1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,280
HR isn't just about policies and
payroll, it's about people. 

2
00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:06,120
But when our tools are clunky 
and disconnected, it's hard to 

3
00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:07,760
stay focused on what matters 
most. 

4
00:00:07,760 --> 00:00:10,320
And I think we can all agree 
that people matter most. 

5
00:00:10,320 --> 00:00:12,920
That's why we listen to my 
podcast in the 1st place, I 

6
00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:15,600
hope. 
And this is ultimately why I'm 

7
00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,560
super excited to tell you about 
Intuit QuickBooks Payroll. 

8
00:00:18,840 --> 00:00:21,920
QuickBooks Payroll isn't just 
for accounting and it will 

9
00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:25,320
totally help you manage it all. 
QuickBooks Payroll brings 

10
00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:28,280
everything together. 
Payroll, time tracking, HR, and 

11
00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:30,280
accounting all in one seamless 
platform. 

12
00:00:30,520 --> 00:00:33,640
That way you can spend less time
chasing data and more time 

13
00:00:33,640 --> 00:00:36,440
supporting your team, all 
without switching systems or 

14
00:00:36,440 --> 00:00:39,160
adding complexity to your 
already complex job. 

15
00:00:39,160 --> 00:00:40,920
Let's be frank, your jobs are 
complex. 

16
00:00:41,160 --> 00:00:44,600
We all know this and I have to 
tell you, someone in my family 

17
00:00:44,760 --> 00:00:48,240
has their own business and uses 
QuickBooks Payroll and they love

18
00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:51,960
it because it integrates with 
everything they have, you know, 

19
00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:54,320
ultimately within the 
integration, AI and automation 

20
00:00:54,320 --> 00:00:57,760
handle all of the heavy lifting,
but it's connection for payroll 

21
00:00:57,920 --> 00:01:00,880
time and accounting helps them 
to understand their full 

22
00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:03,880
financial picture. 
So they love it and they swear 

23
00:01:03,880 --> 00:01:05,920
by it. 
So This is why I'm also really 

24
00:01:05,920 --> 00:01:07,920
excited to tell you about it 
because I know someone who uses 

25
00:01:07,920 --> 00:01:10,440
it. 
So make sure you have a system 

26
00:01:10,440 --> 00:01:13,160
that works for you so that you 
can show up fully for your 

27
00:01:13,160 --> 00:01:15,360
people as we all commit to 
doing. 

28
00:01:15,680 --> 00:01:18,320
Discover how QuickBooks Payroll 
can help you today. 

29
00:01:18,440 --> 00:01:21,520
Learn more by going to 
quickbooks.com/payroll. 

30
00:01:21,520 --> 00:01:25,240
That's quickbooks.com/payroll. 
Welcome to the Bringing the 

31
00:01:25,240 --> 00:01:27,240
human back to human Resources 
podcast. 

32
00:01:27,560 --> 00:01:30,400
I'm Tracy Chernoff and I've 
spent my entire professional 

33
00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:34,120
career in HR Each week we'll 
explore the delicate balance 

34
00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:37,680
between people and business with
the aim to reconnect the two and

35
00:01:37,680 --> 00:01:40,880
create meaningful outcomes. 
Listen in as I share my own 

36
00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:44,680
experiences, challenge the 
status quo, and chat with guests

37
00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:47,720
from various industries about 
our mission to bring the human 

38
00:01:47,720 --> 00:01:50,360
back to human resources. 
Hi everyone, welcome back to the

39
00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:52,480
Bringing the human back to human
Resources podcast. 

40
00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:57,640
We are coming at you live sort 
of not really with our last. 

41
00:01:57,640 --> 00:01:59,800
I think it's our last. 
Maybe I should check actually 

42
00:01:59,800 --> 00:02:03,080
before I commit to this, but I 
think it's our last Policy Pulse

43
00:02:03,400 --> 00:02:07,520
episode of 2025. 
No, it totally is. 

44
00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:10,000
I just checked. 
I am not incorrect. 

45
00:02:10,320 --> 00:02:12,800
It's crazy. 
I think we've done so many of 

46
00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:16,520
these, maybe like six of these 
or so over the last 6 or so 

47
00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:19,240
months since we started these 
Policy Pulse segments. 

48
00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:22,040
And I we've gotten a lot of 
great feedback. 

49
00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:25,400
I certainly have seen a ton of 
comments around these segments. 

50
00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:28,000
So I'm glad everyone's enjoying 
them and we will continue them 

51
00:02:28,200 --> 00:02:32,440
in 2026 as well. 
But as a reminder, Brian 

52
00:02:32,440 --> 00:02:36,720
Driscoll is my Co host on these 
segments and he is an attorney 

53
00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:42,520
and helps us to navigate all of 
these very interesting moments 

54
00:02:42,520 --> 00:02:46,440
in time where things change or 
may change and we need to know 

55
00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:48,920
as HR leaders how we navigate 
those changes. 

56
00:02:48,920 --> 00:02:54,160
So for this November episode of 
the Policy Pulse and last of 

57
00:02:54,160 --> 00:02:59,560
2025, we're going to start off 
with this, this first topic, 

58
00:02:59,560 --> 00:03:03,960
which is that there is a new 
EEOC chair, Andrea Lucas. 

59
00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:06,440
She was sworn in last week. 
So by the time we're recording 

60
00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:09,360
this, it actually is last week 
because, well, two weeks by the 

61
00:03:09,360 --> 00:03:11,000
time this launches, I guess two 
weeks ago. 

62
00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:15,560
And the agency's ability. 
Yeah, exactly. 

63
00:03:15,560 --> 00:03:16,320
Perfect. 
Thank you. 

64
00:03:17,440 --> 00:03:20,120
So the agency's ability to take 
action is now restored. 

65
00:03:20,440 --> 00:03:24,200
Lucas, who is an appointee by 
President Trump, has built her 

66
00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:28,520
career questioning corporate DEI
initiatives and emphasizing race

67
00:03:28,520 --> 00:03:31,800
and sex neutral enforcement. 
That means we're likely heading 

68
00:03:31,800 --> 00:03:35,000
into a period where the EEOC 
reinterprets long standing 

69
00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:38,120
protections in ways that 
rollback progress made under the

70
00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:41,440
Biden administration. 
Brian, I know that there are a 

71
00:03:41,440 --> 00:03:44,840
number of things that could 
potentially change with this new

72
00:03:45,960 --> 00:03:50,040
appointing of Andrea Lucas, but 
do you mind walking us through 

73
00:03:50,040 --> 00:03:51,280
what those potential changes 
are? 

74
00:03:52,200 --> 00:03:54,920
Yeah, sure. 
And I think just to restate what

75
00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:58,680
you just said one more time for 
everybody, it is potential. 

76
00:03:58,680 --> 00:04:00,920
None of this is none of this is 
actual yet. 

77
00:04:01,640 --> 00:04:05,640
These are just things that we 
will most likely see in some 

78
00:04:05,640 --> 00:04:09,280
way, shape or form. 
So big picture, we're we're 

79
00:04:09,280 --> 00:04:12,840
going to see continued rollback 
of DEI. 

80
00:04:13,640 --> 00:04:18,399
We're expecting to see a lot of 
guidance from the EEOC about 

81
00:04:18,399 --> 00:04:21,720
rules treating some diversity 
efforts as possible 

82
00:04:21,720 --> 00:04:28,240
discrimination against against 
majority, majority employees. 

83
00:04:28,560 --> 00:04:32,760
So that means that, and this is 
advice that I think we've been 

84
00:04:32,760 --> 00:04:36,920
giving every time we've talked 
about DEI programs this year, is

85
00:04:36,920 --> 00:04:41,440
that you need to make sure that 
your DEI programs are not quota 

86
00:04:41,440 --> 00:04:46,040
based, they're not preferential.
You need to audit your programs.

87
00:04:46,040 --> 00:04:47,960
This doesn't mean that you can't
have DEI programs, you 

88
00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:50,960
absolutely can. 
But what it means is that you 

89
00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:54,120
need to take some steps to audit
those programs and make sure 

90
00:04:54,120 --> 00:04:56,680
that you're going to be 
compliant with some of these 

91
00:04:56,680 --> 00:04:58,640
rollbacks that we're most likely
going to see. 

92
00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:04,360
Another one that I definitely 
think is unfortunately going to 

93
00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:10,800
be on the, on the audit block 
for the new EEOC is the Pregnant

94
00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:15,240
Workers Fairness Act. 
We're probably going to see 

95
00:05:15,240 --> 00:05:19,920
rollbacks of protected leave for
that essentially for for people 

96
00:05:19,920 --> 00:05:21,720
who aren't intimately familiar 
with it. 

97
00:05:21,720 --> 00:05:24,360
The easiest way to sum up the 
the Pregnant Workers Fairness 

98
00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:30,840
Act is that it provides ADA like
benefits and rights to pregnant 

99
00:05:30,840 --> 00:05:33,280
workers. 
That's the simplest way to to 

100
00:05:33,280 --> 00:05:36,400
make that comparison. 
So what does HR need to do if 

101
00:05:36,400 --> 00:05:38,360
this happens? 
Or in anticipation of this? 

102
00:05:39,120 --> 00:05:42,640
Simply as with everything, 
monitor closely. 

103
00:05:43,200 --> 00:05:47,440
These accommodation policies may
need to be rewritten if the 

104
00:05:47,440 --> 00:05:52,440
Pregnant Workers Fairness Act is
rolled back in any fashion. 

105
00:05:52,800 --> 00:05:55,280
I think this one is going to be 
a challenge for a lot of 

106
00:05:55,280 --> 00:06:00,000
employers to to handle correctly
and they're going to have some 

107
00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:02,400
pushback from employees. 
So you may need to create your 

108
00:06:02,400 --> 00:06:05,760
own internal programs to sort of
counteract some of the rollbacks

109
00:06:05,760 --> 00:06:09,080
we see at the federal level. 
Well, we're also expecting to. 

110
00:06:09,080 --> 00:06:11,600
See, I have actually have a 
question about that too. 

111
00:06:15,120 --> 00:06:19,880
Is there, I mean, I think there 
is, but is there protection 

112
00:06:19,880 --> 00:06:27,480
under the ADA for pregnancy 
already or is the the the impact

113
00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:30,280
that the pregnant, the pregnant 
Workers Fairness Act also 

114
00:06:30,280 --> 00:06:34,200
includes like abortion related 
leaves that the ADA might not 

115
00:06:34,360 --> 00:06:36,560
necessarily the pregnant? 
That's exactly right. 

116
00:06:36,560 --> 00:06:41,080
The so the ADA provides for job 
protected leave. 

117
00:06:41,080 --> 00:06:45,840
So if you're out on leave, your 
your job is is protected. 

118
00:06:45,840 --> 00:06:49,320
The Pregnant Workers Fairness 
Act also like you said, provides

119
00:06:49,320 --> 00:06:54,640
for some expanded benefits, 
expanded protections around 

120
00:06:54,640 --> 00:06:58,200
abortion related leave. 
So you can take leave for a 

121
00:06:58,200 --> 00:07:02,720
couple of days to go to go have 
a procedure if, if you need to, 

122
00:07:03,320 --> 00:07:06,560
to recover from that procedure. 
That is, that is protected under

123
00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:11,800
the Pregnant Workers Fairness 
Act, which will probably go away

124
00:07:11,920 --> 00:07:14,720
under under this new EEOC 
leadership. 

125
00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:18,960
Now, that's not to say audit 
that states that have similar 

126
00:07:18,960 --> 00:07:21,760
laws and we'll talk about this. 
This is another theme that you 

127
00:07:21,760 --> 00:07:25,760
and I have talked about a lot in
these in these segments is that 

128
00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:32,160
states have some pregnant 
workers acts of their own on the

129
00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:36,720
books or have different laws 
that protect pregnant workers or

130
00:07:36,720 --> 00:07:39,040
for abortion related leave. 
So if you're in one of those 

131
00:07:39,040 --> 00:07:41,720
states, you have to pay 
attention to those state laws. 

132
00:07:41,720 --> 00:07:44,680
The general rule of thumb is you
always go with the stricter, the

133
00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:47,440
stricter law. 
So if there, if the federal law 

134
00:07:47,440 --> 00:07:50,120
doesn't, if there's no federal 
law saying anything about 

135
00:07:50,120 --> 00:07:54,240
protection for pregnant workers,
but you are in California and 

136
00:07:54,240 --> 00:07:57,160
there is a law saying that you 
have protection for pregnant 

137
00:07:57,160 --> 00:07:59,000
workers, then you need to follow
that California law. 

138
00:08:00,440 --> 00:08:02,800
Got it. 
And then another question I'm 

139
00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:07,800
curious about if let's say a 
woman does go and, and have an 

140
00:08:07,800 --> 00:08:14,200
abortion or similar procedure, 
they in theory don't have to 

141
00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:17,320
even disclose that that's what 
they're going to receive from 

142
00:08:17,320 --> 00:08:21,200
their, their, you know, to that 
when they communicate to their 

143
00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:23,880
employer, could they 
potentially, let's say it's 

144
00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:27,400
rolled, rolled back rather than,
you know, cuz I think people 

145
00:08:27,400 --> 00:08:29,880
generally kind of like freak out
when these things happen, 

146
00:08:29,960 --> 00:08:32,679
Rightfully so. 
They're, it's concerning when 

147
00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:36,440
something that you have is then 
taken away, or I should say have

148
00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:39,400
access to, is taken away. 
But let's say for all intents 

149
00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:43,120
and purposes, it's rolled back 
and someone does have an 

150
00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:45,840
abortion. 
Could they just receive a 

151
00:08:45,840 --> 00:08:49,680
doctor's note saying that they 
need time off from work because 

152
00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:52,800
of a medical procedure or a 
procedure, not give any 

153
00:08:52,800 --> 00:08:56,200
information and still have 
coverage at least? 

154
00:08:56,320 --> 00:08:58,840
But I guess maybe it would 
depend on the state and the 

155
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:02,480
company specifics around, like 
what's covered. 

156
00:09:02,480 --> 00:09:07,840
But in most cases, when you have
something that's like a personal

157
00:09:07,840 --> 00:09:09,680
procedure, you could always use 
sick time. 

158
00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:11,840
I don't know. 
I'm just thinking of like other 

159
00:09:12,280 --> 00:09:16,080
ways that someone could still 
have the coverage that they need

160
00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,920
without needing to disclose, you
know, what they're getting done.

161
00:09:21,280 --> 00:09:23,160
Yeah, you're right. 
There are other options. 

162
00:09:23,160 --> 00:09:25,520
You know, you can use sick days,
you can use PTO. 

163
00:09:26,320 --> 00:09:29,040
The whole point of of the 
Pregnant Workers Fairness Act is

164
00:09:29,040 --> 00:09:31,280
so that you don't have to tap 
into these. 

165
00:09:31,800 --> 00:09:34,800
This other. 
Time off bucket, Yeah, in 

166
00:09:34,960 --> 00:09:38,920
theory, yes, you you could do 
some of those things that you 

167
00:09:38,920 --> 00:09:41,360
mentioned. 
I do think that's a really 

168
00:09:41,360 --> 00:09:44,280
interesting question because I 
do think we will see some things

169
00:09:44,280 --> 00:09:49,880
like that, especially in some 
really red states that are 

170
00:09:49,880 --> 00:09:55,040
already sort of putting the 
hammer down on, on abortion 

171
00:09:55,120 --> 00:10:00,160
care, abortion procedures, even 
out of their state borders. 

172
00:10:00,960 --> 00:10:05,400
So I think that's going to be an
interesting, an interesting 

173
00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:09,280
legal battle honestly, that that
will probably happen if, if 

174
00:10:09,280 --> 00:10:13,240
these, if the Pregnant Workers 
Fairness Act is, is rolled back.

175
00:10:13,240 --> 00:10:15,240
I, I think that that is 
absolutely something we could 

176
00:10:15,240 --> 00:10:21,960
see and I think that that 
employers need to understand 

177
00:10:22,000 --> 00:10:26,480
sort of where the line is on 
what they can request from 

178
00:10:26,480 --> 00:10:27,760
employees. 
Exactly. 

179
00:10:27,760 --> 00:10:30,200
To your point, if someone needs 
to go and get an abortion, do 

180
00:10:30,200 --> 00:10:33,000
they have to say, I'm taking 
three days off to go get an 

181
00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:35,120
abortion? 
No, they don't. 

182
00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:40,240
So like employers need to sort 
of understand where that line is

183
00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:42,920
on how much they they can 
request documentation, sure, but

184
00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:45,200
what can it be? 
It can. 

185
00:10:45,200 --> 00:10:48,560
It can in some cases simply be a
one line note from the doctor 

186
00:10:48,560 --> 00:10:51,920
saying that your employee was 
out for these three days due to 

187
00:10:51,960 --> 00:10:55,160
a medical procedure. 
Right. 

188
00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:57,200
Anyway, continue. 
Thank you. 

189
00:10:57,200 --> 00:10:59,400
I asked you a bunch of questions
related to that. 

190
00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:03,640
No, I think, I, I think it's 
important to, to discuss these 

191
00:11:03,640 --> 00:11:06,080
things because it, it, there, 
there is a lot of nuance to all 

192
00:11:06,080 --> 00:11:09,280
of these things and the EOC. 
Yeah, yeah, for sure. 

193
00:11:09,280 --> 00:11:13,960
Often not great at giving real 
specific guidance to to some of 

194
00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:16,800
these topics. 
So the next thing on on the list

195
00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:21,000
of of potential rollbacks that 
we could see are religious and 

196
00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:24,560
gender identity conflicts. 
I'm expecting that we will 

197
00:11:24,560 --> 00:11:28,080
probably see some stronger 
protections for employees 

198
00:11:28,080 --> 00:11:30,800
reciting citing religious 
objections. 

199
00:11:32,080 --> 00:11:35,840
We'll probably see narrow, 
narrower interpretations of 

200
00:11:35,840 --> 00:11:40,600
gender identity and possible new
rules around bathroom use 

201
00:11:41,120 --> 00:11:45,400
pronoun use. 
It it's, it's going to be 

202
00:11:45,520 --> 00:11:49,760
another one of those contentious
issues that I think we'll see. 

203
00:11:49,760 --> 00:11:53,560
And I think, you know, the kind 
of a theme with all of these 

204
00:11:53,560 --> 00:11:56,160
things. 
I, I think with this new EEOC 

205
00:11:56,160 --> 00:12:00,560
leadership and, and with some 
unprecedented terminations of, 

206
00:12:00,680 --> 00:12:04,600
of some other EEOC members 
earlier this year, I think we're

207
00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:10,680
going to see the EEOC turn into 
more of a, more of a, a, a, a 

208
00:12:10,680 --> 00:12:13,880
policy body instead of an 
investigatory body. 

209
00:12:13,880 --> 00:12:17,520
I think we're going to see fewer
investigations, broadly 

210
00:12:17,520 --> 00:12:19,000
speaking. 
I think we're going to see more 

211
00:12:19,000 --> 00:12:23,040
targeted investigations, 
religious and gender identity 

212
00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:25,560
being being one of those 
potential categories. 

213
00:12:28,680 --> 00:12:31,200
Yeah, I I can. 
I could see that too. 

214
00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:35,000
I mean, it's interesting, it all
comes back to that one segment 

215
00:12:35,000 --> 00:12:37,440
that we did where we talked 
about the whiplash of being in 

216
00:12:37,600 --> 00:12:40,120
HR that, you know, every every 
four years. 

217
00:12:40,120 --> 00:12:43,040
And even within those four 
years, we're like back and forth

218
00:12:43,040 --> 00:12:45,760
and back and forth. 
And you know, how do we, how do 

219
00:12:45,760 --> 00:12:50,920
we adjust and, and adapt? 
And also, I think to your point,

220
00:12:50,920 --> 00:12:55,880
too, that depending on the state
protection, some of this, you 

221
00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:59,720
know, might not really have as 
much of an impact, like for 

222
00:12:59,960 --> 00:13:03,360
people like me in New York, 
where they're pretty strong 

223
00:13:03,880 --> 00:13:09,680
protections for workers. 
But it's definitely, definitely 

224
00:13:09,680 --> 00:13:12,520
interesting and we'll have to 
continue to watch, especially as

225
00:13:12,520 --> 00:13:15,600
we go into 2026. 
Absolutely. 

226
00:13:15,640 --> 00:13:18,880
And I think that I think that 
we'll see sort of related to the

227
00:13:18,880 --> 00:13:21,000
religious and gender identity. 
I think we'll also see some 

228
00:13:21,280 --> 00:13:23,920
reverse discrimination 
enforcement. 

229
00:13:24,520 --> 00:13:28,080
I think they're the EEOC going 
to the sort of targeted 

230
00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:29,760
investigation comment that I 
just made. 

231
00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:34,080
I think we'll see the EEOC give 
give new weight to claims of of 

232
00:13:34,080 --> 00:13:38,640
alleged reverse discrimination 
and, and I think I think we'll 

233
00:13:38,640 --> 00:13:42,480
see some of that as well. 
Yeah, should be interesting to 

234
00:13:42,480 --> 00:13:45,880
see. 
I don't, I guess I'm, I'm 

235
00:13:45,880 --> 00:13:49,360
holding my breath or maybe I'm 
not, am I? 

236
00:13:49,600 --> 00:13:51,440
I don't know if I'm holding my 
breath actually. 

237
00:13:51,440 --> 00:13:55,560
I have no idea what I'm doing. 
All I know is that it'll be 

238
00:13:55,560 --> 00:13:58,080
it'll be interesting to see how 
things shake out. 

239
00:13:58,080 --> 00:14:00,920
And then, you know, I feel like 
also with these like 

240
00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:05,560
governmental changes, like it 
takes so long for changes to 

241
00:14:05,800 --> 00:14:09,560
generally speaking, actually be 
executed on that. 

242
00:14:09,560 --> 00:14:13,920
Sometimes it's like there's, it 
feels like sometimes there's all

243
00:14:13,920 --> 00:14:17,640
of this commotion that's created
because of the, you know, like 

244
00:14:17,840 --> 00:14:23,040
huge, like polarizing changes. 
And then it's like the changes 

245
00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:27,120
made for a year and then you go 
back, you know, and then there's

246
00:14:27,120 --> 00:14:30,280
the whiplash again. 
So maybe I am holding my breath,

247
00:14:30,920 --> 00:14:33,240
maybe I'm not. 
I don't know what I'm doing, 

248
00:14:33,240 --> 00:14:36,760
like I said. 
I, I, I think at least speaking 

249
00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:38,760
for myself, I think I'm 
definitely holding my breath on 

250
00:14:38,760 --> 00:14:44,240
some of these things because it,
it not only is there like to 

251
00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:47,200
your point about, you know, once
you have a right, it's really 

252
00:14:47,200 --> 00:14:50,440
hard to, to live without that, 
right? 

253
00:14:51,360 --> 00:14:54,320
And I think we're, we're seeing 
that, you know, we saw that with

254
00:14:54,320 --> 00:14:56,240
the overturning of Roe a few 
years ago. 

255
00:14:57,080 --> 00:14:59,960
And, and we're seeing that in, 
in different states that are 

256
00:14:59,960 --> 00:15:05,440
trying to go even further. 
I, I think that that that's sort

257
00:15:05,440 --> 00:15:08,280
of the collective breath holding
at the moment is like, what's 

258
00:15:08,280 --> 00:15:10,280
next? 
What other rights am I going to 

259
00:15:10,280 --> 00:15:14,880
lose? 
And so I, yeah. 

260
00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:17,400
And I think to your point of the
whiplash, I think that's, that's

261
00:15:17,400 --> 00:15:21,840
part of it. 
Like it is, it's chaotic, all of

262
00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:25,160
this. 
I mean, HR has never been, well,

263
00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:26,920
I don't want to speak in 
absolutes. 

264
00:15:27,000 --> 00:15:31,640
HR has rarely been a stable 
environment. 

265
00:15:31,640 --> 00:15:34,320
You've always, you're always 
dealing with something that's 

266
00:15:34,320 --> 00:15:38,360
coming up. 
But this seems like more chaos 

267
00:15:38,360 --> 00:15:40,440
than normal. 
This seems like it's just 

268
00:15:40,440 --> 00:15:44,160
constant whiplash, constant head
spinning of like, where are we 

269
00:15:44,160 --> 00:15:45,520
going now? 
What am I doing? 

270
00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:49,480
And I think in some states, like
you said, New York, Illinois, 

271
00:15:49,760 --> 00:15:53,600
California, Washington, a few 
others, they are creating some 

272
00:15:53,600 --> 00:15:57,040
of that stability in the absence
of that stability from the 

273
00:15:57,040 --> 00:16:00,280
federal government. 
Totally, totally. 

274
00:16:00,800 --> 00:16:06,200
Yeah, I guess we'll see then. 
And this is a, there is no great

275
00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:09,120
way, way to segue into the 
second topic, as you know. 

276
00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:13,520
But because like what? 
What is the segue? 

277
00:16:13,520 --> 00:16:18,000
But I'll let everyone know that 
it has to do with a really 

278
00:16:18,280 --> 00:16:23,960
strange, bizarre ability. 
It like lack of ability for 

279
00:16:23,960 --> 00:16:25,600
someone to think critically, I 
would say. 

280
00:16:25,880 --> 00:16:29,520
And so rather than introduce the
title, I'm just going to read 

281
00:16:29,520 --> 00:16:33,760
through what we've got here. 
So an employee, I think in 

282
00:16:33,760 --> 00:16:37,040
Texas, actually, if I am 
recalling what I quickly looked 

283
00:16:37,040 --> 00:16:41,040
up just before an employee 
thought it would be hilarious to

284
00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:44,440
show up to the office Halloween 
party dressed as a suicide 

285
00:16:44,440 --> 00:16:47,200
bomber and was shocked when he 
got fired. 

286
00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:51,320
See, there is no great way to 
segue into that sentence other 

287
00:16:51,320 --> 00:16:54,760
than what the heck was this 
person thinking on so many 

288
00:16:54,760 --> 00:16:59,080
levels, which Ryan and I did 
definitely have some discourse 

289
00:16:59,080 --> 00:17:00,680
around this before we started 
recording. 

290
00:17:01,680 --> 00:17:05,599
And so this person's reaction 
tells you everything, or the 

291
00:17:05,599 --> 00:17:08,400
reaction in general, I should 
say, tells you everything about 

292
00:17:08,400 --> 00:17:11,079
the company's culture. 
Somehow this employee thought 

293
00:17:11,079 --> 00:17:15,480
that that costume would be OK at
this particular company or at 

294
00:17:15,480 --> 00:17:16,920
least then no one would call him
out. 

295
00:17:17,680 --> 00:17:21,839
And that is the problem that so 
many of us has have seen many 

296
00:17:21,839 --> 00:17:25,640
times, certainly Brian and I. 
And what happens here is not 

297
00:17:25,640 --> 00:17:27,640
just that one person makes a bad
choice. 

298
00:17:27,640 --> 00:17:31,160
The bigger issue for HR is 
having other employees wondering

299
00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:32,800
if they're going to do anything 
about it. 

300
00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:38,040
That what a wonderful way to to 
sum that up, Brian, by the way, 

301
00:17:38,040 --> 00:17:41,360
because it is true. 
It puts, you know, naturally 

302
00:17:41,360 --> 00:17:45,080
this is, I think if everyone 
should realize why this is not 

303
00:17:45,080 --> 00:17:51,120
OK, but there is or I should 
say, and there is so much 

304
00:17:51,120 --> 00:17:57,120
pressure that's put on HR and 
leadership to do something when 

305
00:17:57,120 --> 00:17:58,920
someone has done something 
wrong. 

306
00:17:59,280 --> 00:18:03,480
And that pressure, I think we 
can all, we, we can all probably

307
00:18:03,480 --> 00:18:05,680
feel that we know exactly what 
that feels like. 

308
00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:08,080
Oh my gosh, now I need to 
respond. 

309
00:18:08,280 --> 00:18:10,520
What does the company response 
look like? 

310
00:18:10,800 --> 00:18:12,840
Is it strong enough? 
Is it not strong enough? 

311
00:18:12,840 --> 00:18:15,000
Do we fire someone? 
Do we not fire someone? 

312
00:18:15,960 --> 00:18:19,640
And you know, you know, that 
that I think is it's not a 

313
00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:22,160
conundrum. 
It's not nuanced because 

314
00:18:22,160 --> 00:18:26,200
there's, there's, there's some, 
some things I think were good 

315
00:18:26,200 --> 00:18:29,960
and bad or right and wrong or 
very black and white like this. 

316
00:18:32,040 --> 00:18:36,080
And yet based on what we just 
talked about that this company 

317
00:18:36,080 --> 00:18:41,760
culture is kind of seen in this 
person's decision, I would 

318
00:18:41,760 --> 00:18:45,760
imagine maybe for them there was
more discussion than maybe for 

319
00:18:45,760 --> 00:18:49,040
others or what would have been 
present for others. 

320
00:18:49,040 --> 00:18:52,680
So Brian, I'm going to pass to 
you, why, why are we talking 

321
00:18:52,680 --> 00:18:55,240
about this today? 
Why does this matter for all of 

322
00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:59,800
us in HRI? 
Think I will, I will say one 

323
00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:04,560
thing that sort of sums up kind 
of kind of the, the whole topic 

324
00:19:04,560 --> 00:19:06,520
and the whole reason I think 
we're, we're talking about this.

325
00:19:06,880 --> 00:19:13,120
And that is the way you respond 
or don't respond when someone 

326
00:19:13,120 --> 00:19:15,280
crosses a line in your 
organization. 

327
00:19:16,200 --> 00:19:19,760
That is your culture. 
Your response or lack of 

328
00:19:19,760 --> 00:19:23,560
response is your culture. 
You can say everything you want.

329
00:19:23,880 --> 00:19:26,520
You can have all the 
motivational posters you want. 

330
00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:28,960
You can have all the pizza 
parties that people scoff at. 

331
00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:33,120
That's not culture. 
This is your culture. 

332
00:19:34,840 --> 00:19:37,080
And so that's that I think is 
the point that that really 

333
00:19:37,080 --> 00:19:42,000
matters to HR. 
I mean, look, every every 

334
00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:45,200
offensive costume for Halloween 
parties, every offensive joke, 

335
00:19:46,080 --> 00:19:50,720
every, every situation that goes
up to the line that pushes the 

336
00:19:50,720 --> 00:19:53,680
line that crosses the line is is
just that. 

337
00:19:53,680 --> 00:19:58,200
It's just bad culture. 
I don't I don't think it's H Rs 

338
00:19:58,200 --> 00:20:02,480
job to police people's taste. 
I don't think the dressing up as

339
00:20:02,480 --> 00:20:04,640
a suicide bomber is anyone's 
taste. 

340
00:20:05,400 --> 00:20:10,800
I think it's just wrong. 
But I think it's it it is H Rs 

341
00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:12,760
job to make sure everybody knows
where the boundaries are. 

342
00:20:13,520 --> 00:20:16,720
And sure, I would make the 
argument that dressing up as a 

343
00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:19,480
suicide bomber is probably not a
boundary you need to 

344
00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:22,800
specifically address. 
It should be. 

345
00:20:23,720 --> 00:20:27,000
It should be. 
Common sense that this is across

346
00:20:27,000 --> 00:20:30,480
the line. 
Apparently in some cases it's 

347
00:20:30,480 --> 00:20:34,000
not. 
But you can't build a respectful

348
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:35,600
workplace. 
And more importantly, you can't 

349
00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:38,360
build a safe workplace. 
A workplace where people feel 

350
00:20:38,360 --> 00:20:42,760
free to be themselves, to be 
open, to be honest, to be 

351
00:20:42,760 --> 00:20:45,320
transparent, and to show up and 
do the work you need them to do.

352
00:20:45,680 --> 00:20:48,320
If you keep hiring people that 
don't respect the values that 

353
00:20:48,320 --> 00:20:51,760
you say you have and if you 
don't do anything about it when 

354
00:20:51,760 --> 00:20:58,440
they cross that line. 1010% more
than 1010%. 

355
00:20:58,680 --> 00:21:02,600
I agree with you on every single
point that you made and it makes

356
00:21:02,600 --> 00:21:06,280
me think about those God 
forsaken anti harassment 

357
00:21:06,280 --> 00:21:10,240
training videos, which by the 
way, I have AI have a very 

358
00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:14,200
specific pet peeve when people 
say harassment training, we are 

359
00:21:14,200 --> 00:21:16,880
not training people on how to 
harass. 

360
00:21:17,040 --> 00:21:20,040
We are training people on how 
not to harass. 

361
00:21:20,320 --> 00:21:23,080
You know, so like I make a 
really distinct point. 

362
00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:26,320
It's anti harassment, anti 
sexual harassment. 

363
00:21:26,640 --> 00:21:29,360
Like I, I don't know, I kind of 
like die inside a little bit 

364
00:21:29,360 --> 00:21:32,040
when someone's like, I haven't 
taken my sexual harassment 

365
00:21:32,040 --> 00:21:34,080
training yet. 
I'm like, good, we would. 

366
00:21:34,080 --> 00:21:36,880
That's not what we want. 
Anyway, I digress. 

367
00:21:37,040 --> 00:21:40,160
My point here is that those 
videos, which they are very 

368
00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:43,920
corny and they're like really 
mocked up and the actors are 

369
00:21:43,920 --> 00:21:49,200
like, Brian touched my shoulder 
and I didn't appreciate it and 

370
00:21:49,200 --> 00:21:52,480
quid pro quo, quid pro quo and 
all that stuff, right? 

371
00:21:52,920 --> 00:21:58,560
But this is actually a really 
great example of how important 

372
00:21:59,480 --> 00:22:03,160
it is to take the information 
from an anti harassment training

373
00:22:03,240 --> 00:22:08,680
for example, and understand why 
when a leader doesn't do 

374
00:22:08,680 --> 00:22:10,040
something. 
Because so much of those 

375
00:22:10,040 --> 00:22:14,560
training videos are about what 
like what the manager's response

376
00:22:14,560 --> 00:22:18,160
is supposed to be in order to be
complying with the law, let 

377
00:22:18,160 --> 00:22:22,640
alone doing the right thing. 
That that is what allows you to 

378
00:22:22,640 --> 00:22:25,760
see something as insane as this 
example. 

379
00:22:26,440 --> 00:22:31,800
And understanding that this is 
like this is the why that to 

380
00:22:31,800 --> 00:22:37,400
your point, when HR other 
leaders are not, or maybe it's 

381
00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:39,360
not that they're not doing 
something, but that they're 

382
00:22:39,360 --> 00:22:43,920
tolerating bad behaviors or they
allow or maybe even enable 

383
00:22:44,840 --> 00:22:50,120
things that end up becoming part
of the culture like this, that 

384
00:22:50,200 --> 00:22:53,080
all of this boils up into this 
bigger issue. 

385
00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:57,920
And so no matter how corny those
anti harassment training videos 

386
00:22:57,920 --> 00:23:01,440
are, they're telling a very 
specific story that you as a 

387
00:23:01,440 --> 00:23:06,880
leader have a responsibility to 
not only the that particular 

388
00:23:06,880 --> 00:23:11,640
employee or group of employees, 
also to the company to say this 

389
00:23:11,640 --> 00:23:16,200
is right and this is wrong. 
And I think, you know, for this 

390
00:23:16,200 --> 00:23:21,200
person who was shocked that he 
got fired, like that does tell a

391
00:23:21,200 --> 00:23:24,960
very specific story about this 
company that other people have 

392
00:23:24,960 --> 00:23:29,840
probably done similar, maybe 
worse, maybe better things that 

393
00:23:29,840 --> 00:23:34,400
are obviously not correct and 
not appropriate and frankly 

394
00:23:34,400 --> 00:23:37,960
disgusting that have been just, 
you know, allowed. 

395
00:23:37,960 --> 00:23:43,320
And there haven't been any, you 
know, consequences as a result 

396
00:23:43,320 --> 00:23:46,880
of those actions or behaviors. 
So it to me, it's all related. 

397
00:23:46,880 --> 00:23:50,120
And frankly, someone could 
easily say that this person 

398
00:23:50,120 --> 00:23:53,080
created a hostile work 
environment because maybe they 

399
00:23:53,080 --> 00:23:56,480
have a family member who who 
died at the hands of a suicide 

400
00:23:56,480 --> 00:24:00,320
bomber, or maybe they just found
the costume to be in such poor 

401
00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:02,680
taste that they felt 
uncomfortable like that. 

402
00:24:02,760 --> 00:24:07,320
All of these things are so 
related to the, to, to what we 

403
00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:11,680
hope leaders are walking away 
with an understanding of. 

404
00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:15,760
But I, I think you're absolutely
right that there is a, an 

405
00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:18,400
indication of culture here. 
And there's certainly an 

406
00:24:18,400 --> 00:24:21,720
indication of lack of critical 
thinking on part of the, the 

407
00:24:21,720 --> 00:24:24,960
employee. 
But it does, it definitely does 

408
00:24:24,960 --> 00:24:28,760
bring back around that we have 
so many responsibilities not 

409
00:24:28,760 --> 00:24:32,560
only as employers, but also as 
leaders or HR leaders. 

410
00:24:34,040 --> 00:24:35,120
Yeah. 
And I think you bring up a great

411
00:24:35,120 --> 00:24:37,600
point about training too, 
because one of the things that 

412
00:24:37,600 --> 00:24:41,800
I've always done with with 
clients is to make sure that we 

413
00:24:41,800 --> 00:24:45,080
have two trainings. 
We have an anti harassment 

414
00:24:45,080 --> 00:24:48,520
training for the whole company, 
but then we also have one 

415
00:24:48,520 --> 00:24:51,960
specifically for managers. 
And to your point that goes into

416
00:24:51,960 --> 00:24:54,560
what do you do? 
Because these types of things 

417
00:24:54,560 --> 00:24:56,640
will come up. 
So what do you do? 

418
00:24:57,040 --> 00:25:00,800
Sure, you can, you can learn 
about the anti harassment 

419
00:25:00,800 --> 00:25:04,840
procedures and like what might 
cross a line, what's illegal. 

420
00:25:05,840 --> 00:25:08,560
And now to be clear, some states
are actually starting to require

421
00:25:09,040 --> 00:25:12,240
these two sets of trainings, 
which is great so that managers 

422
00:25:12,240 --> 00:25:15,320
know what to do and how to 
handle these situations. 

423
00:25:16,720 --> 00:25:20,200
But that's the it's, it's 
crucial that managers are given 

424
00:25:20,200 --> 00:25:25,000
the tools to not only spot these
things because a lot of times 

425
00:25:25,000 --> 00:25:27,680
employees won't come to you with
a complaint. 

426
00:25:28,120 --> 00:25:32,160
They'll just quit. 
They'll go take a new job and 

427
00:25:32,160 --> 00:25:35,480
you'll, you'll never know why. 
So it's important for managers 

428
00:25:35,680 --> 00:25:38,280
to not only be able to field 
those complaints when they do 

429
00:25:38,280 --> 00:25:43,080
come, but also spot these issues
on their own and take 

430
00:25:43,080 --> 00:25:48,600
appropriate action based on 
based on what's what's, what 

431
00:25:48,600 --> 00:25:51,400
they're seeing, what their 
culture is, what's important, 

432
00:25:51,400 --> 00:25:54,160
and of course what, what they 
need to do in order to to remain

433
00:25:54,160 --> 00:25:57,120
compliant. 
Totally. 

434
00:25:57,120 --> 00:26:01,120
And you know, I've, when I think
back on some experiences that 

435
00:26:01,120 --> 00:26:08,520
I've had in my career now over 
10 years long, I have seen 

436
00:26:08,640 --> 00:26:13,000
companies that are really 
decisive and allow HR leaders to

437
00:26:13,000 --> 00:26:16,080
be really decisive and say, hey,
this is not OK. 

438
00:26:16,080 --> 00:26:19,160
We don't tolerate this. 
This is not who we are and this 

439
00:26:19,160 --> 00:26:20,680
is the action we're going to 
take. 

440
00:26:21,080 --> 00:26:24,120
And I have unfortunately seen 
companies who are like, well, 

441
00:26:24,120 --> 00:26:27,200
you know, there's some Gray area
here. 

442
00:26:27,200 --> 00:26:32,160
And IT places a little bit of 
difficulty on part of the, you 

443
00:26:32,160 --> 00:26:35,840
know, on to the HR leader to 
assert the right thing. 

444
00:26:36,160 --> 00:26:40,480
And I think that that is, it can
be a very challenging place to 

445
00:26:40,720 --> 00:26:45,600
to work in, meaning not like 
work environment, although I'm 

446
00:26:45,600 --> 00:26:49,320
sure that those environments are
not so easy to work in either. 

447
00:26:49,640 --> 00:26:52,960
But when I think about like an 
HR leader and the nuance that's 

448
00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:57,960
already there for being in this 
role, that is, you know, kind of

449
00:26:58,960 --> 00:27:02,120
duel in that you're an employee 
and you're asserting company 

450
00:27:02,120 --> 00:27:05,560
direction. 
And so like, if the company or 

451
00:27:05,640 --> 00:27:11,560
you know, senior leaders don't 
give you the autonomy and the 

452
00:27:11,560 --> 00:27:16,080
rain to say this is how we 
address these types of issues 

453
00:27:16,080 --> 00:27:19,160
because they are issues and we 
don't tolerate them, that it 

454
00:27:19,160 --> 00:27:22,200
makes it just so much more 
difficult to actually assert the

455
00:27:22,200 --> 00:27:25,840
right thing, which is where I 
think that you know, it, there's

456
00:27:25,840 --> 00:27:30,680
an impact here for HR leaders 
and non HR leaders. 

457
00:27:31,040 --> 00:27:34,280
And for example, with this 
employee, like did that person's

458
00:27:34,280 --> 00:27:38,880
boss like tolerate a bunch of 
crazy stuff from this employee 

459
00:27:38,880 --> 00:27:42,400
before that then, you know, 
again, made them feel that this 

460
00:27:42,400 --> 00:27:45,000
was totally appropriate to come 
to work in this costume? 

461
00:27:45,400 --> 00:27:48,920
It's just, it's a little bit 
mind boggling, but I know that 

462
00:27:48,920 --> 00:27:52,600
it exists out there, you know, 
and it makes it hard. 

463
00:27:52,600 --> 00:27:56,120
It makes it hard for for people 
who want to do the right thing 

464
00:27:56,120 --> 00:27:58,560
to do the right thing and say, 
no, this is not how what we 

465
00:27:58,560 --> 00:28:01,000
tolerate. 
But you do still have to assert 

466
00:28:01,000 --> 00:28:05,400
yourself naturally if you know 
that the right thing is one way 

467
00:28:05,720 --> 00:28:09,080
versus the other. 
And I think that's a, that's an 

468
00:28:09,080 --> 00:28:12,640
extremely important point 
because often HR is sort of in 

469
00:28:12,640 --> 00:28:15,280
that. 
What's the analogy? 

470
00:28:15,800 --> 00:28:20,160
HR is some often times like the 
senior staff to the president, 

471
00:28:20,600 --> 00:28:25,160
where they have to be able to 
tell truth to power, where 

472
00:28:25,160 --> 00:28:31,760
sometimes you have to be able to
go in that room and say, I'm, 

473
00:28:31,760 --> 00:28:35,080
I'm going to make this more 
blunt than than normal, what you

474
00:28:35,080 --> 00:28:36,400
normally would in this 
situation. 

475
00:28:36,400 --> 00:28:37,920
But like, I need you to stop 
doing this. 

476
00:28:38,280 --> 00:28:42,920
I need you to act differently. 
If, if the leaders or if the 

477
00:28:42,920 --> 00:28:48,600
CEO, the owner, whatever is 
acting in such a way that could 

478
00:28:48,600 --> 00:28:51,800
be considered encouragement of 
this type of behavior. 

479
00:28:52,320 --> 00:28:55,160
Because all it's doing is making
your job as an HR professional 

480
00:28:55,560 --> 00:29:00,160
just that much more difficult 
and undermining you because 

481
00:29:00,160 --> 00:29:03,160
you're, you're, you know, you're
saying these things and you're, 

482
00:29:03,240 --> 00:29:05,880
you're talking about these 
policies and procedures and 

483
00:29:05,960 --> 00:29:10,680
compliance and leaders are by 
their own actions, sort of 

484
00:29:11,240 --> 00:29:14,960
counteracting that. 
And, and that isn't in, it's a 

485
00:29:14,960 --> 00:29:18,760
nearly impossible place for, for
HR people to be, especially HR 

486
00:29:18,760 --> 00:29:21,360
teams of one, because you've 
got, you've got nobody to, to 

487
00:29:22,400 --> 00:29:24,200
talk to. 
You've got nobody to help you. 

488
00:29:25,320 --> 00:29:28,200
And I think that again, that 
that's a challenging spot for HR

489
00:29:28,200 --> 00:29:30,840
because HR is often seen, 
especially in smaller 

490
00:29:30,840 --> 00:29:34,720
businesses, as sort of a speed 
bump to growth, as a as an 

491
00:29:34,720 --> 00:29:37,160
unnecessary thing in in a 
company. 

492
00:29:38,160 --> 00:29:40,960
And so leaders often times 
already have that viewpoint. 

493
00:29:40,960 --> 00:29:43,160
They already have that sort of 
bias in their heads. 

494
00:29:44,320 --> 00:29:46,280
And so if HR is going to tell 
them to stop doing something 

495
00:29:46,280 --> 00:29:48,880
that would change their 
behavior, who the hell are you 

496
00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:50,760
to tell? 
I don't even want you Like what?

497
00:29:51,040 --> 00:29:52,920
Why? 
Why should I listen to you about

498
00:29:52,920 --> 00:29:55,240
about what you want? 
Yeah. 

499
00:29:56,080 --> 00:29:58,640
So, yeah, I think that that's a 
great point because it's often 

500
00:29:58,640 --> 00:30:04,560
times HRHR can often times feel 
like a siloed department. 

501
00:30:04,560 --> 00:30:09,160
Even if you do have a, you know,
a team with you and it's 

502
00:30:09,160 --> 00:30:12,080
challenging to be able to stand 
up to the owner of the company, 

503
00:30:12,080 --> 00:30:15,320
to ACEO and say you're 
encouraging this type of 

504
00:30:15,320 --> 00:30:17,000
behavior. 
This is why it keeps happening. 

505
00:30:18,920 --> 00:30:24,080
It is it is hard to do and it's 
so important to do it, which is 

506
00:30:24,080 --> 00:30:28,520
why like not everyone is meant 
to be in like an HR business 

507
00:30:28,520 --> 00:30:32,320
partner type of role. 
Because if you don't have a loud

508
00:30:32,320 --> 00:30:35,640
voice or if you don't feel 
comfortable asserting your own 

509
00:30:35,640 --> 00:30:44,280
opinion, which can't relate, 
frankly, then that's just not 

510
00:30:44,280 --> 00:30:46,160
the path for you. 
And that's totally OK. 

511
00:30:46,520 --> 00:30:52,040
But I like, I've met HR, you 
know, I have eight former HR 

512
00:30:52,040 --> 00:30:55,720
colleagues and who are like, I 
never, ever, ever want to be on 

513
00:30:55,720 --> 00:30:57,960
the business partner track 
because I don't want to deal 

514
00:30:57,960 --> 00:31:00,200
with employee relations. 
I don't want to have to assert 

515
00:31:00,200 --> 00:31:02,840
my opinion. 
I just want to get the job done 

516
00:31:02,840 --> 00:31:05,960
and know exactly, you know, like
run some reports, analyze and 

517
00:31:05,960 --> 00:31:07,160
whatever. 
And that's totally OK. 

518
00:31:07,800 --> 00:31:11,040
But I think self-awareness is 
really important in a lot of 

519
00:31:11,040 --> 00:31:13,520
these roles because you do have 
to have some pretty difficult 

520
00:31:13,520 --> 00:31:17,560
conversations, especially as you
scale and grow and scale and 

521
00:31:17,560 --> 00:31:21,040
scope. 
But yeah, so if, if you're like,

522
00:31:21,040 --> 00:31:25,840
oh God, I hate telling someone 
what I think or I, you know, I, 

523
00:31:25,880 --> 00:31:29,320
it makes me nervous to tell 
someone who is higher ranked 

524
00:31:29,320 --> 00:31:32,320
than me that they're doing 
something wrong, then definitely

525
00:31:32,320 --> 00:31:36,760
reconsider the business partner 
track because it just might not 

526
00:31:36,760 --> 00:31:40,400
be the right one for you because
inevitably you're in a situation

527
00:31:40,400 --> 00:31:43,200
where you have to do that. 
Absolutely. 

528
00:31:43,200 --> 00:31:46,320
At some time or another, you're 
gonna have a tough conversation 

529
00:31:46,320 --> 00:31:48,320
with an employee, you're gonna 
have a tough conversation with a

530
00:31:48,320 --> 00:31:50,600
manager, you're gonna have a 
tough conversation with the CEO.

531
00:31:51,280 --> 00:31:53,840
It's gonna happen. 
Yeah. 

532
00:31:53,840 --> 00:31:57,560
And certainly for teams of 1, to
your point, I mean that I 

533
00:31:57,560 --> 00:32:01,200
remember one time I interviewed 
for a job, this is a long time 

534
00:32:01,200 --> 00:32:06,080
ago and it was like party of one
HR role in a luxury company that

535
00:32:06,080 --> 00:32:08,360
was like, you know, fashion 
company that was like building. 

536
00:32:08,800 --> 00:32:13,160
And I was like it wasn't the 
being the party of one that I 

537
00:32:13,160 --> 00:32:14,960
didn't like. 
It was that I had to do payroll 

538
00:32:14,960 --> 00:32:16,960
that I didn't want to do, and 
that's why I didn't take the 

539
00:32:16,960 --> 00:32:19,520
job. 
But other people, they're like, 

540
00:32:19,600 --> 00:32:22,800
oh, yeah, payroll, totally cool.
But when you're a party of one, 

541
00:32:22,800 --> 00:32:24,680
it's your point. 
You have no one to bounce these 

542
00:32:24,680 --> 00:32:26,720
things off of unless you have a 
really strong network of 

543
00:32:26,920 --> 00:32:29,560
colleagues around you in other 
companies. 

544
00:32:29,840 --> 00:32:32,880
But even still, it's like you 
have to, you have to be like 

545
00:32:32,880 --> 00:32:37,200
really concerted in your efforts
and like really strong in your 

546
00:32:37,200 --> 00:32:39,680
beliefs around like the right 
thing to do. 

547
00:32:39,680 --> 00:32:41,720
You have to have strong best 
practices. 

548
00:32:41,920 --> 00:32:48,080
It's tough, a very tough 
position to be in, to be totally

549
00:32:48,080 --> 00:32:51,680
alone in a department that 
generally is, you know, 

550
00:32:51,760 --> 00:32:54,160
overlooked for its importance. 
It is. 

551
00:32:54,240 --> 00:32:57,400
Yeah, it is. 
And, and it's stressful and 

552
00:32:57,400 --> 00:33:00,680
exhausting because you've always
got to be on, you've always got 

553
00:33:00,680 --> 00:33:03,200
to be ready for the next thing. 
You've always got to be ready 

554
00:33:03,200 --> 00:33:05,280
for the next question, the 
compliance question. 

555
00:33:06,400 --> 00:33:09,480
And, and yeah, it's it, it's 
tough. 

556
00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:12,480
It is, it is tough. 
I I definitely, definitely 

557
00:33:12,480 --> 00:33:14,320
empathize with people in in that
position. 

558
00:33:14,320 --> 00:33:15,800
I've been in it myself years 
ago. 

559
00:33:15,800 --> 00:33:19,920
It's it's tough. 
Yeah, totally. 

560
00:33:21,160 --> 00:33:26,160
And to close us out this in this
segment and for the this week, 

561
00:33:26,160 --> 00:33:28,480
but also the last of 2025, can't
believe it. 

562
00:33:29,440 --> 00:33:31,480
I know that I'm going to pass to
you, Brian, because I know you 

563
00:33:31,480 --> 00:33:36,360
have had a ton of questions that
you get each and every week that

564
00:33:36,640 --> 00:33:39,560
I think could be a good 
opportunity for us to talk 

565
00:33:39,560 --> 00:33:42,120
about. 
Yeah, one of the questions that 

566
00:33:42,120 --> 00:33:45,760
I get sort of in, in different 
forms, and I'm beginning this 

567
00:33:45,760 --> 00:33:49,880
one for a while, but it seems to
be ramping up in the last couple

568
00:33:49,880 --> 00:33:52,960
of months. 
And it's it, it revolves around 

569
00:33:54,120 --> 00:33:58,360
essentially companies asking me 
how do we convince our employees

570
00:33:58,360 --> 00:34:02,000
to come back to the office? 
And if you have to convince them

571
00:34:02,040 --> 00:34:04,560
you've, you've already lost, 
you've lost their trust, you've 

572
00:34:04,560 --> 00:34:08,239
lost the, the, the whole point 
of bringing them back into the 

573
00:34:08,239 --> 00:34:13,080
office. 
And, and I think, at least in my

574
00:34:13,080 --> 00:34:16,600
opinion and in my experience, 
the reason that I say that is 

575
00:34:16,600 --> 00:34:21,639
because employees see it as just
nothing more than control. 

576
00:34:21,960 --> 00:34:25,280
If the only reason to bring 
people back to the office is 

577
00:34:25,280 --> 00:34:29,440
because leadership likes seeing 
people in their seats, then 

578
00:34:29,440 --> 00:34:33,320
you're making very clear, very 
transparent that you simply do 

579
00:34:33,320 --> 00:34:37,000
not trust your team. 
If you want people to come back 

580
00:34:37,000 --> 00:34:38,600
in the office, give them a 
genuine reason. 

581
00:34:38,600 --> 00:34:40,840
Give them a legitimate business 
reason, something that makes 

582
00:34:40,840 --> 00:34:43,760
sense, something that that, that
they can latch onto, something 

583
00:34:43,760 --> 00:34:49,159
that they can trust is, is, is a
true and honest reason. 

584
00:34:50,920 --> 00:34:54,639
There are many reasons why being
in office makes sense. 

585
00:34:54,639 --> 00:34:56,880
There are many reasons why being
remote makes sense. 

586
00:34:56,880 --> 00:34:58,760
There are many reasons why 
hybrid makes sense. 

587
00:34:58,760 --> 00:35:00,320
And there are cons to all of 
those as well. 

588
00:35:01,840 --> 00:35:04,040
If you want people back in the 
office because collaboration is 

589
00:35:04,040 --> 00:35:06,800
dropped, or new employees aren't
getting the mentorship that they

590
00:35:06,800 --> 00:35:10,240
need, or customer experience has
taken a hit, those are 

591
00:35:10,240 --> 00:35:12,680
legitimate reasons to want to 
bring people together. 

592
00:35:12,680 --> 00:35:15,360
Doesn't mean you need people in 
the office five days a week. 

593
00:35:15,560 --> 00:35:18,200
Probably not. 
Can you go with some hybrid 

594
00:35:18,200 --> 00:35:19,120
thing? 
Sure. 

595
00:35:19,320 --> 00:35:22,000
But have that transparent 
discussion with your employees. 

596
00:35:22,200 --> 00:35:26,320
If you can't explain why being 
in the office matters, employees

597
00:35:26,320 --> 00:35:30,840
will simply treat it like 
another compliance exercise to 

598
00:35:30,840 --> 00:35:34,320
show up, do the bare minimum and
count the hours until they can 

599
00:35:34,320 --> 00:35:41,480
leave. 
I think that that for HR, if 

600
00:35:41,480 --> 00:35:45,240
you're, if you're being asked to
send out another Slack message, 

601
00:35:45,240 --> 00:35:48,120
another e-mail that says 
everyone must be in the office 

602
00:35:48,120 --> 00:35:50,280
three days a week, everybody 
must be in the office five days 

603
00:35:50,280 --> 00:35:52,480
a week. 
You should ask yourself or as a 

604
00:35:52,480 --> 00:35:55,120
leader in a company to ask 
yourself one question. 

605
00:35:55,400 --> 00:35:59,520
Would I come in for that reason?
If the answer is no, then go 

606
00:35:59,520 --> 00:36:02,080
back and find a better reason. 
Don't make one up. 

607
00:36:02,560 --> 00:36:06,800
I'm not saying make one up, but 
go back and find a legitimate 

608
00:36:06,800 --> 00:36:10,920
business reason, a genuine 
reason that people will believe 

609
00:36:10,920 --> 00:36:15,600
and understand and stand behind 
for why you want people to come 

610
00:36:15,600 --> 00:36:17,880
back into the office. 
I think that's that. 

611
00:36:18,840 --> 00:36:21,360
Like I said, in some way shape 
or form, one of the most 

612
00:36:21,360 --> 00:36:23,400
frequent questions I've been 
getting the last the last few 

613
00:36:23,400 --> 00:36:26,400
months. 
Yeah, I'm not surprised that 

614
00:36:26,400 --> 00:36:30,000
this question comes up because 
it it's an important topic. 

615
00:36:30,000 --> 00:36:35,280
And frankly, I have gone on 
record probably 1001 times on my

616
00:36:35,280 --> 00:36:38,200
podcast saying I will never go 
back in the office. 

617
00:36:38,520 --> 00:36:42,240
No one could ever make me 
because I love being remote and 

618
00:36:42,240 --> 00:36:44,080
it offers me a lot of 
flexibility. 

619
00:36:44,600 --> 00:36:47,440
And yet as much as I say that, 
I'm also like, well, if a 

620
00:36:47,440 --> 00:36:51,520
company said to me, OK, well, 
you know, we need you in one day

621
00:36:51,520 --> 00:36:55,480
a week, we can, you know, you 
can figure out what that day 

622
00:36:55,480 --> 00:36:57,040
looks like. 
Like I wouldn't be opposed. 

623
00:36:57,200 --> 00:37:00,080
But I think to this, to this 
end, as you mentioned about 

624
00:37:00,080 --> 00:37:05,160
control, that is that would be 
the key for me that I need to 

625
00:37:05,160 --> 00:37:07,560
have control over my life and my
schedule. 

626
00:37:07,960 --> 00:37:12,040
And maybe you'd even get another
day out of me if, if you, if you

627
00:37:12,040 --> 00:37:13,680
gave me that type of 
flexibility. 

628
00:37:14,080 --> 00:37:18,360
And I don't think that I'm this 
anomaly to the to in this 

629
00:37:18,360 --> 00:37:20,440
regard. 
I think most people, we 

630
00:37:20,440 --> 00:37:23,120
certainly this see this with 
Gen. 

631
00:37:23,120 --> 00:37:28,800
Z and, and probably later 
generations too, that people 

632
00:37:28,800 --> 00:37:31,760
want the ultimate flexibility. 
They want to have the option to 

633
00:37:31,760 --> 00:37:34,000
be in the office. 
So they want there to be space, 

634
00:37:34,400 --> 00:37:37,160
but they also don't want to be 
told when to come in. 

635
00:37:37,800 --> 00:37:41,480
And I think that's where when 
you again, when you say, Hey, we

636
00:37:41,480 --> 00:37:45,600
have this office space, we want 
people to use it one day a week 

637
00:37:45,600 --> 00:37:47,480
minimum, figure out what that 
day is. 

638
00:37:47,760 --> 00:37:50,720
People probably would go in more
frequently than if they were 

639
00:37:50,720 --> 00:37:55,040
told you need to have your butts
in your seats three days a week.

640
00:37:55,800 --> 00:37:59,880
Because who wants to be told 
what to do after 5-4 or five 

641
00:37:59,880 --> 00:38:03,640
years of successfully working 
remotely and where most 

642
00:38:03,640 --> 00:38:06,960
businesses have made a 
tremendous amount of money, more

643
00:38:07,280 --> 00:38:11,680
than they did prior to COVID. 
And I think that is the issue. 

644
00:38:11,680 --> 00:38:14,720
And frankly, I, I think 
companies need to remember that 

645
00:38:14,720 --> 00:38:18,880
they did not, they did not hire 
dummies like they're, they hired

646
00:38:18,880 --> 00:38:22,600
people who have their wits about
them, with the exception of the 

647
00:38:22,600 --> 00:38:24,720
guy who was fired for the 
costume that he wore. 

648
00:38:26,000 --> 00:38:30,240
He's he's the exception here. 
And you know, they're, they're 

649
00:38:30,240 --> 00:38:32,880
going to be able to put those 
things together that they were 

650
00:38:32,880 --> 00:38:36,920
successfully working and 
executing while remote. 

651
00:38:36,920 --> 00:38:38,760
Why can they not continue to do 
that? 

652
00:38:39,120 --> 00:38:42,760
And so, yeah, to your point, 
it's there's a trust issue now 

653
00:38:43,200 --> 00:38:46,720
and that's not great. 
There is and I think to your 

654
00:38:46,720 --> 00:38:50,480
point about about control, I 
think it's it goes back to the 

655
00:38:50,480 --> 00:38:55,120
discussion about rights. 
This is a a the flexibility, the

656
00:38:55,120 --> 00:38:59,480
control over your own time is a 
right that employees have become

657
00:38:59,480 --> 00:39:02,840
accustomed to. 
And employers, some employers 

658
00:39:02,840 --> 00:39:04,640
are trying to take that right 
away. 

659
00:39:04,960 --> 00:39:08,320
And I think that is part of the 
issue that it's mandating that 

660
00:39:08,320 --> 00:39:12,200
employees come back to the 
office, not requesting or 

661
00:39:12,200 --> 00:39:15,920
opening a line of communication 
about some sort of hybrid 

662
00:39:15,920 --> 00:39:18,040
environment. 
There's certainly reasons why 

663
00:39:18,520 --> 00:39:20,280
people might not want to come 
back to the office. 

664
00:39:20,280 --> 00:39:23,080
Maybe they've moved, they've 
they, you know, it's now a 2 

665
00:39:23,080 --> 00:39:24,680
hour commute each way. 
They're not doing that. 

666
00:39:24,680 --> 00:39:26,440
That makes sense. 
They've moved across the country

667
00:39:26,520 --> 00:39:31,080
makes sense. 
But if, if the whole point is to

668
00:39:31,080 --> 00:39:36,760
bring people into the office for
a legitimate good reason, then 

669
00:39:36,760 --> 00:39:38,800
there's a way to find a 
compromise. 

670
00:39:38,840 --> 00:39:42,000
There's a way to find that 
common ground where employees 

671
00:39:42,000 --> 00:39:46,040
can still retain that right of 
flexibility, that right of 

672
00:39:46,040 --> 00:39:49,760
control over their their time. 
I mean, look at it this way. 

673
00:39:50,440 --> 00:39:53,680
Sure, a lot of this is sleeping 
time, but there's 168 hours in 

674
00:39:53,680 --> 00:39:57,720
a, in a work week, right? 
And there in a week, there's 40 

675
00:39:57,880 --> 00:39:59,040
that your employer gets from 
you. 

676
00:39:59,800 --> 00:40:02,960
Some employers require more, you
know, but 40 traditionally, 

677
00:40:02,960 --> 00:40:06,240
right? 
So that's less than than half. 

678
00:40:06,480 --> 00:40:10,000
Why should my employer dictate 
what I do? 

679
00:40:10,440 --> 00:40:14,200
For essentially the entirety of 
those hours, not just the four. 

680
00:40:14,200 --> 00:40:17,440
Of that. 
And I think that that's, that's 

681
00:40:17,440 --> 00:40:20,080
something I've I've heard from 
employees and, and from 

682
00:40:20,440 --> 00:40:22,360
individuals making career 
transitions. 

683
00:40:22,680 --> 00:40:27,240
They're doing it for for those 
types of reasons that it's their

684
00:40:27,240 --> 00:40:32,440
employer is trying to take back 
the control over essentially the

685
00:40:32,440 --> 00:40:35,240
way they see it over their 
private time, their private 

686
00:40:35,240 --> 00:40:39,440
hours. 
I think that's a great point. 

687
00:40:39,440 --> 00:40:42,840
I never thought of things that 
way, but I think I mean, I guess

688
00:40:42,840 --> 00:40:45,320
we'll continue to see how things
evolve. 

689
00:40:45,320 --> 00:40:49,600
I mean, certainly the job market
and the landscape in that regard

690
00:40:49,600 --> 00:40:52,920
has changed quite a bit. 
At least from where I stand, it 

691
00:40:52,920 --> 00:40:57,680
seems that it has. 
And I think that companies, you 

692
00:40:57,680 --> 00:41:00,240
know, it doesn't matter that 
there are people on 

693
00:41:00,240 --> 00:41:05,640
unemployment, companies are 
always in a deficit of talent 

694
00:41:05,840 --> 00:41:10,160
always, because unless you have,
unless it's, you know, a family 

695
00:41:10,160 --> 00:41:13,080
run business where you're not 
hiring people on the outside and

696
00:41:13,080 --> 00:41:16,240
you always have, you know, 100% 
attrition. 

697
00:41:16,240 --> 00:41:18,600
And some companies do have, you 
know, close to that. 

698
00:41:19,480 --> 00:41:23,840
It doesn't pay for companies to 
do something that then risks 

699
00:41:23,920 --> 00:41:27,920
their their attrition rates or 
their tenure rates. 

700
00:41:27,920 --> 00:41:31,320
Like, don't you want to figure 
out what is going to engage your

701
00:41:31,320 --> 00:41:35,720
people the most so that you can 
retain them and elevate your 

702
00:41:35,720 --> 00:41:39,200
tenure and keep people around 
and continue to do great 

703
00:41:39,200 --> 00:41:43,160
business? 
Like, to me, that's really just 

704
00:41:43,200 --> 00:41:46,800
so intrinsic in the way that I 
think that it's like, Oh yeah, 

705
00:41:47,120 --> 00:41:48,680
this makes sense. 
People want flexibility. 

706
00:41:48,680 --> 00:41:51,360
Let's give them flexibility 
because that keeps them happy 

707
00:41:51,760 --> 00:41:55,440
and it ensures better retention.
But not everyone thinks that 

708
00:41:55,440 --> 00:42:00,240
way, especially when there is a 
concern from someone at a 

709
00:42:00,240 --> 00:42:02,440
leadership level that people are
not doing what they're supposed 

710
00:42:02,440 --> 00:42:04,560
to be doing. 
But maybe that person is just 

711
00:42:04,560 --> 00:42:05,960
projecting. 
I don't know, Like, are you 

712
00:42:05,960 --> 00:42:08,320
doing what you're supposed to be
doing if you think that others 

713
00:42:08,320 --> 00:42:09,920
are not doing what they're 
supposed to be doing? 

714
00:42:09,920 --> 00:42:14,280
Just saying, I don't know. 
But anyway, Brian, thank you so 

715
00:42:14,280 --> 00:42:19,560
much for your time on this 
segment and in general for 

716
00:42:19,560 --> 00:42:23,200
helping, first of all, for being
a part of these segments, but 

717
00:42:23,200 --> 00:42:29,120
also helping kick off what has 
become a very exciting part of 

718
00:42:29,120 --> 00:42:32,480
the podcast menu, so to speak 
every month. 

719
00:42:33,280 --> 00:42:36,720
And so really appreciate it. 
I think all the listeners have a

720
00:42:36,720 --> 00:42:41,280
lot to look forward to in 2026. 
And there probably hopefully 

721
00:42:41,280 --> 00:42:46,200
will be some, some cream. 
I said some ice cream, Supreme 

722
00:42:46,200 --> 00:42:50,800
Court decisions, that ice cream 
on the brain, Supreme Court 

723
00:42:50,800 --> 00:42:56,800
decisions that we can hopefully 
talk about in 2026 that again, 

724
00:42:56,800 --> 00:42:58,440
adding to the whiplash. 
But that's OK, OK. 

725
00:42:58,440 --> 00:43:01,080
This is part of our job. 
So thank you so much, really 

726
00:43:01,080 --> 00:43:03,880
appreciate it. 
And all of your information, of 

727
00:43:03,880 --> 00:43:05,720
course, is in the show notes for
everyone to connect with you. 

728
00:43:07,080 --> 00:43:08,560
Thank you, Tracy. 
Really appreciate it. 

729
00:43:08,560 --> 00:43:11,040
Looking forward to talking about
some of those Supreme Court 

730
00:43:11,040 --> 00:43:12,920
cases, I think, and maybe some 
ice cream too. 

731
00:43:13,400 --> 00:43:14,800
Maybe we. 
Could and maybe some ice cream. 

732
00:43:14,800 --> 00:43:17,120
Yeah. 
Yeah, right. 

733
00:43:17,920 --> 00:43:18,960
I love it. 
Awesome. 

734
00:43:18,960 --> 00:43:22,800
See you next year. 
Hey, just before you go, don't 

735
00:43:22,800 --> 00:43:25,560
forget to subscribe to the show 
so that you are the first to 

736
00:43:25,560 --> 00:43:29,320
hear when an episode drops each 
week and maybe leave a five star

737
00:43:29,320 --> 00:43:31,920
review and a comment about how 
much you loved this episode. 

738
00:43:32,080 --> 00:43:34,720
Plus, if you have someone in 
mind who would really enjoy this

739
00:43:34,720 --> 00:43:36,360
episode, make sure you share it 
with them. 

740
00:43:36,440 --> 00:43:39,280
Thank you so much for tuning in 
and I'll see you next week.

