1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,520
Welcome to the Bringing the 
Human Back to Human Resources 

2
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:04,880
podcast. 
I'm Tracy Chernoff, and I've 

3
00:00:04,880 --> 00:00:07,280
spent my entire professional 
career in HR. 

4
00:00:07,760 --> 00:00:10,880
Each week, we'll explore the 
delicate balance between people 

5
00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:13,880
and business, with the aim to 
reconnect the two and create 

6
00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:16,800
meaningful outcomes. 
Listen in as I share my own 

7
00:00:16,800 --> 00:00:20,600
experiences, challenge the 
status quo, and chat with guests

8
00:00:20,600 --> 00:00:23,640
from various industries about 
our mission to bring the human 

9
00:00:23,640 --> 00:00:25,320
back to human resources. 
Hello. 

10
00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:26,840
Everyone and welcome back to the
podcast. 

11
00:00:26,840 --> 00:00:28,800
Thank you so much for being here
for another week. 

12
00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:32,400
I'm really, really excited 
because Joshua Berry returns to 

13
00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:36,480
the podcast and Joshua has been 
on the podcast before, as you 

14
00:00:36,480 --> 00:00:39,600
can tell from what I've just 
said, but he was on the podcast 

15
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:43,360
June in 2024 and so not so long 
ago. 

16
00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:47,160
But Joshua has some very 
exciting updates for us and we 

17
00:00:47,160 --> 00:00:50,520
have a lot to cover. 
The last time he was on it was 

18
00:00:50,520 --> 00:00:54,440
episode 183 and the episode was 
called Challenging Beliefs There

19
00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:56,640
to be Naive featuring Joshua 
Berry. 

20
00:00:57,280 --> 00:01:00,880
So let me remind you who he is 
and then we'll jump right into 

21
00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:03,320
the episode. 
Joshua Berry is a world class 

22
00:01:03,320 --> 00:01:05,680
facilitator of change. 
As an author, speaker, 

23
00:01:05,680 --> 00:01:08,720
entrepreneur, and director of 
Econic, Joshua has spent the 

24
00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:12,480
last two decades evolving the 
what, who and why of Fortune 500

25
00:01:12,480 --> 00:01:14,480
companies and venture backed 
startups. 

26
00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:17,280
For employees and leaders 
looking to grow themselves and 

27
00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:20,000
their organizations. 
Joshua speaks on overcoming 

28
00:01:20,000 --> 00:01:23,360
limiting beliefs, adaptive 
leadership, and the innovation 

29
00:01:23,360 --> 00:01:26,600
systems and mindsets that create
engines for growth. 

30
00:01:26,920 --> 00:01:31,360
So of course, I'll link where 
you can find Joshua and iconic 

31
00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:34,760
and all of that fabulous 
information that you might need 

32
00:01:35,240 --> 00:01:37,400
in order to connect. 
But in the meantime, Joshua, 

33
00:01:37,400 --> 00:01:39,760
welcome back. 
Thanks so much for for being 

34
00:01:39,760 --> 00:01:42,000
able to join and being open to 
rejoin. 

35
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:45,600
So glad to have you back. 
Happy New Year, Tracy with you 

36
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:47,400
too. 
Amazing. 

37
00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:51,160
Well, I don't wanna, I don't 
wanna share the big news, but 

38
00:01:51,160 --> 00:01:53,320
you do have some big news for 
the. 

39
00:01:53,320 --> 00:01:56,280
Listeners, absolutely. 
So the last time I was with you,

40
00:01:56,280 --> 00:02:01,400
Tracy, you helped poke some 
ideas and we got into thinking 

41
00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:05,040
about words and the meaning of 
words, and we could talk about 

42
00:02:05,040 --> 00:02:09,160
those later. 
But that kind of snowballed into

43
00:02:09,160 --> 00:02:14,320
a Ted talk that I was hoping to 
get chosen for eventually got 

44
00:02:14,320 --> 00:02:18,680
chosen for that. 
And I delivered that Ted talk to

45
00:02:18,720 --> 00:02:23,480
a full audience in Omaha, NE in 
November of 2024. 

46
00:02:23,480 --> 00:02:27,440
And in that talk should be 
released soon, But it has big 

47
00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:31,640
implications for truly bringing 
the human back into human 

48
00:02:31,640 --> 00:02:34,640
resources and artificial 
intelligence and a bunch of 

49
00:02:34,640 --> 00:02:37,040
other things we can get into. 
But I really just wanted to come

50
00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:40,720
back to say thank you, Tracy, 
for poking and dislodging 

51
00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:45,440
something in my brain, in my 
heart that turned into what what

52
00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:48,600
hopefully people will see as a 
provocative idea that's worth 

53
00:02:48,600 --> 00:02:51,680
spreading. 
Oh, my gosh, First of all, you 

54
00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:54,480
owe me no thanks. 
But I will say you're welcome 

55
00:02:54,480 --> 00:02:56,760
because I was raised not to be 
rude. 

56
00:02:57,480 --> 00:02:59,720
When someone says thank you, you
say you're welcome. 

57
00:02:59,920 --> 00:03:03,920
No, I, you really, you know, I 
make joke make I'm making light 

58
00:03:03,920 --> 00:03:05,720
of this, but you really don't 
owe me anything. 

59
00:03:05,720 --> 00:03:07,400
It was such a pleasure having 
you on. 

60
00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:09,760
It's why I'm so excited that 
you're back. 

61
00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:14,440
And I'm really excited for you. 
I mean, a Ted Talk is kind of 

62
00:03:14,440 --> 00:03:18,560
like, that's the thing, Like 
that's if, you know, if we're 

63
00:03:18,560 --> 00:03:22,240
not doing anything else, like we
should probably want to have a 

64
00:03:22,240 --> 00:03:23,640
Ted Talk at some point in our 
lives. 

65
00:03:23,640 --> 00:03:25,400
And you've done it. 
That's so amazing. 

66
00:03:25,400 --> 00:03:27,920
I can't wait for it to come out.
Thank you. 

67
00:03:28,080 --> 00:03:32,920
It definitely was on the bucket 
list and it was something that 

68
00:03:33,560 --> 00:03:36,400
at the beginning of the year, I,
I truly set forward a couple of 

69
00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:39,320
ideas and goals. 
And so the fact that that was 

70
00:03:39,320 --> 00:03:41,720
able to happen, I'm excited and 
we'll see how it's received 

71
00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:43,240
right. 
That's, that's always the thing.

72
00:03:43,480 --> 00:03:44,200
So. 
Totally. 

73
00:03:44,200 --> 00:03:48,400
Well, knowing you now for the 
better part of what is that 

74
00:03:48,400 --> 00:03:51,280
about Cigna? 
8 months now, no more than that,

75
00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:55,080
maybe nine months, considering 
we spoke before we recorded, I 

76
00:03:55,080 --> 00:03:57,040
think that it will be received 
very well. 

77
00:03:57,320 --> 00:04:00,360
And you know, something that I 
really appreciate about what you

78
00:04:00,360 --> 00:04:05,480
do and what you bring also to to
this audience is that you 

79
00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:08,360
emphasize the importance of 
things that matter. 

80
00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:10,760
Like we're talking like words, 
for example. 

81
00:04:11,040 --> 00:04:17,959
And sometimes people, I think 
undervalue the value of words or

82
00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:21,680
you know what, what we can do 
with the things that we say or 

83
00:04:21,680 --> 00:04:24,640
how we say them. 
I mean, I'm asked, for example, 

84
00:04:24,640 --> 00:04:27,000
all the time about bringing the 
human back to human resources 

85
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:30,280
where that came from. 
And it's like, well, it, it's 

86
00:04:30,280 --> 00:04:33,560
in, it's in the name, right? 
So when we think about the power

87
00:04:33,560 --> 00:04:38,520
of words and, you know, coming 
back to also just what you stand

88
00:04:38,520 --> 00:04:42,000
for and what you've done, I 
mean, can you take us through or

89
00:04:42,000 --> 00:04:45,720
like, can you give us a slight 
preview into the Ted Talk what 

90
00:04:45,720 --> 00:04:48,080
that was about? 
Yeah, yeah, yeah. 

91
00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:55,080
My pleasure, you know it, it 
came from the realization that, 

92
00:04:55,480 --> 00:04:58,680
as you said, we use a lot of 
words without even thinking 

93
00:04:58,680 --> 00:05:01,760
about them or more importantly, 
truly understanding the 

94
00:05:01,760 --> 00:05:05,560
implications that they have. 
You know, I earlier in my 

95
00:05:05,560 --> 00:05:09,440
career, I LED sales and 
marketing teams and we would 

96
00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:14,880
constantly be talking about our 
prospects and our leads and how 

97
00:05:14,880 --> 00:05:16,360
to put people in a better 
funnel. 

98
00:05:17,000 --> 00:05:21,640
And often times we're talking 
about listeners like those to 

99
00:05:21,680 --> 00:05:24,480
your podcast, right? 
Like who actually wants to be 

100
00:05:24,480 --> 00:05:28,640
put into a funnel or to be 
prospected or targeted or any of

101
00:05:28,640 --> 00:05:30,960
those things. 
And yet those are words we just,

102
00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:34,560
we just throw out. 
And what I explore in the talk 

103
00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:38,640
is that unfortunately, just 
copying and pasting those words 

104
00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:43,600
that were used before us, we 
sometimes start to rationalize 

105
00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:47,040
behavior that we wouldn't 
normally take if the person was 

106
00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:50,240
sitting right on the other side 
of the screen like you are to 

107
00:05:50,240 --> 00:05:53,800
me, Tracy, right? 
And that extends into human 

108
00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:56,160
resources, right? 
When we start to think about 

109
00:05:57,280 --> 00:06:02,040
head count as just a number or 
people as an expense to be 

110
00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:05,440
controlled or others, we start 
to dehumanize. 

111
00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:12,160
And truly, dehumanization is one
of the first steps towards even 

112
00:06:12,160 --> 00:06:14,040
worse actions that that can come
from that. 

113
00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:17,280
So I get into all of that in my 
Ted talk in a nice little bite 

114
00:06:17,280 --> 00:06:23,440
sized 10 minute entertaining. 
Wow, well, my next question 

115
00:06:23,440 --> 00:06:25,840
would be how do you do that in 
10 minutes? 

116
00:06:25,880 --> 00:06:27,760
I mean, but it's the power of 
words. 

117
00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:32,480
I mean, that's so amazing and 
it's really powerful. 

118
00:06:32,480 --> 00:06:35,400
You're right. 
When, when like I'm thinking 

119
00:06:35,400 --> 00:06:38,560
about, first of all, let me take
a step back because I, I'm, I'm 

120
00:06:38,720 --> 00:06:43,200
about to ramble if I don't. 
When I think about one of the 

121
00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:46,400
main functions within HR, 
especially when you're starting 

122
00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:50,960
to work on strategy and things 
like you are analyzing people. 

123
00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:54,480
And when you're analyzing 
people, you eventually get to a 

124
00:06:54,480 --> 00:06:57,800
place where you're analyzing 
people as numbers to your point.

125
00:06:58,400 --> 00:07:02,920
And the bigger the company, the 
easier it is to remove yourself 

126
00:07:02,920 --> 00:07:06,680
from what that number 
represents, who that number 

127
00:07:06,680 --> 00:07:10,160
represents and who that person 
actually is. 

128
00:07:10,600 --> 00:07:15,360
And so when you talk about 
dehumanizing, it is it is so 

129
00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:17,120
real. 
And you know, The thing is, it's

130
00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:21,600
so beyond just business, like 
when anyone or anything is 

131
00:07:21,600 --> 00:07:25,440
dehumanized, I mean, that's, 
it's kind of like the breakdown 

132
00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:29,600
for everything, right? 
So when we keep the focus on the

133
00:07:29,600 --> 00:07:34,160
human and we do our, because of 
course it's unrealistic to 

134
00:07:34,160 --> 00:07:37,040
think, Oh, well, we're going to 
look at every single person as a

135
00:07:37,040 --> 00:07:41,320
human when we're analyzing big 
things, sure, fine, no problem. 

136
00:07:41,320 --> 00:07:45,760
But it's like when you're, I 
think the most important point 

137
00:07:45,760 --> 00:07:50,560
in all of that when, when a 
company is analyzing people is 

138
00:07:50,960 --> 00:07:53,920
once you come to the point where
you're making a decision about 

139
00:07:53,920 --> 00:07:57,080
those people that you reframe 
it, it's like, OK, you have 

140
00:07:57,080 --> 00:08:00,760
10,000 people that you are going
to lay off. 

141
00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:03,480
Well, who are those 10,000 
people? 

142
00:08:04,000 --> 00:08:06,120
Who are they made-up of? 
You know, like what, what 

143
00:08:06,120 --> 00:08:08,760
comprises that group of people? 
Do they have children? 

144
00:08:08,760 --> 00:08:11,080
Are they on the benefits? 
Like what kind of resources are 

145
00:08:11,080 --> 00:08:12,920
they going to need, you know, 
so. 

146
00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:17,920
What you're hitting on is, is 
I'm not saying like remove all 

147
00:08:17,920 --> 00:08:21,840
of that language. 
What I, what I advocate for is 

148
00:08:21,840 --> 00:08:25,400
just being more intentional 
about the language that we're 

149
00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:34,120
using and, and not just using 
unconscious words because a 

150
00:08:34,120 --> 00:08:39,120
mentor of mine, Ari once told me
that that words are just a 

151
00:08:39,120 --> 00:08:43,679
symptom of our conscious or 
unconscious beliefs, right. 

152
00:08:43,720 --> 00:08:46,880
And, and often times when we 
when we throw out those words 

153
00:08:46,880 --> 00:08:49,520
like you said, what we got a 
layout, we got a right size, we 

154
00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:51,960
got a streamline, the. 
Buzzwords. 

155
00:08:52,320 --> 00:08:56,680
Any of those sorts of things 
that may be true and it may 

156
00:08:56,680 --> 00:09:00,600
actually be necessary for a 
healthy organization going 

157
00:09:00,600 --> 00:09:07,640
forward, let's say. 
And yet maybe those words are 

158
00:09:07,640 --> 00:09:11,760
actually representative of some 
underlying unconscious or 

159
00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:16,240
unspoken belief about the 
replaceability of people within 

160
00:09:16,240 --> 00:09:19,800
a system that you're working in.
OK, I at least want people to be

161
00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:23,160
cognizant of that. 
It'll even be intentional that. 

162
00:09:23,360 --> 00:09:25,960
OK, that's what I think. 
And then back to what we talked 

163
00:09:25,960 --> 00:09:30,200
about in episode 183, there are 
things you gain and there are 

164
00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:32,920
things you lose by holding that 
particular belief. 

165
00:09:33,000 --> 00:09:37,120
And so I just want people to 
wake up a little bit more to the

166
00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:41,200
consciousness of that, 
especially in today's day and 

167
00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:46,000
age with artificial intelligence
and, and the power that our 

168
00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:49,680
words have on shaping our future
through AI. 

169
00:09:51,280 --> 00:09:55,760
Oh my gosh, yes. 
And actually, when I think about

170
00:09:55,880 --> 00:10:00,080
AI and words, my initial 
thought, and this is probably 

171
00:10:00,080 --> 00:10:03,680
just because I just bought a 
minivan and it came up and I, I 

172
00:10:03,680 --> 00:10:05,640
promise you I'm going to make 
the connection. 

173
00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:07,760
I'm really excited about the 
minivan, by the way, even though

174
00:10:07,760 --> 00:10:11,880
I'm so much cooler than what a 
minivan necessarily like. 

175
00:10:12,600 --> 00:10:19,680
Portrays I'm, so I. 
Really am like I am really 

176
00:10:19,680 --> 00:10:22,600
changing the game for minivans. 
I'm just saying if Toyota wants 

177
00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:26,400
to sponsor me, I got the Sienna.
I'm so excited. 

178
00:10:26,600 --> 00:10:29,680
I'm going to make the connection
here in a moment when when I 

179
00:10:29,680 --> 00:10:33,120
think about AI, my first thought
because of my experience buying 

180
00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:39,320
the minivan is the what we ask 
AI, if we're using generative 

181
00:10:39,320 --> 00:10:43,760
like, you know, language with 
like, let's say Chachi BT. 

182
00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:49,320
And I think about that because 
it's kind of a perfect example 

183
00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:54,920
of like what you give to AI can 
sometimes be what you receive. 

184
00:10:54,920 --> 00:10:57,960
It's not necessarily thinking 
beyond the scope of what you 

185
00:10:57,960 --> 00:11:00,000
might mean, what your context 
might be, right. 

186
00:11:00,360 --> 00:11:05,120
And so I share the mini ven 
anecdote because when my husband

187
00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:08,440
and I were going to buy it, they
were like, and you know, 

188
00:11:08,440 --> 00:11:13,560
according to Google, this is 
like the percent above MSRP that

189
00:11:13,560 --> 00:11:15,960
it should be like above MSRP for
a minivan. 

190
00:11:16,720 --> 00:11:19,000
And no offense minivans, but I 
love you. 

191
00:11:19,960 --> 00:11:27,600
And the question was how much of
what percentage above MSRP is 

192
00:11:27,600 --> 00:11:29,560
the Toyota Sienna or the 
minivan? 

193
00:11:29,840 --> 00:11:32,280
I'm like, well, of course that's
going to tell you a percent 

194
00:11:32,280 --> 00:11:37,320
above MSRP because you're asking
it to tell you the percent if 

195
00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:42,600
you ask what the average price 
of a Toyota like that might not 

196
00:11:42,600 --> 00:11:46,680
be above MSRP. 
So this is a very, very nuanced 

197
00:11:46,680 --> 00:11:50,640
example, but that's the way I 
take kind of what you're saying 

198
00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:54,600
in terms of like how we think 
about nuance and language when 

199
00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:57,800
it is related to AI and that 
might not be your intention. 

200
00:11:57,800 --> 00:12:02,720
But no, no, no, it's exactly a 
flavor of my intention in that, 

201
00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:07,280
as you said, large language 
models that power tools like 

202
00:12:07,280 --> 00:12:13,680
ChatGPT or Anthropics Clod or 
Microsoft Copilot, etcetera, are

203
00:12:13,680 --> 00:12:20,760
all built on studying and 
ingesting and training on 

204
00:12:21,640 --> 00:12:25,920
immense amounts of data and text
and images and music and 

205
00:12:25,920 --> 00:12:32,440
everything that can go into it. 
And in a response to your 

206
00:12:32,440 --> 00:12:39,360
prompt, which you very much have
control over, the agent will do 

207
00:12:39,360 --> 00:12:44,120
its best to be able to predict 
what the right response should 

208
00:12:44,120 --> 00:12:47,840
be to what you're saying. 
But it's all based upon previous

209
00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:50,160
patterns that it's seen in the 
training data. 

210
00:12:50,880 --> 00:12:55,200
And so you're right, if they've 
asked 1000 times what percent 

211
00:12:55,200 --> 00:13:00,280
above MSRP is this van the 
thousandth and first time is 

212
00:13:00,280 --> 00:13:05,680
likely going to give that back. 
And that's my intent of marrying

213
00:13:05,680 --> 00:13:08,480
this being conscious about your 
words, especially in human 

214
00:13:08,480 --> 00:13:14,360
resources and AI, because as 
publicly available sources of 

215
00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:20,240
training data are exhausted, 
companies are routinely turning 

216
00:13:20,240 --> 00:13:24,040
more and more towards private or
at least once and gated sources 

217
00:13:24,040 --> 00:13:26,320
of information for for training 
their models. 

218
00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:31,520
And so when you start to think 
about the last ways that you 

219
00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:38,520
described people in your emails 
or Microsoft Teams messages or 

220
00:13:38,520 --> 00:13:43,080
blog posts or other things, and 
there's a million examples of 

221
00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:47,560
treating people like a resource 
in, in those previous ones, like

222
00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:53,720
what do we expect AI is going to
predict the value of people is 

223
00:13:53,720 --> 00:13:57,400
beyond that. 
And so I, I think we're, we're 

224
00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:00,680
at a, we're at a very 
interesting inflection point 

225
00:14:00,680 --> 00:14:05,000
where we can start to shift the 
narrative even of what 

226
00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:09,600
generative AI thinks about 
people, right, and their value 

227
00:14:09,800 --> 00:14:13,160
based upon the conscious word 
choice that we have. 

228
00:14:13,360 --> 00:14:18,800
Yeah, Oh, this is really 
important because everyone, of 

229
00:14:18,800 --> 00:14:21,880
course, rightfully so, is 
talking about AI. 

230
00:14:22,920 --> 00:14:26,760
And AI will continue to be a 
part of the conversation 

231
00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:31,160
naturally, because it's our 
future, it's our present. 

232
00:14:31,160 --> 00:14:35,040
It's just, you know, what is 
important in today's day and 

233
00:14:35,040 --> 00:14:38,880
age, but how we use it and 
having a better understanding 

234
00:14:38,880 --> 00:14:44,040
of, I guess just generally like 
how we can best use it, what the

235
00:14:44,040 --> 00:14:46,560
best use case is, makes a lot of
sense. 

236
00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:52,440
Yes, absolutely. 
And I'm very much a pro AI and, 

237
00:14:52,440 --> 00:14:58,360
and being intentional in its use
case and just being, as I said, 

238
00:14:58,360 --> 00:15:01,720
even before, whether we had AI 
or not, being a little bit more 

239
00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:04,920
aware of the types of word 
choices that we're using and the

240
00:15:04,920 --> 00:15:08,880
implications that they have and 
how those choices impact our 

241
00:15:08,880 --> 00:15:11,480
actions and behaviors. 
Yeah, no, it makes sense. 

242
00:15:11,520 --> 00:15:17,520
I was just talking to someone in
HR who, you know, I was. 

243
00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:22,760
I kind of said like, Hey, what 
do you, what do you think about 

244
00:15:22,760 --> 00:15:27,160
this fear that people have with 
like AI taking their jobs 

245
00:15:27,440 --> 00:15:28,760
basically? 
And this was not in the 

246
00:15:28,760 --> 00:15:30,600
recording. 
It was like an intro call 

247
00:15:30,600 --> 00:15:33,480
because I'd like to, you know, 
see what I can get out of 

248
00:15:33,480 --> 00:15:35,520
people, you know, because these 
are some, these are the 

249
00:15:35,520 --> 00:15:39,960
questions that people have. 
And she was like, oh, well, it's

250
00:15:39,960 --> 00:15:43,080
totally true. 
AI is going to replace jobs. 

251
00:15:43,400 --> 00:15:45,440
And this is like, you know, 
ahead of people. 

252
00:15:45,880 --> 00:15:49,840
And I was like, oh, like I was 
kind of taken aback because part

253
00:15:49,840 --> 00:15:54,600
of me like, you know, I get it. 
Of course there are jobs that 

254
00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:57,880
are at risk. 
And then the other part of me is

255
00:15:57,880 --> 00:16:04,840
like, well, how do we see AI as 
a resource to better fulfill our

256
00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:07,760
jobs so that we're not as much 
at risk? 

257
00:16:08,840 --> 00:16:11,120
But that is not something that 
you can cover in a 10 minute 

258
00:16:11,120 --> 00:16:13,840
conversation. 
And so I wonder like, you know, 

259
00:16:13,840 --> 00:16:17,920
from your perspective and how, 
you know, I guess really 

260
00:16:17,920 --> 00:16:20,960
relating it to being very 
cognizant of what we say and how

261
00:16:20,960 --> 00:16:24,880
we say it, especially in HR. 
How would you answer? 

262
00:16:24,880 --> 00:16:25,880
I'm putting you in the hot seat 
here. 

263
00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:29,040
I'm so sorry, but how would you 
like answer that? 

264
00:16:29,040 --> 00:16:31,760
If someone's like, you know, I'm
really worried that AI is going 

265
00:16:31,760 --> 00:16:35,360
to take my job. 
I'm an HR admin, I'm an HR 

266
00:16:35,360 --> 00:16:39,080
manager, I'm an HR whatever. 
And I'm really worried that AI 

267
00:16:39,080 --> 00:16:40,960
is going to take over my job. 
Maybe it's someone in 

268
00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:45,760
recruiting. 
What do I do to how do I, how do

269
00:16:45,760 --> 00:16:50,520
I navigate using AI without 
putting myself in a position 

270
00:16:50,520 --> 00:16:54,880
where it's doing my job instead 
of me doing my job with AI? 

271
00:16:54,880 --> 00:16:57,760
You know, like, is there a way 
that we answer that? 

272
00:16:57,760 --> 00:17:00,760
Or maybe it's on the other side 
of things where like, how do 

273
00:17:00,760 --> 00:17:04,960
you, what would you say to an HR
person who's like an HR leader 

274
00:17:04,960 --> 00:17:08,119
who's confronted with that and 
has to navigate answering that 

275
00:17:08,119 --> 00:17:10,079
question? 
Like either perspective, I'd 

276
00:17:10,160 --> 00:17:14,280
love to hear. 
So the first thing that comes to

277
00:17:14,280 --> 00:17:18,640
mind is, is I believe you called
out in some of your 2025 HR 

278
00:17:18,640 --> 00:17:23,000
trends the need for 
adaptability, for evolving, for 

279
00:17:23,000 --> 00:17:27,599
continuous skill development. 
I think that all very much 

280
00:17:27,599 --> 00:17:33,800
applies here because the the 
individual or the leader who's 

281
00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:38,080
thinking about application of HR
and their workflows or or job 

282
00:17:38,080 --> 00:17:42,840
tasks for their people, just 
like digging in your heels and 

283
00:17:42,840 --> 00:17:45,760
resisting likely isn't going to 
work. 

284
00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:51,360
The better approach is to start 
to understand, OK, what are some

285
00:17:51,360 --> 00:17:56,840
of the ways that if I had, this 
is I think the best descriptor. 

286
00:17:56,840 --> 00:18:03,080
Somebody said, if I had infinite
interns at my disposal, what 

287
00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:07,400
would I be able to do? 
And, and, and, and because at 

288
00:18:07,400 --> 00:18:11,880
least for now, like some of the 
abilities are around that level.

289
00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:14,720
And, and so you, you need to 
think about that's a fabulous 

290
00:18:15,360 --> 00:18:17,680
example, things on a different 
level of scale. 

291
00:18:17,680 --> 00:18:21,800
And so if you were basing let's 
you to your HR admin role, like 

292
00:18:21,800 --> 00:18:27,840
if you were basing your job 
value on the ability to know all

293
00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:30,800
of the policies and how to 
implement them and how to 

294
00:18:30,800 --> 00:18:38,080
adjudicate them and and being a 
resource, know how person that 

295
00:18:38,080 --> 00:18:42,080
that is something that could 
probably be replaced eventually,

296
00:18:42,480 --> 00:18:44,800
probably not the relational side
of things. 

297
00:18:46,560 --> 00:18:48,880
But even there, I'll start to 
challenge that some younger 

298
00:18:48,880 --> 00:18:51,920
generations would actually 
probably prefer to interface 

299
00:18:51,920 --> 00:18:54,680
with a non person for some of 
that information. 

300
00:18:55,080 --> 00:18:57,800
And so you, you are left with 
thinking what what are the 

301
00:18:57,800 --> 00:19:01,000
additional skills or other 
things that could continue to 

302
00:19:01,000 --> 00:19:03,760
add value around that? 
Because if it's just information

303
00:19:03,760 --> 00:19:09,400
retrieval or analysis, that may 
not be as as helpful going 

304
00:19:09,400 --> 00:19:12,960
forward. 
And so a simple way to also 

305
00:19:13,000 --> 00:19:17,400
answer this is just start 
experimenting, find ways that 

306
00:19:17,400 --> 00:19:22,080
are either corporately 
responsible, if you, if you can,

307
00:19:22,360 --> 00:19:25,320
or off on the side on your own 
personal things to at least 

308
00:19:25,320 --> 00:19:29,960
start to practice with some of 
these tools so that you can have

309
00:19:29,960 --> 00:19:33,360
a better understanding of what 
they're capable of and, and 

310
00:19:33,360 --> 00:19:37,400
practice that curiosity. 
And, and yeah, consider the, the

311
00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:40,440
thought exercise. 
If I had infinite interns, what 

312
00:19:40,440 --> 00:19:43,800
might I be capable of? 
I love that so much and it's 

313
00:19:43,800 --> 00:19:47,200
really true. 
As a former intern myself, that 

314
00:19:47,200 --> 00:19:50,440
is exactly where Chachi like AI 
is. 

315
00:19:50,440 --> 00:19:54,400
I shouldn't just say Chachi BTU.
It's really any AI tool that 

316
00:19:54,400 --> 00:19:58,120
we're using because I guess 
depending I think of these, what

317
00:19:58,120 --> 00:20:00,720
is the phrase? 
It's not generative. 

318
00:20:00,760 --> 00:20:02,440
I guess it is generative AI, 
right. 

319
00:20:02,440 --> 00:20:03,400
With that's what I'm thinking 
of. 

320
00:20:03,400 --> 00:20:06,560
Yeah. 
So with any generative AI tool 

321
00:20:06,560 --> 00:20:10,920
that I have used, and I've used 
a few, anything that I kind of. 

322
00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:14,240
Put in it is kind of you know, 
it's a little sophomoric it's 

323
00:20:14,360 --> 00:20:19,080
it's coming it's delivering 
information based on, you know, 

324
00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:23,200
a limited or certain amount of 
data and with limited experience

325
00:20:23,200 --> 00:20:25,720
so far. 
And I can only imagine once 

326
00:20:25,840 --> 00:20:30,800
generative AI turns 30, you 
know, how how much more or maybe

327
00:20:30,800 --> 00:20:34,960
even 40 or 50 or 60, like how 
much more it will be able to do.

328
00:20:35,320 --> 00:20:39,560
And then when you were sharing 
about, you know, not resisting 

329
00:20:39,560 --> 00:20:41,880
so much. 
I'm really basically embracing 

330
00:20:41,880 --> 00:20:44,520
this technology. 
It makes me think about the 

331
00:20:44,520 --> 00:20:47,160
phrase keep your, keep your 
friends close, keep your enemies

332
00:20:47,160 --> 00:20:49,480
closer. 
Because even though I don't 

333
00:20:49,480 --> 00:20:52,640
believe that AI is the enemy at 
all, I really don't, I say that 

334
00:20:52,640 --> 00:20:55,360
to be very tongue in cheek. 
It's kind of like this, this 

335
00:20:55,360 --> 00:21:00,480
idea that you, you could find 
yourself in a position where 

336
00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:06,480
technology could do the a 
certain job. 

337
00:21:06,600 --> 00:21:09,320
I don't think that it's going to
be able to do like at least with

338
00:21:09,320 --> 00:21:12,280
an HR, especially from the 
relationship side. 

339
00:21:12,280 --> 00:21:15,560
That's still a very important 
part of what we do is build and 

340
00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:19,640
maintain those relationships. 
And so it's like, well, if it's 

341
00:21:19,640 --> 00:21:22,600
doing all these other things 
that actually help us to 

342
00:21:23,280 --> 00:21:27,120
repurpose our time that was once
spent doing heavily 

343
00:21:27,120 --> 00:21:29,680
administrative things. 
It's kind of like you're keeping

344
00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:32,480
it closer. 
Once you embrace it, it's not 

345
00:21:32,480 --> 00:21:34,800
this thing that you have to work
against anymore. 

346
00:21:34,800 --> 00:21:37,320
It's this thing that you're 
working with and that's 

347
00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:40,240
empowering you, enabling you 
hopefully and your job to do 

348
00:21:40,640 --> 00:21:43,600
more, to upskill, to adapt. 
I appreciate that you reference 

349
00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:48,040
the 2025 HR Trends episode 
because that's kind of what I'm 

350
00:21:48,040 --> 00:21:51,360
hoping to invoke throughout the 
rest of this year is that like 

351
00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:55,280
AI doesn't have to be the enemy.
It's something that we really 

352
00:21:55,280 --> 00:21:58,800
can kind of leverage. 
It's, you know, it's a tool at 

353
00:21:58,800 --> 00:22:00,280
the end of the day. 
Yeah. 

354
00:22:00,880 --> 00:22:05,560
You know, we so our core 
business is custom training and 

355
00:22:05,560 --> 00:22:09,960
development programming, whether
it's leadership development 

356
00:22:09,960 --> 00:22:14,080
programming to certain specific 
skills or behaviors. 

357
00:22:15,120 --> 00:22:20,960
We use it quite often to help 
make us better facilitators and 

358
00:22:21,320 --> 00:22:24,120
curriculum designers and and 
experienced people. 

359
00:22:25,280 --> 00:22:29,480
So if you start to think about 
it as a tool of not just go find

360
00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:33,920
this for me or research this for
me, but instead, here's here's 

361
00:22:33,920 --> 00:22:38,920
an outline for an experience. 
Why won't this work right? 

362
00:22:38,920 --> 00:22:42,280
Or you start using it in a 
coaching challenging make me 

363
00:22:42,280 --> 00:22:46,080
better sort of way. 
I think you can unlock then a 

364
00:22:46,080 --> 00:22:50,400
whole nother level of potential 
value out of a tool like that. 

365
00:22:51,920 --> 00:22:55,760
Here's here's, here's even a, a 
silly, maybe it's a meta example

366
00:22:55,760 --> 00:23:00,000
of this is if you're the HR 
admin and you had your job 

367
00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:02,840
description, you could put it 
into one of these tools and say 

368
00:23:03,160 --> 00:23:08,080
which of these tasks are most 
likely to be taken over by AI in

369
00:23:08,080 --> 00:23:11,240
the future and why? 
And then teach me why. 

370
00:23:11,240 --> 00:23:12,440
And then what are some things I 
could do? 

371
00:23:12,480 --> 00:23:15,160
Like use the tool for itself, 
right? 

372
00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:20,120
Yes, I think that's great advice
and I really like what you 

373
00:23:20,120 --> 00:23:23,560
shared in terms of this idea 
around brainstorming. 

374
00:23:23,920 --> 00:23:27,320
Like you don't need to tap the 
shoulder of your Co worker when 

375
00:23:27,320 --> 00:23:31,280
you've got an AI brain readily 
available to you, you know, and 

376
00:23:31,560 --> 00:23:35,520
to think about like asking it, 
well, what wouldn't work about 

377
00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:37,160
this? 
What am I missing? 

378
00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:41,440
What what are my blind spots? 
I mean, I think of so many use 

379
00:23:41,440 --> 00:23:45,560
cases for that. 
And as I always share on the 

380
00:23:45,560 --> 00:23:48,400
podcast that, you know, I'm the 
first to admit that I move 

381
00:23:48,400 --> 00:23:50,920
really fast, most of the time 
too fast. 

382
00:23:50,920 --> 00:23:54,360
I like don't always like notice 
like the fine details because 

383
00:23:54,360 --> 00:23:57,240
I'm moving so fast and like, you
know, execution, execution, 

384
00:23:57,240 --> 00:24:02,360
execution. 
And I find like IAI generative 

385
00:24:02,440 --> 00:24:04,520
AI and I tend to use Chachi PT 
the most. 

386
00:24:04,800 --> 00:24:08,760
I find it to be extremely 
helpful to be aware of my blind 

387
00:24:08,760 --> 00:24:11,000
spots. 
Like what, what question am I 

388
00:24:11,000 --> 00:24:15,080
not asking? 
What, what am I missing about 

389
00:24:15,080 --> 00:24:18,680
this like really important topic
and whether it's for my podcast 

390
00:24:18,680 --> 00:24:21,280
or for work. 
I mean, it's, it just tends to 

391
00:24:21,280 --> 00:24:26,720
be to me like an additional 
brain, something that will allow

392
00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:31,600
me to think more or more deeply 
about something that I otherwise

393
00:24:31,600 --> 00:24:34,560
would probably miss unless I ask
someone else and hopefully they 

394
00:24:34,560 --> 00:24:36,520
wouldn't miss it. 
Yeah, yeah. 

395
00:24:37,040 --> 00:24:41,400
Yes, great topic. 
We can keep digging into this 

396
00:24:42,000 --> 00:24:46,360
and again, how it all ties back 
to that Ted talk. 

397
00:24:46,360 --> 00:24:53,320
I think that we can use and 
leverage the power of AI to also

398
00:24:53,320 --> 00:24:58,320
bring more human back into human
resources in the workplace 

399
00:24:58,520 --> 00:25:05,200
because our intentional usage 
each time, hopefully, each time,

400
00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:08,600
hopefully a transcript from your
podcast is getting put in the 

401
00:25:08,600 --> 00:25:11,640
training data. 
I hope it's getting smarter and 

402
00:25:11,640 --> 00:25:15,680
more more pro human. 
I hope all the thoughts. 

403
00:25:15,680 --> 00:25:17,800
That would be kind of cool. 
Yeah, I hope. 

404
00:25:17,840 --> 00:25:20,080
And actually, it makes me think 
of another question for you 

405
00:25:20,080 --> 00:25:25,800
here, which is, you know, when 
you think about AI and the 

406
00:25:25,800 --> 00:25:29,800
human, you know, let's say 
humanizing work more, humanizing

407
00:25:29,800 --> 00:25:34,400
the workplace more. 
Are there strategies that maybe 

408
00:25:34,800 --> 00:25:38,360
people who struggle with this, 
like people who really tend to 

409
00:25:38,360 --> 00:25:42,520
lose sight of the human element?
Are there strategies that you 

410
00:25:42,520 --> 00:25:46,040
would advise they take or follow
when it comes to using AI in 

411
00:25:46,040 --> 00:25:49,760
order to ensure that they're not
inadvertently dehumanizing? 

412
00:25:50,400 --> 00:26:01,400
Yeah, I, I think that one can be
more how you are using it for 

413
00:26:01,400 --> 00:26:03,960
coaching, right? 
Just being conscious about the 

414
00:26:03,960 --> 00:26:07,240
questions that you're asking 
and, and why, right. 

415
00:26:07,240 --> 00:26:11,000
And, and so back to the idea of 
not putting in anything that you

416
00:26:11,000 --> 00:26:13,560
wouldn't want to see on the 
front page of the newspaper, 

417
00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:18,360
just being cognizant of, of that
and how a lot of that data is 

418
00:26:18,360 --> 00:26:20,840
being used. 
We, we were, we were doing a 

419
00:26:20,840 --> 00:26:25,760
workshop on adaptive leadership 
at one of the big companies out 

420
00:26:25,760 --> 00:26:31,120
there that also has an AI 
product that may sit by your 

421
00:26:31,120 --> 00:26:37,320
side, we'll just call it that. 
And they too were thinking about

422
00:26:37,360 --> 00:26:40,360
and saying like we, we believe 
that Big Brother is always 

423
00:26:40,360 --> 00:26:43,280
watching our stuff that we're 
putting into here because we, we

424
00:26:43,280 --> 00:26:45,440
are the makers of this, of this 
tool. 

425
00:26:46,040 --> 00:26:49,560
And so I think just being 
conscious about that can maybe 

426
00:26:49,560 --> 00:26:53,560
keep some of it into check, 
especially because you have a, 

427
00:26:53,760 --> 00:26:57,320
you have another lens that your 
words might actually be 

428
00:26:57,320 --> 00:27:00,320
perpetuating a different world 
in the future that could have 

429
00:27:00,320 --> 00:27:02,640
ramifications beyond what you 
thought. 

430
00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:08,000
And then the other is maybe a 
very practical use of how you 

431
00:27:08,000 --> 00:27:12,840
can start to humanize your work 
a little bit more is to ask 

432
00:27:13,440 --> 00:27:18,960
whatever AI tool you're using, 
things like here's the e-mail 

433
00:27:18,960 --> 00:27:22,920
I'm about to send. 
How might this be received by 

434
00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:28,800
someone or ask empathy driven 
questions to give you feedback, 

435
00:27:29,040 --> 00:27:31,480
right. 
And, and I've this has helped 

436
00:27:31,480 --> 00:27:35,320
me, I'm sure send out some 
emails that were landed a lot 

437
00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:37,840
better than than the one. 
So you know, you know the old 

438
00:27:37,840 --> 00:27:40,760
thing in the past of like, write
your e-mail if you're mad and 

439
00:27:40,760 --> 00:27:43,200
then delete it, or write your 
e-mail if you're mad and then 

440
00:27:43,200 --> 00:27:45,320
leave it in your drafts for 24 
hours or exactly. 

441
00:27:46,040 --> 00:27:48,160
Yep. 
You could potentially also do 

442
00:27:48,160 --> 00:27:50,520
that here and say like, this is 
what I'm going to send. 

443
00:27:50,520 --> 00:27:54,520
How might this be received? 
Help me come up with a more 

444
00:27:54,520 --> 00:27:57,240
empathetic way to share this 
through AB or C. 

445
00:27:57,240 --> 00:27:59,240
Should I even send this e-mail? 
Right? 

446
00:27:59,240 --> 00:28:01,960
Like, there's different ways 
that you can, if you think about

447
00:28:01,960 --> 00:28:06,280
it from a coaching standpoint. 
Yeah, makes a lot of sense. 

448
00:28:06,720 --> 00:28:10,080
The other piece, I don't know if
you use this, but there is the 

449
00:28:10,080 --> 00:28:13,920
setting for instance. 
I also use ChatGPT as as my 

450
00:28:13,920 --> 00:28:16,440
primary one. 
There's a setting where you can 

451
00:28:16,440 --> 00:28:20,480
have almost like the master 
prompts in your settings and you

452
00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:25,720
can put in specific things like 
you could actually say if I am 

453
00:28:25,720 --> 00:28:29,920
referring to people in a 
dehumanizing way, call me out on

454
00:28:29,920 --> 00:28:34,400
it and you can put some of those
master prompts in there. 

455
00:28:35,120 --> 00:28:37,480
Oh, you. 
You're not. 

456
00:28:37,680 --> 00:28:40,760
Maybe you're not using this. 
Hey, well, we need to we, we 

457
00:28:40,760 --> 00:28:42,680
need to teach you. 
I know. 

458
00:28:42,680 --> 00:28:45,440
I feel like I know what you're 
talking about and I've probably 

459
00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:48,080
ignored it. 
That's OK. 

460
00:28:48,720 --> 00:28:53,280
If you go into, tell me. 
If you go into, I probably can't

461
00:28:53,280 --> 00:28:55,160
screen share, can I? 
But when I'm in chat, actually, 

462
00:28:55,760 --> 00:28:56,360
can I? 
Can I? 

463
00:28:56,440 --> 00:28:57,880
Let's see. 
Yeah, I think you can. 

464
00:28:57,920 --> 00:28:59,800
Do you see share and then 
screen? 

465
00:28:59,800 --> 00:29:02,280
Do. 
But now we're in it all. 

466
00:29:02,360 --> 00:29:04,520
We're in the thick of it. 
And you're gonna see it. 

467
00:29:04,840 --> 00:29:06,680
All of my. 
For those who are watching a 

468
00:29:06,680 --> 00:29:09,120
video, they're gonna really be 
in for it now. 

469
00:29:09,400 --> 00:29:11,200
And now you're gonna see all my 
search terms. 

470
00:29:11,200 --> 00:29:13,320
I don't even see what I have. 
That's really funny. 

471
00:29:14,640 --> 00:29:20,480
When I am over in the right here
and I go into customize ChatGPT,

472
00:29:21,080 --> 00:29:26,280
I can start to see things like 
what what should it call me? 

473
00:29:26,400 --> 00:29:31,120
What traits so I put treat me as
an expert, consider new 

474
00:29:31,120 --> 00:29:36,000
technologies, no moral lectures 
like list URLs. 

475
00:29:36,000 --> 00:29:40,040
At the end of your response, you
can add a number of these things

476
00:29:40,040 --> 00:29:45,800
in here to help you. 
So in there you could put 

477
00:29:45,800 --> 00:29:50,400
something like, if ever I am 
sounding dehumanizing, like call

478
00:29:50,400 --> 00:29:52,560
me out on it. 
Oh my gosh. 

479
00:29:52,560 --> 00:29:56,400
Well, listen, I first of all, I 
learned something new today. 

480
00:29:56,440 --> 00:29:58,600
Thank you. 
I can officially go home. 

481
00:29:58,600 --> 00:30:01,480
The day is over. 
You're not home or any Tracy. 

482
00:30:01,640 --> 00:30:03,080
Yeah. 
I'm home, I'm home. 

483
00:30:03,080 --> 00:30:04,800
I can just close my laptop and 
be done. 

484
00:30:05,120 --> 00:30:08,720
Thank you for that. 
Secondly, I think you probably 

485
00:30:08,720 --> 00:30:10,480
taught a lot of people something
new today. 

486
00:30:10,480 --> 00:30:13,400
So thank you for that. 
That's, I mean, first of all, 

487
00:30:13,400 --> 00:30:15,840
everyone learned hopefully 
something new before you shared 

488
00:30:15,840 --> 00:30:21,480
your screen, but now after 
really being able to see how we 

489
00:30:21,480 --> 00:30:26,680
can make this technology work 
for us in the best possible 

490
00:30:27,080 --> 00:30:31,000
humanly possible way. 
I mean, that's really cool. 

491
00:30:31,000 --> 00:30:32,760
Thank you for sharing that. 
You're welcome. 

492
00:30:33,400 --> 00:30:36,240
Amazing. 
Well, I don't know any better 

493
00:30:36,240 --> 00:30:40,040
way to leave this episode and 
conclude, but I all I know is 

494
00:30:40,040 --> 00:30:43,280
that I want to congratulate you 
again on your Ted talk. 

495
00:30:43,280 --> 00:30:46,480
I can't wait for it to come out.
Hopefully it'll be out by the 

496
00:30:46,480 --> 00:30:49,120
time this episode is. 
Otherwise, we will you. 

497
00:30:49,120 --> 00:30:53,200
We will keep all of the 
listeners totally, totally 

498
00:30:53,200 --> 00:30:56,200
informed and we'll get it shared
in the newsletter once it's out.

499
00:30:56,200 --> 00:30:59,480
I'm just so excited for you. 
I can't think of anyone better 

500
00:30:59,480 --> 00:31:01,760
to do a Ted Talk and any better 
topic. 

501
00:31:01,760 --> 00:31:04,120
I think it's awesome. 
That's sweet, and thank you so 

502
00:31:04,120 --> 00:31:07,240
much, Tracy. 
I appreciate your curiosity and 

503
00:31:07,640 --> 00:31:11,080
obviously for showing up every 
week and putting out great 

504
00:31:11,080 --> 00:31:14,440
content like this to keep 
bringing even more humanity back

505
00:31:14,440 --> 00:31:16,280
into the workplace. 
So thank you for your work. 

506
00:31:16,520 --> 00:31:19,160
Oh my gosh, thank you so much. 
It is truly my pleasure. 

507
00:31:19,160 --> 00:31:23,040
And with that, I will remind 
everyone that Joshua's links and

508
00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:26,600
everything that you might need 
in order to connect or learn 

509
00:31:26,600 --> 00:31:29,720
more about Iconic or Joshua in 
general are in the show notes. 

510
00:31:29,720 --> 00:31:32,560
So please click along and don't 
forget to rate, review and 

511
00:31:32,560 --> 00:31:34,760
subscribe. 
Joshua, thank you so much again.

512
00:31:34,760 --> 00:31:36,800
Second episode in the books that
just means you have to come 

513
00:31:36,800 --> 00:31:40,600
back. #3 there's a special 
jacket, some swag. 

514
00:31:40,680 --> 00:31:43,000
Exactly. 
Ooh, that'll be fine. 

515
00:31:43,000 --> 00:31:45,800
Don't tell me with a good time. 
I love swag. 

516
00:31:46,560 --> 00:31:48,080
Amazing. 
Thank you so much. 

517
00:31:48,760 --> 00:31:49,520
Thanks, Tracy. 
Hey. 

518
00:31:49,600 --> 00:31:52,560
Just before you go, don't forget
to subscribe to the show so 

519
00:31:52,560 --> 00:31:54,000
that. 
You are the 1st to hear. 

520
00:31:54,000 --> 00:31:57,480
When an episode drops each week 
and maybe leave a five star 

521
00:31:57,480 --> 00:32:00,080
review and a comment about how 
much you love this episode. 

522
00:32:00,280 --> 00:32:02,880
Plus, if you have someone in 
mind who would really enjoy this

523
00:32:02,880 --> 00:32:04,480
episode, make sure you share it 
with them. 

524
00:32:04,600 --> 00:32:07,440
Thank you so much for tuning in 
and I'll see you next week.

