Hello and welcome to the program UFO Warning.
In this episode we're talking about Space Force shuts down AI.
That's correct, Space Force shuts down AI.
Now mainly the reason I'm I'm even covering this is because so
often times the climates, it seems like there is a certain
substantial group of people that really does believe that at some
point the government is going to give us disclosure on UF O's.
And of course if you've listened to the podcast at all, you know
that's not how I feel about the situation at all.
I think that the government in large part is just behind the 8
ball on this stuff, possibly corrupt, possibly most likely
incompetent on a lot of this stuff.
And today's article just goes, I think, demonstrate a couple of
the problems that I'm always complaining about #1 just
situational incompetence when it comes to using a I not
understanding the risk until after the cats out of the bag.
And secondly, some of the infighting is happening there.
So for the people that really get on my case about not putting
trust in certain former government employees complaining
about their pet programs not being funded, well, this is kind
of the reason why I don't care about any of that except to
expose it. And why I'm really of the belief
that the only way that we're ever going to get real
disclosure in the whole UFO thing is by crowdsourcing
disclosure or is one of my favorite Youtubers that Jason
Goodness has crowdsourcing the truth.
And I think that applies to this subject right here.
Now, this first article that we're looking at comes from
cointelegraph.com of all places. It says US space force pauses,
use of ChatGPT like tools due to security fears.
Yeah, no kidding. You know when you're putting the
stuff into ChatGPT or Google bar or any of these AI programs that
scrape the Internet for all their data and information and
everything else, it's what they call this large language
program. Well, stuff you put in there
becomes part of the stuff they use.
So probably not a very good place to put top secret
documents and says at least 500 Space Force staff members have
been affected, according to the department's former chief
software officer. Now I want you to see this
starting to form up here now. 500 people have been affected.
Well, 500 people have been restricted from sharing
classified information, I suppose, if you will.
Or restrict or restricted information with a bot.
And of course, a former chief software officer.
And we'll get into that in a bit.
Well, they're not happy about that.
Well, why wouldn't they be happy?
Well, maybe they were making money off of it.
And this is what's so this insidious about this whole thing
about us depending on the government to tell us about
UFO's. You were.
You're right in the middle of this giant tug.
A word between current employees, former employees,
contractors, making money off the thing.
I mean, the whole thing's just a big nasty mess.
Now we're going on here and tells us the United States Space
Force has temporarily banned its staff from using generative
artificial tools while on duty to protect government data.
According to reports, Space Force members were informed that
they are not authorized to web-based generative A I tools
to create image to create text, images and other media unless
specifically approved. According to an October 12th
report by Bloomberg citing A memorandum addressed to the
Guardian workforce Space Force members on September 29th.
And that's another thing. These guys aren't called
soldiers. They're not called sailors.
They're called Guardians. I mean come on man generative A
I will undoubtedly revolutionize our workforce and enhance
Guardians ability to operate at speed.
Lisa Costa, space forces deputy chief of space operations for
technology and innovation, reportedly said in the
memorandum. However, Costa cited concerns
over current cybersecurity and data handling standards,
explaining that a I and large language and large language
model LLM adoption needs to be more responsible now.
The whole point of a large language model is that you dump
everything in there, and then the computer is able to use the
data that you provide in this new context to this larger body
of data. So in order for them to be more
responsible, and I suppose they mean changing the data or
whitewashing it or whatever, that's going to change the data
that you're putting into the large language model, thereby
making it less or possibly irrelevant.
Wow. the United States Space Force is a space service branch
of the US armed forces tasked with protecting the US and
allied interest in space. I often think these guys are
tasked with protecting their own paycheck more than anything.
And then it's got a tweet here. It says it shows them holding
this. You know, the space flag.
I don't know, man. This whole thing's shaping up to
me to be a colossal waste of money.
It goes on. It says the Space Forces
decision has already impacted at least 500 individuals using a
generative a I platform called Ask Sage.
Now we're going to get into Ask Sage here just a minute.
And that's according to Bloomberg, citing comments from
Here we Go, Nick Chillion, former chief software officer
for the United States Air Force and Space Force.
So he leaves the Air Force in Space Force, then starts his own
A I Company, which the people in Space Force apparently love, But
I don't think it's free. We're going to get into that in
a minute. Chilean reportedly criticizes
Space Force's decision. Clearly this is going to put US
years behind China, he wrote in a September e-mail complaining
to Costa and the other senior defense officials.
Quote, it's a very short sighted decision, Chilean added.
Chilean noted that the US Central Intelligence Agency and
its departments have developed generative a I tools of their
own that meet security standards.
Okay. Then why aren't they using those
concerns That LL M's could leak private information to the
public have been a fear for some governments in recent months.
Well, because maybe it's happened already.
Italy temporarily blocked a I chat box ChatGPT in March,
citing suspected breaches of data privacy rules, before
reversing its decision about a month later.
You know, we've seen Italy. They can't make up their mind
about anything. My opinion?
Tech giants such as Apple, Amazon and Samsung are among the
firms that have also banned or restricted employees from using
ChatGPT like a I tools at work? We'll think about it.
Apple, Amazon. Samsung.
The biggest, the biggest guys in tech, The guys that know the
most about tech, understand tech security and the importance of
not leaking their information online.
Who cares about yours? Those guys are saying, no, you
can't use ChatGPT at work? Of course not.
Wow. So there you have the Space
Force blundering into the 21st century using a paid for version
of ChatGPT, not even giving thought or care to the security
concerns involved. Yet these guys are supposed to
be the ones to tell us about UFOs, give us disclosure, and
protect us from the boogeyman and outer space.
Now I wanted to take a look at just follow up with this with
this Project Sage guy here. It says under the leadership of
Nick Challion, A distinguished technology leader, founder of 13
companies and former Chief software officer for the US Air
Force and Space Force. The Ask Sage team consists of
industry experts from the DoD, intelligence community and
industry innovation. So there you have it.
The top guy at Space Force, he quits and we're going to look at
a little letter he wrote when he resigned.
He quits and starts this company called Ask Sage, where you pay
for the use of this like open large language model computer
program like ChatGPT. And who is it populated with?
Old former Air Force people, former Space Force people,
experts from the DoD, the intelligence community and
industry innovation got another giant revolving door.
Now this guy was a former, says former chief software officer
for the US Air Force and Space Force.
Yet he's not concerned about people using an open language,
large model type program at work when they work at Space Force.
That's I find that interesting. Wow.
Now we learn here kind of putting Mr. Chailean in
perspective. Now this article we just read
here about Space Force telling people no, you cannot use this
as each program at work because it's a security issue written by
a former Space Force top guy. Well, three years ago Mr.
Chailean didn't have such a great opinion of the Air Force
apparently. It says this is from the
federalnewsnetwork.com and goodbye message.
Chalian unloads his frustrations over DOD's technology, culture
and process. This article is written by Jason
Miller, dated September 2nd, 2021.
It says the Air Force is losing a key technology executive and
the US Digital Service has a new leader.
I can just hear the revolving door as it swishes around in 1/2
circle. Nicholas Chalian, the Air
Force's Chief Software Officer, announced today on LinkedIn that
he is heading back to the private sector.
In his goodbye message, Challion didn't hold back on his
frustrations and progress he made while working for the
Defense Department, and I could imagine in numerable contacts
any recent interview. Challion expressed his
disappointment over too much talk and not enough action,
particularly around funding, staffing, and prioritizing basic
IT issues across DoD. Yeah, I've heard that they still
use Fortran programming. You know, it's like, what, a
4050 year old program to operate our nuclear missile systems?
Sounds good. Join us for a panel discussion.
It says October 18th at blah blah blah.
A lack of response and alignment is certainly a contributor to my
accelerated exit, he wrote on LinkedIn.
There have been continuous and exhausting fights to chase after
funding out of high because we are not able to fix enterprise
IT teams within progress within program offices.
Worse, some are starting to use the size of the DoD as an excuse
to claim that enterprise services cannot succeed in the
department. That is false and we have
demonstrated it with with Platform one.
The Department of Defense overall needs to stop staffing
enterprise IT teams as if it is not a highly technical skill and
expertise. Look, DoD is all about
compartmentalizing data and information.
They don't want these. They don't want these IT teams,
I'm pretty sure, because they don't want to lose control over
that data and information. He went one step further,
highlighting a bigger problem with Dod's approach to
technology modernization. Quote Please stop putting a
major or Lieutenant Colonel, despite their devotion,
exceptional attitude and culture in charge of identity,
credentialing and access management.
ICAM, Zero trust or cloud for one to 4 million users when they
have no previous experience in that field, We're setting up
critical infrastructure to fail. We would not put a pilot in the
cockpit without extensive flight training.
Why would? Why would we expect someone with
no I T experience to be close to successful?
They do not know what to execute on or what to prioritize on,
which leads to endless risk reduction efforts and diluted
focus, he wrote. IT is a highly skilled and
trained job staff IT as such. I told my leadership that I
could have fixed enterprise IT in six months if empowered.
Yet with my 22 years of experience running IT innovation
that I was underutilized and poorly leveraged by the dot as
most of my time was wasted trying to convince folks to
engage me and consider it more relevant and efficient solutions
while I watched as they continue to deliver capabilities that do
not meet the basic needs of our war fighters.
The DoD should stop pretending they want industry folks to come
and help if they are not going to let them do the work.
While we wasted time in bureaucracy, our adversaries
moved further ahead. Actually, I think fortunately
for us, our adversaries are probably in the same boat,
staffed by power hungry and competent people who are lazy.
And the last thing that they would want is for a go getter
who is smarter than them to be assigned to or attain a position
where they could leverage that power over the said lazy
bureaucrat. Now, this guy obviously might
have ulterior motives. Seems like he's a pretty smart
guy. I mean, he was in charge of the
entire tech program at the Air Force and Space Force.
He gets out and he starts this country up called Ask Sage.
It's a large language model program where you type in a
question just like you do ChatGPT and it gives you an
answer. Of course we know ChatGPT has
its own problems. It hallucinates or what we might
call lies. It also keeps track of
everything you put in there which goes into the computer
database which is supposedly helps chat GBD come up with new
answers which can also cause problems when it starts saying
things about famous people that aren't true, and especially when
it says things about not so famous people that aren't true.
Those are all security concerns which I think Mr. Chillian may
have overlooked a little bit in his excitement to start his own
chat B ChatGPT type program called Ask Sage which now he
seems to be very upset about the DUD not allowing their employees
to use it. Now if we we can go to the the
ChatGPT, the Ask Sage, the Ask Sage program itself.
And if you go there, you will find that they've got a nice
little clean website with a picture of Mr. Chellian on the
front. And then you can do a free, a
free tryout on it and then if you want to go beyond that, you
can pay for it. Now you could imagine that the
government would been paying quite a lot for this.
So it just kind of shows you where we're at with this stuff
as far as, you know, what we're running into and just the
overall incompetence combined with the revolving door that we
have going on in the military and why these are the last
people that should be given total control over UFO
information and UFO disclosure. Now I want to finish up with
just another example of how badly they've handled this whole
notion of transparency when it comes to UFOs.
This article's from February 15th, 2023, back when they had
the 3UFO shot down over Alaska, Yukon, and Lake Huron.
It says Space Force Space Command pass the buck on UF O's
as US airspace security questions swirl.
And the subtitle says Space Command is not taking a lead
role on UF O's as objects operated outside the commands.
Astrograph Astrographic Area of Responsibility Written by Kelly
Laco. Fox News published February
15th, 2023 So the Guardians don't care about UF O's.
That's what we're finding out. The Pentagon, US Space Force,
and the US Space Command have so far been absent from discussions
on a handful of UF O's over North America that have been
shot down by the military in recent days.
Of course, this is going back to February 3.
Flying objects were shot down last weekend, including one over
northeastern Alaska on Friday, one over Canada's Yukon
Territory on Saturday, and one over Lake Huron on Sunday.
A week prior, a Chinese spy balloon was shot down over the
Atlantic Ocean off the coast of South Carolina.
Very good writing there. She separated the three UFOs
from the spy balloon, the North American Aerospace Defense
Command, NORAD and the United States Northern Command.
NORTHCOM have been taking the lead on and information related
to the UF O's, but details on how involved the space focused
military agencies have been on identifying the objects and
securing the US airspace is not clear.
The Space Command, which is one of the the is one of the eleven
of the military's combatant commands, is in charge of a
command and control of the military's action in space
region. Interesting that it's #11.
I think in numerology the number 11 represents chaos and that
seems to be what we're getting out of this particular agency.
However, a spokesman for the command said it is not taking a
lead role on the UFO's as the objects operated outside the
commands. Astrographic area of
responsibility. OK, so I guess once they get too
close to the ground, then Space Force just doesn't care because
if they come from outer space, is that part of their
responsibility? I don't know.
They don't say US Space Command operates the most exquisite and
extensive sensor network in the world, the agency told Fox News
Digital in a statement Tuesday, while noting that NORAD,
Northcom and the Pentagon are the focal point of efforts to
identify the UFOs well. So Space Command operates the
most exquisite and extensive sensor network in the world.
They're listening to everything. Why not just go ahead and take
all that data, dump it in to ask Sage where hackers can have a
good long look at it? The public can have a good long
look at it, I suppose, and then just not worry about.
I mean, I don't know. Why would you think it's okay to
use a large language model unless that guy can prove to you
that everything is 100% been protected and it's hacker proof.
And I'm not seeing that while the unidentified aerial
phenomena are below. USS Space Comms Astrographic
Area of responsibility says 100 kilometers, I guess 60 miles.
We continue to monitor these events and provide supporting
data to US Northern Command, the spokesperson said.
So there you go. They're called Space Force, but
as long as the UFO comes in cloaked or camouflaged, and it
doesn't show up until it gets within 60 miles of the Earth's
surface, then Spacecom can't help you, even though they've
got the most exquisite and extensive sensor network on the
planet. When asked to elaborate on what
supporting data the US Space Command is sharing with
NORTHCOM, the commander declined to specify.
I wonder, do they even know the command plans, executes, and
integrates military space power into multi domain global
operations in order to deter aggression, defend national
interest, and when necessary, defeat threats?
According to its website, this sounds like so much.
You know what the spaceship is the newest branch the military
created or former President Donald Trump and organized under
the Air Force, similarly to how the Marine Corps is structured
under the Navy, But they're called Guardians.
Space Force Media operations officer Jackie Lockett referred
News Digital to NORAD and Northcom on the matter and did
not come up and did not comment on whether Space Force is
working with those agencies on tracking objects or if if it
often encounters UFO's. Would they even know?
Secretary of Defense Dwait Austin said Wednesday that there
had been no new objects reported to US airspace over the last 48
hours. Wow, I don't know.
You can go to Move fund or USA sightings daily or new for can
probably find that there have been new objects reported in the
last 48 hours. I read them all the time on
here. We're also working with other
agencies, NASA, FAAFBI and everybody in the community who
may have an interest in operating in this space to learn
more about, you know, what these could possibly have been, he
added. Wow.
And so I would just tell you that the safety and security of
the American people are, that's the thing that's most important
to me and everybody on the DoD team and throughout the
interagency. I don't know.
They could maybe run this paragraph through ChatGPT, and
see if it could make it more readable.
Senior US defense officials recently told Fox News that
passed incursions by suspected Chinese spy balloons were
briefed and logged by the military, but did not get
flagged for senior officials in the Biden administration or in
your previous Trump administration until recently.
So you're protecting the country?
Yep, you're looking after us, but you're not bothering to even
count the Chinese spy balloons. Think about that most exquisite
and extensive extensive sensory system.
But we didn't bother to tell Biden or Trump about the spy
balloons, really, the official said.
There were sometimes hundreds of reports on occurs each day.
That would just be too much work.
Questions continue to pile up from lawmakers on the origin of
purpose of these objects. According to sources with
knowledge of an unclassified briefing from members, the House
representatives Tuesday on the UF O's 3 objects were not
engaged in hostile actions, but the military could not rule out
that they were sent by a hostile country.
Yeah, maybe a hostile country from another planet, for all we
know. So what do they do?
Well, they shot him down. But up until that point, Chinese
spy balloons have been flying by in the dozens in the 20s and the
30s. And nobody bothered to tell
Trump or Biden because, well, you know, no, I don't know.
And then apparently when they did tell somebody, we've got to
shoot these things down right now.
What they didn't realize is that these things have been going on
for a long time. And the very top of the food
chain, the commander in chief being kept in the dark, that I
can believe. Meanwhile, below him and the
bowels of the bureaucracy, people are patting their checks.
They're getting ready for the next job.
They're greasing the wheels on the revolving door so that as
soon as they step out, they can write a little letter flaming
the agency that they worked for, telling everybody how
incompetent and dumb they are. And please use my software,
Don't worry about whether or not it can get hacked.
I'll be in charge of that. These are the kind of people
that have been left with monopoly powers over UFO data,
images, video, possibly actual craft, and as Gresh has told us,
non biologic entities, non biologic, non human biologic, et
dead or alive. We don't know.
They know. They know where the bodies are
buried, but they're not telling us.
They know what's going on with these things.
They know why the cattle are being mutilated.
They know why people are being found with implants in them.
But they're not going to tell you.
And the last thing they want is somebody on the inside who might
tell you. Until next time, this is UFO
Warning. Over and out.