see the writing on the wall.
They see that, look, there's no way that we can, we can fight
the US and the Soviet Union at the same time.
So they're starting to, they're starting to do the math.
You know, they may be Nazis, but they're not that stupid.
And a lot of them are thinking that, yeah, the US is going to
be probably a lot better deal in the long run than the Soviets.
So it's brewing up devil in the details and what do we have?
We end up with thousands and thousands of these former Nazi
scientists infiltrating secretly everything from the Defense
Department to NASA. I would imagine just about every
department in the in the government.
Did these guys ever have to go through any kind of
deprogramming to help relieve them of their Nazi satanic
ideology? Did we ever go through to find
out which ones had committed the really, really bad crimes and
which ones like Warner von Braun had just simply availed
themselves of slave labor that was headed for the gas chambers?
Doesn't seem to be like it really ever cared that much
about any of it. My opinion, that was the very
seeds of the deep state. That's where it took on this.
As you could say, nature of the devil.
So I don't think Birch is wrong when he tells us that the devil
is opposing us. They may seem like hyperbole to
a lot of people just because he's frustrated, like he's
turned down every time he he requests information from the
DoD and he ends up either being denied completely or he gets
blacked out reports. But if you look at this thing a
little bit closer, if you look at the history of the Department
of Defense and see how they colluded with Nazis at the end
of World War Two and maybe even a little before the end of World
War Two because they needed that intellectual capital in their
opinion, then maybe you can see these people are capable of
cluding with the devil. Whether the devil is some sort
of alien force or whether the devil was already here in 1945,
these guys seem to have no problem bringing them, bringing
them on board if it benefits them.
Until next time, this is UFO Warning.
Over and out.