1
00:00:04,200 --> 00:00:07,120
This is Geology Bites with 
Oliver Strimpel. 

2
00:00:08,720 --> 00:00:12,880
Why is there water on Earth? 
We asked this question because 

3
00:00:12,880 --> 00:00:16,280
one might naively expect water 
to be too volatile to be 

4
00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:21,120
retained by the hot early Earth.
Rather, water should have been 

5
00:00:21,120 --> 00:00:24,680
confined to the outer solar 
system, beyond the so-called 

6
00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:28,720
snow line, where the distance 
from the sun is such that water 

7
00:00:28,720 --> 00:00:31,840
can freeze. 
In the solar system. 

8
00:00:31,920 --> 00:00:35,320
That line runs between the 
orbits of Mars and Jupiter. 

9
00:00:36,880 --> 00:00:40,680
Lindy Elkins Tanton's research 
has focused on how to rest your 

10
00:00:40,680 --> 00:00:44,960
planet's form and evolve. 
She has a particular interest in

11
00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:48,520
where the Earth's water came 
from and is a major proponent of

12
00:00:48,520 --> 00:00:51,480
one of the competing theories 
that attempt to answer this 

13
00:00:51,480 --> 00:00:54,280
question. 
She's a professor in the School 

14
00:00:54,280 --> 00:00:57,960
of Earth and Space Exploration 
at Arizona State University. 

15
00:00:59,320 --> 00:01:02,120
Lindy Elkins Tansen Welcome to 
Geology Bytes. 

16
00:01:02,320 --> 00:01:04,920
Thank you so much, Oliver. 
It's a pleasure to be here. 

17
00:01:04,920 --> 00:01:08,400
Thanks for inviting me. 
Did I summarize the problem of 

18
00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:10,360
the origin of the Earth's water 
correctly? 

19
00:01:10,880 --> 00:01:14,800
Yeah, this is just how people 
think about it with the snow 

20
00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:17,520
line. 
The old view of water in the 

21
00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:20,800
planets, in the rocky planets 
and water in the Earth is that 

22
00:01:20,920 --> 00:01:24,280
the planets formed from a 
planetary nebula that consisted 

23
00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:28,080
of gas and dust orbiting around 
our young sun while the sun was 

24
00:01:28,080 --> 00:01:31,520
forming. 
And high temperatures and the 

25
00:01:31,520 --> 00:01:35,520
solar wind from the active young
sun evaporated the volatiles 

26
00:01:35,520 --> 00:01:38,160
from the inner parts of that 
planetary disk and blew them 

27
00:01:38,160 --> 00:01:40,280
outwards past this so-called 
snow line. 

28
00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,840
And so the inner terrestrial 
planets like the Earth formed 

29
00:01:44,240 --> 00:01:48,760
dry with just rock and metal. 
But there's a new view. 

30
00:01:49,280 --> 00:01:52,320
First of all, we've learned that
that planetary nebula only 

31
00:01:52,320 --> 00:01:54,640
lasted a few million years, and 
then it dispersed. 

32
00:01:54,640 --> 00:01:57,240
We can see it in exoplanets, and
we can measure it in certain 

33
00:01:57,240 --> 00:01:58,560
ways in our own solar. 
System. 

34
00:01:59,040 --> 00:02:02,280
So the planets had to have 
formed very rapidly because 

35
00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:04,480
after that there's no more 
material available to form a 

36
00:02:04,480 --> 00:02:07,080
planet. 
So even though volatiles were 

37
00:02:07,080 --> 00:02:10,639
relatively depleted from the 
inner solar system by those very

38
00:02:10,639 --> 00:02:12,320
processes of solar, wind and 
high. 

39
00:02:12,320 --> 00:02:15,680
Temperature minerals still. 
Formed with water trapped within

40
00:02:15,680 --> 00:02:18,840
them in crystal voids or as part
of the crystal lattices 

41
00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:23,520
themselves, and fast forming 
planetary cores of metal and 

42
00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:26,480
rock in the outer solar system. 
Grew large enough to 

43
00:02:26,480 --> 00:02:29,920
gravitationally gather their 
volatile envelopes before the 

44
00:02:29,920 --> 00:02:33,600
planetary nebula dispersed, 
where the littler planets and 

45
00:02:33,600 --> 00:02:36,640
the inner solar system never got
big enough to gather that water.

46
00:02:36,640 --> 00:02:40,040
So they look very different. 
But it turns out the materials 

47
00:02:40,040 --> 00:02:43,760
that made those cores are not 
very different, because a lot of

48
00:02:43,760 --> 00:02:46,720
material migrated regularly both
inward and outward while the 

49
00:02:46,720 --> 00:02:50,160
planets were forming. 
And so that idea that the inner 

50
00:02:50,160 --> 00:02:54,080
ones were just dry and the outer
ones were wet is really almost 

51
00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:58,360
the product of what the solar 
system looks like today and not 

52
00:02:58,360 --> 00:03:02,400
the actual process by which 
things form. 2/3 of the Earth's 

53
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:06,280
surface is covered by oceans. 
It certainly looks as if there's

54
00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:10,360
a lot of water on Earth, but 
actually, what proportion of the

55
00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:13,400
Earth is water, and is it mainly
in the oceans? 

56
00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:17,760
We are such surface creatures. 
We really feel that all the 

57
00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:19,480
water is here and we're standing
in it. 

58
00:03:19,760 --> 00:03:22,160
But the interior of the Earth 
still contains quite a lot of 

59
00:03:22,160 --> 00:03:23,920
water. 
And again, it's mostly water 

60
00:03:23,920 --> 00:03:28,680
that's either just an oxygen and
a hydrogen and a hydroxyl ion 

61
00:03:28,680 --> 00:03:31,320
instead of a full water 
molecule, and in some cases a 

62
00:03:31,320 --> 00:03:34,960
full water molecule that are 
trapped in crystal voids or part

63
00:03:34,960 --> 00:03:37,040
of crystal lattices. 
So they almost seem like they're

64
00:03:37,040 --> 00:03:39,840
part of the solid Earth, but 
inside the Earth. 

65
00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:43,640
The estimate range is from 2 to 
10 times as much water as we 

66
00:03:43,640 --> 00:03:46,200
have fear on the surface. 
So there's actually more water 

67
00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:48,000
inside the Earth than there is 
outside. 

68
00:03:48,600 --> 00:03:51,680
Okay, can you summarize the 
theories that have been put 

69
00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:53,960
forward to explain the origin of
Earth's water? 

70
00:03:54,400 --> 00:03:55,440
There's a. 
Range. 

71
00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:56,600
Of course, there's always a 
range. 

72
00:03:56,600 --> 00:03:58,760
It's not just. 
Like one thing or exactly? 

73
00:03:58,760 --> 00:04:01,320
Another thing, the way these 
theories go, but the simplest 

74
00:04:01,320 --> 00:04:04,080
way to describe it is. 
One end of the idea. 

75
00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:06,400
Is that Earth's water came from 
cometary? 

76
00:04:06,400 --> 00:04:09,400
Impacts that the earth formed. 
Really dry, and then it was 

77
00:04:09,400 --> 00:04:13,880
later wet impactors like comets 
that brought water to the Earth.

78
00:04:14,440 --> 00:04:19,240
And then the other end member 
concept is that although comets 

79
00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:22,840
have definitely hit the Earth in
the past, water was delivered to

80
00:04:22,840 --> 00:04:25,960
the Earth in the very rocky 
building blocks of the Earth 

81
00:04:25,960 --> 00:04:27,920
itself. 
Found inside. 

82
00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:32,440
Those rocky material crystals. 
And so the earth actually formed

83
00:04:32,440 --> 00:04:34,680
with water from its original 
rocky material. 

84
00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:39,080
So what observations can we make
to help distinguish among the 

85
00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:43,640
different theories? 
One thing is detailed analysis 

86
00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:48,680
of meteorites and asteroids and 
comets by audacious space 

87
00:04:48,680 --> 00:04:51,920
missions that have measured 
particles of comets and also 

88
00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:54,960
observations from the Earth. 
We now know a lot more about 

89
00:04:54,960 --> 00:04:58,040
what comets are made of, even on
the isotopic level. 

90
00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:01,480
So what we can do is we can 
compare the isotopes of certain 

91
00:05:01,480 --> 00:05:04,680
elements as they're found on the
Earth versus the ones that are 

92
00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:09,520
found in comets or in meteorites
that are parts of asteroids or 

93
00:05:09,520 --> 00:05:14,240
in asteroids themselves. 
And when you look at deuterium 

94
00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:18,800
to hydrogen, those two hydrogen 
isotopes, or nitrogen 14 to 

95
00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:23,600
nitrogen 15, those nitrogen 
isotopes and also noble gas 

96
00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:28,240
compositions, it's been shown 
that cometary water contributed 

97
00:05:28,440 --> 00:05:32,720
1% or less of the Earth's water.
Some people say perhaps up to 

98
00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:36,160
15%, but really a very low 
amount. 

99
00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:38,360
So water really can't have come 
from comets. 

100
00:05:38,760 --> 00:05:42,640
It had to have come from the 
water that's bound up in rocky 

101
00:05:43,040 --> 00:05:45,080
asteroidal material like 
meteorites. 

102
00:05:45,840 --> 00:05:49,480
When you talked about the 
isotopic measurements, you 

103
00:05:49,480 --> 00:05:52,240
talked about nitrogen. 
Does that actually bear directly

104
00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:56,440
on where the hydrogen and oxygen
in the water came from as well? 

105
00:05:56,640 --> 00:05:59,040
Yeah. 
We think of comets mainly as ice

106
00:05:59,040 --> 00:06:02,480
balls, balls of ice, and we 
think of them as water ice, but 

107
00:06:02,480 --> 00:06:05,640
they're about half ice. 
And that ice is not just water 

108
00:06:05,640 --> 00:06:08,440
ice, but it's also things like 
ammonia ice that contains a lot 

109
00:06:08,440 --> 00:06:10,960
of nitrogen. 
And the other half of comet 

110
00:06:10,960 --> 00:06:14,680
materials, broadly speaking, are
organic materials. 

111
00:06:15,240 --> 00:06:19,360
And so things that are made of 
carbon and nitrogen and hydrogen

112
00:06:19,360 --> 00:06:23,000
and then other elements as well.
And so when you add the water 

113
00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:26,240
from comets, you actually are 
forced to also add those other 

114
00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:28,680
ices and the organic material as
well. 

115
00:06:29,120 --> 00:06:33,480
And so you can compare those, 
the whole volatile inventory of 

116
00:06:33,480 --> 00:06:35,360
comets to what we find on our 
Earth. 

117
00:06:36,040 --> 00:06:41,080
So if we can say that the other 
volatiles have the isotopic 

118
00:06:41,120 --> 00:06:45,280
signature of comets, then we can
infer that the water must have 

119
00:06:45,280 --> 00:06:47,360
come along for the ride. 
Yeah, that's right. 

120
00:06:47,360 --> 00:06:51,240
Or conversely, if none of the 
other measurements fit, then 

121
00:06:51,240 --> 00:06:53,080
cometary water is not the main 
source. 

122
00:06:53,640 --> 00:06:56,920
Perhaps you've already indicated
your preference, but which 

123
00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:01,600
theory do you favour and why? 
I came at this not so much to 

124
00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:05,360
solve the problem of Earth's 
water, but instead looking at 

125
00:07:05,360 --> 00:07:09,360
the processes by which rocky 
planets form from giant impacts 

126
00:07:09,400 --> 00:07:11,680
of material in early solar 
systems. 

127
00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:15,080
And those giant impacts, as they
creep into the planet, deliver 

128
00:07:15,080 --> 00:07:19,640
enough kinetic energy that they 
melt the target body as it's 

129
00:07:19,640 --> 00:07:21,360
growing. 
And the target body goes through

130
00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:26,920
this phase called a magma ocean.
And so my interest was how can 

131
00:07:26,920 --> 00:07:30,240
we use our quite extensive 
knowledge of how magma 

132
00:07:30,560 --> 00:07:35,920
solidifies and how volatiles 
interact with magma to predict 

133
00:07:35,960 --> 00:07:39,240
and understand how rocky planets
form from that starting point of

134
00:07:39,240 --> 00:07:42,560
a magma ocean? 
And it had been thought the 

135
00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:45,600
magma oceans were necessarily 
fully dry, that the water was 

136
00:07:45,600 --> 00:07:49,360
driven off by heat. 
And again, it's because I think 

137
00:07:49,360 --> 00:07:53,200
that some of our scientific 
intuition comes from our simple 

138
00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:58,440
experiences at one atmosphere, 
pressure and Earth gravity and 

139
00:07:58,440 --> 00:08:01,520
the kind of conditions we 
normally live in where if you, 

140
00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:04,840
for example, put your clothes in
a hot dryer, it drives off the 

141
00:08:04,840 --> 00:08:08,640
water. 
And that's true, but also the 

142
00:08:08,640 --> 00:08:11,440
thing that we forget is that 
water is actually incredibly 

143
00:08:11,440 --> 00:08:13,840
sticky and you never drive it 
all off. 

144
00:08:14,160 --> 00:08:18,120
And so is the amount of water 
that is retained enough to do 

145
00:08:18,120 --> 00:08:19,640
what we need to make a rocky 
planet. 

146
00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:23,640
And so my work showed that if 
you build a rocky planet with 

147
00:08:23,800 --> 00:08:27,760
rocky material that contains 
just 100 parts per million of 

148
00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:32,039
water bound up in crystals, just
the way we find it in meteorites

149
00:08:32,039 --> 00:08:35,200
and in asteroids, many of them 
are in fact wetter than 100 

150
00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:38,200
parts per million. 
But if you process that through 

151
00:08:38,200 --> 00:08:41,880
a magma ocean, a lot of water is
released into an early steam 

152
00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:45,480
atmosphere that's free to later 
cool and collapse into an ocean,

153
00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:48,960
but then a lot is actually 
retained inside in the magma 

154
00:08:48,960 --> 00:08:51,080
because the magma won't give up 
all the water. 

155
00:08:51,520 --> 00:08:54,280
And. 
So it turns out that just 

156
00:08:54,280 --> 00:08:57,440
starting with just 100 parts per
million of water produces. 

157
00:08:57,560 --> 00:08:59,960
A nice wet. 
Planet one with water inside, 

158
00:08:59,960 --> 00:09:03,160
similar to what the Earth has 
today and with a deep water 

159
00:09:03,160 --> 00:09:05,520
ocean. 
In fact, the problem becomes 

160
00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:08,400
getting rid of the surface 
water, not making more. 

161
00:09:08,840 --> 00:09:13,000
And So what that work indicated 
that really confirmed my 

162
00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:15,320
opinions about this whole field 
is that. 

163
00:09:15,560 --> 00:09:19,480
Any rocky planet. 
Born anywhere in our universe at

164
00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:22,960
a material that has just 100 
parts per million of water will 

165
00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:25,520
be born wet. 
And therefore if it's in a 

166
00:09:25,520 --> 00:09:28,160
habitable zone, it will be born 
habitable. 

167
00:09:28,560 --> 00:09:33,080
And so when you think about it 
that way, requiring comets to 

168
00:09:33,080 --> 00:09:37,000
strike the surface later, which 
is a stochastic process that you

169
00:09:37,000 --> 00:09:42,080
can't count on, sounds a little 
bit like special pleading when 

170
00:09:42,080 --> 00:09:44,680
you know that the planets going 
to be wet from the beginning. 

171
00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:47,920
The problem is not delivering 
water to a planet, the problem 

172
00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:50,000
is getting rid of it. 
These planets are born with so 

173
00:09:50,000 --> 00:09:52,640
much water. 
Did the water in the oceans then

174
00:09:52,760 --> 00:09:56,040
have to be extracted from the 
magma ocean, or do we think it 

175
00:09:56,240 --> 00:09:58,160
just came out of the steam 
atmosphere? 

176
00:09:58,520 --> 00:10:01,600
That steam atmosphere is a bit 
vulnerable. 

177
00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:04,080
A hot steam atmosphere is 
expansive. 

178
00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:07,520
It rises up from the planet's 
surface farther than a cold 

179
00:10:07,520 --> 00:10:09,240
atmosphere like what we have 
today. 

180
00:10:09,600 --> 00:10:13,640
And the early young sun was very
active and so a lot of that 

181
00:10:13,640 --> 00:10:17,760
steam could have been lost to 
solar wind, but not all of it 

182
00:10:17,760 --> 00:10:19,400
before it. 
Cooled, in fact. 

183
00:10:19,400 --> 00:10:22,560
This is one of the ideas of the 
difference between Venus and the

184
00:10:22,600 --> 00:10:25,320
Earth. 
Just that distance from the sun 

185
00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:28,440
could have meant that Venus's 
atmosphere was stripped, but the

186
00:10:28,520 --> 00:10:31,920
the Earth retained more of its 
atmosphere to allow it to 

187
00:10:31,920 --> 00:10:35,720
collapse into an ocean. 
And so I think that the physics 

188
00:10:35,720 --> 00:10:39,080
and chemistry would indicate 
that some steam atmospheres may 

189
00:10:39,080 --> 00:10:41,760
be stripped, and then the planet
needs to start over with 

190
00:10:41,760 --> 00:10:45,480
volcanism, releasing water from 
the inside, and then others will

191
00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:48,240
collapse and make something of 
an ocean before they're 

192
00:10:48,240 --> 00:10:50,640
stripped. 
Is that the main mechanism then 

193
00:10:50,640 --> 00:10:53,480
for getting the water from the 
inside to the outside then via 

194
00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:55,280
volcanism? 
That's right. 

195
00:10:55,320 --> 00:10:58,200
That's part of why people care 
so much about plate tectonics. 

196
00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:01,440
When we think about 
habitability, that the way that 

197
00:11:01,440 --> 00:11:05,760
we understand that carbon is 
controlled on our planet and 

198
00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:07,920
water is refreshed into the 
atmosphere. 

199
00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:12,920
If the problem then becomes how 
to get rid of the excess water, 

200
00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:16,080
so to speak, what do we think 
happened to make it disappear? 

201
00:11:17,040 --> 00:11:21,040
I think that the primary 
mechanism would be stripping of 

202
00:11:21,040 --> 00:11:24,240
that inflated hot steam 
atmosphere by the young sun. 

203
00:11:24,560 --> 00:11:28,320
But another way to remove water 
from the surface is through 

204
00:11:28,640 --> 00:11:31,320
ongoing impacts. 
For example, on the Earth, our 

205
00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:34,080
last really giant impact had to 
have been the one that formed 

206
00:11:34,080 --> 00:11:36,360
our moon. 
But impacts? 

207
00:11:36,360 --> 00:11:39,720
Didn't just end then. 
And in fact, the moon forming 

208
00:11:39,720 --> 00:11:45,040
impact or impacts of that scale 
would create a trail of debris 

209
00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:47,520
in the Earth's orbit, which the 
Earth and the Moon would 

210
00:11:47,520 --> 00:11:50,000
necessarily sweep up again over 
time. 

211
00:11:50,400 --> 00:11:54,400
And so those impacts, plus other
objects flung in from the outer 

212
00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:57,600
solar system or out from the 
inner solar system during those 

213
00:11:58,040 --> 00:12:01,440
early chaotic times before the 
planets completely cleared their

214
00:12:01,440 --> 00:12:04,920
orbits, all of those impacts 
would have removed some amount 

215
00:12:04,920 --> 00:12:07,320
of atmosphere and water from the
surface. 

216
00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:11,200
Although it's been shown also 
that that removal is not as 

217
00:12:11,200 --> 00:12:14,840
efficient as our surface bound 
brains might think. 

218
00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:16,720
They remove some, but not 
everything. 

219
00:12:17,600 --> 00:12:21,560
As you already mentioned, water 
plays a critical role in plate 

220
00:12:21,560 --> 00:12:26,120
tectonics as the presence of 
even minute quantities of water 

221
00:12:26,120 --> 00:12:29,360
in a rock has a very big effect 
on its strength and melting 

222
00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:32,280
temperature. 
This in turn effects then what 

223
00:12:32,280 --> 00:12:35,480
happens to plate boundaries, 
especially at subduction zones 

224
00:12:35,480 --> 00:12:38,040
where water is released by 
dehydration reactions in the 

225
00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:40,680
down growing plate. 
And as you should have 

226
00:12:40,680 --> 00:12:44,040
mentioned, that's the source of 
the volcanism that we now see 

227
00:12:44,040 --> 00:12:47,120
above, subduction zones in 
volcanic arcs. 

228
00:12:47,640 --> 00:12:51,440
Can we envisage how the Earth 
might have evolved if it had 

229
00:12:51,560 --> 00:12:55,240
much less water? 
And you mentioned Venus, Is that

230
00:12:55,240 --> 00:12:58,160
a case in point? 
That's certainly one of the 

231
00:12:58,160 --> 00:13:01,320
predominant views in the 
scientific community, that Venus

232
00:13:01,320 --> 00:13:04,800
is just dry on the inside. 
Also, as you point out, even a 

233
00:13:04,800 --> 00:13:08,880
very small amount of water, 
again in those crystals within 

234
00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:12,760
the crystals not wandering 
around as a free fluid, reduces 

235
00:13:12,760 --> 00:13:15,040
the viscosity tremendously. 
And that the thing to think 

236
00:13:15,040 --> 00:13:19,720
about here is that the interior 
of the Earth is moving 

237
00:13:20,120 --> 00:13:24,560
centimeters to meters per year, 
so very, very slowly, and it 

238
00:13:24,560 --> 00:13:27,880
moves through the deformation of
solid crystals. 

239
00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:30,920
And those solid crystals are the
same as you might pick up in a 

240
00:13:30,920 --> 00:13:33,400
piece of rock on the surface, 
but under heat and pressure they

241
00:13:33,400 --> 00:13:36,400
can flow. 
And you can imagine this makes 

242
00:13:36,400 --> 00:13:39,040
some kind of intuitive sense. 
That if. 

243
00:13:39,080 --> 00:13:42,800
In their little crystal voids 
are bits of water, or in their 

244
00:13:42,800 --> 00:13:45,880
crystal lattices are water. 
Those are generally weaker 

245
00:13:45,880 --> 00:13:49,280
crystals than ones without, and 
so they flow more easily. 

246
00:13:49,680 --> 00:13:53,160
So just little bits of water 
inside the solid crystals. 

247
00:13:53,160 --> 00:13:56,120
The mineral crystals actually 
allows the inside of the Earth 

248
00:13:56,120 --> 00:13:59,880
to flow more easily, 
particularly right up underneath

249
00:13:59,880 --> 00:14:02,440
the tectonic plates, and that's 
where there's an area of 

250
00:14:02,440 --> 00:14:04,920
particularly low viscosity that 
allows that. 

251
00:14:04,920 --> 00:14:07,880
Plate tectonic movement, which 
we don't. 

252
00:14:07,880 --> 00:14:09,760
Think is. 
Happening on Venus, although 

253
00:14:09,760 --> 00:14:11,200
that's debated. 
It could be. 

254
00:14:11,480 --> 00:14:14,600
Still happening on Venus. 
But the idea is that the 

255
00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:18,880
interior of Venus in fact is 
drier and therefore much stiffer

256
00:14:19,240 --> 00:14:23,360
and much less willing to flow. 
But an interesting question is. 

257
00:14:23,960 --> 00:14:27,120
If there was plate tectonics on 
Venus, how would we really know?

258
00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:30,240
Because the way that we 
absolutely confirmed it on the 

259
00:14:30,240 --> 00:14:34,360
Earth was with seismic networks 
that were able to locate 

260
00:14:34,360 --> 00:14:38,840
earthquakes that conform to the 
shape of a down going slab under

261
00:14:38,840 --> 00:14:40,760
these volcanic arcs that you 
refer to. 

262
00:14:41,200 --> 00:14:43,360
We have no seismic network on 
Venus. 

263
00:14:43,640 --> 00:14:47,600
We could hope, maybe someday. 
So just to get back to why Venus

264
00:14:47,600 --> 00:14:51,440
is dry and the Earth is not, is 
it you think fundamentally 

265
00:14:51,560 --> 00:14:54,760
because it's slightly closer to 
the Sun and therefore it 

266
00:14:54,760 --> 00:14:56,640
couldn't retain water in an 
atmosphere? 

267
00:14:56,720 --> 00:15:00,760
That is a good solid hypothesis 
for why that is. 

268
00:15:00,800 --> 00:15:03,680
And I think that's probably 
where I would go first to look 

269
00:15:03,680 --> 00:15:07,480
for an answer. 
But there's still so much that's

270
00:15:07,480 --> 00:15:10,720
not known about Venus, so much 
more that we need to learn. 

271
00:15:10,960 --> 00:15:14,680
And so I wouldn't venture to say
that I'd place money on that 

272
00:15:14,680 --> 00:15:16,720
bet, but it's absolutely 
plausible. 

273
00:15:17,160 --> 00:15:20,120
I said in the introduction that 
the snow line runs between Mars 

274
00:15:20,120 --> 00:15:22,680
and Jupiter. 
So is Mars wet? 

275
00:15:23,080 --> 00:15:26,680
Mars is a bit wet at the present
time and has a bunch of water 

276
00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:29,440
ice on its surface that migrates
back and forth. 

277
00:15:29,800 --> 00:15:33,320
But there's evidence that it was
much wetter in the past and so 

278
00:15:33,360 --> 00:15:35,360
there's the thought that. 
Then in the. 

279
00:15:35,360 --> 00:15:40,920
Distant past Mars was as wet and
habitable as the Earth, and that

280
00:15:40,960 --> 00:15:45,080
it lost its water over time and 
became much much drier, which is

281
00:15:45,080 --> 00:15:48,120
where it is is today. 
The thought for that water loss 

282
00:15:48,120 --> 00:15:51,920
is mainly just that Mars is much
smaller than the Earth and water

283
00:15:51,920 --> 00:15:55,440
is not as well gravitationally 
bound to it, and especially if 

284
00:15:55,440 --> 00:15:57,160
Mars lost. 
Its magnetic. 

285
00:15:57,160 --> 00:15:59,480
Field early on, which it has. 
None now. 

286
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:03,240
It's not as protected on Mars as
it is on the Earth, and so that 

287
00:16:03,240 --> 00:16:06,080
water will be lost over time to 
the solar wind. 

288
00:16:06,440 --> 00:16:10,000
That's one set of ideas. 
That hangs together well and 

289
00:16:10,000 --> 00:16:11,600
might. 
Explain what we see on Mars 

290
00:16:11,600 --> 00:16:15,240
today. 
As we search for exoplanets, 

291
00:16:15,520 --> 00:16:18,160
there's a lot of discussion 
about the habitable zone, 

292
00:16:18,720 --> 00:16:22,720
defined as the band within which
liquid water can exist, because 

293
00:16:23,280 --> 00:16:25,280
we believe water is essential 
for life. 

294
00:16:25,960 --> 00:16:30,520
But could it be that a typical 
planet in the habitable zone 

295
00:16:30,520 --> 00:16:34,720
might just be dry, even if any 
water would have been in liquid 

296
00:16:34,720 --> 00:16:37,160
form if it was there? 
Would you think the sort of 

297
00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:41,920
mechanisms that you describe for
Earth would prevail in any 

298
00:16:42,000 --> 00:16:46,440
plausible exoplanetary system? 
Well, I hate to generalize to 

299
00:16:46,440 --> 00:16:48,520
the universe because we know so 
little about it. 

300
00:16:48,880 --> 00:16:52,560
I can only say that if a planet 
like the Earth was formed around

301
00:16:52,560 --> 00:16:55,960
another star from materials 
similar to what we have in our 

302
00:16:55,960 --> 00:16:57,920
solar system, then it would also
be wet. 

303
00:16:58,320 --> 00:17:02,880
But the concept of a habitable 
zone is a very, very simplistic 

304
00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:06,720
concept because everything about
the habitability of a planet 

305
00:17:06,720 --> 00:17:10,920
depends upon its chemistry. 
In fact, more even than its 

306
00:17:10,920 --> 00:17:13,599
distance from its star or how 
large it is. 

307
00:17:14,000 --> 00:17:16,680
In a solar system where for some
reason there's a higher 

308
00:17:16,680 --> 00:17:19,880
percentage of radiogenic 
elements than interior, heating 

309
00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:23,640
up the planet can keep its 
surface wet longer and you don't

310
00:17:23,640 --> 00:17:25,920
need to rely on that star 
distance. 

311
00:17:26,240 --> 00:17:29,360
The composition of its 
atmosphere will entirely 

312
00:17:29,360 --> 00:17:32,280
determine the current surface 
temperatures of that planet. 

313
00:17:32,560 --> 00:17:34,440
And if you look at the 
difference between Venus's 

314
00:17:34,440 --> 00:17:37,640
atmosphere and the Earth's 
atmosphere and how different our

315
00:17:37,640 --> 00:17:41,080
surface conditions are, knowing 
we could not discriminate 

316
00:17:41,080 --> 00:17:44,280
between Venus and the Earth, 
when looking through telescopes,

317
00:17:44,760 --> 00:17:46,680
you see the composition is 
everything. 

318
00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:51,680
And I would just add that even 
in planets that are not in the 

319
00:17:51,680 --> 00:17:56,320
classical habitable zone, there 
could be the liquid water just 

320
00:17:56,320 --> 00:18:00,000
under the surface of those 
planets, Either brines or waters

321
00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:02,200
that are heated from radiogenic 
heating inside. 

322
00:18:02,400 --> 00:18:05,280
Or the moons of planets that are
not at all in the habitable 

323
00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:09,120
zone, but tidal heating from 
their main planet keeps them 

324
00:18:09,120 --> 00:18:14,760
warm enough to habitable. 
Have we in fact seen evidence of

325
00:18:14,760 --> 00:18:17,560
water on an exoplanet? 
Yes, traces of. 

326
00:18:17,560 --> 00:18:20,640
Water and exoplanetary. 
Atmospheres have been found. 

327
00:18:21,120 --> 00:18:23,160
So we know. 
There's water out there, There's

328
00:18:23,160 --> 00:18:25,200
water out there and then a. 
Whole. 

329
00:18:25,200 --> 00:18:28,200
Chain of questions need to be 
asked about what that water 

330
00:18:28,480 --> 00:18:32,880
might mean and does it indicate 
any kind of habitable situation 

331
00:18:32,880 --> 00:18:35,440
that we could understand with 
our comprehension of life. 

332
00:18:35,920 --> 00:18:39,840
Unfortunately, it seems that the
most likely kind of life 

333
00:18:40,440 --> 00:18:44,440
elsewhere in the universe is 
going to be microbial life 

334
00:18:44,440 --> 00:18:48,120
living under the surface of a 
planet, which is unfortunately 

335
00:18:48,120 --> 00:18:50,600
going to be virtually 
undetectable using today's 

336
00:18:50,600 --> 00:18:54,280
technologies. 
If you were to be in charge of 

337
00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:58,840
formulating missions to try and 
figure out if and where there 

338
00:18:58,840 --> 00:19:01,080
might be life, how would you go 
about it? 

339
00:19:01,360 --> 00:19:05,120
Well, my favorite thing to do 
would be to go to Mars and drill

340
00:19:05,120 --> 00:19:07,640
into the groundwater system and 
measure what's there. 

341
00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:10,720
That's where I would go first. 
But that's already technology 

342
00:19:10,720 --> 00:19:13,800
that we don't have. 
What about under the surface of 

343
00:19:14,000 --> 00:19:17,560
Europa or Enceladus? 
Or under those icy exteriors. 

344
00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:19,880
Sure. 
Famously great places that 

345
00:19:19,880 --> 00:19:22,080
people want to go look for life?
Absolutely. 

346
00:19:22,840 --> 00:19:24,280
What are you working on at the 
moment? 

347
00:19:24,880 --> 00:19:28,600
I am absolutely focused on the 
Psyche mission, which is a 

348
00:19:28,600 --> 00:19:32,440
mission to a metal asteroid, not
a site for searching for life 

349
00:19:32,440 --> 00:19:35,000
and no liquid water. 
I've been working on that since 

350
00:19:35,000 --> 00:19:38,760
2011. 
And we won our NASA competition 

351
00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:43,520
in 2017 and we launched in 2023,
and we'll get to the asteroid in

352
00:19:43,520 --> 00:19:47,320
2029. 
And so all of my time is spent 

353
00:19:47,400 --> 00:19:51,480
leading this very large team of 
people on this project, making 

354
00:19:51,480 --> 00:19:55,080
sure that our spacecraft stays 
happy and healthy on its its way

355
00:19:55,080 --> 00:19:57,160
to the asteroid so that we can 
get our science. 

356
00:19:58,200 --> 00:20:00,400
Lindy Elkinstanton, thank you 
very much. 

357
00:20:00,640 --> 00:20:03,120
Thank you very much indeed for 
this time, Oliver. 

358
00:20:03,120 --> 00:20:05,800
I appreciate it. 
To see pictures and 

359
00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:11,200
illustrations that support this 
podcast, go to geologybytes.com,

360
00:20:11,320 --> 00:20:14,080
where you'll also find a subject
matter index of all the 

361
00:20:14,080 --> 00:20:16,440
episodes. 
There you can also give me 

362
00:20:16,440 --> 00:20:20,400
feedback which I welcome, as 
well as sign up to get my emails

363
00:20:20,400 --> 00:20:21,600
about new episodes.
