1
00:00:00,400 --> 00:00:04,080
Arguing was always followed by 
silence when I was growing up. 

2
00:00:04,360 --> 00:00:08,680
Hours, days, weeks, months when 
I then became an adult. 

3
00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:13,040
In fact, the reason I'm no 
contact now is because I simply 

4
00:00:13,040 --> 00:00:16,400
asked her not to do something 
very, very small. 

5
00:00:16,640 --> 00:00:21,520
And how dare I? 
My raising something that upset 

6
00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:25,480
me, or indeed the other way 
around, was either met with 

7
00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:29,720
attack or LED with it. 
Conflict wasn't about 

8
00:00:29,720 --> 00:00:32,759
resolution, it was about 
destruction of me. 

9
00:00:32,759 --> 00:00:35,560
Specifically, it was an 
opportunity for my mother to 

10
00:00:35,560 --> 00:00:38,880
risk her dominance, her control,
her priority in my life. 

11
00:00:39,120 --> 00:00:43,840
From the moment I was born until
I went no contact, I learned 

12
00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:47,440
that resolution was based on me 
saying sorry, not on trying to 

13
00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:52,000
understand what had happened and
why, and that nothing but Kate 

14
00:00:52,000 --> 00:00:56,280
Payne came from it. 
I learned that conflict was loud

15
00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:59,360
and angry and belittling and 
shaming and critical and quite 

16
00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:04,200
honestly, an excuse to spew 
hatred at me on a foundation of 

17
00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:09,400
something so minor that it often
got lost within seconds of the 

18
00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:12,440
opening gambit. 
I mean, why wouldn't I be 

19
00:01:12,440 --> 00:01:15,640
considered inherently evil, 
given I'd forgotten to put the 

20
00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:18,960
new loo on their holder and I 
wasn't supposed to argue back, 

21
00:01:18,960 --> 00:01:21,440
God forbid, or have a voice or 
an opinion. 

22
00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:25,280
And once it was over, I was 
supposed to pretend it had never

23
00:01:25,280 --> 00:01:29,560
happened and never raise how she
spoke to me or how hurtful it 

24
00:01:29,560 --> 00:01:31,400
was. 
But that Lero? 

25
00:01:32,200 --> 00:01:36,480
That Lero could get bought up 
whenever she needed evidence for

26
00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:40,080
some other imperceptible 
transgression that needed 

27
00:01:40,080 --> 00:01:43,080
additional weight because it was
so bloody minor. 

28
00:01:43,440 --> 00:01:47,680
But I've often said toxic 
parents have the lumpiest rugs 

29
00:01:47,680 --> 00:01:50,760
in the world, so adept are they 
at sweeping things under them. 

30
00:01:51,000 --> 00:01:53,560
Because every argument just 
ends. 

31
00:01:54,000 --> 00:01:57,280
No resolution, no 
accountability, no change. 

32
00:01:57,520 --> 00:02:04,000
And the only apology comes from 
the victims, in my case, from 

33
00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:06,440
me. 
Or if there was something 

34
00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:10,440
resembling an apology, it was 
sorry you feel that way, or 

35
00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:15,080
sorry I touched a nerve 
apologizing for my feelings, my 

36
00:02:15,080 --> 00:02:18,720
flaw, rather than their 
behaviour, their flaw. 

37
00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:22,360
So naturally, I avoided conflict
at all costs. 

38
00:02:22,640 --> 00:02:25,960
Kept quiet about things that 
bothered me, terrified that if I

39
00:02:25,960 --> 00:02:30,520
did anything other than agree or
apologize, I would be presented 

40
00:02:30,520 --> 00:02:33,560
with a filing cabinet of 
evidence of how awful I am. 

41
00:02:34,200 --> 00:02:38,440
I mean, of course I avoided it. 
In my experience, conflict was 

42
00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:42,680
always either terminal for a 
relationship or an opportunity 

43
00:02:42,680 --> 00:02:45,280
to tell me what an awful human 
that I was. 

44
00:02:45,640 --> 00:02:50,760
I read all conflict as attack as
a result, primed and prepped to 

45
00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:54,000
defend myself rather than to 
absorb and listen. 

46
00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:57,560
I saw the potential for 
rejection bulging through the 

47
00:02:57,560 --> 00:03:02,280
comment, blurring my vision to 
everything other than avoid 

48
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:07,360
rejection at all costs because 
rejection was evidence of all 

49
00:03:07,360 --> 00:03:13,280
the things toxic shame told me I
was the worst of humanity rather

50
00:03:13,280 --> 00:03:16,080
than we're in a relationship and
for it to keep working and 

51
00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:18,520
growing, this thing needs to 
change. 

52
00:03:18,880 --> 00:03:22,400
Are you happy to change it? 
And if I wasn't, does the 

53
00:03:22,400 --> 00:03:24,840
relationship end? 
And so on and so forth. 

54
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:29,000
But then I learned differently. 
I learned that in healthy 

55
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:32,040
relationships, conflict is 1 and
done. 

56
00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:35,480
It's not raised over and over 
again to back up another 

57
00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:37,560
argument. 
It's not a character 

58
00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:40,720
assassination. 
It's about growth, both for the 

59
00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:44,080
relationship and for each 
individual as a person. 

60
00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:48,720
That if someone raises something
that bothers them, it's actually

61
00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:52,120
them caring about the 
relationship and that this 

62
00:03:52,120 --> 00:03:54,440
thing. 
That's a tiny bit of grit right 

63
00:03:54,440 --> 00:03:58,600
now, has the potential to become
a boulder we stumble over. 

64
00:03:58,880 --> 00:04:03,120
So we need to work together to 
find a way to stop that 

65
00:04:03,120 --> 00:04:06,240
happening in a way that we're 
both happy with. 

66
00:04:06,920 --> 00:04:10,840
And I also learned that 
distinction will help filter the

67
00:04:10,840 --> 00:04:13,680
toxic people in your life. 
I remember a few years ago 

68
00:04:13,920 --> 00:04:17,519
someone repeatedly accusing me 
of something I just would never 

69
00:04:17,519 --> 00:04:19,920
do. 
And if they really knew me, they

70
00:04:19,920 --> 00:04:21,760
would have known that, believed 
that. 

71
00:04:21,959 --> 00:04:25,800
But instead, they weren't 
prepared to let that possibility

72
00:04:25,800 --> 00:04:28,360
exist. 
They kept applying this motive 

73
00:04:28,360 --> 00:04:31,920
to every situation they could 
shoehorn it in into. 

74
00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:35,960
And it felt like I was going mad
because I just couldn't see what

75
00:04:35,960 --> 00:04:37,880
they were saying. 
I didn't agree with their 

76
00:04:37,880 --> 00:04:41,160
perception, but still the 
accusations came. 

77
00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:44,800
I was checking with everyone I 
trusted to be honest with me, 

78
00:04:45,000 --> 00:04:47,600
including my therapist and my 
supervisor. 

79
00:04:47,800 --> 00:04:51,640
Because of course, I believe 
there must be some truth in it 

80
00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:55,320
because well, you know, thanks 
mom. 

81
00:04:56,240 --> 00:04:59,480
I call it default blame, that 
thing where you don't even wear 

82
00:04:59,480 --> 00:05:00,680
it up. 
You just start from the 

83
00:05:00,680 --> 00:05:04,280
assumption that they're right 
and wet backwards because you 

84
00:05:04,280 --> 00:05:06,480
were always in the wrong growing
up. 

85
00:05:06,640 --> 00:05:09,680
So why would any of this be 
different? 

86
00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:14,240
Until 1 friend said to me, you 
know, Helen, sometimes people 

87
00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:17,040
are just determined to believe 
things about you that have 

88
00:05:17,040 --> 00:05:20,760
nothing to do with you. 
And it stopped me in my tracks. 

89
00:05:20,880 --> 00:05:24,560
I mean, I knew this thing. 
I knew that idea, that concept, 

90
00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:29,160
but did not apply it that 
because what I realized then was

91
00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:33,600
in that relationship, even 
though I've heard being assured 

92
00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:36,120
it was absolutely different in 
that relationship. 

93
00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:41,160
It didn't matter what I said, 
how I explained, how I examined 

94
00:05:41,160 --> 00:05:44,560
and listened and reflected. 
They wanted to believe I was 

95
00:05:44,560 --> 00:05:47,880
doing the thing and there was 
nothing I could do that would 

96
00:05:47,880 --> 00:05:51,400
change that. 
That was another important thing

97
00:05:51,400 --> 00:05:54,120
I learned about conflict. 
If someone isn't willing to 

98
00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:58,720
work, work towards resolution, 
if they're not willing to move 

99
00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:02,320
their opinion of you and they're
only able to see the worst of 

100
00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:04,880
you, the conflict isn't for 
growth. 

101
00:06:05,480 --> 00:06:09,200
It's to silence and control you.
Because after all, if they 

102
00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:13,520
really think you could be doing 
those awful things they're 

103
00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:18,680
suggesting, why on earth would 
they want you in their life? 

104
00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:22,040
So it's no wonder you avoid 
conflict. 

105
00:06:22,280 --> 00:06:25,360
Not because you're unable to 
accept the truth about yourself.

106
00:06:25,480 --> 00:06:29,080
Might be difficult, might have a
whole perfection wound and fear 

107
00:06:29,080 --> 00:06:31,240
of rejection if you're not 
perfection, but that's a 

108
00:06:31,240 --> 00:06:33,480
different thing. 
But not because of that, but 

109
00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:37,360
because you've only ever 
experienced conflict as 

110
00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:41,640
destruction rather than growth, 
and it's probably close to 

111
00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:44,360
impossible to someone. 
Imagine someone bringing 

112
00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:48,840
conflict to you because they 
love you rather than because 

113
00:06:48,840 --> 00:06:52,080
they hate you. 
Today we're doing conflict. 

114
00:06:52,280 --> 00:06:55,880
What it actually is, why the 
version you were given isn't 

115
00:06:55,880 --> 00:07:00,120
conflict at all, what happens 
when brains like ours try to 

116
00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:04,560
disagree with each other, and 
what it looks like to get better

117
00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:08,040
at something that has only ever 
gone badly for you. 

118
00:07:08,640 --> 00:07:11,440
I know you've been asking 
yourself, am I the problem? 

119
00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:15,640
Let's find out with me, your 
host, Helen Villas. 

120
00:07:24,400 --> 00:07:26,400
Here's what I think happens for 
a lot of you. 

121
00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:28,680
And if it doesn't fit, of 
course, that's fine. 

122
00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:33,000
But before you discard it, allow
it to roll around and ruminate a

123
00:07:33,000 --> 00:07:35,800
little bit. 
Marinade and be sure that you're

124
00:07:35,800 --> 00:07:38,960
not defending something. 
Because when we're defending, 

125
00:07:39,320 --> 00:07:42,240
we're maybe not listening and 
reflecting. 

126
00:07:42,840 --> 00:07:46,440
And then take what's useful and 
leave the rest. 

127
00:07:47,160 --> 00:07:50,360
Knowing it isn't something you 
relate to is just as important 

128
00:07:50,360 --> 00:07:53,080
as knowing something is 
something you relate to. 

129
00:07:54,040 --> 00:07:57,920
You don't do conflict, you do 
capitulation, or you do 

130
00:07:57,920 --> 00:08:00,800
catastrophe, and there isn't 
really very much in between. 

131
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:04,040
So either you're agreeing before
the other person has even 

132
00:08:04,040 --> 00:08:07,080
finished their sentence, 
apologizing for something you're

133
00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:11,240
not even sure you did, absorbing
it, moving on, telling yourself 

134
00:08:11,240 --> 00:08:16,760
it wasn't a big deal, Or you go 
from mildly irritated to 

135
00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:20,000
absolutely certain that this is 
it, this is the end of the 

136
00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:23,280
relationship in the space of 
about 90 seconds. 

137
00:08:24,200 --> 00:08:26,960
And then there's what happens 
afterwards. 

138
00:08:27,880 --> 00:08:31,000
The disagreement is over, 
they've moved on, making a cup 

139
00:08:31,000 --> 00:08:34,440
of tea and asking if you want 
one, and you're still 3 days 

140
00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:37,600
deep in it, rereading their 
texts for tone, running the 

141
00:08:37,600 --> 00:08:40,600
conversation again to check 
whether you said it wrong, 

142
00:08:40,679 --> 00:08:42,520
waiting for the other shoe to 
drop. 

143
00:08:42,799 --> 00:08:46,560
That gap between how long it 
takes them and how long it takes

144
00:08:46,560 --> 00:08:51,960
you is enormous, and I think a 
lot of you have quietly decided 

145
00:08:52,200 --> 00:08:55,960
that gap is more evidence that 
you're the problem, And if 

146
00:08:56,200 --> 00:08:59,280
that's not you, fine, but just 
check it again before you 

147
00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:01,400
decide. 
Then there's the thing 

148
00:09:01,400 --> 00:09:05,160
underneath all of it, which is 
that you probably can't reliably

149
00:09:05,160 --> 00:09:08,600
tell the difference between a 
disagreement and an attack 

150
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:12,400
because in the house you grew up
in, there just wasn't one. 

151
00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:15,000
Someone says can we talk about 
something? 

152
00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:20,000
And your entire system goes just
red DEFCON 3 because in your 

153
00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:24,480
experience, can we talk about 
something was never followed by 

154
00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:27,360
a conversation. 
It was followed by an hour of 

155
00:09:27,360 --> 00:09:31,160
being told what's wrong with 
you, and those things were 

156
00:09:31,160 --> 00:09:33,880
probably lies anyway. 
There's also the version of this

157
00:09:33,880 --> 00:09:36,680
that happens entirely inside 
your own head, which is where 

158
00:09:36,680 --> 00:09:39,280
you have the conflict with them 
without them. 

159
00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:42,720
Weeks of it, the entire argument
in which you say it perfectly 

160
00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:46,720
and they finally understand, and
then you say nothing to them and

161
00:09:46,720 --> 00:09:49,280
the actual thing never gets 
raised at all. 

162
00:09:49,520 --> 00:09:52,240
I have to say, the arguments 
that I've won in my kitchen at 

163
00:09:52,240 --> 00:09:55,840
11:00 at night against people 
who weren't even there are some 

164
00:09:55,840 --> 00:09:59,640
of my finest work, I must admit.
So I'm going to pull you up on 

165
00:09:59,640 --> 00:10:02,640
something here, gently. 
You've probably described 

166
00:10:02,640 --> 00:10:06,200
yourself as conflict avoidant, 
maybe even as someone who hates 

167
00:10:06,200 --> 00:10:09,720
confrontation like it's a 
personality trait, like it's 

168
00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:12,280
just how you're built. 
It isn't. 

169
00:10:12,840 --> 00:10:15,960
It's learned, and I'm going to 
show you exactly how. 

170
00:10:17,280 --> 00:10:20,000
Start with what conflict 
actually is, because I don't 

171
00:10:20,000 --> 00:10:24,920
think any of us ever really get 
shown conflict is 2 people who 

172
00:10:24,920 --> 00:10:28,280
disagree about something, both 
of whom have standing to say so 

173
00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:31,960
working out what to do about it.
It's absolutely not about 

174
00:10:31,960 --> 00:10:34,920
winning, it's not a competition.
There aren't trophies being 

175
00:10:34,920 --> 00:10:37,440
given out to the person who gets
proven right. 

176
00:10:37,680 --> 00:10:41,520
It's about the relationship. 
That's the thing that comes out 

177
00:10:41,520 --> 00:10:44,280
of conflict, better or worse. 
That's it. 

178
00:10:44,680 --> 00:10:48,560
That's the entire thing. 
Now compare that to what you 

179
00:10:48,560 --> 00:10:52,320
got, which was a dominance event
with a winner and a loser, and 

180
00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:55,960
the loser was always you. 
Because in a toxic house, 

181
00:10:56,160 --> 00:10:59,200
conflict isn't about the 
disagreement, it's how the 

182
00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:02,800
hierarchy gets reasserted. 
And that's why the new role just

183
00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:04,960
doesn't matter. 
Why the actual subject of the 

184
00:11:05,000 --> 00:11:07,880
argument goes missing within 
seconds of the opening gambit. 

185
00:11:07,880 --> 00:11:09,800
Because the subject was never 
the point. 

186
00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:12,200
The subject, it was just the way
in. 

187
00:11:12,480 --> 00:11:15,600
I obviously don't know for sure 
what any individual parent 

188
00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:18,720
intends by that, and I certainly
can't say whether it's conscious

189
00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:23,040
or what level it's conscious on.
But there's that pattern where a

190
00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:26,640
small thing reliably becomes a 
referendum on your entire 

191
00:11:26,640 --> 00:11:30,360
character, and where it happens 
again and again over years. 

192
00:11:30,600 --> 00:11:34,120
What that behaviour communicates
is that the small thing was an 

193
00:11:34,120 --> 00:11:38,560
opportunity, not a grievance. 
So what gets installed isn't I'm

194
00:11:38,560 --> 00:11:41,760
bad at conflict. 
What gets installed is conflict 

195
00:11:41,760 --> 00:11:45,600
is a threat to my continued 
existence in this relationship. 

196
00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:50,480
And I want to be very clear that
this was an accurate reading of 

197
00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:52,520
your environment. 
It wasn't a distortion. 

198
00:11:52,760 --> 00:11:55,920
You learned the correct lesson 
about the house you were in. 

199
00:11:56,320 --> 00:11:59,800
The problem is you're now 
applying it in houses that 

200
00:11:59,800 --> 00:12:03,480
aren't that one. 
And the reason it's so sticky is

201
00:12:03,480 --> 00:12:06,760
straightforward learning, which 
is that conceding ended the 

202
00:12:06,760 --> 00:12:10,000
threat. 
Every single time you apologized

203
00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:12,080
and it stopped, that behaviour 
got stronger. 

204
00:12:12,080 --> 00:12:15,320
Every time you kept quiet and 
the storm passed over you rather

205
00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:17,800
than landing on you, that got 
stronger too. 

206
00:12:18,040 --> 00:12:20,960
This is basic operant 
conditioning, and it's not a 

207
00:12:20,960 --> 00:12:23,480
character flaw. 
It's your brain doing exactly 

208
00:12:23,480 --> 00:12:26,280
what brains do, which is repeat 
what works. 

209
00:12:26,880 --> 00:12:29,760
Which is also why understanding 
all of this hasn't fixed it. 

210
00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:32,240
And I know some of you are going
to be furious about that. 

211
00:12:32,320 --> 00:12:34,080
Me too. 
I get it. 

212
00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:37,040
You've read the books, you've 
done the therapy. 

213
00:12:37,040 --> 00:12:39,920
You can explain your own 
conditioning better than most 

214
00:12:39,920 --> 00:12:43,600
professionals, and you still say
sorry to someone who's just 

215
00:12:43,600 --> 00:12:46,040
accused you of something that 
you didn't do. 

216
00:12:46,680 --> 00:12:49,520
Insight doesn't undo 
conditioning, only new 

217
00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:52,080
experience does. 
And new experience is precisely 

218
00:12:52,080 --> 00:12:55,880
the thing you spent your whole 
life avoiding because it 

219
00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:57,840
terrifies you. 
Of course it does. 

220
00:12:58,120 --> 00:13:02,000
That's the trap, and we'll get 
to how you get out of it in a 

221
00:13:02,000 --> 00:13:04,760
bit. 
You also learned that conflict 

222
00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:08,280
has a shelf life of forever 
because nothing was ever 

223
00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:10,520
finished. 
The new role was still available

224
00:13:10,520 --> 00:13:13,760
as evidence two years later. 
So you have no experience of a 

225
00:13:13,760 --> 00:13:17,520
thing being genuinely over. 
Which means when somebody in 

226
00:13:17,520 --> 00:13:20,560
your adult life says no, 
honestly, it's fine with it's 

227
00:13:20,560 --> 00:13:22,640
done, you just don't believe 
them. 

228
00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:26,120
You can't. 
You've got no data for it. 

229
00:13:26,520 --> 00:13:29,240
And so you keep checking. 
You bring it up again to make 

230
00:13:29,240 --> 00:13:31,440
sure you apologize a second time
and a third. 

231
00:13:31,960 --> 00:13:35,000
And what you're actually doing 
is looking for the reassurance 

232
00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:38,040
that it's finished. 
And reassurance seeking has this

233
00:13:38,040 --> 00:13:43,120
horrible quality where it works 
for about 4 minutes and then you

234
00:13:43,120 --> 00:13:45,400
need it again. 
And the person giving it starts 

235
00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:48,800
to get slightly irritated, which
then confirms the fear that 

236
00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:52,320
started the whole thing off. 
Now, where our brains come into 

237
00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:55,040
this? 
And both directions matter here.

238
00:13:55,600 --> 00:13:59,280
For those of us with ADHD, 
emotional dysregulation is a 

239
00:13:59,280 --> 00:14:01,920
well evidenced core feature. 
It isn't the diagnostic 

240
00:14:01,920 --> 00:14:04,520
criteria, sorry. 
It isn't in the diagnostic 

241
00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:09,840
criteria in either DSM 5 or ICD 
11, which is a real genuine gap 

242
00:14:09,840 --> 00:14:12,160
and one worth being really 
honest about rather than 

243
00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:14,400
glossing over. 
I've spoken about it before, but

244
00:14:14,680 --> 00:14:18,680
the evidence base for it as a 
feature of ADHD is solid and it 

245
00:14:18,680 --> 00:14:21,040
is being looked at being 
included. 

246
00:14:21,200 --> 00:14:24,400
Russell Barclay's work on 
inhibition is where a lot of 

247
00:14:24,400 --> 00:14:27,840
this sits. 
What it means in practice is 

248
00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:31,480
that the emotional response 
arrives at full volume before 

249
00:14:31,480 --> 00:14:34,200
you've had a chance to assess 
whether or not it's warranted. 

250
00:14:34,560 --> 00:14:38,040
So somebody says something 
mildly critical about how you 

251
00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:40,840
loaded the dishwasher, and 
before any thinking has 

252
00:14:40,840 --> 00:14:42,920
happened, you are already 
flooded. 

253
00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:47,520
Then you're managing the flood 
rather than the conversation, 

254
00:14:47,880 --> 00:14:50,520
and the conversation is still 
going on without you. 

255
00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:53,640
And I'd add that the flooding 
itself becomes a thing you're 

256
00:14:53,640 --> 00:14:56,080
ashamed of. 
So now you're in a disagreement 

257
00:14:56,080 --> 00:15:00,160
about the dishwasher, managing a
physical response that you just 

258
00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:02,640
can't control, and 
simultaneously running 

259
00:15:02,640 --> 00:15:06,920
commentary about how ridiculous 
you're being, which is 3 jobs 

260
00:15:07,320 --> 00:15:09,480
and the conversation only needed
one. 

261
00:15:10,400 --> 00:15:12,960
Then there's impulse control, 
which is the other half of it. 

262
00:15:13,200 --> 00:15:16,440
And here I mean the gap between 
feeling something and doing it. 

263
00:15:16,600 --> 00:15:19,920
Or rather than the absence of 1,
the thing you say in the heat of

264
00:15:19,920 --> 00:15:22,600
the moment that you spend the 
next fortnight paying for. 

265
00:15:22,920 --> 00:15:25,800
Which then feeds the shame, 
which makes the next conflict 

266
00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:29,680
more dangerous, which makes you 
you avoid it harder. 

267
00:15:30,000 --> 00:15:35,040
And absolutely no judgement 
because I used to do the same 

268
00:15:35,040 --> 00:15:37,080
thing. 
I've said things in the heat of 

269
00:15:37,080 --> 00:15:41,160
a moment that I would give quite
a lot to have back, and the 

270
00:15:41,160 --> 00:15:43,480
fortnight afterwards a lot of 
fun. 

271
00:15:44,120 --> 00:15:47,760
For those of you who are who are
autistic is different and it 

272
00:15:47,760 --> 00:15:50,760
stacks on top. 
Processing time is real. 

273
00:15:51,120 --> 00:15:54,160
If you need longer to work out 
what you actually think, and the

274
00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:57,240
conversation is happening at 
speed, you'll agree to things 

275
00:15:57,240 --> 00:16:00,800
you don't agree with simply 
because agreement is the only 

276
00:16:00,800 --> 00:16:03,320
response available at the speed 
required. 

277
00:16:03,800 --> 00:16:07,400
Then an hour later or the next 
morning, your actual position 

278
00:16:07,400 --> 00:16:11,000
arrives, and by then the 
conversation is closed and 

279
00:16:11,000 --> 00:16:13,560
reopening it feels like starting
a fight. 

280
00:16:13,880 --> 00:16:18,840
So you don't open it, reopen it,
and then you're living with an 

281
00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:21,360
agreement you never made, 
resenting it quietly. 

282
00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:24,320
The other person has no idea 
because as far as they're 

283
00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:26,640
concerned it was settled 
amicably. 

284
00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:29,800
There's also straightforward 
communication mismatch. 

285
00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:33,280
Directness read as aggression 
when it was just information, a 

286
00:16:33,280 --> 00:16:35,840
comment taken literally when it 
was hyperbole. 

287
00:16:36,280 --> 00:16:40,720
Tone that doesn't match the 
content in either direction. 

288
00:16:41,000 --> 00:16:45,200
None of that is a deficit. 
It's a mismatch, and mismatches 

289
00:16:45,400 --> 00:16:48,480
are two way. 
But you've been trained to 

290
00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:52,960
assume the fault is always at 
your end, which is where the 

291
00:16:52,960 --> 00:16:56,680
default blame does it's work. 
Default blame is the thing that 

292
00:16:56,680 --> 00:17:00,360
I described in the opening where
somebody says you've done 

293
00:17:00,360 --> 00:17:02,160
something and you don't weigh it
up at all. 

294
00:17:02,360 --> 00:17:05,160
You skip straight to looking for
how they're right. 

295
00:17:05,400 --> 00:17:07,839
You go and check with other 
people, you examine yourself, 

296
00:17:07,839 --> 00:17:11,480
you go back through the evidence
looking for your crime. 

297
00:17:11,480 --> 00:17:15,000
And that feels like humility. 
It feels like being a reflective

298
00:17:15,000 --> 00:17:18,839
person who's open to feedback is
honestly one of the most 

299
00:17:18,839 --> 00:17:22,359
convincing disguises this this 
stuff wears because it looks 

300
00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:27,240
like a strength, a virtue even. 
But being open to feedback means

301
00:17:27,240 --> 00:17:31,520
considering it, weighing it, 
deciding default. 

302
00:17:31,520 --> 00:17:35,520
Blame skips all of that and goes
straight to conviction. 

303
00:17:35,880 --> 00:17:38,200
And a person who convicts 
themselves before hearing the 

304
00:17:38,200 --> 00:17:41,800
evidence isn't being humble, 
they're being obedient. 

305
00:17:42,560 --> 00:17:44,880
Now, I know some of you will be 
bristling at that word. 

306
00:17:45,040 --> 00:17:47,680
Me too. 
I'm not calling you obedient as 

307
00:17:47,680 --> 00:17:49,560
an insult. 
You were trained into it 

308
00:17:49,560 --> 00:17:53,400
deliberately over years by 
people who benefited from you 

309
00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:55,200
being that way. 
That's not a character 

310
00:17:55,200 --> 00:17:58,200
judgement, it's a description of
what happened to you. 

311
00:17:58,960 --> 00:18:01,360
Now here's where this gets 
genuinely useful. 

312
00:18:01,600 --> 00:18:05,320
Because default blame is also 
the thing that stops you telling

313
00:18:05,480 --> 00:18:08,520
the difference between the two 
kinds of conflict. 

314
00:18:09,240 --> 00:18:11,360
Conflict for Growth looks like 
this. 

315
00:18:12,160 --> 00:18:15,800
Somebody raises a specific 
thing, they stay on that thing. 

316
00:18:16,120 --> 00:18:19,640
They want to know your side, and
their position can actually 

317
00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:21,640
move. 
There's a resolution, and 

318
00:18:21,640 --> 00:18:24,120
afterwards it's finished. 
It doesn't come back as 

319
00:18:24,120 --> 00:18:28,040
ammunition six months later. 
Conflict for Control looks like 

320
00:18:28,040 --> 00:18:30,720
this. 
The specific thing expands into 

321
00:18:30,720 --> 00:18:33,760
your character. 
Your explanation doesn't change 

322
00:18:33,760 --> 00:18:36,040
anything. 
Their position was fixed before 

323
00:18:36,040 --> 00:18:39,600
the conversation started. 
There's no resolution available 

324
00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:43,960
because resolution was never the
goal and it gets brought back 

325
00:18:44,080 --> 00:18:49,040
whenever it's needed. 
The teller is whether their view

326
00:18:49,040 --> 00:18:51,040
of you can move. 
That's it. 

327
00:18:51,440 --> 00:18:54,320
That is the test. 
And what my friend said to me, 

328
00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:57,280
that sometimes people are 
determined to believe things 

329
00:18:57,280 --> 00:19:01,680
about you that have nothing to 
do with you, is the same test 

330
00:19:01,680 --> 00:19:05,200
from the other side. 
If nothing you say makes any 

331
00:19:05,200 --> 00:19:08,520
difference, you're not in a 
disagreement, you're in a 

332
00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:11,760
verdict. 
Which brings me to something you

333
00:19:11,760 --> 00:19:14,200
need to hear, because default 
blame will fight you on it. 

334
00:19:14,480 --> 00:19:18,360
If somebody genuinely believes 
you're capable of the awful 

335
00:19:18,360 --> 00:19:21,760
thing that they're accusing you 
of, and they're not willing to 

336
00:19:21,760 --> 00:19:26,280
have that belief tested, that 
tells you something about the 

337
00:19:26,280 --> 00:19:30,800
relationship that has nothing to
do with whether or not you did 

338
00:19:30,800 --> 00:19:33,600
it. 
Because why would they want you 

339
00:19:33,600 --> 00:19:36,080
in their life if they thought 
that of you? 

340
00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:39,280
Let me flip this for you, 
because I think you'll accept it

341
00:19:39,280 --> 00:19:41,960
faster about someone else than 
maybe about yourself. 

342
00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:44,040
Always works pretty well in 
therapy. 

343
00:19:44,680 --> 00:19:47,480
Imagine a friend tells you that 
their partner has accused them 

344
00:19:47,480 --> 00:19:49,480
of something that they would 
just never do. 

345
00:19:49,920 --> 00:19:52,280
They've explained, they've 
apologized for the 

346
00:19:52,280 --> 00:19:55,480
misunderstanding, they've gone 
over it, and the partner won't 

347
00:19:55,480 --> 00:19:58,200
move. 
They ask you whether they should

348
00:19:58,200 --> 00:20:01,200
try explaining again. 
What do you tell them? 

349
00:20:02,080 --> 00:20:06,000
You tell them explaining isn't 
the problem and you'd probably 

350
00:20:06,000 --> 00:20:11,040
be quite angry on their behalf. 
Now flip it back and apply that 

351
00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:14,320
to yourself. 
Notice how much harder that is. 

352
00:20:14,800 --> 00:20:18,240
That difficulty is the 
conditioning sitting right there

353
00:20:18,440 --> 00:20:22,240
where you can feel it. 
And I want to name an objection 

354
00:20:22,240 --> 00:20:25,400
here because I know some of you 
are already probably thinking it

355
00:20:25,840 --> 00:20:28,520
and it's a fair 1. 
Doesn't this just give you 

356
00:20:28,520 --> 00:20:31,960
permission to dismiss any 
criticism as control? 

357
00:20:32,360 --> 00:20:36,440
Can't you use their view? 
Can't move to avoid ever hearing

358
00:20:36,440 --> 00:20:38,040
anything difficult about 
yourself? 

359
00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:44,120
Yeah, you absolutely could. 
And some people do, which is why

360
00:20:44,120 --> 00:20:46,800
it isn't about whether the 
feedback is uncomfortable. 

361
00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:50,280
Same test as before. 
Can they engage with what you 

362
00:20:50,280 --> 00:20:53,120
say back someone who says that's
fair? 

363
00:20:53,120 --> 00:20:55,560
I hadn't thought about it that 
way, but I still think the 

364
00:20:55,560 --> 00:20:59,720
underlying thing stands is in a 
conversation with you, someone 

365
00:20:59,720 --> 00:21:03,600
who says the same sentence back 
for the fifth time regardless of

366
00:21:03,600 --> 00:21:07,400
what you said, is not. 
And honestly, given how 

367
00:21:07,400 --> 00:21:10,840
voraciously most of you accept 
criticism about yourselves, the 

368
00:21:10,840 --> 00:21:13,880
risk of you over dismissing 
feedback is not the one that 

369
00:21:13,880 --> 00:21:17,080
keeps me up at night. 
And let me tell you, you could 

370
00:21:17,080 --> 00:21:21,720
apply that idea of whether or 
not I was just looking for a 

371
00:21:21,720 --> 00:21:25,480
reason to dismiss the thing that
was being said or I was being 

372
00:21:25,480 --> 00:21:30,800
accused of as control. 
I wasn't because I was asking 

373
00:21:30,800 --> 00:21:33,920
the questions. 
What is it that makes you think 

374
00:21:33,920 --> 00:21:35,240
that? 
What is it that makes you feel 

375
00:21:35,240 --> 00:21:36,680
that? 
Please explain to me. 

376
00:21:37,040 --> 00:21:40,640
And the answer would just be the
same back over and over and over

377
00:21:40,640 --> 00:21:43,160
again. 
It never shifted. 

378
00:21:43,560 --> 00:21:47,640
And then another one came along 
and the same accusation and the 

379
00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:50,560
same questions and it never 
shifted. 

380
00:21:50,560 --> 00:21:56,840
So there is a big difference 
between using it as an excuse, 

381
00:21:57,320 --> 00:21:59,920
who justified dismissing 
something that you don't want to

382
00:21:59,920 --> 00:22:03,720
hear about yourself, and it 
actually being done. 

383
00:22:06,720 --> 00:22:10,360
If today's episode landed, the 
place to take it further is the 

384
00:22:10,360 --> 00:22:12,120
Hub. 
The Hub is my membership 

385
00:22:12,120 --> 00:22:14,480
community, and it's where the 
people who listen to this 

386
00:22:14,480 --> 00:22:18,080
podcast go when they actually 
want to do something with it 

387
00:22:18,360 --> 00:22:20,320
rather than just understand it 
better. 

388
00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:23,200
Their courses live calls in a 
community of people who've had 

389
00:22:23,560 --> 00:22:26,160
roughly the same childhood in 
different clothing, which means 

390
00:22:26,160 --> 00:22:29,920
that you can describe the blue 
roll incident and nobody asks 

391
00:22:29,920 --> 00:22:32,240
you to explain why that was a 
big deal. 

392
00:22:32,880 --> 00:22:35,640
I would love to see you there. 
It's Liberation 

393
00:22:35,640 --> 00:22:41,520
academy.co.uk/the Hyphen Hub. 
Come and have a look and maybe 

394
00:22:41,640 --> 00:22:43,120
join in. 
Take care. 

395
00:22:43,440 --> 00:22:48,200
Bye. 
Anyway, moving on. 

396
00:22:48,240 --> 00:22:52,880
So now friendships where a lot 
of you, I think, maybe have the 

397
00:22:52,880 --> 00:22:57,200
least language and possibly 
actually the most damage. 

398
00:22:57,480 --> 00:23:00,800
Romantic relationships get 
talked about endlessly. 

399
00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:03,560
Friendship conflict barely gets 
talked about at all. 

400
00:23:03,560 --> 00:23:07,440
And I think that's because 
there's this kind of unspoken 

401
00:23:07,640 --> 00:23:11,360
idea, rather that friendship is 
supposed to be the easy one, the

402
00:23:11,360 --> 00:23:15,480
one without all the negotiation.
So when it goes wrong, there's 

403
00:23:15,480 --> 00:23:18,600
absolutely no framework for it 
and no permission to make a 

404
00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:21,520
fuss. 
So what happens instead is you 

405
00:23:21,520 --> 00:23:24,480
just don't raise it. 
The friend cancels for the 4th 

406
00:23:24,480 --> 00:23:27,480
time, or says something that 
stings, or you notice you're 

407
00:23:27,480 --> 00:23:30,880
always the one making contact 
and you say nothing. 

408
00:23:31,360 --> 00:23:34,040
Because a friendship feels like 
a thing you have no standing to 

409
00:23:34,040 --> 00:23:36,360
complain about. 
You're not married to them, 

410
00:23:36,560 --> 00:23:39,760
there's no contract, they could 
just leave. 

411
00:23:39,760 --> 00:23:43,960
And that's the fear underneath 
it, that friendship is the most 

412
00:23:43,960 --> 00:23:47,800
easily discarded relationship 
you have, so raising anything at

413
00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:52,440
all risks the whole thing. 
So instead of conflict, you get 

414
00:23:52,440 --> 00:23:56,440
slow withdrawal, you reply a bit
less, you stop suggesting 

415
00:23:56,440 --> 00:24:01,560
things, the friendship just 
stops without either of you ever

416
00:24:01,560 --> 00:24:04,880
saying why. 
And you tell yourself, yeah, we 

417
00:24:04,880 --> 00:24:07,880
just drifted apart. 
And that's not you being a bad 

418
00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:11,760
friend, that's you doing the 
only thing you were ever shown 

419
00:24:11,760 --> 00:24:17,360
to do, whether it was at home or
socially, which was to disappear

420
00:24:17,360 --> 00:24:21,520
rather than say the thing that 
may not be your person at all. 

421
00:24:21,760 --> 00:24:24,160
That's fine. 
Again, it's useful to know. 

422
00:24:24,920 --> 00:24:28,800
I'd say though, that that's one 
of the saddest patterns I do 

423
00:24:28,800 --> 00:24:32,320
come across because a lot of 
those cases the friend would 

424
00:24:32,320 --> 00:24:35,640
have been horrified to know and 
would have changed the thing or 

425
00:24:35,640 --> 00:24:39,200
talked about it and found a way 
through and would still be in 

426
00:24:39,440 --> 00:24:42,320
their lives. 
The thing that you're missing, 

427
00:24:42,320 --> 00:24:46,240
potentially, is that raising 
something with a friend is a 

428
00:24:46,240 --> 00:24:49,160
compliment. 
You don't do the frightening 

429
00:24:49,160 --> 00:24:53,120
thing for a relationship that 
you're indifferent to somebody 

430
00:24:53,120 --> 00:24:55,440
bringing you a grievances, 
telling you that they want to 

431
00:24:55,440 --> 00:24:58,320
keep you. 
And if you can hear it that way 

432
00:24:58,320 --> 00:25:02,000
round, it changes what the 
conversation is. 

433
00:25:02,480 --> 00:25:05,480
And the same test applies as 
everywhere else. 

434
00:25:05,800 --> 00:25:08,600
If you raise something small 
with a friend, and that view can

435
00:25:08,600 --> 00:25:11,280
move, that friendship has just 
got sturdier. 

436
00:25:11,640 --> 00:25:14,880
If it can't, you've learned 
something you needed to know and

437
00:25:14,880 --> 00:25:18,520
you've learned it over something
small rather than finding out in

438
00:25:18,520 --> 00:25:21,440
a crisis. 
Now the other thing about 

439
00:25:21,440 --> 00:25:25,160
conflict, which is what happens 
when both of you have brains 

440
00:25:25,160 --> 00:25:27,800
like ours. 
What I see a lot is a couple 

441
00:25:27,800 --> 00:25:30,480
where the argument isn't the 
argument at all, it's the 

442
00:25:30,840 --> 00:25:34,000
recovery mismatch. 
One of them is done in 20 

443
00:25:34,000 --> 00:25:37,000
minutes and genuinely doesn't 
understand why the other is 

444
00:25:37,000 --> 00:25:40,680
still upset three days later. 
The other one needs 3 days and 

445
00:25:40,680 --> 00:25:43,600
experiences the 20 minute 
recovery as proof that the 

446
00:25:43,600 --> 00:25:46,000
relationship just doesn't matter
to the partner. 

447
00:25:46,720 --> 00:25:50,440
Both are reading the other's 
nervous system as a statement 

448
00:25:50,440 --> 00:25:53,480
about the relationship and 
neither of them is doing 

449
00:25:53,560 --> 00:25:56,040
anything wrong. 
Same thing with processing 

450
00:25:56,040 --> 00:25:57,720
speed. 
One person needs to resolve it 

451
00:25:57,720 --> 00:26:01,640
now because unresolved conflict 
is unbearable to them and their 

452
00:26:01,640 --> 00:26:05,480
whole system is screaming. 
The other needs 6 hours before 

453
00:26:05,480 --> 00:26:09,080
they can even locate what they 
think, and the request for time 

454
00:26:09,280 --> 00:26:12,480
gets heard as a withdrawal, 
which for someone raised on the 

455
00:26:12,480 --> 00:26:15,440
silent treatment is the most 
frightening thing in the world. 

456
00:26:15,680 --> 00:26:19,040
So they push, which makes the 
other person need more time. 

457
00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:21,960
And round and round it goes. 
Flip it. 

458
00:26:22,640 --> 00:26:25,560
Imagine one of your children 
came home visibly upset and 

459
00:26:25,560 --> 00:26:28,280
needed 20 minutes in their room 
before they could tell you what 

460
00:26:28,280 --> 00:26:31,120
happened. 
And imagine standing outside 

461
00:26:31,120 --> 00:26:34,920
that door insisting they explain
now because you needed to know 

462
00:26:34,920 --> 00:26:38,520
now you wouldn't. 
I hope you'd wait. 

463
00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:41,480
And you'd probably be actually 
quite proud of them for knowing 

464
00:26:41,480 --> 00:26:43,600
what they needed. 
Maybe a little envious too. 

465
00:26:43,960 --> 00:26:46,760
The same courtesy applies to the
adults in your life. 

466
00:26:46,800 --> 00:26:51,280
And, and this is the harder 
half, it applies to you as well.

467
00:26:51,800 --> 00:26:54,560
While we're on children, there's
a version of this that a lot of 

468
00:26:54,560 --> 00:26:57,760
you are living with right now, 
which is conflict with your own 

469
00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:00,280
kids. 
Because the only template you 

470
00:27:00,280 --> 00:27:02,840
were given for how a parent 
handles a child disagreeing with

471
00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:07,240
them is the one you've spent 
your entire adult life either 

472
00:27:07,240 --> 00:27:11,000
refusing to use or copying 
because you didn't know any 

473
00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:12,440
better. 
No judgement. 

474
00:27:12,960 --> 00:27:16,280
So your child pushes back about 
bedtime or tells you something 

475
00:27:16,280 --> 00:27:19,880
you said was unfair, and there's
genuinely nothing available in 

476
00:27:19,880 --> 00:27:23,840
your head about what to do next.
Because the only thing in there 

477
00:27:23,840 --> 00:27:25,640
is the thing that you've 
promised yourself you would 

478
00:27:25,640 --> 00:27:30,320
never do, or again, the thing 
that you do do because you don't

479
00:27:30,320 --> 00:27:33,640
know any different. 
So a lot of you just go 

480
00:27:33,640 --> 00:27:35,600
completely the other way and 
give in every time. 

481
00:27:35,840 --> 00:27:39,040
And a lot of you don't. 
But if you give in, it's because

482
00:27:39,320 --> 00:27:42,200
any firmness at all feels like 
you've become them. 

483
00:27:42,560 --> 00:27:45,520
I'd say that's understandable, 
and I'd also say it isn't 

484
00:27:45,520 --> 00:27:49,240
working. 
And if that stings, it isn't a 

485
00:27:49,240 --> 00:27:53,640
criticism of you as a parent. 
You were given a template and 

486
00:27:53,640 --> 00:27:57,760
told to build something you'd 
just never seen that a child 

487
00:27:57,760 --> 00:27:59,720
needs to experience 
disagreement. 

488
00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:03,640
That doesn't destroy anything 
because that's how they learn. 

489
00:28:03,640 --> 00:28:07,240
Conflict is survivable and they 
can only learn that from 

490
00:28:07,240 --> 00:28:10,560
watching you hold a position 
kindly and stay in a room. 

491
00:28:11,240 --> 00:28:14,480
Giving in teaches them your 
position was never real. 

492
00:28:14,640 --> 00:28:17,960
Arguing back to silence also 
does the same thing. 

493
00:28:18,320 --> 00:28:23,800
It teaches them also when you're
giving in that pushing hard gets

494
00:28:23,800 --> 00:28:27,600
results, which is not the lesson
that anyone wants. 

495
00:28:27,680 --> 00:28:31,000
That is also operant 
conditioning them of you. 

496
00:28:31,440 --> 00:28:35,720
You can say no, explain it, hear
their objection properly, and 

497
00:28:35,720 --> 00:28:38,520
still say no. 
That's conflict done well, and 

498
00:28:38,520 --> 00:28:41,440
it will feel to you like you are
being cruel. 

499
00:28:41,720 --> 00:28:46,240
You may project onto them your 
feelings from childhood, but 

500
00:28:46,760 --> 00:28:49,280
you're not being. 
Which brings me to the 

501
00:28:49,280 --> 00:28:52,120
relationship advice you may well
have been given, most of which 

502
00:28:52,280 --> 00:28:54,320
was not built for brains like 
ours. 

503
00:28:54,880 --> 00:28:58,600
Never go to bed angry is a 
terrible rule for someone who 

504
00:28:58,600 --> 00:29:01,160
needs processing time. 
All it guarantees is a 

505
00:29:01,160 --> 00:29:06,000
conversation conducted by two 
exhausted people at 12:30, which

506
00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:09,080
is not a conversation, it's an 
endurance event. 

507
00:29:09,880 --> 00:29:13,960
Use I statements assumes you can
identify what you need and 

508
00:29:14,240 --> 00:29:17,440
sorry, what you feel rather or 
even need in real time. 

509
00:29:17,440 --> 00:29:21,960
Which if you listen to episode 1
you'll know is not a given for a

510
00:29:21,960 --> 00:29:25,280
lot of us, and repair in the 
moment assumes both people 

511
00:29:25,280 --> 00:29:29,120
regulate at the same rate, which
is exactly what we've just 

512
00:29:29,120 --> 00:29:32,640
established is often not true. 
None of that advice is 

513
00:29:32,640 --> 00:29:34,360
malicious. 
Just want to be very clear. 

514
00:29:34,600 --> 00:29:38,840
Just wasn't written with 
autistic or ADHD brains in mind.

515
00:29:39,160 --> 00:29:43,000
And when it doesn't work, you've
quite reasonably concluded that 

516
00:29:43,000 --> 00:29:46,760
you're the broken thing. 
So what do you actually do? 

517
00:29:47,760 --> 00:29:50,440
The first thing, and it has to 
happen when you're calm is 

518
00:29:50,440 --> 00:29:52,960
deciding in advance what 
distinguishes A disagreement 

519
00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:57,080
from danger for you because you 
cannot assess that live your 

520
00:29:57,080 --> 00:30:00,000
system has already responded 
before any assessment could 

521
00:30:00,000 --> 00:30:02,600
happen. 
But most people it comes down to

522
00:30:02,600 --> 00:30:06,520
something like are they talking 
about the thing or about me? 

523
00:30:06,680 --> 00:30:09,640
Can their view move? 
And is that this going to come 

524
00:30:09,640 --> 00:30:12,040
back at me later? 
Write your version down 

525
00:30:12,040 --> 00:30:13,480
somewhere you'll actually find 
it. 

526
00:30:13,720 --> 00:30:16,800
Which for those of us with ADHD 
is a genuine design problem and 

527
00:30:16,800 --> 00:30:19,440
not a joke. 
And the failure mode on this 

528
00:30:19,440 --> 00:30:21,040
one? 
So you're expecting it. 

529
00:30:21,240 --> 00:30:24,680
You'll write the list and then 
in the moment you won't remember

530
00:30:24,680 --> 00:30:26,800
a single word of it. 
It's not the list failing. 

531
00:30:27,080 --> 00:30:31,120
Even having written it changes 
what you notice afterwards, and 

532
00:30:31,120 --> 00:30:33,520
afterwards is where you'll do 
most of your early work. 

533
00:30:33,720 --> 00:30:36,080
Because live is just too fast 
for now. 

534
00:30:36,760 --> 00:30:40,560
Then once you've got that even 
loosely in place, the prepared 

535
00:30:40,560 --> 00:30:44,760
line, you are going to freeze. 
That's not a prediction I'm 

536
00:30:44,760 --> 00:30:47,640
making about you personally. 
It's the baseline for this 

537
00:30:47,640 --> 00:30:49,840
audience. 
If you freeze in the moment, you

538
00:30:49,840 --> 00:30:52,400
have not failed. 
You've done the thing that your 

539
00:30:52,400 --> 00:30:56,840
brain was trained to do under 
threat, which is why you prepare

540
00:30:56,840 --> 00:31:01,360
lines when you're not in it. 
I need to think about that and 

541
00:31:01,360 --> 00:31:04,680
I'll come back to you. 
I don't agree, but I want to 

542
00:31:04,680 --> 00:31:07,200
understand why you see it that 
way. 

543
00:31:07,640 --> 00:31:11,400
That's not going to work for me.
That is the whole line. 

544
00:31:11,960 --> 00:31:15,120
That last one is a complete 
sentence and does not require a 

545
00:31:15,200 --> 00:31:18,480
justification afterwards that 
you will want to add it one, and

546
00:31:18,480 --> 00:31:22,120
it will take you a very long 
time before you stop. 

547
00:31:22,960 --> 00:31:25,400
The failure mode here is that it
will feel like lying. 

548
00:31:25,640 --> 00:31:27,920
It might even feel like 
manipulation or control. 

549
00:31:27,920 --> 00:31:31,000
You'll see the prepared line and
your whole body will tell you 

550
00:31:31,000 --> 00:31:33,120
that you're being fake, 
manipulative, performing 

551
00:31:33,120 --> 00:31:36,520
something that isn't you. 
That's not a signal that you're 

552
00:31:36,520 --> 00:31:39,520
doing it wrong, that's just what
saying something unfamiliar 

553
00:31:39,520 --> 00:31:43,040
feels like when the familiar 
thing was silence. 

554
00:31:43,600 --> 00:31:46,600
Then there's the pause and this 
is the one I'd want you to take 

555
00:31:46,600 --> 00:31:52,800
away if you take nothing else, 
if you need time, take it, but 

556
00:31:52,800 --> 00:31:55,280
say when you're coming back and 
then come back. 

557
00:31:55,480 --> 00:31:57,480
I need an hour and then I want 
to finish. 

558
00:31:57,480 --> 00:32:01,400
This is a completely different 
act from walking out of the room

559
00:32:01,640 --> 00:32:05,200
because an open-ended withdrawal
is the silent treatment, whether

560
00:32:05,200 --> 00:32:08,200
you mean it that way or not. 
And for someone raise the way 

561
00:32:08,200 --> 00:32:10,800
that you were being on the 
receiving end of that is 

562
00:32:10,800 --> 00:32:14,080
terrifying. 
Adult or child, your need for 

563
00:32:14,080 --> 00:32:16,680
processing time is 100% 
legitimate. 

564
00:32:17,000 --> 00:32:21,200
Attaching a return time to it is
what makes it a boundary rather 

565
00:32:21,200 --> 00:32:24,280
than a punishment. 
And if you're the one waiting, 

566
00:32:24,600 --> 00:32:27,800
the hour is not rejection. 
Be firm with yourself about that

567
00:32:27,800 --> 00:32:31,680
because your brain will spend 
that hour building a case that 

568
00:32:31,680 --> 00:32:35,920
it is the failure mode on. 
This one is ADHD specific and 

569
00:32:35,920 --> 00:32:38,600
it's a big one. 
You'll say an hour and then 

570
00:32:38,600 --> 00:32:42,320
genuinely lose the hour and I'm 
laughing a little bit because 

571
00:32:43,120 --> 00:32:46,080
same, same, same. 
And I genuinely apologize to 

572
00:32:46,080 --> 00:32:50,440
every single person that I have 
ever said I will be an hour and 

573
00:32:50,600 --> 00:32:54,120
lost that time because I didn't 
have this technique. 

574
00:32:54,480 --> 00:32:57,280
Set an alarm. 
And it sounds absurd for 

575
00:32:57,280 --> 00:33:00,000
something absurd, for something 
emotional. 

576
00:33:00,320 --> 00:33:03,280
It's a bit absurd to somebody 
who doesn't have a brain like 

577
00:33:03,320 --> 00:33:07,080
ours, but it also protects the 
other person, the person you 

578
00:33:07,080 --> 00:33:11,760
care about, the person you love 
and want the relationship to 

579
00:33:11,760 --> 00:33:16,400
succeed with, from experiencing 
your time blindness as 

580
00:33:16,800 --> 00:33:20,560
abandonment. 
Now, the repair, Because the 

581
00:33:20,560 --> 00:33:23,400
thing you said in the heat of 
the moment is not the 

582
00:33:23,400 --> 00:33:26,440
catastrophe you think it is. 
See, it landed badly. 

583
00:33:26,840 --> 00:33:28,560
That came out harsher than I 
meant. 

584
00:33:28,560 --> 00:33:30,840
I'm sorry. 
What I was trying to say was 

585
00:33:30,840 --> 00:33:33,400
this. 
That's repair and it takes about

586
00:33:33,400 --> 00:33:36,400
10 seconds. 
It isn't a confession that 

587
00:33:36,400 --> 00:33:39,640
you're fundamentally the problem
and it doesn't reopen the whole 

588
00:33:39,640 --> 00:33:43,040
thing. 
Default blame will try to turn 1

589
00:33:43,040 --> 00:33:46,200
sharp sentence into proof of 
everything you already think 

590
00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:48,840
about yourself. 
Notice it doing that. 

591
00:33:49,120 --> 00:33:52,440
You're allowed to have said 
something badly and still be 

592
00:33:52,440 --> 00:33:55,760
right about the underlying .2. 
Things can be true at once. 

593
00:33:56,080 --> 00:33:59,840
The other little twisteroo in 
this situation is that in the 

594
00:33:59,840 --> 00:34:04,320
past, conceding any kind of 
agreement or fault to their 

595
00:34:04,320 --> 00:34:07,560
points might have meant 
annihilation when the toxic 

596
00:34:07,560 --> 00:34:11,280
parent or whomever it was 
latched onto it and used it 

597
00:34:11,280 --> 00:34:14,440
against you. 
So you become defensive and 

598
00:34:14,440 --> 00:34:18,840
defended, and when you realize 
there might be a awkward point 

599
00:34:18,840 --> 00:34:22,920
to their argument, you panic a 
bit because you're terrified 

600
00:34:23,199 --> 00:34:27,520
they will do the same. 
But if they do, that's data 

601
00:34:27,679 --> 00:34:31,280
about them and the relationship 
accountability shouldn't be met 

602
00:34:31,280 --> 00:34:34,239
with a ha ha I knew it. 
You really are evil. 

603
00:34:34,639 --> 00:34:37,920
It should be accepted with 
thanks and that's really 

604
00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:42,800
helpful. 
Just grace conflict for growth, 

605
00:34:43,280 --> 00:34:46,760
not for points. 
For those of you where 

606
00:34:46,760 --> 00:34:50,679
communication mismatch is the 
recurring issue, the useful move

607
00:34:50,679 --> 00:34:54,760
is agreeing it out loud with the
people who matter outside of any

608
00:34:54,760 --> 00:34:57,320
argument. 
Something like I take things 

609
00:34:57,320 --> 00:35:00,120
really literally that sometimes 
and I might miss that you were 

610
00:35:00,120 --> 00:35:02,760
joking so I'm going to ask 
rather than assume. 

611
00:35:02,760 --> 00:35:05,880
Or my tone doesn't always match 
what I mean. 

612
00:35:05,880 --> 00:35:10,040
So if I sound sharp, please 
check with me and I will also 

613
00:35:10,040 --> 00:35:12,320
maybe correct myself too, you 
know? 

614
00:35:13,240 --> 00:35:16,800
And then the actual work, which 
is asking what someone meant 

615
00:35:16,800 --> 00:35:20,200
rather than deciding, because 
deciding is faster and feels 

616
00:35:20,200 --> 00:35:23,440
safer and is wrong more often 
than you'd think. 

617
00:35:24,120 --> 00:35:27,160
There's one more, which is the 
one you'll skip. 

618
00:35:27,960 --> 00:35:30,480
Raise one tiny thing with 
somebody safe. 

619
00:35:30,840 --> 00:35:33,120
Not the big thing. 
The small thing you'd normally 

620
00:35:33,120 --> 00:35:34,880
absorb the wrong order in the 
coffee shop. 

621
00:35:34,880 --> 00:35:38,160
The friend who is 20 minutes 
late and say it once. 

622
00:35:38,400 --> 00:35:42,760
Plainly, the failure mode here 
is that this feels too small to 

623
00:35:42,760 --> 00:35:45,000
matter and you'll conclude it 
just doesn't count. 

624
00:35:45,320 --> 00:35:48,560
It counts more than anything 
else because you cannot practice

625
00:35:48,560 --> 00:35:50,240
conflict on the terrifying 
stuff. 

626
00:35:50,600 --> 00:35:54,760
And every small thing that you 
say and survive is data that 

627
00:35:54,760 --> 00:35:56,360
your brain didn't have 
yesterday. 

628
00:35:56,640 --> 00:35:59,800
Now what progress actually looks
like, because I really want you 

629
00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:02,240
to just have a very realistic 
measure. 

630
00:36:02,960 --> 00:36:06,480
Progress is not calm conflict. 
You may never have calm 

631
00:36:06,480 --> 00:36:09,120
conflict. 
And I'd say I'm pretty got there

632
00:36:09,120 --> 00:36:11,960
myself for all my training and 
therapy and knowing exactly how 

633
00:36:11,960 --> 00:36:13,680
all this works. 
I say every episode. 

634
00:36:13,920 --> 00:36:17,480
It still catches me out, 
especially when I'm tired or in 

635
00:36:17,480 --> 00:36:19,640
pain or my cognitive load is 
already high. 

636
00:36:19,920 --> 00:36:23,720
Progress is short of recovery. 
Three days becomes a day, a day 

637
00:36:23,720 --> 00:36:26,680
becomes an evening, an evening 
becomes a couple of hours and a 

638
00:36:26,680 --> 00:36:30,920
slightly rough night's sleep. 
Progress is noticing the flood 

639
00:36:30,920 --> 00:36:33,640
while it's happening rather than
a week later. 

640
00:36:33,640 --> 00:36:37,600
Progress is saying the thing 
badly rather than not saying it 

641
00:36:37,600 --> 00:36:39,800
at all. 
And the response coming back, 

642
00:36:39,800 --> 00:36:43,080
sometimes under fatigue or 
stress, or when someone reminds 

643
00:36:43,080 --> 00:36:47,000
you of them, doesn't mean you've
undone your progress. 

644
00:36:47,280 --> 00:36:49,560
Conditioned responses get 
overwritten. 

645
00:36:49,560 --> 00:36:52,920
They don't get deleted. 
So the old one resurfacing is 

646
00:36:52,920 --> 00:36:56,600
information about your load that
day, not a verdict on the work. 

647
00:36:56,960 --> 00:37:01,120
One last thing, none of this 
works with someone who 

648
00:37:01,120 --> 00:37:03,800
escalates. 
If you're in a relationship or a

649
00:37:03,800 --> 00:37:07,120
situation where raising 
something safely isn't available

650
00:37:07,120 --> 00:37:11,200
to you, where the cost of 
speaking is genuinely high, then

651
00:37:11,200 --> 00:37:13,080
the timing of that is yours to 
judge. 

652
00:37:13,120 --> 00:37:19,800
And nobody, including me, is in 
a position to tell you when, OK,

653
00:37:20,400 --> 00:37:23,120
this is the bit that you might 
not enjoy. 

654
00:37:24,160 --> 00:37:27,320
Understanding why you avoid 
conflict is the start of the 

655
00:37:27,320 --> 00:37:28,680
work. 
It's not the work. 

656
00:37:28,720 --> 00:37:31,920
And I think some of you have got
very good at the explanation. 

657
00:37:31,920 --> 00:37:34,960
You can say I'm conflict 
avoidant because of my childhood

658
00:37:35,160 --> 00:37:37,600
with real fluency. 
And it's true. 

659
00:37:38,040 --> 00:37:40,960
And it's also become the thing 
that you say instead of the 

660
00:37:41,400 --> 00:37:43,720
difficult thing that you need to
say. 

661
00:37:44,360 --> 00:37:47,040
The explanation was supposed to 
be a starting point. 

662
00:37:47,360 --> 00:37:51,240
It's turned into somewhere to 
sort of just sit down and stop. 

663
00:37:51,600 --> 00:37:54,080
I'm not blaming you for that, 
because the explanation 

664
00:37:54,080 --> 00:37:56,680
genuinely does bring relief, and
the relief is reinforcing. 

665
00:37:56,840 --> 00:38:00,440
So of course you go back to it. 
And you were taught over years 

666
00:38:00,680 --> 00:38:03,680
that speaking up carries a cost 
that you cannot pay. 

667
00:38:04,080 --> 00:38:06,480
That's conditioning, not 
cowardice. 

668
00:38:06,800 --> 00:38:11,080
And I am not confusing the 2. 
So here's what you owe yourself,

669
00:38:11,440 --> 00:38:14,760
and it isn't conflict done well.
You owe yourself the sentence 

670
00:38:14,920 --> 00:38:18,080
said badly, slightly the wrong 
moment, in a voice that maybe 

671
00:38:18,080 --> 00:38:21,080
shakes, possibly followed by a 
shame spiral that you'll have to

672
00:38:21,080 --> 00:38:23,880
talk yourself down from over the
next two days. 

673
00:38:24,400 --> 00:38:28,240
Not conflict done well, Conflict
done at all. 

674
00:38:28,400 --> 00:38:33,080
Because every year you spend not
saying it is another year of 

675
00:38:33,080 --> 00:38:36,200
evidence for your brain that's 
saying it would have been 

676
00:38:36,200 --> 00:38:40,320
unsurvivable and you can't build
the counter evidence without 

677
00:38:40,480 --> 00:38:44,200
doing the thing. 
Next week is the last episode of

678
00:38:44,200 --> 00:38:48,120
the season, and we're talking 
about a work in progress, what 

679
00:38:48,120 --> 00:38:51,960
realistic change actually looks 
like when you've got a brain 

680
00:38:51,960 --> 00:38:53,800
like ours and a childhood like 
ours. 

681
00:38:54,120 --> 00:38:58,720
So I want to know, what does 
progress look like for you 

682
00:38:58,720 --> 00:39:01,280
specifically? 
Not the big version, the small, 

683
00:39:01,280 --> 00:39:04,440
measurable one that you'd 
actually notice. 

684
00:39:05,360 --> 00:39:07,360
There we are. 
Thank you, as ever, for 

685
00:39:07,360 --> 00:39:10,280
listening. 
And all that remains to be said 

686
00:39:10,320 --> 00:39:11,480
is take care.
