1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,200
Hey, a quick message. 
For those of you who are 

2
00:00:02,200 --> 00:00:04,300
listening to this episode on 
Spotify. 

3
00:00:04,600 --> 00:00:07,500
I have a small favor to ask 
Spotify. 

4
00:00:07,500 --> 00:00:10,100
Now allows mobile users to rate 
podcasts. 

5
00:00:10,400 --> 00:00:13,300
I would really appreciate it. 
If you can take a quick, pause 

6
00:00:13,300 --> 00:00:16,100
to go to the technique Journal 
podcast page, and leave your 

7
00:00:16,100 --> 00:00:18,800
favorite show. 
Your best rating on Spotify. 

8
00:00:19,200 --> 00:00:21,800
It will help me a lot to get 
this podcast to reach more 

9
00:00:21,800 --> 00:00:24,300
people on the platform. 
Thanks a lot. 

10
00:00:25,000 --> 00:00:28,700
So you'll see this happen. 
Maybe you've experienced this 

11
00:00:28,700 --> 00:00:31,400
yourself so on. 
Often we go into a meeting. 

12
00:00:31,500 --> 00:00:33,800
We come out of the meeting, 
everyone's ready to go. 

13
00:00:34,100 --> 00:00:35,800
And then we come back and a week
later. 

14
00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:37,800
We feel like we're having the 
same meeting again. 

15
00:00:38,100 --> 00:00:42,000
We probably can all think of 
experience or maybe one too many

16
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:44,100
that we've had where we feels 
like we're just doing the same 

17
00:00:44,100 --> 00:00:45,500
thing again. 
Again. 

18
00:00:45,900 --> 00:00:49,300
It's frustrating people leave 
their jobs because of this 

19
00:00:49,300 --> 00:00:51,200
pattern. 
Oftentimes. 

20
00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:53,100
It's not about. 
What's being said, is the fact 

21
00:00:53,100 --> 00:00:55,300
that there's not a shared 
understanding of what's being 

22
00:00:55,300 --> 00:00:58,100
said? 
And no one is in a position or 

23
00:00:58,100 --> 00:00:59,800
understands that it needs to be 
reconciled. 

24
00:01:00,500 --> 00:01:03,500
What happens, a lot of times is 
this, when it does come time to 

25
00:01:03,500 --> 00:01:06,100
getting reconciled, you are in a
state of crisis. 

26
00:01:11,100 --> 00:01:13,900
Hey everyone. 
My name is Henry Surya with 

27
00:01:13,900 --> 00:01:17,200
Robin. 
And you're listening to the 

28
00:01:17,200 --> 00:01:20,500
technology, you know, podcast 
the show where I'll be bringing 

29
00:01:20,500 --> 00:01:23,600
you the greatest technical 
leaders practitioners and 

30
00:01:23,600 --> 00:01:27,400
thought leaders in the industry,
who discuss about their Journey 

31
00:01:27,600 --> 00:01:32,100
ideas and practices that we all 
can learn and apply to build a 

32
00:01:32,100 --> 00:01:35,600
highly performing technical team
and to make an impact in your 

33
00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:38,900
personal work. 
So let's dive into our Journal. 

34
00:01:44,000 --> 00:01:46,600
Hello to all of you, my good 
friends and listeners. 

35
00:01:46,800 --> 00:01:50,000
Welcome to another new episode 
of the Tecla Journal podcast, 

36
00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:52,100
with me, Ojos, Henry, Surya 
Robin. 

37
00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:55,500
Thank you for tuning in today, 
listening to this episode. 

38
00:01:55,800 --> 00:01:58,600
If this is your first time 
listening to tackle, it Journal,

39
00:01:58,900 --> 00:02:02,300
subscribe, and follow the show 
on your favorite podcast app and

40
00:02:02,300 --> 00:02:05,800
social media on LinkedIn, 
Twitter, and Instagram, and if 

41
00:02:05,800 --> 00:02:09,199
you are a regular listener and 
enjoy listening to the episode, 

42
00:02:09,400 --> 00:02:12,200
It's will you subscribe as a 
patron at technology? 

43
00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:16,900
Not Dev slash Patron and support
my journey to continue producing

44
00:02:16,900 --> 00:02:20,600
great technology, new episodes 
every week, based on some 

45
00:02:20,600 --> 00:02:24,200
statistics, a lot of digital 
products, and services fail. 

46
00:02:24,600 --> 00:02:28,500
And the number quoted could be 
as high as 70 to 90%. 

47
00:02:28,700 --> 00:02:30,700
That is a very high failure 
rate. 

48
00:02:31,100 --> 00:02:33,400
While there could be many 
reasons that lead to those 

49
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:35,400
failures. 
We are going to learn one of the

50
00:02:35,400 --> 00:02:39,100
common reason in our episode. 
Today, my guest for today's 

51
00:02:39,100 --> 00:02:42,300
episode. 
Is Jonathan Hensley, he is the 

52
00:02:42,300 --> 00:02:46,500
co-founder and CEO of emerge. 
A digital product consulting 

53
00:02:46,500 --> 00:02:51,000
firm and the author of alignment
overcoming, internal sabotage 

54
00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:54,000
and digital product failure in 
this episode. 

55
00:02:54,100 --> 00:02:57,500
Jonathan first shared his main 
motivation for writing 

56
00:02:57,500 --> 00:03:00,500
alignment, which is to 
understand why digital products 

57
00:03:00,500 --> 00:03:03,600
and services fail. 
So commonly he then shared the 

58
00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:06,900
concept of alignment and why it 
is so important for leaders to 

59
00:03:06,900 --> 00:03:09,200
get it right in order to 
deliver, sir. 

60
00:03:09,400 --> 00:03:12,900
Successful great products, and 
services and a fun fact. 

61
00:03:12,900 --> 00:03:15,700
The concept of alignment 
actually aligns with our 

62
00:03:15,700 --> 00:03:19,900
biological need Jonathan. 
Then explain the danger of when 

63
00:03:19,900 --> 00:03:22,300
organization is at war with 
itself. 

64
00:03:22,700 --> 00:03:25,600
And what are some of the common 
reasons that cause internal 

65
00:03:25,600 --> 00:03:29,600
misalignments Jonathan shared 
how leaders can work towards 

66
00:03:29,600 --> 00:03:33,100
creating alignment and why it is
important to move away from 

67
00:03:33,100 --> 00:03:36,700
monolithic product thinking, and
move more towards platform 

68
00:03:36,700 --> 00:03:40,900
thinking, finally Jonathan. 
Oh shit, some team alignment 

69
00:03:40,900 --> 00:03:44,300
recipes that can help transform 
one team to become a high 

70
00:03:44,300 --> 00:03:47,500
performing product team. 
I love my conversation with 

71
00:03:47,500 --> 00:03:51,400
Jonathan learning about the 
concept of alignment and how to 

72
00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:54,700
avoid common internal 
misalignment in an organization.

73
00:03:55,100 --> 00:03:58,700
I think sometimes alignment is 
mostly assume within a team or 

74
00:03:58,700 --> 00:04:02,500
company, but the actual effort 
to build a true alignment is 

75
00:04:02,500 --> 00:04:04,800
something that any great leader 
should strive. 

76
00:04:04,800 --> 00:04:08,400
For if you also enjoy and find 
this episode useful. 

77
00:04:08,700 --> 00:04:11,900
I Hu to share it with someone, 
you know, either your friends or

78
00:04:11,908 --> 00:04:15,000
colleagues who would also 
benefit from listening to this 

79
00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:17,700
episode. 
Also leave a rating and review 

80
00:04:17,700 --> 00:04:20,800
on your podcast app or share 
about this episode on your 

81
00:04:20,800 --> 00:04:23,900
social media before we continue 
to the episode. 

82
00:04:24,100 --> 00:04:26,400
Let's hear some words from our 
sponsor. 

83
00:04:27,200 --> 00:04:30,500
Today's episode is proudly 
sponsored by skills matter. 

84
00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:34,500
The global community and events 
platform with more than 100,000 

85
00:04:34,500 --> 00:04:38,300
software professionals here 
members can organize their 

86
00:04:38,300 --> 00:04:41,000
learning experience. 
Around the technology topics. 

87
00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:44,800
They care about most you get 
on-demand access to their latest

88
00:04:44,800 --> 00:04:48,100
content thought, leadership 
insights, as well as the 

89
00:04:48,100 --> 00:04:52,300
exciting schedule of tech events
running across all time zones. 

90
00:04:52,700 --> 00:04:56,300
So whether devops our data 
science is your bus or you're a 

91
00:04:56,300 --> 00:05:00,200
fan of functional programming or
all things Cloud, you can make 

92
00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:04,000
real connections with people who
share your interests head on 

93
00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,000
over to skills method or calm to
become part of the tech 

94
00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:09,100
community that matters most to 
you. 

95
00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:12,600
It's free to join and you will 
find it easy to keep up with the

96
00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:18,100
latest tech Trends, everyone. 
Welcome back to another new 

97
00:05:18,100 --> 00:05:20,600
episode of the package. 
You know, today I have with me, 

98
00:05:20,600 --> 00:05:25,300
a guest named Jonathan Hensley. 
He's the CEO of Evil Arch, which

99
00:05:25,300 --> 00:05:28,700
is a digital product agency. 
He helps his clients to 

100
00:05:28,700 --> 00:05:31,300
transform. 
This is strategies the user 

101
00:05:31,300 --> 00:05:34,700
needs and new technologies into 
valuable products and services. 

102
00:05:35,300 --> 00:05:38,900
So, Jonathan is an accomplished 
writer and also speaks a lot 

103
00:05:38,900 --> 00:05:42,300
about Top management and users 
digital Transformations. 

104
00:05:42,600 --> 00:05:45,900
So he recently published a book 
titled alignment. 

105
00:05:45,900 --> 00:05:49,100
And today, we'll be covering a 
lot about the book and why it is

106
00:05:49,100 --> 00:05:52,200
important to have alignment. 
So Jonathan, welcome you to the 

107
00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:54,900
show, really looking forward to 
learning from you about 

108
00:05:54,900 --> 00:05:57,700
alignment today. 
Thank you so much for having me 

109
00:05:57,700 --> 00:06:00,600
on the show Henry. 
So first of all, maybe Jenna 

110
00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:03,500
that, if you can help to 
introduce yourself by people who

111
00:06:03,500 --> 00:06:06,600
are not aware about you yet, 
maybe telling us more about your

112
00:06:06,600 --> 00:06:09,100
highlights or maybe turning 
points in your career that you 

113
00:06:09,300 --> 00:06:12,200
Would like to share with all of 
us, sure. 

114
00:06:12,300 --> 00:06:16,400
So, I am originally from San 
Francisco, grew up in the heart 

115
00:06:16,400 --> 00:06:18,700
of Silicon Valley, right in Palo
Alto. 

116
00:06:19,100 --> 00:06:21,200
My career started at a very 
young age. 

117
00:06:21,300 --> 00:06:26,700
I was a nerd at heart from the 
very beginning and at a time, 

118
00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:31,900
growing up in Silicon Valley, 
where I could go to the campus 

119
00:06:31,900 --> 00:06:34,200
for Hewlett Packard and do 
software. 

120
00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:37,600
Meetups, with these incredibly 
brilliant Engineers who would 

121
00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:40,700
take a kid under their wing and 
Trade for parts to build 

122
00:06:40,700 --> 00:06:43,500
computers and talk about the 
latest approaches of writing 

123
00:06:43,500 --> 00:06:46,500
software. 
And so I had this very early 

124
00:06:46,500 --> 00:06:50,200
passion that started with 
technology because of where I 

125
00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:56,100
was that led me into a lifelong 
pursuit of using technology to 

126
00:06:56,100 --> 00:06:59,800
help people improve the way that
they work and live a huge 

127
00:06:59,800 --> 00:07:02,900
turning point. 
In that process passion. 

128
00:07:02,900 --> 00:07:06,400
I would say for me with the 
emergence of the internet and 

129
00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:12,100
then also the.com bust in The 
early 2000s where I saw really 

130
00:07:12,100 --> 00:07:14,200
amazing transformation taking 
place. 

131
00:07:14,200 --> 00:07:17,400
There was many people who were 
really upset and overwhelmed 

132
00:07:17,400 --> 00:07:20,700
with this big bubble bursting in
this transition. 

133
00:07:20,700 --> 00:07:24,400
What you started to see is an 
incredible industry. 

134
00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:28,700
Take its first step towards 
maturing where Innovation was at

135
00:07:28,700 --> 00:07:32,200
the heart of it. 
It really instilled to me at a 

136
00:07:32,200 --> 00:07:35,900
very young age as a young, 
professional the opportunity to 

137
00:07:35,900 --> 00:07:40,800
understand the psychology of how
new OG impacts and the way that 

138
00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:43,900
we live and work, how you do 
business, when you're in the 

139
00:07:43,907 --> 00:07:48,100
technology sector that has 
become a driving force of 

140
00:07:48,100 --> 00:07:51,400
curiosity for me, ever since, 
I've never let go of that 

141
00:07:51,400 --> 00:07:54,900
incredible feeling of being a 
part of that time, and seeing 

142
00:07:54,900 --> 00:07:58,300
the companies that had huge 
Office Buildings full of people 

143
00:07:58,300 --> 00:08:02,100
one day and gone the next, and 
then in entirely new, stream of 

144
00:08:02,100 --> 00:08:06,000
innovation and Entrepreneurship 
come through in a very short 

145
00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:09,100
period of time right after and 
to be a part of that. 

146
00:08:09,300 --> 00:08:12,300
That to see the evolution of 
Hardware software coming 

147
00:08:12,300 --> 00:08:15,900
together in that time period. 
It's one of my greatest memories

148
00:08:15,900 --> 00:08:18,600
and really did set the tone for 
my entire career. 

149
00:08:19,400 --> 00:08:22,700
Really interesting that you 
actually grew up in the center 

150
00:08:22,700 --> 00:08:25,100
of the Innovation side of the 
world. 

151
00:08:25,100 --> 00:08:27,700
So to speak. 
So Silicon Valley was well known

152
00:08:27,700 --> 00:08:30,600
since the beginning of due to 
that you have seen it ups and 

153
00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:32,900
downs, I guess. 
And now it's kind of like UPS 

154
00:08:32,900 --> 00:08:35,299
again, with all this space and 
Technology changes. 

155
00:08:35,500 --> 00:08:38,799
I'm sure you have learned a lot 
of things in Silicon Valley, but

156
00:08:38,799 --> 00:08:41,900
what You tell for people who 
haven't been there before, what 

157
00:08:41,900 --> 00:08:44,600
will be the best description of 
Silicon Valley? 

158
00:08:44,600 --> 00:08:47,800
Or maybe it's culture. 
I think the Silicon Valley 

159
00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:50,200
culture. 
It's changed a lot. 

160
00:08:50,300 --> 00:08:54,900
It went from the idea of 
starting a tech company out of 

161
00:08:54,900 --> 00:08:58,100
your garage, which is the 
beginnings of many famous 

162
00:08:58,100 --> 00:09:01,600
stories, and it's evolved into 
this incredible AP. 

163
00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:05,400
Better for Innovation and coming
together with Venture Capital. 

164
00:09:05,900 --> 00:09:09,100
It's become an epicenter to 
bring people together from all. 

165
00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:12,800
All over the world to want to 
contribute to technology and be 

166
00:09:12,800 --> 00:09:15,100
a part of it. 
And I think that the Bay Area 

167
00:09:15,100 --> 00:09:18,900
has an energy all of it cell 
that is very hard to produce or 

168
00:09:18,900 --> 00:09:21,500
recreate. 
You can see it and feel it, 

169
00:09:21,500 --> 00:09:24,100
anywhere you go. 
There's a conversation every 

170
00:09:24,100 --> 00:09:27,500
coffee shop about the next big 
Tech thing that's happening or 

171
00:09:27,500 --> 00:09:29,300
solving that problem. 
What? 

172
00:09:29,300 --> 00:09:32,700
I loved most personally about 
that environment is that there's

173
00:09:32,700 --> 00:09:36,000
this constant pursuit of 
solving, the next problem and I 

174
00:09:36,008 --> 00:09:40,000
think that it creates such a 
unique place in the I've had the

175
00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:42,700
benefit of traveling around the 
world and speaking a lot in 

176
00:09:42,700 --> 00:09:45,900
teaching and being a participant
and learning from so many other 

177
00:09:45,900 --> 00:09:48,700
great people. 
But San Francisco is unique in 

178
00:09:48,700 --> 00:09:51,700
its own way of how people come 
together to do. 

179
00:09:51,700 --> 00:09:54,100
Just that and solve problems. 
And I think it will continue to 

180
00:09:54,100 --> 00:09:56,400
be a very special place for a 
very long time. 

181
00:09:56,900 --> 00:09:59,200
Thanks for sharing that. 
So for me, I myself have an 

182
00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:01,700
experience with looking there. 
So it's really great to see a 

183
00:10:01,700 --> 00:10:04,400
such passionate people, you 
know, looking together and 

184
00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:06,300
trying to solve the next big 
problem. 

185
00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:09,100
So, moving onto the book that 
you just recently published. 

186
00:10:09,200 --> 00:10:11,900
This shit's titled alignment. 
Maybe you can share a little 

187
00:10:11,900 --> 00:10:13,800
bit. 
Why did you write the book? 

188
00:10:13,900 --> 00:10:17,900
What kind of problems that you 
saw and you try to convey as a 

189
00:10:17,900 --> 00:10:20,100
message in the book? 
Sure. 

190
00:10:20,100 --> 00:10:22,800
So the book came out of a labor 
of love. 

191
00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:26,500
I originally started the process
about three years ago and 

192
00:10:26,500 --> 00:10:30,400
writing this book and it was out
of my own curiosity and the work

193
00:10:30,400 --> 00:10:33,900
that we do it emerge around 
understanding why do digital 

194
00:10:33,900 --> 00:10:37,800
products and services? 
So commonly fail so depending on

195
00:10:37,800 --> 00:10:41,600
the statistics you would People 
say that products fail anywhere 

196
00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:44,800
between 70 and maybe 90 plus 
percent. 

197
00:10:45,000 --> 00:10:48,700
We worked with a lot of amazing 
people who have consistently 

198
00:10:48,700 --> 00:10:51,200
beaten those odds, and they 
haven't just delivered one great

199
00:10:51,200 --> 00:10:52,500
product. 
It's been successful. 

200
00:10:52,500 --> 00:10:54,800
They've delivered multiple 
products in their careers. 

201
00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:58,400
And so when you look at that, 
there's an incredible story 

202
00:10:58,400 --> 00:11:02,900
behind that data about what's 
happening and what's different. 

203
00:11:03,000 --> 00:11:05,700
We had been a part of many 
successful products. 

204
00:11:05,700 --> 00:11:08,600
We'd worked on some really 
challenging products and I 

205
00:11:08,600 --> 00:11:12,300
wanted To step back and 
understand the bigger story. 

206
00:11:12,300 --> 00:11:16,300
So, what started as a passion 
project to really deep dive into

207
00:11:16,300 --> 00:11:20,400
the study of failure, quickly 
became a process of interviewing

208
00:11:20,400 --> 00:11:25,400
product, managers designers 
engineers and Executives Chief 

209
00:11:25,400 --> 00:11:28,800
product officer, CEOs, and cios 
of companies. 

210
00:11:28,800 --> 00:11:32,200
And starting to try to 
understand, and codify what was 

211
00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:35,500
happening differently inside of 
the companies that could 

212
00:11:35,500 --> 00:11:39,700
continuously deliver great 
products and services that Name 

213
00:11:39,700 --> 00:11:42,500
the goal of the book is to bring
that forward. 

214
00:11:42,500 --> 00:11:47,900
So that leaders had a guy in a 
way to collaborate and Inspire 

215
00:11:47,900 --> 00:11:51,700
and work with their teams and 
for product teams who felt stuck

216
00:11:51,900 --> 00:11:54,900
to take ownership of the 
conversation and have a tool 

217
00:11:54,900 --> 00:11:59,500
that they could use to work up 
Street and bring new insight and

218
00:11:59,500 --> 00:12:02,700
knowledge to management and 
Leadership to say, there's a 

219
00:12:02,708 --> 00:12:05,800
different way to think about 
some of these things that can 

220
00:12:05,800 --> 00:12:09,400
help us be successful. 
And so, that was really Lee. 

221
00:12:09,400 --> 00:12:12,900
What the book became all about 
is becoming that tool for 

222
00:12:12,900 --> 00:12:16,000
product leaders and teams to 
work together to create great 

223
00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:19,000
products and services. 
So you mentioned a very 

224
00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:21,900
interesting statistics. 
I think this traditionally in 

225
00:12:21,900 --> 00:12:25,500
the past, they say it, projects 
always fail and I'll digital 

226
00:12:25,500 --> 00:12:28,400
products, and services. 
Also, still statistically very 

227
00:12:28,400 --> 00:12:31,600
highly likely to fail, like you 
mentioned, 70 to 90 plus 

228
00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:33,400
percent. 
That is actually pretty high to 

229
00:12:33,400 --> 00:12:35,000
me. 
So why do you think all these 

230
00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:37,800
things happen technologies have 
improved a lot. 

231
00:12:37,800 --> 00:12:40,900
People also have learned So many
people just pouring over 

232
00:12:40,900 --> 00:12:43,400
knowledge on the Block's 
webinars and all that. 

233
00:12:43,500 --> 00:12:46,100
Why still? 
It's not soft why digital 

234
00:12:46,100 --> 00:12:49,500
products still fading? 
Well, there's a lot of common 

235
00:12:49,500 --> 00:12:51,700
answers to that. 
I would say the most common 

236
00:12:51,700 --> 00:12:55,200
answer that you would hear from 
people is that there's a lack of

237
00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:59,500
Market fit while that is, I 
think a huge issue and I don't 

238
00:12:59,500 --> 00:13:03,300
want to make it any smaller than
it is because it is substantial.

239
00:13:03,900 --> 00:13:06,000
Honestly. 
I think it's because a lot of 

240
00:13:06,008 --> 00:13:09,800
companies skip the fundamentals.
What they're Doing is that 

241
00:13:09,800 --> 00:13:14,100
they're looking for shortcuts 
and quick wins. 

242
00:13:14,400 --> 00:13:19,300
They're emphasizing the approach
from their vantage point. 

243
00:13:19,500 --> 00:13:22,500
If you're a product leader and 
you have an engineering 

244
00:13:22,500 --> 00:13:25,500
background, you're going to come
at it from an engineering point 

245
00:13:25,500 --> 00:13:27,700
of view. 
And if you're a great product 

246
00:13:27,700 --> 00:13:30,500
manager, who's maybe a great 
business analyst, you're going 

247
00:13:30,500 --> 00:13:33,000
to come from it, from an analyst
perspective. 

248
00:13:33,400 --> 00:13:35,800
And so there's nothing wrong 
with that. 

249
00:13:36,100 --> 00:13:39,500
But the challenge is, is when 
you become that product, Or that

250
00:13:39,500 --> 00:13:43,400
product manager you need to now 
have the responsibility to bring

251
00:13:43,400 --> 00:13:48,300
a holistic point of view to how 
that product is created around 

252
00:13:48,300 --> 00:13:50,800
solving, whatever. 
The problem is that product 

253
00:13:50,800 --> 00:13:53,700
helps fulfill and the 
fundamentals of that get missed 

254
00:13:53,700 --> 00:13:55,300
a lot. 
They get missed in business. 

255
00:13:55,600 --> 00:13:59,200
And then what happens is when 
those things get missed, instead

256
00:13:59,200 --> 00:14:02,600
of having empowered product 
teams that are really there to 

257
00:14:02,600 --> 00:14:06,100
solve problems. 
What you end up, having is teams

258
00:14:06,100 --> 00:14:09,000
that are fulfilling the 
requirements working towards 

259
00:14:09,100 --> 00:14:12,500
Hope instead of outcomes, some 
might take that harsh, but it's 

260
00:14:12,500 --> 00:14:16,300
completely true. 
The work becomes ungrounded, two

261
00:14:16,300 --> 00:14:20,600
foundational principles that are
essential to allow your team to 

262
00:14:20,600 --> 00:14:23,900
solve problems. 
Effectively, it making sure 

263
00:14:23,900 --> 00:14:27,000
those problems are being solved 
in a way that align with the 

264
00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:30,400
market aligned with the 
organization's resources and 

265
00:14:30,400 --> 00:14:34,700
capabilities and having the 
teamwork at its best possible 

266
00:14:34,700 --> 00:14:37,800
level of performance to achieve 
the outcome that's been set 

267
00:14:37,800 --> 00:14:39,900
forth. 
And so I think That there's a 

268
00:14:39,900 --> 00:14:43,400
fundamental aspect there, that 
is really holding many companies

269
00:14:43,400 --> 00:14:45,900
back. 
And I also found one of the 

270
00:14:45,900 --> 00:14:48,700
quote, in the book. 
It mentioned that organizational

271
00:14:48,700 --> 00:14:52,500
leaders are lured by the promise
of Innovations and Technology 

272
00:14:52,800 --> 00:14:55,100
without understanding the 
fundamental requirements that 

273
00:14:55,100 --> 00:14:56,800
guide initiatives to the Finish 
Line. 

274
00:14:57,200 --> 00:15:00,100
I mean, yes, there are plenty of
Technology, breakthroughs 

275
00:15:00,100 --> 00:15:02,100
Innovations. 
Maybe we can call out like 

276
00:15:02,100 --> 00:15:07,400
blockchain or maybe a iCloud. 
Do you think that all these new 

277
00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:09,000
Innovations? 
Also, in a sense? 

278
00:15:09,100 --> 00:15:12,000
And play a part in to the 
failure of all these digital 

279
00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:15,200
products they do. 
Absolutely. 

280
00:15:15,200 --> 00:15:17,300
But it's actually not the 
Technology's fault. 

281
00:15:17,600 --> 00:15:20,100
Let me expand on that. 
So there's something called a 

282
00:15:20,100 --> 00:15:22,600
law. 
The idea of this is that 

283
00:15:22,600 --> 00:15:26,500
people's expectations of 
Technology are too high in the 

284
00:15:26,500 --> 00:15:27,900
beginning. 
When a new technology is 

285
00:15:27,900 --> 00:15:29,400
introduced. 
So let's use artificial 

286
00:15:29,400 --> 00:15:33,000
intelligence as the example. 
When a I was first introduced, 

287
00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:34,900
it was introduced back in the 
80s. 

288
00:15:34,900 --> 00:15:36,800
I can remember it being a major 
thing. 

289
00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:40,200
It became another theme in the 
late 90s and It's a major thing.

290
00:15:40,200 --> 00:15:42,500
Again. 
Our expectations of what 

291
00:15:42,500 --> 00:15:46,500
artificial intelligence is 
capable of doing in can do, has 

292
00:15:46,500 --> 00:15:48,700
been ahead of the technology 
itself. 

293
00:15:48,700 --> 00:15:53,600
For decades very shortly. 
Our expectations will be behind 

294
00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:57,600
the actual capabilities of that 
technology, but it's taken 30 

295
00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:00,100
plus years for that to actually 
be true. 

296
00:16:00,500 --> 00:16:03,800
And this is really something 
that is an incredibly common 

297
00:16:03,800 --> 00:16:06,000
thing. 
So you see a new technology, get

298
00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:08,800
introduced our expectations in 
the excitement and the buzz 

299
00:16:08,800 --> 00:16:10,500
around. 
And it is incredibly High. 

300
00:16:10,600 --> 00:16:13,400
It doesn't meet those 
expectations people, abandon 

301
00:16:13,400 --> 00:16:16,700
that technology, or move away 
from it, to either, what they 

302
00:16:16,700 --> 00:16:20,300
knew that would work before or 
the next thing, those that are 

303
00:16:20,300 --> 00:16:22,600
in the technology to build these
incredible Innovations of 

304
00:16:22,608 --> 00:16:25,300
Technologies. 
They're proving their learning 

305
00:16:25,300 --> 00:16:27,700
their in this continuous 
learning cycle, and then 

306
00:16:27,700 --> 00:16:31,600
eventually they get there. 
And so This Promise in these 

307
00:16:31,600 --> 00:16:35,300
expectations, Gap is really a 
huge thing that has to be 

308
00:16:35,300 --> 00:16:38,600
managed correctly. 
When you take a leader in an 

309
00:16:38,600 --> 00:16:40,600
organization. 
Asian, they would be the leader 

310
00:16:40,600 --> 00:16:42,400
of that organization. 
If they weren't really good at 

311
00:16:42,408 --> 00:16:46,200
their job, very smart 
individual, able to make good 

312
00:16:46,200 --> 00:16:48,600
decisions with very little 
information. 

313
00:16:48,900 --> 00:16:51,700
It's challenging if they can't 
manage that expectation of that 

314
00:16:51,700 --> 00:16:53,900
technology. 
And that isn't something that's 

315
00:16:53,900 --> 00:16:57,400
talked about, it's not something
that is at the Forefront of our 

316
00:16:57,400 --> 00:16:59,600
conversations. 
When we talk about Innovation 

317
00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:03,200
and new technologies and that's 
not how technology is sold. 

318
00:17:03,300 --> 00:17:06,300
Why would I sell you a promise 
that's going to fall flat. 

319
00:17:06,599 --> 00:17:08,800
So there's this disconnect that 
happens. 

320
00:17:08,800 --> 00:17:11,000
Very Very early on in new 
technologies. 

321
00:17:11,300 --> 00:17:13,800
Those technologies have to 
evolve in order to meet 

322
00:17:13,800 --> 00:17:18,500
expectations and leaders have to
be able to diagnose what phases 

323
00:17:18,500 --> 00:17:22,099
that technology in and what is 
its propensity to actually drive

324
00:17:22,099 --> 00:17:26,000
change effectively at a lower 
cost than transitioning from the

325
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:28,800
way that we do business today. 
And I think what are the 

326
00:17:28,800 --> 00:17:32,100
fundamental maybe requirements 
or to speak on skill set that 

327
00:17:32,100 --> 00:17:34,500
you want to emphasize on the 
book is actually called 

328
00:17:34,500 --> 00:17:36,600
alignment. 
I think many people would have 

329
00:17:36,600 --> 00:17:39,700
understood about the term 
alignment, but maybe Your view 

330
00:17:39,700 --> 00:17:41,800
as the author of this book. 
Can you help to describe? 

331
00:17:41,800 --> 00:17:45,600
What do you thing is alignment? 
And why is it so critical for 

332
00:17:45,600 --> 00:17:49,000
people or teams to actually have
this alignment for the success 

333
00:17:49,000 --> 00:17:51,100
of their either? 
Digital products or Services? 

334
00:17:52,000 --> 00:17:52,500
Sure. 
Sure. 

335
00:17:52,500 --> 00:17:56,700
I think alignment is one of the 
most commonly assumed things 

336
00:17:56,700 --> 00:18:00,500
from many people. 
It is probably in many cases, 

337
00:18:00,500 --> 00:18:04,400
one of the least understood. 
So when we talk about alignment 

338
00:18:04,400 --> 00:18:07,300
in the context of what we're 
talking about today and in 

339
00:18:07,300 --> 00:18:10,300
creating products and services, 
There's four levels of 

340
00:18:10,300 --> 00:18:12,500
alignment. 
We have to consider, and I'll go

341
00:18:12,500 --> 00:18:15,300
from the inside out. 
So, the Inside Out approach to 

342
00:18:15,300 --> 00:18:17,000
that we start with the 
individual. 

343
00:18:17,400 --> 00:18:21,900
How does an individual know how 
their work contributes to 

344
00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:25,000
success of the product. 
How does that impact its 

345
00:18:25,000 --> 00:18:27,600
customer? 
Its users in that product. 

346
00:18:27,600 --> 00:18:29,600
How do they know that their work
matters? 

347
00:18:29,900 --> 00:18:33,200
That's an incredible point of 
alignment, that individuals need

348
00:18:33,200 --> 00:18:37,000
to have to be passionate to be 
curious. 

349
00:18:37,500 --> 00:18:40,800
And to know that they can It can
impact through the work that 

350
00:18:40,800 --> 00:18:42,900
they do. 
So whether you're a designer an 

351
00:18:42,900 --> 00:18:46,900
engineer or a product manager or
your oversee, an entire teams 

352
00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:50,100
that individual linemen and 
understanding how your work 

353
00:18:50,100 --> 00:18:54,000
matters becomes foundational and
we know engaged a teams and 

354
00:18:54,000 --> 00:18:57,400
people are far more effective at
solving problems. 

355
00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:01,600
The second piece to that is team
alignment, is everybody on the 

356
00:19:01,600 --> 00:19:05,100
team, understand their roles. 
Responsibilities. 

357
00:19:05,100 --> 00:19:08,300
Are they accountable? 
Do they know how cumulatively 

358
00:19:08,300 --> 00:19:10,900
they can come? 
Together to solve problems and 

359
00:19:10,900 --> 00:19:13,800
to do great things. 
And so that's really important. 

360
00:19:14,400 --> 00:19:17,500
And then the third one is 
organizational alignment is the 

361
00:19:17,500 --> 00:19:21,800
organization aligned. 
Its resources, expectations 

362
00:19:21,800 --> 00:19:26,000
built teams empowered 
individuals to effectively 

363
00:19:26,000 --> 00:19:27,700
achieve. 
The things that the company 

364
00:19:27,700 --> 00:19:30,200
exists to do. 
If those things aren't 

365
00:19:30,200 --> 00:19:33,100
happening. 
It can be very difficult to 

366
00:19:33,100 --> 00:19:36,200
align with the market, which is 
where we find market fit, and 

367
00:19:36,208 --> 00:19:38,700
essentially a lining with our 
customers are our users. 

368
00:19:39,700 --> 00:19:44,100
Being able to have enough 
awareness of what's the actual 

369
00:19:44,100 --> 00:19:46,800
cost and impact of the problem 
that were solving. 

370
00:19:46,800 --> 00:19:49,900
What's this new idea? 
How are we solving it better or 

371
00:19:49,900 --> 00:19:52,900
differently than someone else? 
How does that create distinct 

372
00:19:52,900 --> 00:19:55,900
competitive advantage or 
business model opportunity, or 

373
00:19:56,000 --> 00:19:58,400
an advantage? 
That is hard to replicate. 

374
00:19:58,900 --> 00:20:03,500
This idea of alignment at all, 
four levels is essential and in 

375
00:20:03,500 --> 00:20:06,900
the top performing 
organizations, from our research

376
00:20:06,900 --> 00:20:10,900
and work over the years. 
You find consistently that 

377
00:20:10,900 --> 00:20:15,500
leaders from the top are working
towards alignment at all times 

378
00:20:15,900 --> 00:20:19,400
at every level and it's not a 
one-time exercise. 

379
00:20:19,800 --> 00:20:23,500
It's a discipline of incredibly 
high impact leaders to be 

380
00:20:23,500 --> 00:20:26,900
working on that focus of 
alignment at all four levels. 

381
00:20:27,400 --> 00:20:28,900
Thanks for sharing all these 
fault level. 

382
00:20:28,900 --> 00:20:32,000
So just to recap, there are four
different levels, you mentioned 

383
00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:35,000
individual teams, organization 
and Market. 

384
00:20:35,000 --> 00:20:36,900
I think it's really interesting 
insights. 

385
00:20:36,900 --> 00:20:40,100
Definitely like what you 
mentioned, we Assume we are all 

386
00:20:40,100 --> 00:20:43,400
aligned maybe some speech or 
maybe some message over the 

387
00:20:43,400 --> 00:20:46,000
time, you know, you keep 
repeating yourself, but actually

388
00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:49,500
it's least understood not 
necessarily people gets to align

389
00:20:49,500 --> 00:20:51,400
to the core. 
I also found another chord, 

390
00:20:51,400 --> 00:20:54,300
which I find really interesting 
to share the book mention and 

391
00:20:54,300 --> 00:20:57,200
Enterprise. 
That is at war with itself will 

392
00:20:57,200 --> 00:21:00,600
not have the strength of focus 
to survive and thrive in today's

393
00:21:00,600 --> 00:21:03,200
competitive environment. 
So this is a quote from 

394
00:21:03,400 --> 00:21:05,200
Professor called John. 
Oh Whitney. 

395
00:21:05,600 --> 00:21:08,600
I find it really interesting 
because we can see it especially

396
00:21:08,600 --> 00:21:10,600
in big. 
Enterprise or maybe big 

397
00:21:10,600 --> 00:21:12,400
startups, where people call it 
politics. 

398
00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:14,400
So to speak. 
Can you maybe elaborate a little

399
00:21:14,400 --> 00:21:17,400
bit more on here? 
What do you mean by at war with 

400
00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:19,200
itself? 
Sure. 

401
00:21:19,600 --> 00:21:23,900
Well many organizations are 
built around an old kind of 

402
00:21:23,900 --> 00:21:28,100
Commander control model that is 
part of a byproduct of how 

403
00:21:28,100 --> 00:21:31,800
businesses will built and how 
Innovation started during the 

404
00:21:31,800 --> 00:21:35,000
industrial era. 
What happens is that I'm going 

405
00:21:35,000 --> 00:21:38,900
to tell you to go do this thing 
and you're going to do that. 

406
00:21:39,100 --> 00:21:40,600
Thing really well and you're 
going to do it. 

407
00:21:40,608 --> 00:21:43,700
A hundred times a day. 
Now, that's not problem. 

408
00:21:43,700 --> 00:21:46,700
Solving that's production. 
There's a role in that in 

409
00:21:46,700 --> 00:21:52,500
business and I get that but when
we look at this today, we need 

410
00:21:52,500 --> 00:21:55,800
to look at how do we build 
Empower teams that are 

411
00:21:55,800 --> 00:21:59,100
autonomous that have the ability
to solve problem, great 

412
00:21:59,100 --> 00:22:02,200
designers and engineers and 
producers are expensive 

413
00:22:02,200 --> 00:22:04,900
resources. 
These are brilliant men and 

414
00:22:04,900 --> 00:22:08,800
women who need the opportunity 
to unleash. 

415
00:22:09,000 --> 00:22:12,300
Their capabilities, their life 
experience and their expertise 

416
00:22:12,300 --> 00:22:16,100
on the problem at hand. 
And so it's really essential to 

417
00:22:16,100 --> 00:22:18,300
do that. 
When we talk about a company at 

418
00:22:18,300 --> 00:22:21,600
War, we think about, okay. 
Well, what happens then if I 

419
00:22:21,600 --> 00:22:25,100
have different teams with 
competing priorities, where's my

420
00:22:25,100 --> 00:22:27,700
incentive structure for the 
organization? 

421
00:22:27,900 --> 00:22:31,500
How do I actually create 
alignment between the product, 

422
00:22:31,500 --> 00:22:34,800
the teams and the company? 
I'll give that one very specific

423
00:22:34,800 --> 00:22:37,300
thing. 
Many companies understand the 

424
00:22:37,300 --> 00:22:39,500
idea of customer lifetime. 
Value. 

425
00:22:39,900 --> 00:22:42,900
But I would say, many companies 
also don't understand where fits

426
00:22:42,900 --> 00:22:44,500
into the hierarchy of the 
company. 

427
00:22:45,000 --> 00:22:48,000
In my opinion. 
You have the mission or vision 

428
00:22:48,000 --> 00:22:51,100
of the company or the product 
that may be the same in many 

429
00:22:51,100 --> 00:22:53,600
cases. 
And then you have everything in 

430
00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:57,800
the company from there exist, in
order to achieve that Vision. 

431
00:22:58,100 --> 00:23:01,700
Well, there is no vision that is
possible of being achieved 

432
00:23:01,700 --> 00:23:05,500
without customer lifetime value.
The number one thing that 

433
00:23:05,500 --> 00:23:08,500
everybody in an organization has
to realize is no matter who you 

434
00:23:08,500 --> 00:23:10,400
are. 
What division you work in how 

435
00:23:10,400 --> 00:23:13,200
small or big your company? 
Everybody contributes to 

436
00:23:13,200 --> 00:23:16,700
customer lifetime value? 
It is the most important metric 

437
00:23:16,900 --> 00:23:20,500
of all metrics because 
everything else is a byproduct 

438
00:23:20,700 --> 00:23:22,800
about when it comes to the 
sustainability of that 

439
00:23:22,800 --> 00:23:26,900
organization. 
Many times these kpis for 

440
00:23:26,900 --> 00:23:31,000
organizations, the expectations,
the roles and responsibilities 

441
00:23:31,000 --> 00:23:36,200
are misaligning to what actually
drives the vision of the company

442
00:23:36,500 --> 00:23:38,800
and money is the fuel. 
That's all it is. 

443
00:23:39,200 --> 00:23:42,200
The existence of the company is 
not to make money, that is the 

444
00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:44,800
fuel by which to achieve that 
objective and if the 

445
00:23:44,800 --> 00:23:47,100
organization is not clear about 
that. 

446
00:23:47,300 --> 00:23:50,600
It's at war with itself. 
It's competing in cannibalizing 

447
00:23:50,600 --> 00:23:53,300
resources. 
You have people who build these 

448
00:23:53,300 --> 00:23:56,900
systems within the organizations
and they poured information, or 

449
00:23:56,900 --> 00:23:59,000
they're working 
counterproductive to other 

450
00:23:59,000 --> 00:24:02,200
groups in the organization, and 
they're in Conflict there. 

451
00:24:02,200 --> 00:24:05,000
Misaligned. 
It's the inverse of alignment 

452
00:24:05,200 --> 00:24:08,800
that war is happening subtly and
many organizations. 

453
00:24:08,900 --> 00:24:11,700
It's whether they're 10 people 
or 10,000 people. 

454
00:24:12,000 --> 00:24:15,600
And in some cases. 
It's all-out War where you have 

455
00:24:15,600 --> 00:24:18,900
massive transformation, and 
change taking place right now, 

456
00:24:19,200 --> 00:24:22,300
some who are embracing that 
chain and four others, that 

457
00:24:22,300 --> 00:24:26,100
creates conflict and scarcity 
and a lot of fear because 

458
00:24:26,100 --> 00:24:28,800
there's an uncertain outcome of 
what that means. 

459
00:24:29,300 --> 00:24:33,700
And so this war is happening 
very naturally in organizations 

460
00:24:33,700 --> 00:24:39,300
and is something for leaders to 
be mindful of I'm not anti I 

461
00:24:39,300 --> 00:24:43,000
think conflict can be actually 
extremely healthy, especially 

462
00:24:43,000 --> 00:24:46,200
when it's honest. 
I think that it has to be more 

463
00:24:46,200 --> 00:24:49,400
about. 
We need to be able to challenge 

464
00:24:49,400 --> 00:24:54,000
and go after the hard things and
organizations to not allow 

465
00:24:54,000 --> 00:24:57,600
ourselves to fall into this 
unintentional War within. 

466
00:24:58,500 --> 00:25:02,000
Thanks for sharing the gifts of 
customer lifetime value and all 

467
00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:03,500
that. 
I mean, like companies 

468
00:25:03,800 --> 00:25:07,100
intentionally, I believe they 
understand it, but in practice, 

469
00:25:07,100 --> 00:25:09,600
or in execution, sometimes this 
fall all true because 

470
00:25:09,600 --> 00:25:12,900
individuals or just misalignment
of objectives or just people 

471
00:25:12,900 --> 00:25:17,000
competing unhealthily internally
and you brought up another good 

472
00:25:17,000 --> 00:25:19,400
analogy. 
I find it interesting alignment 

473
00:25:19,400 --> 00:25:23,200
and biological needs actually 
seamlessly synergized. 

474
00:25:23,300 --> 00:25:25,900
Tell us, how do you find these 
connections between alignment of

475
00:25:25,900 --> 00:25:28,100
actually biology? 
There are. 

476
00:25:28,100 --> 00:25:32,700
So during my research. 
I was really interested in this 

477
00:25:32,700 --> 00:25:35,100
idea. 
I've had an interest myself in 

478
00:25:35,100 --> 00:25:39,500
Psychology for 25 plus years, 
but the essence of it, Actually 

479
00:25:39,500 --> 00:25:42,100
happened by accident while I was
researching. 

480
00:25:42,100 --> 00:25:45,100
Well, look, I was aware that 
from a psychological 

481
00:25:45,100 --> 00:25:46,700
perspective. 
We want alignment. 

482
00:25:46,700 --> 00:25:49,800
We don't want conflict. 
We want to find connection. 

483
00:25:49,800 --> 00:25:53,700
We want to be part of a team. 
We want to do great things, that

484
00:25:53,700 --> 00:25:55,700
part of it. 
Was it really that elusive. 

485
00:25:55,700 --> 00:25:59,600
But what happened was, I was in 
London and I met an individual 

486
00:25:59,600 --> 00:26:02,100
by the name of Dan cable, who's 
one of the leading 

487
00:26:02,100 --> 00:26:05,000
neuroscientist in the world, and
he's also a professor at the 

488
00:26:05,000 --> 00:26:07,500
London Business School. 
I was listening to him. 

489
00:26:07,500 --> 00:26:11,000
Give a talk about. 
His book alive at work and he 

490
00:26:11,000 --> 00:26:15,600
drew a connection just through 
anecdote of alignment. 

491
00:26:15,800 --> 00:26:20,000
I decided I had to meet him and 
I had to interview him for the 

492
00:26:20,000 --> 00:26:22,300
book. 
We ended up having an incredible

493
00:26:22,300 --> 00:26:26,400
conversation or around, really 
understanding that in 

494
00:26:26,400 --> 00:26:28,800
Neuroscience. 
It's been proven that the 

495
00:26:28,800 --> 00:26:32,700
concept of alignment is actually
there's a biological need for 

496
00:26:32,700 --> 00:26:35,600
it. 
It goes beyond just psychology, 

497
00:26:35,600 --> 00:26:38,200
but there's a biological 
component because when we create

498
00:26:38,200 --> 00:26:40,900
alignment and Able to solve 
problems we drive engagement. 

499
00:26:40,900 --> 00:26:44,600
It activates parts of our body 
with cause and effect, which 

500
00:26:44,600 --> 00:26:47,600
create a surge of dopamine and 
satisfaction that comes from 

501
00:26:47,600 --> 00:26:50,900
interaction. 
And so, you can break down the 

502
00:26:50,900 --> 00:26:55,200
importance that it plays in, not
just short term, behavior of 

503
00:26:55,200 --> 00:26:58,400
people, but long-term 
sustainable teams and 

504
00:26:58,400 --> 00:27:00,500
performance. 
When you think about this 

505
00:27:00,500 --> 00:27:05,000
Dynamic of alignment, at a 
biological level, his Insight, 

506
00:27:05,000 --> 00:27:10,000
in research related to, that was
absolutely Groundbreaking and 

507
00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:12,900
really understanding why this is
so critical. 

508
00:27:13,500 --> 00:27:16,400
One of the discussions that 
happen from that. 

509
00:27:16,400 --> 00:27:19,200
As you really understand that, 
if you want to apply it in 

510
00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:23,800
practice is why empathy is the 
foundation of great design 

511
00:27:23,800 --> 00:27:28,200
thinking we just don't 
intuitively or logically or the 

512
00:27:28,200 --> 00:27:30,700
rational side of our brain know,
when something's a good 

513
00:27:30,700 --> 00:27:32,100
experience. 
We feel it. 

514
00:27:32,400 --> 00:27:34,800
It's impactful. 
It changes. 

515
00:27:34,800 --> 00:27:38,600
Our mood, it changes the way 
that we feel about ourselves or 

516
00:27:38,600 --> 00:27:41,700
the Our men around us. 
Whatever that may be, that is a 

517
00:27:41,700 --> 00:27:45,500
biological reaction, taking 
place from an experience. 

518
00:27:45,900 --> 00:27:48,600
So product teams have to be 
thinking about that and 

519
00:27:48,600 --> 00:27:51,700
embracing that from 
foundationally alignment. 

520
00:27:51,700 --> 00:27:53,700
And then bringing themselves 
into alignment with their 

521
00:27:53,700 --> 00:27:57,100
customer, which is a 
well-documented and discuss 

522
00:27:57,100 --> 00:28:01,800
practice and great design. 
So that entire idea was in an 

523
00:28:01,800 --> 00:28:06,000
hour, what Dan was completely 
just connected and became such 

524
00:28:06,000 --> 00:28:09,800
an integral part of the book and
something that Is probably still

525
00:28:09,800 --> 00:28:13,600
one of my favorite aspects of 
talking about alignment, or when

526
00:28:13,600 --> 00:28:16,100
I work with teams is discussing 
that very thing. 

527
00:28:16,800 --> 00:28:18,400
Thanks for sharing the inside 
CSI. 

528
00:28:18,400 --> 00:28:19,900
Found it really interesting as 
well. 

529
00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:23,100
And for those leaders who think 
that your people are not 

530
00:28:23,100 --> 00:28:26,200
interested to get alignment. 
I think it's actually not true. 

531
00:28:26,300 --> 00:28:29,900
People biologically need to get 
alignment so that they can be 

532
00:28:30,100 --> 00:28:32,400
what you mentioned, about 
problem, solving natural 

533
00:28:32,400 --> 00:28:36,400
creativity and things like that.
So definitely people wants to 

534
00:28:36,400 --> 00:28:38,700
align, it's about how we can get
them. 

535
00:28:38,900 --> 00:28:42,200
Line speaking about 
misalignment, why leaders think 

536
00:28:42,200 --> 00:28:44,300
people are not aligned? 
What do you think are some of 

537
00:28:44,300 --> 00:28:46,400
the root causes for 
misalignment? 

538
00:28:46,400 --> 00:28:49,500
So maybe you have seen it in 
your Consulting and also your 

539
00:28:49,500 --> 00:28:51,100
experience being in Silicon 
Valley. 

540
00:28:51,100 --> 00:28:54,800
What are the top two or three? 
Most misalignment reasons why 

541
00:28:54,800 --> 00:28:58,400
people in the end did not 
deliver great successful 

542
00:28:58,400 --> 00:29:01,000
products. 
Well, I think, the one thing I 

543
00:29:01,000 --> 00:29:04,300
started with earlier wrong with 
this idea of that often, it's 

544
00:29:04,300 --> 00:29:07,200
talked about as Market fit. 
And so, I would say the first 

545
00:29:07,200 --> 00:29:10,100
real issue of misalignment. 
That you have to acknowledge, is

546
00:29:10,100 --> 00:29:13,700
that reality that many 
organizations do not know their 

547
00:29:13,700 --> 00:29:16,600
users are their customers. 
They make a lot of assumptions 

548
00:29:16,600 --> 00:29:19,300
through their own lens. 
There's a lot of bias that comes

549
00:29:19,300 --> 00:29:23,700
into practice and often case of 
misalignment is they have yet to

550
00:29:23,700 --> 00:29:27,300
do the work necessary to 
understand the problem that 

551
00:29:27,300 --> 00:29:31,400
they're solving for their end, 
customer what the impacts and 

552
00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:35,400
ramifications are of that and 
what the true costs are and what

553
00:29:35,400 --> 00:29:37,400
they're competing for with that 
product. 

554
00:29:37,400 --> 00:29:40,300
Are they competing against? 
Patter is at 121. 

555
00:29:40,800 --> 00:29:43,800
Or are they competing against 
the psychological need or a 

556
00:29:43,800 --> 00:29:46,900
functional need of the product? 
How do they distinguish that? 

557
00:29:47,100 --> 00:29:50,500
Are they competing for cost and 
time? 

558
00:29:50,700 --> 00:29:53,900
There's a lot of ways to think 
about what the exchange is 

559
00:29:53,900 --> 00:29:57,200
between the business that is 
offering the product and in the 

560
00:29:57,200 --> 00:30:00,700
actual customer or user. 
So that's fundamentally. 

561
00:30:00,700 --> 00:30:02,900
One of them that has to be 
acknowledged. 

562
00:30:03,300 --> 00:30:05,500
The other one. 
I think that we see really 

563
00:30:05,500 --> 00:30:08,700
common is just not realizing the
impact. 

564
00:30:08,800 --> 00:30:13,100
Act of siloed knowledge, so 
organizational complexity in 

565
00:30:13,100 --> 00:30:15,400
dealing with the cost of siloed 
knowledge. 

566
00:30:15,700 --> 00:30:18,200
Knowledge management is a very 
difficult thing for 

567
00:30:18,200 --> 00:30:22,000
organizations at scale to be 
able to do when that information

568
00:30:22,000 --> 00:30:24,800
becomes siloed, within an 
individual or teams. 

569
00:30:25,200 --> 00:30:29,500
You are unintentionally locking,
incredible, wealth, of 

570
00:30:29,500 --> 00:30:32,200
information and knowledge. 
And a lot of that knowledge is 

571
00:30:32,200 --> 00:30:35,900
yet never documented or mapped. 
So you see a lot of initiatives 

572
00:30:35,900 --> 00:30:38,700
have to start with things like, 
Journey, mapping, or workflow. 

573
00:30:38,900 --> 00:30:42,400
Feed the things like that, just 
to try to pull the institutional

574
00:30:42,400 --> 00:30:45,400
knowledge forward. 
Well, that has a lot of impacts,

575
00:30:45,400 --> 00:30:47,300
which we can discuss that. 
You know, it's probably an 

576
00:30:47,300 --> 00:30:51,300
entire show in itself. 
I think the other one out of the

577
00:30:51,300 --> 00:30:54,900
eight core root causes that we 
defined that I'd like to focus 

578
00:30:54,900 --> 00:30:58,700
on at least today, is this idea 
of lack of a shared 

579
00:30:58,700 --> 00:31:01,000
understanding? 
Let me explain that one a little

580
00:31:01,000 --> 00:31:05,000
bit, every group of people or 
organization every industry for 

581
00:31:05,000 --> 00:31:08,000
that matter, has its own 
language, its own shorthand. 

582
00:31:08,000 --> 00:31:10,400
If you will. 
Has its own acronyms its way of 

583
00:31:10,400 --> 00:31:13,300
talking about things. 
It's way of communicating and it

584
00:31:13,300 --> 00:31:15,200
comes naturally out of 
efficiency. 

585
00:31:15,500 --> 00:31:18,400
But when you have a team that's 
evolved in an organization 

586
00:31:18,400 --> 00:31:21,000
that's changing or you're 
working cross-industry. 

587
00:31:21,400 --> 00:31:24,900
The challenge is that my 
understanding of a word or an 

588
00:31:24,900 --> 00:31:28,700
expectation, versus your 
expectation, may be different. 

589
00:31:28,900 --> 00:31:32,400
It really requires individuals, 
at every level of an 

590
00:31:32,400 --> 00:31:36,600
organization to slow, down the 
speed up, as the old saying 

591
00:31:36,600 --> 00:31:40,600
goes, It's this idea of we need 
to verify By the understanding, 

592
00:31:41,000 --> 00:31:43,900
not just what was said, but why?
It was said, and what it meant 

593
00:31:43,900 --> 00:31:46,700
in order to be able to 
effectively move forward. 

594
00:31:47,000 --> 00:31:50,700
So you'll see this happen. 
Maybe you've experienced this 

595
00:31:50,700 --> 00:31:53,300
yourself. 
So often we go into a meeting. 

596
00:31:53,600 --> 00:31:55,800
We come out of the meeting, 
everyone's ready to go. 

597
00:31:56,100 --> 00:31:57,900
And then we come back and a week
later. 

598
00:31:57,900 --> 00:31:59,800
We feel like we're having the 
same meeting again. 

599
00:32:00,100 --> 00:32:04,000
We probably can all think of 
experience or maybe one too many

600
00:32:04,000 --> 00:32:06,100
that we've had where we feels 
like we're just doing the same 

601
00:32:06,100 --> 00:32:08,700
thing again. 
And again, it's frustrating. 

602
00:32:08,800 --> 00:32:13,000
Three people, get mad people, 
get angry people, get concerned 

603
00:32:13,200 --> 00:32:16,200
people leave their jobs because 
of this pattern. 

604
00:32:16,400 --> 00:32:18,100
Oftentimes. 
It's not about. 

605
00:32:18,100 --> 00:32:20,200
What's being said, is the fact 
that there's not a shared 

606
00:32:20,200 --> 00:32:22,000
understanding of what's being 
said? 

607
00:32:22,300 --> 00:32:25,500
And no one is in a position or 
understands that it needs to be 

608
00:32:25,500 --> 00:32:28,100
reconciled. 
What happens a lot of times is 

609
00:32:28,100 --> 00:32:31,300
this, when it does come time to 
getting reconciled, you are in a

610
00:32:31,308 --> 00:32:34,900
state of Crisis. 
So it's important that 

611
00:32:34,900 --> 00:32:38,700
organizations proactively think 
about how they build. 

612
00:32:38,800 --> 00:32:42,400
A Common Language and manage 
that in usually it's not managed

613
00:32:42,400 --> 00:32:43,900
by the company. 
What happens is? 

614
00:32:44,000 --> 00:32:48,200
It happens organically, but once
leadership or teams can take 

615
00:32:48,200 --> 00:32:51,600
control of the common language 
and understand that it also 

616
00:32:51,600 --> 00:32:54,900
requires building a common 
understanding their able to 

617
00:32:54,908 --> 00:32:58,400
navigate one of the most 
Insidious root causes of failure

618
00:32:58,500 --> 00:33:01,900
when everything else is aligned.
And so that becomes a really 

619
00:33:01,900 --> 00:33:05,000
important issue. 
Thanks for sharing this shit, 

620
00:33:05,000 --> 00:33:08,900
understanding, because I've also
invited few leaders talking 

621
00:33:08,900 --> 00:33:11,500
about software development. 
Why software projects fail as 

622
00:33:11,500 --> 00:33:13,500
well? 
So, one of the things also 

623
00:33:13,500 --> 00:33:15,900
commonly mentioned is about 
communication and this shared 

624
00:33:15,900 --> 00:33:18,200
understanding. 
And that's why the domain driven

625
00:33:18,200 --> 00:33:21,100
design is also one thing that is
very popular, this take to 

626
00:33:21,100 --> 00:33:23,700
create ubiquitous language like,
bounded context. 

627
00:33:23,900 --> 00:33:27,100
Make sure that people, either 
your software, developer product

628
00:33:27,100 --> 00:33:29,300
owner. 
Whatever role you have the same 

629
00:33:29,300 --> 00:33:31,800
shared, understanding about 
whatever common terms that you 

630
00:33:31,800 --> 00:33:33,400
use within the team of the 
organization. 

631
00:33:33,900 --> 00:33:36,400
So I think it kind of like ties 
back from software development 

632
00:33:36,400 --> 00:33:38,600
to product management. 
Thanks for sharing all these 

633
00:33:38,600 --> 00:33:41,100
misalignments. 
So for people who wants to know 

634
00:33:41,100 --> 00:33:44,200
more, what are the other common 
misalignments, make sure to 

635
00:33:44,200 --> 00:33:46,000
check in the book. 
They are, I think, in total, 

636
00:33:46,000 --> 00:33:49,500
eight of them. 
Moving on from this, we know why

637
00:33:49,500 --> 00:33:52,300
people get misaligned. 
So what do you think the 

638
00:33:52,300 --> 00:33:54,600
responsibility of leader? 
What can we do? 

639
00:33:54,600 --> 00:33:58,700
Practically to actually ensure 
that people get aligned or maybe

640
00:33:58,700 --> 00:34:01,300
what kind of actions that they 
need to do to achieve this? 

641
00:34:02,100 --> 00:34:06,300
So, I think for leaders, there's
a couple of really important 

642
00:34:06,300 --> 00:34:10,100
things that go back to that idea
of foundational aspects. 

643
00:34:10,500 --> 00:34:13,500
What I've seen is a lot of the 
great leaders that I've had the 

644
00:34:13,500 --> 00:34:16,699
opportunity to work with or were
interviewed for the book or that

645
00:34:16,699 --> 00:34:20,400
I've researched, they are 
incredibly good at the 

646
00:34:20,400 --> 00:34:23,699
fundamentals. 
I think the first one that is 

647
00:34:23,699 --> 00:34:27,699
really important to highlight is
this idea of they really 

648
00:34:27,699 --> 00:34:31,199
understand the difference 
between strategy versus 

649
00:34:31,199 --> 00:34:35,000
planning. 
This idea of really getting a 

650
00:34:35,000 --> 00:34:40,199
grasp that planning can without 
a great strategy in place, gives

651
00:34:40,199 --> 00:34:45,400
us a false sense of security and
false set of expectations that 

652
00:34:45,400 --> 00:34:48,600
can be extremely problematic for
those listening. 

653
00:34:49,100 --> 00:34:52,400
Let me Define just very quickly 
what the foundation of a good 

654
00:34:52,400 --> 00:34:56,199
strategy has to Encompass. 
A good strategy has to have a 

655
00:34:56,199 --> 00:35:00,300
clear articulated Vision. 
It has to have a clear 

656
00:35:00,300 --> 00:35:03,600
understanding and definition of 
Problem that you're solving for 

657
00:35:03,900 --> 00:35:07,400
and has to have a clear outcome 
for the business and a clear 

658
00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:09,300
outcome for the customer to 
find. 

659
00:35:09,800 --> 00:35:13,200
It has to have a cohesive and 
comprehensive approach of how 

660
00:35:13,200 --> 00:35:15,900
you're going to get there. 
And it has to have a way to 

661
00:35:15,900 --> 00:35:19,300
measure forward progress. 
That's just the foundation. 

662
00:35:19,300 --> 00:35:22,500
I mean, strategy has so many 
other facets to it, but 

663
00:35:22,500 --> 00:35:25,500
fundamentally that is critical. 
It's not goals. 

664
00:35:25,500 --> 00:35:28,100
It's not projections. 
It's not schedules. 

665
00:35:28,200 --> 00:35:31,700
These things are often today to 
the disservice. 

666
00:35:31,900 --> 00:35:36,100
Of people that are trying to do 
this work there, talked about as

667
00:35:36,100 --> 00:35:40,900
strategies at following a 
framework strategy is embracing 

668
00:35:40,900 --> 00:35:43,800
this new model. 
It's like that's not a strategy.

669
00:35:44,000 --> 00:35:47,000
That's a tool. 
Yes, but it's not a clearly 

670
00:35:47,000 --> 00:35:49,800
defined strategy. 
The framework, it might help. 

671
00:35:49,800 --> 00:35:52,300
You understand what you have to 
fill in, but it does not take 

672
00:35:52,300 --> 00:35:54,300
away any of the work. 
It's not a shortcut. 

673
00:35:54,800 --> 00:35:58,500
So leaders at understand that 
are one of the reasons they can 

674
00:35:58,500 --> 00:36:00,700
do. 
Such amazing things consistently

675
00:36:01,000 --> 00:36:02,900
is because not only They know 
that but they know how to 

676
00:36:02,900 --> 00:36:04,600
delegate it. 
They know what their 

677
00:36:04,600 --> 00:36:07,000
responsibilities in that were 
kids. 

678
00:36:07,400 --> 00:36:11,300
So as an example, a CEO cannot 
delegate the vision away. 

679
00:36:11,700 --> 00:36:13,400
You just can't do it. 
If they are. 

680
00:36:13,400 --> 00:36:15,400
It's a red flag. 
If you're going in that 

681
00:36:15,400 --> 00:36:17,800
interview, ask him who wrote 
that Vision. 

682
00:36:18,400 --> 00:36:20,600
Maybe lots of people contribute 
it but who owns it? 

683
00:36:20,600 --> 00:36:23,500
Who's accountable for it? 
It needs to be that whoever's 

684
00:36:23,500 --> 00:36:27,100
running the company. 
That's an essential piece versus

685
00:36:27,200 --> 00:36:29,900
really diagnosing understanding,
the problem that you need to 

686
00:36:29,900 --> 00:36:31,700
solve understanding the 
outcomes. 

687
00:36:31,800 --> 00:36:33,200
Sanding. 
These other facets. 

688
00:36:33,500 --> 00:36:36,600
Those are things that you rely 
on the expertise and skills 

689
00:36:36,600 --> 00:36:40,700
across an organization and to 
bring more definition and more 

690
00:36:40,700 --> 00:36:43,400
Fidelity to that, I think is one
aspect. 

691
00:36:43,600 --> 00:36:46,100
The other one is I think that 
leaders today. 

692
00:36:46,500 --> 00:36:51,800
There is a necessity to be tried
lingual and what I mean by that 

693
00:36:51,800 --> 00:36:55,500
is that leaders have to have a 
strong business design and 

694
00:36:55,500 --> 00:36:58,300
Technology Acumen, and I don't 
mean to act, you have to be 

695
00:36:58,300 --> 00:37:01,700
proficient in doing the work, 
but your Acumen has to be well. 

696
00:37:01,800 --> 00:37:05,200
Established in those three 
together because you need to be 

697
00:37:05,207 --> 00:37:07,500
able to build effective teams, 
which means you need to 

698
00:37:07,500 --> 00:37:10,400
understand what type of people 
skill sets and capabilities. 

699
00:37:10,400 --> 00:37:12,600
You need in those to use. 
You need to understand how to 

700
00:37:12,607 --> 00:37:16,300
hold those types of roles and 
responsibilities accountable to 

701
00:37:16,300 --> 00:37:20,200
supporting the organization and 
you need to be able to Mentor 

702
00:37:20,200 --> 00:37:23,700
them and support them. 
So I think being trilingual and 

703
00:37:23,700 --> 00:37:26,500
having that knowledge becomes 
essential for leaders, 

704
00:37:26,500 --> 00:37:31,100
especially as more and more 
organizations are trying to put 

705
00:37:31,100 --> 00:37:33,400
emphasis on Jean customer 
experience. 

706
00:37:33,500 --> 00:37:36,600
As just one example, if customer
experience is key in your 

707
00:37:36,607 --> 00:37:39,600
delivering technology product. 
You better know design and you 

708
00:37:39,600 --> 00:37:43,200
better know Tech and if you 
don't that's okay backfill that 

709
00:37:43,200 --> 00:37:45,500
make sure you have the right 
people around you build your 

710
00:37:45,500 --> 00:37:48,600
team up so that you can do 
whatever aspect that you do 

711
00:37:48,600 --> 00:37:51,800
best, but recognize that either 
you have that need to have that 

712
00:37:51,800 --> 00:37:54,700
skill set, or you need to build 
a team that can fulfill that 

713
00:37:54,700 --> 00:37:57,800
necessity. 
So that would be to the third 

714
00:37:57,800 --> 00:37:59,500
one is. 
I think that in this day and 

715
00:37:59,500 --> 00:38:02,500
age, we have to stop thinking of
products as Individual or 

716
00:38:02,508 --> 00:38:05,200
monolithic Solutions. 
We have to be thinking them as 

717
00:38:05,200 --> 00:38:08,800
platforms platform thinking. 
They think is one of the thing 

718
00:38:08,800 --> 00:38:12,700
that is probably on the most 
bleeding edge, even though 

719
00:38:12,700 --> 00:38:15,400
people use the term platforms 
all the time. 

720
00:38:15,400 --> 00:38:18,600
There are very few companies 
that are actually delivering 

721
00:38:18,600 --> 00:38:23,000
true platform products. 
Today, more and more products 

722
00:38:23,000 --> 00:38:25,700
are going to take that form 
going forward. 

723
00:38:25,700 --> 00:38:30,000
And it's revolutionising the way
that traditional businesses are 

724
00:38:30,000 --> 00:38:32,500
operating. 
So being able to To understand 

725
00:38:32,500 --> 00:38:35,600
that difference and being able 
to have that interoperability 

726
00:38:35,600 --> 00:38:39,600
and scalability is going to 
become an essential skill for 

727
00:38:39,600 --> 00:38:43,400
leaders going forward. 
When you mention about platform.

728
00:38:43,400 --> 00:38:45,600
Can you tell us more? 
What do you mean by platform? 

729
00:38:45,600 --> 00:38:49,000
Because again, this term is 
probably commonly used, but 

730
00:38:49,000 --> 00:38:50,700
maybe not. 
Well understood. 

731
00:38:50,800 --> 00:38:53,800
So you're talking about 
technology called platform or is

732
00:38:53,800 --> 00:38:56,500
it something different? 
What do you mean by platforms 

733
00:38:56,500 --> 00:38:59,900
to? 
Yeah, so the idea of a platform 

734
00:39:00,000 --> 00:39:03,300
it's often talked about as Think
of it as a Marketplace. 

735
00:39:03,500 --> 00:39:07,400
So I have two groups that 
innately benefit one another, 

736
00:39:07,900 --> 00:39:09,800
but there are different types of
platforms. 

737
00:39:09,800 --> 00:39:12,400
And so when we traditionally 
think of platforms, we think of 

738
00:39:12,400 --> 00:39:15,900
these open marketplaces and 
Amazon is probably the most 

739
00:39:15,900 --> 00:39:19,600
well-known one in the world or 
something like the app store for

740
00:39:19,600 --> 00:39:22,800
Apple or Google Play are great 
examples of platforms. 

741
00:39:23,200 --> 00:39:26,900
We have platforms as a service 
for developers that are 

742
00:39:26,900 --> 00:39:29,300
incredible. 
They're not necessarily the same

743
00:39:29,300 --> 00:39:31,700
as a two-sided Market, but they 
still are in. 

744
00:39:31,800 --> 00:39:35,500
It's a platform. 
They enable you to abstract and 

745
00:39:35,500 --> 00:39:38,900
build and cumulative value. 
So the way that I like to think 

746
00:39:38,900 --> 00:39:42,800
about it is understanding 
platforms. 

747
00:39:42,800 --> 00:39:46,800
And the sense of what is the 
value amplifier in the 

748
00:39:46,800 --> 00:39:50,700
technology or product that I'm 
creating that, I need to be able

749
00:39:50,700 --> 00:39:54,900
to have the ability to be 
interoperable across my product 

750
00:39:54,900 --> 00:39:58,700
as it evolves, then. 
How can I build a path for that 

751
00:39:58,700 --> 00:40:02,200
platform? 
That will lead to That 

752
00:40:02,200 --> 00:40:05,800
amplification of value in the 
most significant way, over time 

753
00:40:06,400 --> 00:40:08,400
companies take very different 
approaches. 

754
00:40:08,400 --> 00:40:10,900
There's one company. 
I absolutely love based here, in

755
00:40:10,900 --> 00:40:12,200
the United States, called 
Rackspace. 

756
00:40:12,200 --> 00:40:15,500
They're hosting company. 
They do manage hosting Services.

757
00:40:16,000 --> 00:40:18,600
They realize that they can 
actually create a platform out 

758
00:40:18,600 --> 00:40:22,400
of a branded concept, which is 
fanatical support. 

759
00:40:22,400 --> 00:40:25,600
Their support structure is 
absolutely unbelievable and they

760
00:40:25,600 --> 00:40:28,800
have innovated existing 
Technologies of just about the 

761
00:40:28,808 --> 00:40:31,400
experience. 
How do you build a platform and 

762
00:40:31,400 --> 00:40:34,200
they determine how they can 
actually amplify that value 

763
00:40:34,200 --> 00:40:37,400
across the entire customer 
Journey, that allows them to 

764
00:40:37,400 --> 00:40:41,000
deliver on their promises 
consistently at scale as they 

765
00:40:41,000 --> 00:40:43,800
continue to grow. 
And so I think leaders need to 

766
00:40:43,800 --> 00:40:47,500
understand that concept of 
platform thinking so they can 

767
00:40:47,500 --> 00:40:49,600
understand how it applies to the
business and what they're 

768
00:40:49,600 --> 00:40:52,200
creating. 
Thanks for emphasizing the 

769
00:40:52,200 --> 00:40:55,600
importance of value amplifier. 
I think this is probably one of 

770
00:40:55,600 --> 00:40:58,500
the critical things when you 
think about platform what things

771
00:40:58,500 --> 00:41:00,300
that can allow you to amplify 
the value. 

772
00:41:00,300 --> 00:41:03,300
And also allows you to A lot 
easier, right? 

773
00:41:03,300 --> 00:41:05,900
Not necessarily adding more 
people resources to it. 

774
00:41:06,300 --> 00:41:09,400
So we know what leaders need to 
do, but then it comes back to 

775
00:41:09,400 --> 00:41:11,600
the team itself, right? 
They need to be aligned. 

776
00:41:12,000 --> 00:41:14,300
What do you think? 
Are the recipes that you can 

777
00:41:14,300 --> 00:41:17,700
tell us to be a high performing 
product teams? 

778
00:41:18,000 --> 00:41:20,400
What do you think are? 
Some of the attributes that you 

779
00:41:20,400 --> 00:41:23,300
can see from your experience 
teams that are really fully 

780
00:41:23,300 --> 00:41:26,300
aligned and productive and 
deliver successful products. 

781
00:41:27,100 --> 00:41:29,700
Here we've touched on several of
the points. 

782
00:41:29,900 --> 00:41:33,600
But as they relate to the team, 
a team needs to have a clear 

783
00:41:33,600 --> 00:41:35,800
strategy. 
A high-performance teams have a 

784
00:41:35,800 --> 00:41:39,900
clear strategy to follow their 
not handed requirements. 

785
00:41:39,900 --> 00:41:42,600
They're handed problems. 
There are empowered to make 

786
00:41:42,600 --> 00:41:46,300
decisions to solve that problem 
to test and how to solve that 

787
00:41:46,300 --> 00:41:49,700
problem. 
There's a very dangerous term. 

788
00:41:49,900 --> 00:41:52,100
It's used everywhere. 
But especially I find it to be 

789
00:41:52,100 --> 00:41:54,000
dangerous. 
In Silicon Valley is fail, fast 

790
00:41:54,000 --> 00:41:56,700
and fail often. 
It's a management quote. 

791
00:41:56,900 --> 00:42:00,100
Fast and fail often. 
What context some people take it

792
00:42:00,100 --> 00:42:01,700
too literal. 
That's when it becomes 

793
00:42:01,700 --> 00:42:03,400
dangerous. 
But when you think about it, 

794
00:42:03,400 --> 00:42:07,900
from how I test hypotheses and 
how I gather quickly, the best 

795
00:42:07,900 --> 00:42:11,600
information cumulatively in the 
fastest, most efficient way. 

796
00:42:12,000 --> 00:42:14,100
It's not about failure of the 
product or the company. 

797
00:42:14,300 --> 00:42:19,100
It's their experiments that 
aspect having that continuous 

798
00:42:19,100 --> 00:42:22,700
learning dynamic in a team and 
high-performance teams as 

799
00:42:22,700 --> 00:42:24,600
essential. 
What it does. 

800
00:42:24,800 --> 00:42:28,800
Is it helps Elevate the Of 
competence of a team when you 

801
00:42:28,800 --> 00:42:32,300
decentralize and you re 
distribute knowledge and 

802
00:42:32,300 --> 00:42:35,000
information that's coming both 
from the customers and from the 

803
00:42:35,000 --> 00:42:37,900
individual experts and 
contributors within a team that 

804
00:42:37,900 --> 00:42:41,100
becomes a huge performance 
amplifier for a team. 

805
00:42:41,500 --> 00:42:45,600
The next one is making sure that
you have Knowledge Management 

806
00:42:45,700 --> 00:42:48,800
something we talked about before
but something as simple as what 

807
00:42:48,800 --> 00:42:51,700
are the flows in your product. 
What's the intended outcome of 

808
00:42:51,700 --> 00:42:53,800
your flows? 
I will tell you probably nine 

809
00:42:53,800 --> 00:42:55,800
out of ten product. 
Managers that I asked that 

810
00:42:55,800 --> 00:42:56,800
question. 
Can't answer. 

811
00:42:57,400 --> 00:43:00,000
Product manager in my opinion, 
should be able to answer that 

812
00:43:00,000 --> 00:43:02,700
question without having to pull 
up a single document. 

813
00:43:02,800 --> 00:43:06,600
If you don't know what the 
intended outcome is for those 

814
00:43:06,900 --> 00:43:09,300
and then why they need to be 
improved. 

815
00:43:09,300 --> 00:43:12,600
We have to step back and we have
to reset because the team is 

816
00:43:12,600 --> 00:43:14,400
more focused on delivery than 
outcome. 

817
00:43:14,800 --> 00:43:16,400
The delivery output doesn't 
matter. 

818
00:43:16,400 --> 00:43:19,700
If we don't know, we're moving 
towards an intended outcome and 

819
00:43:19,700 --> 00:43:23,100
we have a way to measure it. 
So the high-performance teams 

820
00:43:23,100 --> 00:43:25,900
are embracing that Collective 
competence their building off of

821
00:43:25,900 --> 00:43:28,300
focus and solve. 
You problems and they're really 

822
00:43:28,300 --> 00:43:30,500
emphasize the proper Knowledge 
Management. 

823
00:43:30,500 --> 00:43:35,600
So they can collectively be 
working on the same things and 

824
00:43:35,600 --> 00:43:37,100
the right things at the right 
time. 

825
00:43:37,700 --> 00:43:39,200
Thanks for sharing this 
attributes. 

826
00:43:39,400 --> 00:43:42,600
So I think people sometimes, 
yes, we don't understand the 

827
00:43:42,600 --> 00:43:44,800
outcome fully, we know the 
details of it. 

828
00:43:44,800 --> 00:43:47,700
But yeah, we done to focus on 
just delivery the tosser. 

829
00:43:47,700 --> 00:43:50,500
The next story in line, what 
kind of things what features to 

830
00:43:50,500 --> 00:43:52,600
build. 
So, thanks for emphasizing that 

831
00:43:52,600 --> 00:43:54,900
we need to understand the 
outcome without actually pulling

832
00:43:54,900 --> 00:43:56,600
a document. 
That is also another 

833
00:43:56,600 --> 00:43:57,800
interesting. 
Things that this takes that 

834
00:43:57,800 --> 00:43:59,800
you'll just imagine 9 out of 10 
product. 

835
00:43:59,800 --> 00:44:02,100
Managers might not be able to 
answer you the outcome 

836
00:44:02,100 --> 00:44:03,700
straightaway on top of their 
mind. 

837
00:44:04,100 --> 00:44:06,200
So this has been a pleasant 
conversation. 

838
00:44:06,200 --> 00:44:09,400
Jonathan really thank you for 
sharing all your knowledge due 

839
00:44:09,400 --> 00:44:11,600
to the time. 
I think we need to wrap up soon.

840
00:44:11,800 --> 00:44:14,400
But before I let you go, I have 
one last question that I 

841
00:44:14,400 --> 00:44:17,400
normally ask all my guests which
is to share your tree. 

842
00:44:17,400 --> 00:44:19,800
Technical leadership wisdom. 
It could be that it could be 

843
00:44:19,800 --> 00:44:21,600
product. 
Would you be able to share some 

844
00:44:21,600 --> 00:44:23,900
of the wisdom that you think 
will be good to share with the 

845
00:44:23,900 --> 00:44:26,700
audience here as a learning as 
wisdom, so to speak? 

846
00:44:27,500 --> 00:44:30,800
Yeah, I would say that for my 
experience, after everything 

847
00:44:30,800 --> 00:44:34,600
that we've talked about today. 
I think that one of the most 

848
00:44:34,600 --> 00:44:38,100
important things I found is a 
technical leader in many 

849
00:44:38,100 --> 00:44:41,300
projects. 
In cases is really focusing on 

850
00:44:41,300 --> 00:44:44,300
my team. 
And understanding that the most 

851
00:44:44,300 --> 00:44:49,100
dangerous thing I can do is 
bring my ego and my assumptions 

852
00:44:49,100 --> 00:44:52,400
to the table. 
I have found that a great idea 

853
00:44:52,400 --> 00:44:56,200
can come from anywhere. 
The most powerful thing I can 

854
00:44:56,200 --> 00:44:58,400
do. 
As a technical leader is to 

855
00:44:58,400 --> 00:45:01,500
Mentor. 
Those who have passion for 

856
00:45:01,500 --> 00:45:04,900
technology to really deliver 
incredible things. 

857
00:45:05,300 --> 00:45:10,000
So my job as a technical leader,
I tend to find is mentoring the 

858
00:45:10,000 --> 00:45:14,400
connection between the impact of
their work in creating a place 

859
00:45:14,400 --> 00:45:20,500
for them to fail successfully 
quickly and move on to realize 

860
00:45:20,500 --> 00:45:24,600
the goal of what we're working 
towards that has been essential.

861
00:45:24,600 --> 00:45:27,600
I think with everybody that I've
had the The tremendous pleasure 

862
00:45:27,600 --> 00:45:30,000
of working with thanks for 
sharing this. 

863
00:45:30,300 --> 00:45:34,000
So Jonathan for people who want 
to follow you or find more about

864
00:45:34,000 --> 00:45:35,400
the book. 
Maybe you can share where they 

865
00:45:35,400 --> 00:45:37,600
can find it online. 
Sure. 

866
00:45:37,600 --> 00:45:41,300
So the book is available at 
amazon.com just search for the 

867
00:45:41,300 --> 00:45:44,600
title alignment, overcoming, 
internal sabotage and digital 

868
00:45:44,600 --> 00:45:46,900
product failure. 
Thanks for that Settle. 

869
00:45:46,900 --> 00:45:49,400
Yeah, Jenna bed, really pleasure
to have this conversation. 

870
00:45:49,600 --> 00:45:51,900
I wish you good luck and 
transforming all digital 

871
00:45:51,900 --> 00:45:55,500
products and services that you 
touch to be more successful and 

872
00:45:55,500 --> 00:45:57,900
get more alignment. 
Thank you so much. 

873
00:45:57,900 --> 00:46:00,700
It was a pleasure to be on the 
show and great to have this 

874
00:46:00,700 --> 00:46:06,500
conversation with you today. 
Thank you for listening to this 

875
00:46:06,500 --> 00:46:09,900
episode and for staying, right 
until the end if you highly 

876
00:46:09,900 --> 00:46:12,700
enjoyed it, I would appreciate 
if you share it with your 

877
00:46:12,700 --> 00:46:15,700
friends and colleagues who you 
think would also benefit from 

878
00:46:15,700 --> 00:46:18,200
listening to this episode. 
And if you are new to the 

879
00:46:18,200 --> 00:46:21,200
podcast, make sure to subscribe 
and leave me your valuable 

880
00:46:21,200 --> 00:46:23,800
review and feedback. 
It helps me a lot. 

881
00:46:23,800 --> 00:46:25,800
In order to grow this podcast 
better. 

882
00:46:26,200 --> 00:46:29,100
You can also find the full show 
notes of this conversation on 

883
00:46:29,100 --> 00:46:33,200
the episode page, at Tech Legion
l.f website, including the full 

884
00:46:33,200 --> 00:46:36,100
transcript interesting. 
What's and links to the 

885
00:46:36,100 --> 00:46:38,400
resources mention from the 
conversation? 

886
00:46:38,800 --> 00:46:41,800
And lastly make sure to 
subscribe to the show's mailing 

887
00:46:41,800 --> 00:46:45,700
list on pack leader dot f to get
notified for any future 

888
00:46:45,700 --> 00:46:47,900
episodes. 
Stay tuned for the next 

889
00:46:47,900 --> 00:46:50,500
technology, not episode, and 
until then. 

890
00:46:50,700 --> 00:46:51,300
Goodbye.
