1
00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:06,840
This is Geology Bites with 
Oliver Strimpel. 

2
00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:12,120
Since almost all of our modern 
understanding of the Earth has 

3
00:00:12,120 --> 00:00:15,520
something to do with the theory 
of plate tectonics, it is 

4
00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:18,560
natural to ask when plate 
tectonics started. 

5
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:22,840
This is a very challenging 
question, since so few rocks 

6
00:00:22,840 --> 00:00:26,640
from the early Earth survived to
the present day, and many of 

7
00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:29,800
those that do have been heavily 
altered by intervening 

8
00:00:29,800 --> 00:00:32,000
metamorphic or hydrothermal 
events. 

9
00:00:33,400 --> 00:00:36,840
I discussed this topic in an 
earlier podcast episode with 

10
00:00:36,840 --> 00:00:41,400
Peter Kaywood. 
One key manifestation of plate 

11
00:00:41,400 --> 00:00:45,120
tectonics is the relative motion
of tectonic plates. 

12
00:00:46,200 --> 00:00:49,600
My guest today recently 
succeeded in detecting such 

13
00:00:49,600 --> 00:00:54,200
motion occurring fully a billion
years earlier than any previous 

14
00:00:54,200 --> 00:00:59,040
such detection. 
Alec Brenner studies Archaean 

15
00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:02,480
rocks using paleomagnetic and 
petrographic methods. 

16
00:01:03,200 --> 00:01:06,360
He is a post doctoral associate 
at Yale University. 

17
00:01:07,400 --> 00:01:09,760
Alec Brenner, welcome to geology
bouts. 

18
00:01:10,040 --> 00:01:14,080
Thanks for having me, Oliver. 
Let's start with your results. 

19
00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:18,880
Exactly what motions did you 
measure and when did they occur?

20
00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:22,520
We looked at a piece of Earth's 
crust that's been around for 

21
00:01:22,520 --> 00:01:25,640
over 3 1/2 billion years. 
Ancient pieces of crust like 

22
00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:29,080
that are called cratons, and we 
specifically were looking at the

23
00:01:29,080 --> 00:01:32,640
Pilbara Craton. 
It's part of WA today, and by 

24
00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:36,320
making magnetic measurements of 
some of its rocks that are 3 1/2

25
00:01:36,320 --> 00:01:39,480
billion years old, we measured 
the latitude where those rocks 

26
00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:42,760
formed over time. 
And those measurements showed us

27
00:01:42,760 --> 00:01:46,640
that at the time, about 3.48 
billion years ago, the Pilbara 

28
00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:51,360
was at about 53° latitude, give 
or take somewhat. 

29
00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:54,520
That's roughly the same place as
Berlin, Germany is today. 

30
00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:58,600
But when we then did the same 
measurements on rocks that were 

31
00:01:58,600 --> 00:02:02,040
just a few million years younger
than those, those slightly 

32
00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:04,520
younger rocks showed that the 
Pilbara was at quite a bit 

33
00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:07,640
higher of a latitude, about 77°,
give or take. 

34
00:02:07,640 --> 00:02:09,800
That's about where Svalbard is 
today. 

35
00:02:10,199 --> 00:02:13,000
So a pretty big shift in just a 
few million years. 

36
00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:17,640
And that means that the Pilbara 
had moved rapidly from 1 

37
00:02:17,640 --> 00:02:19,760
latitude to another during that 
time, right? 

38
00:02:19,800 --> 00:02:23,240
And the rate turned out to be 
about several 10s of centimeters

39
00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:27,360
a year, in line with the very 
fastest of modern plate motions.

40
00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:31,240
And what's especially important 
here is that our colleagues 

41
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:35,800
previously have measured rocks 
of the same ages in another 

42
00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:38,440
ancient piece of Earth's crust 
that's called the Koppal craton 

43
00:02:38,440 --> 00:02:41,880
in South Africa. 
And those measurements of those 

44
00:02:41,880 --> 00:02:44,920
South African rocks showed that 
that craton, the Koppal, was at 

45
00:02:44,920 --> 00:02:48,880
the equator at 3 1/2 billion 
years ago and was not moving at 

46
00:02:48,880 --> 00:02:51,480
the same time. 
It that's a big contrast to the 

47
00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:55,920
Pilbara part of Australia that 
was at higher latitudes and 

48
00:02:55,920 --> 00:02:58,760
moving around. 
And that means that we've found 

49
00:02:58,920 --> 00:03:03,040
two pieces of crust that were 
moving relative to each other 

50
00:03:03,360 --> 00:03:07,880
3.48 billion years ago. 
And fundamentally speaking, that

51
00:03:07,880 --> 00:03:10,880
requires that there's a plate 
boundary in between those two 

52
00:03:10,880 --> 00:03:13,560
pieces of crust. 
That's differential motion, and 

53
00:03:13,560 --> 00:03:16,240
that's a hallmark of plate 
motions. 

54
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:21,320
And you know that that was 
actual translation motion, 

55
00:03:21,320 --> 00:03:24,520
rather than just one giant 
rotation of a single plate. 

56
00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:28,480
It's a little more complex than 
that in the sense that all plate

57
00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:32,200
motions are rotations, but yes, 
the fact that we see one piece 

58
00:03:32,200 --> 00:03:36,120
of crust moving in the other 
isn't allows us to constrain 

59
00:03:36,120 --> 00:03:40,960
that they aren't part of one 
global single plate, one global 

60
00:03:40,960 --> 00:03:44,560
shell that doesn't have plate 
boundaries in it, as has been 

61
00:03:44,560 --> 00:03:47,080
proposed pretty often for this 
time in Earth history. 

62
00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:51,800
You said that the one plate that
you actually worked on the Ilbro

63
00:03:51,800 --> 00:03:55,440
was moving fast, but the other 
plate was not really moving at 

64
00:03:55,440 --> 00:03:58,440
all. 
Is that actually something 

65
00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:01,080
different from what we see 
today, in the sense that we 

66
00:04:01,080 --> 00:04:03,760
wouldn't really find any plates 
that are static over the time 

67
00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:07,080
scale you described? 
It's quite similar today in that

68
00:04:07,080 --> 00:04:07,960
respect. 
Actually. 

69
00:04:07,960 --> 00:04:11,080
There are plates that you can 
find that aren't really moving 

70
00:04:11,080 --> 00:04:13,920
all that quickly. 
A good example is South America.

71
00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:18,519
It is moving in longitude 
somewhat, but paleomagnetically 

72
00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:22,320
using the technique that I used 
to study this problem, you can't

73
00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:24,880
really see that it's moving 
because it's not moving in 

74
00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:29,920
latitude or it's, it's also not 
rotating, it's just moving in 

75
00:04:29,920 --> 00:04:33,200
longitude, if that makes sense. 
So that motion is invisible to 

76
00:04:33,200 --> 00:04:35,280
us. 
And there are also a few other 

77
00:04:35,280 --> 00:04:38,560
places on Earth where you can 
see no motion occurring. 

78
00:04:39,200 --> 00:04:42,000
But yes, that's roughly in line 
with what you might expect. 

79
00:04:42,600 --> 00:04:47,600
So as you said, you use 
paleomagnetic methods to measure

80
00:04:47,600 --> 00:04:52,000
this motion and paleomagnetism 
has actually come up in previous

81
00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:55,800
episodes of Geology Bites, in 
particular the one on super 

82
00:04:55,800 --> 00:05:00,240
continents with David Evans. 
Can you refresh us on how 

83
00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:04,360
paleomagnetic methods enable us 
to reconstruct past plate 

84
00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:05,840
motions? 
Yeah, sure. 

85
00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:10,160
Earth's got a liquid iron, 
nickel, metal outer core, and 

86
00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:13,240
that's electrically conductive 
and also convecting. 

87
00:05:13,360 --> 00:05:17,800
And so it generates a strong 
magnetic field that surrounds 

88
00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:19,840
Earth. 
And it's in the shape of a 

89
00:05:19,840 --> 00:05:21,880
dipole, right? 
The shape of a bar magnet with a

90
00:05:21,880 --> 00:05:26,880
North Pole and a South Pole. 
And what's handy is that most 

91
00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:30,880
rocks forming on Earth's surface
contain tiny grains of these 

92
00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:34,640
magnetic minerals like magnetite
and hematite and puritite. 

93
00:05:35,160 --> 00:05:39,800
And those grains can act like 
microscopic compasses that when 

94
00:05:39,800 --> 00:05:42,880
they form, they can freeze the 
magnetic field where they form 

95
00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:46,640
in place and record it therefore
for us to measure later. 

96
00:05:46,640 --> 00:05:50,920
And so, much like you can use a 
compass to navigate your way 

97
00:05:50,920 --> 00:05:54,720
around the world today, we can 
measure the directions of these 

98
00:05:54,720 --> 00:05:58,280
magnetic signals preserved by 
tiny magnetic mineral grains and

99
00:05:58,280 --> 00:06:01,760
rocks to piece together how 
those rocks and the pieces of 

100
00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:05,440
crust they sit on have shifted 
over Earth's surface over time, 

101
00:06:05,960 --> 00:06:08,680
piercing together things like 
the supercontinent cycle and the

102
00:06:08,680 --> 00:06:12,840
formation and closure of oceans.
And for this study that we're 

103
00:06:12,840 --> 00:06:16,720
doing, we don't have very much 
context beyond just single 

104
00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:19,560
points in time for individual 
plates. 

105
00:06:19,880 --> 00:06:22,880
But what's important is that we 
can measure the latitude at 

106
00:06:22,880 --> 00:06:26,640
which those rocks formed. 
And that, it turns out, is very 

107
00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:30,520
straightforward to calculate 
from how steeply up or down the 

108
00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:33,720
magnetic field is pointing on 
Earth's surface. 

109
00:06:33,720 --> 00:06:37,480
If you're at the equator, the 
magnetic field is horizontal to 

110
00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:38,800
the Earth's surface, pointing 
north. 

111
00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:42,200
If you're at the North Pole, the
magnetic field points straight 

112
00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:44,240
down into the Earth, and if 
you're at the South Pole, it 

113
00:06:44,280 --> 00:06:45,800
points straight up out of the 
Earth. 

114
00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:47,960
And it smoothly varies in 
between. 

115
00:06:48,280 --> 00:06:51,200
But how do you cope with the 
fact that the actual magnetic 

116
00:06:51,200 --> 00:06:54,400
pole is usually wandering 
around, even if it's not 

117
00:06:54,400 --> 00:06:56,760
reversing? 
Yeah, we cope with that with a 

118
00:06:56,760 --> 00:06:59,920
lot of samples. 
Yes, the magnetic field does 

119
00:06:59,920 --> 00:07:03,400
vary through what we would call 
in the business paleo secular 

120
00:07:03,400 --> 00:07:07,120
variation. 
I've heard it analogized to a 

121
00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:10,920
drunk person hanging on to a 
pole in a subway car, and they 

122
00:07:10,920 --> 00:07:14,560
kind of dance around it as 
they're unstable, but on 

123
00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:16,800
average, they're still standing 
up straight. 

124
00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:20,240
And the same thing applies to 
Earth's magnetic field. 

125
00:07:20,240 --> 00:07:24,400
It's chaotic and it varies quite
a bit, but on average it's still

126
00:07:24,640 --> 00:07:27,520
oriented along Earth's rotation 
axis. 

127
00:07:28,000 --> 00:07:32,600
And the reason that works is 
that Earth's rotation organizes 

128
00:07:32,600 --> 00:07:37,000
all of the convecting motions 
inside the core along that 

129
00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:41,160
vertical axis on average over 
10s of thousands of years. 

130
00:07:41,640 --> 00:07:44,840
And so if you take a lot of 
samples that are preserving the 

131
00:07:44,840 --> 00:07:49,000
field at slightly different 
points in time over several 10s 

132
00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:52,880
of thousands of years in the 
year's past, you can average out

133
00:07:52,880 --> 00:07:56,520
all of that variability and get 
at something a lot more 

134
00:07:56,520 --> 00:08:00,400
coherent, an average result. 
So we sample a lot of rocks. 

135
00:08:00,400 --> 00:08:04,000
In this case, we sampled several
thousand samples for this study 

136
00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:06,720
to be able to average all of 
that out properly. 

137
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:10,440
Wow, several thousand? 
And how much rock do you need to

138
00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:15,320
drill out for each sample? 
Each sample is, in our case, a 

139
00:08:15,320 --> 00:08:20,960
core of rock that's about 2 1/2 
centimeters an inch wide and a 

140
00:08:20,960 --> 00:08:23,560
few inches few like 10 
centimeters long. 

141
00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:26,880
And we can also grab a block 
that we've oriented. 

142
00:08:26,880 --> 00:08:29,560
But the main thing that we have 
to do when we're sampling is 

143
00:08:29,720 --> 00:08:33,039
make sure that we're recording 
the orientation of the sample as

144
00:08:33,039 --> 00:08:36,679
we found it, because we're 
measuring the directions of the 

145
00:08:36,679 --> 00:08:39,080
magnetization vector in these 
samples. 

146
00:08:39,520 --> 00:08:43,600
And so we have all these fancy 
oriented devices in the field 

147
00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:47,360
with us to measure that. 
But for any geologists or 

148
00:08:47,360 --> 00:08:50,440
geology enthusiasts who have 
been out in the field and 

149
00:08:50,440 --> 00:08:55,240
randomly seen, oh, that outcrop 
has a cluster of holes about 

150
00:08:55,240 --> 00:08:57,480
that wide of it, that's people 
like us. 

151
00:08:57,480 --> 00:09:00,960
That's paleomagnetists usually. 
And the number of samples there 

152
00:09:01,080 --> 00:09:05,520
reflects again our effort to try
and reproduce our data and make 

153
00:09:05,520 --> 00:09:08,560
sure that we're getting that 
average field orientation. 

154
00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:12,320
Let's talk a bit about the 
actual kind of rock it is that 

155
00:09:12,320 --> 00:09:16,960
you're sampling. 
Are these rocks lava flows that 

156
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:22,200
took place on an ocean floor and
left kind of phonetic stripes 

157
00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:25,720
like we see today in either side
of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, for 

158
00:09:25,720 --> 00:09:31,120
example, and then using uranium,
lead and zircons inside that 

159
00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:33,040
lava? 
Yes and no. 

160
00:09:33,560 --> 00:09:37,160
They are, yes, lava flows that 
erupted onto the ocean floor 

161
00:09:37,320 --> 00:09:41,560
about 3 1/2 billion years ago. 
They're mostly pillow lavas, so 

162
00:09:41,560 --> 00:09:45,280
exactly the sort of thing you 
might see in say Hawaii today. 

163
00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:49,400
They aren't necessarily in the 
same setting that would have 

164
00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:52,840
produced magnetic stripes or 
magnetic lineations on the sea 

165
00:09:52,840 --> 00:09:57,720
floor because these are forming 
in a setting that's not a mid 

166
00:09:57,720 --> 00:09:59,400
ocean Ridge that's spreading 
apart. 

167
00:09:59,800 --> 00:10:04,360
The setting would more look like
maybe something like Hawaii or 

168
00:10:04,400 --> 00:10:07,680
parts of Iceland today. 
We don't have very much context,

169
00:10:07,680 --> 00:10:09,560
but that's at least something 
that we do know. 

170
00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:14,240
And yes, the way that we date 
these rocks is using uranium 

171
00:10:14,240 --> 00:10:18,440
lead systematics and zircons. 
The lavas themselves are very 

172
00:10:18,440 --> 00:10:21,480
poor in zircon. 
So these are mostly basalt 

173
00:10:21,520 --> 00:10:25,280
lavas. 
And what's fortunate is that in 

174
00:10:25,280 --> 00:10:29,440
between some of these lava 
flows, you get sedimentary 

175
00:10:29,440 --> 00:10:34,520
horizons or Felzik volcanic 
horizons that are rich in 

176
00:10:34,560 --> 00:10:37,280
zircons that can be dated using 
uranium lead methods. 

177
00:10:37,800 --> 00:10:41,720
And so throughout this stack of 
lava flows that we've measured 

178
00:10:41,720 --> 00:10:45,120
throughout this stratigraphy, 
there are different points that 

179
00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:47,160
other of our colleagues have 
dated. 

180
00:10:47,280 --> 00:10:50,120
And so we can interpolate what 
time all of those different 

181
00:10:50,120 --> 00:10:54,160
rocks formed. 
So it seems like a huge question

182
00:10:54,160 --> 00:10:58,200
is how do we know that the 
magnetic signal you're measuring

183
00:10:58,200 --> 00:11:03,600
today was in fact printed so 
very long ago, and it's not the 

184
00:11:03,600 --> 00:11:07,040
result of some intervening 
effects that overwrote or in 

185
00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:10,280
some other way masked the 
original magnetic imprint. 

186
00:11:11,040 --> 00:11:15,560
And I wonder how intense such 
effects would have needed to be 

187
00:11:15,560 --> 00:11:17,400
in order to erase the original 
signal. 

188
00:11:17,960 --> 00:11:20,360
Right, as you've alluded to, 
magnetizations that are 

189
00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:24,120
preserved by rocks can get reset
in a few different ways. 

190
00:11:24,120 --> 00:11:27,880
The main one is thermally. 
So if you heat a magnetic 

191
00:11:27,880 --> 00:11:31,520
material up to a high enough 
temperature, the magnetization 

192
00:11:31,520 --> 00:11:34,600
that it's holding onto gets 
overwritten with a new one. 

193
00:11:35,200 --> 00:11:38,920
You can actually try this at 
home by putting a fridge magnet 

194
00:11:38,920 --> 00:11:42,760
in your oven and baking it. 
And that will actually we neuter

195
00:11:42,760 --> 00:11:44,360
the magnet. 
It will make it quite a bit 

196
00:11:44,360 --> 00:11:48,440
weaker for the mineral that 
we're measuring in nature most 

197
00:11:48,440 --> 00:11:51,560
often, that's magnetite. 
The temperature required to 

198
00:11:51,560 --> 00:11:56,400
completely reset any magnetite 
grain is about 585 Celsius. 

199
00:11:56,400 --> 00:12:02,040
That's almost 1100 Fahrenheit. 
And there's another issue also. 

200
00:12:02,080 --> 00:12:05,480
Thermal processes are not the 
only thing that can reset a 

201
00:12:05,520 --> 00:12:09,080
magnetization. 
You can also undergo chemical 

202
00:12:09,080 --> 00:12:13,120
reactions between minerals and 
fluids, for example, that might 

203
00:12:13,120 --> 00:12:16,240
dissolve or grow grains of 
magnetic minerals. 

204
00:12:16,680 --> 00:12:20,480
And so we have to be really 
careful that the magnetizations 

205
00:12:20,480 --> 00:12:25,120
that we are measuring date to 
when those rocks formed, or at 

206
00:12:25,120 --> 00:12:27,680
the very least that we can date 
when those magnetizations 

207
00:12:27,680 --> 00:12:31,240
happened in the first place. 
And that goes for anyone 

208
00:12:31,240 --> 00:12:34,640
studying the very earlier, the 
oldest rock, as you pointed out,

209
00:12:34,960 --> 00:12:38,760
have all been heated and altered
somewhat by billions of years of

210
00:12:38,760 --> 00:12:42,200
later geological events. 
And so it doesn't matter if 

211
00:12:42,200 --> 00:12:45,800
you're a paleomagnetist like 
myself or a geochemist, you have

212
00:12:45,800 --> 00:12:48,400
to make sure that the signals 
that you're measuring actually 

213
00:12:48,400 --> 00:12:50,160
date to when you think you're 
measuring them. 

214
00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:52,040
And we really have our work cut 
out for us. 

215
00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:56,600
We have developed a whole 
battery of tests in order to 

216
00:12:56,680 --> 00:13:01,520
establish the authenticity of 
that magnetic signal. 

217
00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:04,200
Can you describe what these 
tests are? 

218
00:13:04,960 --> 00:13:07,200
Sure, yes. 
So they're called field tests in

219
00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:10,280
paleomagnetism. 
And as he said, they tell us 

220
00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:14,680
whether magnetizations in a rock
predate or post date some 

221
00:13:14,680 --> 00:13:18,000
geological feature of interest 
and they take advantage of 

222
00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:21,040
traditional cross cutting 
relationships that geologists 

223
00:13:21,040 --> 00:13:24,200
use for mapping and relative 
dating of different units. 

224
00:13:24,600 --> 00:13:27,880
So one of those is a fold test. 
So let's say you measured rocks 

225
00:13:28,320 --> 00:13:31,360
in a bunch of different areas 
that are all the same age of 

226
00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:34,600
rock, but they've been folded or
tilted in different ways after 

227
00:13:34,600 --> 00:13:37,960
they formed. 
And So what you should see if 

228
00:13:37,960 --> 00:13:42,840
the magnetization is older than 
the folding event, is that, you 

229
00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:46,240
know, two different rocks that 
originally had one coherent 

230
00:13:46,240 --> 00:13:48,640
magnetization that then got 
folded. 

231
00:13:49,040 --> 00:13:52,240
You should see that if you 
correct for that folding, their 

232
00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:55,240
magnetization should line back 
up again, roughly speaking. 

233
00:13:55,720 --> 00:13:58,480
And so therefore, again, the 
magnetization predates the 

234
00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:02,360
folding, which again you can 
date using other mapping and 

235
00:14:02,360 --> 00:14:05,720
uranium lead methods. 
Another one of these tests is a 

236
00:14:05,720 --> 00:14:08,560
baked contact test. 
This is something you can try 

237
00:14:08,560 --> 00:14:12,120
wherever there's a magma body, 
like a dike or a pluton that's 

238
00:14:12,160 --> 00:14:16,280
intruded into some older rock. 
And the trick there is to 

239
00:14:16,280 --> 00:14:21,080
measure the magnetization inside
the intrusion, just outside of 

240
00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:24,120
the intrusion, and then 
gradually further and further 

241
00:14:24,120 --> 00:14:27,360
away from it in those 
surrounding older rocks. 

242
00:14:27,880 --> 00:14:30,800
And what you should expect to 
see if nothing has been 

243
00:14:30,800 --> 00:14:35,960
overprinted, is that the 
intrusion magnetization and the 

244
00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:39,760
magnetization immediately 
outside of it is One Direction. 

245
00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:42,680
And then as you work your way 
further and further away from 

246
00:14:42,680 --> 00:14:46,680
it, you should expect to see it 
gradually give way to some other

247
00:14:46,680 --> 00:14:50,640
magnetization in the surrounding
older rocks, which therefore 

248
00:14:50,640 --> 00:14:53,720
means that that intrusion 
magnetization dates to that time

249
00:14:53,720 --> 00:14:56,840
of that intrusion. 
And the other magnetization in 

250
00:14:56,840 --> 00:14:59,000
the country rocks around it is 
older. 

251
00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:03,760
And there are more examples of 
tests than that, but those are 

252
00:15:03,760 --> 00:15:07,520
the two tests that we've used in
this study are rocks fortunately

253
00:15:07,520 --> 00:15:10,440
passed them with flying colors. 
That means that they're still 

254
00:15:10,440 --> 00:15:13,840
holding on to magnetizations 
that are older than a folding 

255
00:15:13,840 --> 00:15:18,080
event that's been dated to about
3.4 billion years ago and also 

256
00:15:18,080 --> 00:15:21,160
older than magma intrusions 
dikes that have been dated to 

257
00:15:21,360 --> 00:15:26,640
3.44 and 3.46 billion years ago.
And again, just for reference, 

258
00:15:26,880 --> 00:15:31,120
the rocks themselves that we're 
measuring are 3.48 to 3.45 

259
00:15:31,120 --> 00:15:34,560
billion years old. 
So that's not much older in the 

260
00:15:34,560 --> 00:15:37,080
grand scheme of things. 
And so we can have confidence 

261
00:15:37,080 --> 00:15:40,720
that what we're looking at are 
truly ancient signals, rather 

262
00:15:40,720 --> 00:15:44,160
than some later noise 
superimposed on top of it. 

263
00:15:44,680 --> 00:15:50,000
And these tests rule out both 
sort of physical or metamorphic 

264
00:15:50,000 --> 00:15:51,960
events as well as chemical 
overprinting. 

265
00:15:52,520 --> 00:15:55,760
Yes and no actually. 
So yes, it doesn't matter where 

266
00:15:55,760 --> 00:15:59,600
the magnetization came from. 
These tests can still apply. 

267
00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:03,440
They're still useful for 
figuring out what the relative 

268
00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:06,400
ages of the magnetization and 
geological events are. 

269
00:16:07,120 --> 00:16:10,960
That said, we've actually done 
quite a bit of legwork on these 

270
00:16:10,960 --> 00:16:14,760
rocks to determine how they got 
magnetized in the 1st place, and

271
00:16:14,760 --> 00:16:18,480
they're actually not holding on 
to the original thermal 

272
00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:21,600
magnetizations that these lavas 
would have picked up when they 

273
00:16:21,600 --> 00:16:24,320
cooled in the ocean floor. 
We've actually determined that 

274
00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:28,240
they got remagnetized in sea 
floor hydrothermal systems, and 

275
00:16:28,520 --> 00:16:31,800
this is where hot sea water 
percolates through the rocks, 

276
00:16:32,120 --> 00:16:34,680
makes them undergo chemical 
reactions, And those reactions, 

277
00:16:34,680 --> 00:16:38,400
as I mentioned earlier, both 
dissolve old magnetite grains 

278
00:16:38,400 --> 00:16:42,600
and grow new ones. 
So that's a little disquieting, 

279
00:16:42,600 --> 00:16:45,680
but what's fortunate here is 
that even though these 

280
00:16:45,680 --> 00:16:49,560
hydrothermal overprint 
magnetizations are overprints, 

281
00:16:49,840 --> 00:16:52,760
they're still incredibly old. 
And in fact, they actually 

282
00:16:52,760 --> 00:16:55,600
happened just after the rocks 
formed within a few million 

283
00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:58,920
years at most. 
And we've been able to determine

284
00:16:58,920 --> 00:17:02,720
that used by mapping the 
hydrothermal deposits that are 

285
00:17:02,720 --> 00:17:06,760
formed by these systems with 
help from all sorts of different

286
00:17:06,760 --> 00:17:09,440
data sets. 
A major one are regional scale 

287
00:17:09,440 --> 00:17:13,800
images, spectral images taken by
planes and satellites of the 

288
00:17:13,800 --> 00:17:16,760
field area that we're in. 
And that all allows us to 

289
00:17:16,760 --> 00:17:20,200
pinpoint where in the 
stratigraphy, where in the stack

290
00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:24,319
of lava flows and therefore when
in the, you know, relative 

291
00:17:24,319 --> 00:17:26,880
timing of things. 
These hydrothermal circulating 

292
00:17:26,880 --> 00:17:29,640
fluids percolated through each 
of the rock units that we 

293
00:17:29,640 --> 00:17:32,920
sampled and reset them. 
So we're still able to use them.

294
00:17:33,080 --> 00:17:36,240
We're leveraging that alteration
as signal itself. 

295
00:17:37,000 --> 00:17:41,200
OK, let's get back to your 
results and what we can learn 

296
00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:45,800
from them. 
You show relative motion between

297
00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:48,920
two plates at about 3 1/2 
billion years ago. 

298
00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:54,240
Does this require full blown 
modern style plate tectonics 

299
00:17:54,240 --> 00:17:57,840
with subduction and so on? 
Or can we explain your 

300
00:17:57,840 --> 00:17:59,760
observations with alternative 
models? 

301
00:18:00,160 --> 00:18:03,320
No, it does not necessarily 
require modern style subduction.

302
00:18:03,320 --> 00:18:07,000
So fundamentally, stepping back 
and looking at our results, all 

303
00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:10,320
that we can completely 
confidently say geodynamically 

304
00:18:10,320 --> 00:18:14,280
speaking, is that we see one 
piece of crust, the Pilbara, 

305
00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:18,280
moving relative to a different 
piece of crust, the Copvol. 

306
00:18:18,960 --> 00:18:22,760
And this rules out a situation, 
as I've mentioned before, that 

307
00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:25,360
has often been proposed for this
time in Earth history where 

308
00:18:25,360 --> 00:18:28,960
Earth's whole surface is 1 giant
global shell that's rendered 

309
00:18:29,120 --> 00:18:32,160
stagnant and unmoving by its 
lack of plate boundaries. 

310
00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:35,040
And that's because our data 
require a plate boundary of some

311
00:18:35,040 --> 00:18:38,640
kind in between the two pieces 
of crust that we can see, again,

312
00:18:38,640 --> 00:18:42,240
moving relative to each other, 
each on a separate plate 3.48 

313
00:18:42,240 --> 00:18:46,160
billion years ago. 
What we don't know is where or 

314
00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:50,240
how many or what kind of plate 
boundary that might have been. 

315
00:18:50,560 --> 00:18:53,000
There are different scenarios 
depending on what that might 

316
00:18:53,000 --> 00:18:56,360
have looked like that feature 
moving plates that are not 

317
00:18:56,440 --> 00:18:59,160
modern plate tectonics. 
So of course, modern plate 

318
00:18:59,160 --> 00:19:01,120
tectonics, as you mentioned, is 
possible. 

319
00:19:01,120 --> 00:19:05,760
So that's where plates actively 
move themselves as they're 

320
00:19:05,880 --> 00:19:09,280
pulled into the mantle by 
sinking at subduction zones. 

321
00:19:09,840 --> 00:19:13,760
But you can also maybe get 
plates moving as they're more 

322
00:19:13,760 --> 00:19:18,080
passively, sluggishly pulled 
along by the mantle as it drags 

323
00:19:18,080 --> 00:19:21,240
on their underside. 
And you can also envision an 

324
00:19:21,240 --> 00:19:24,320
Earth that might be stagnant 
most of the time, but 

325
00:19:24,320 --> 00:19:28,360
intermittently it might undergo 
these really brief but rapid 

326
00:19:28,360 --> 00:19:31,880
episodes of plate motion that 
resurface big portions of 

327
00:19:31,880 --> 00:19:35,080
Earth's crust. 
And our data can work with all 

328
00:19:35,080 --> 00:19:37,160
of those situations that I just 
mentioned. 

329
00:19:37,600 --> 00:19:40,120
So we can't necessarily with 
what we have in hand at the 

330
00:19:40,120 --> 00:19:41,960
moment say anything more than 
that. 

331
00:19:42,440 --> 00:19:46,160
We are working on additional 
data from a longer time span in 

332
00:19:46,160 --> 00:19:49,240
the pill borough. 
And those data may suggest that 

333
00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:53,160
what we're looking at is that 
last episodic intermittent case 

334
00:19:53,160 --> 00:19:55,440
that I just described. 
So that again, that'd be quick 

335
00:19:55,440 --> 00:19:59,920
bursts of plate motion 
punctuating these long 10s of 

336
00:19:59,920 --> 00:20:03,960
millions of year long periods of
quiescence and static with no 

337
00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:06,800
motion periods. 
But just a work in progress. 

338
00:20:07,040 --> 00:20:09,640
But you can say pretty 
confidently that it wasn't just 

339
00:20:09,640 --> 00:20:14,360
a big stagnant lid all the way 
around the Earth, perhaps a bit 

340
00:20:14,360 --> 00:20:16,880
like Mars or Venus today. 
Correct. 

341
00:20:16,880 --> 00:20:21,160
Our data do require that there 
was some kind of plate boundary 

342
00:20:21,160 --> 00:20:24,120
to accommodate that 
differential, that relative 

343
00:20:24,120 --> 00:20:27,600
motion between two different 
pieces of Earth's lithosphere at

344
00:20:27,600 --> 00:20:30,720
the time. 
Do your results enable us to say

345
00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:34,680
anything about what else was 
happening in the Earth around 3 

346
00:20:34,680 --> 00:20:37,840
1/2 billion years ago? 
Yeah, I guess I'll make 2 points

347
00:20:37,840 --> 00:20:40,320
there. 
One is that paleomagnetic data 

348
00:20:40,320 --> 00:20:44,560
are direct observations of what 
Earth's core is doing because 

349
00:20:44,560 --> 00:20:46,960
that's what makes the magnetic 
field in the first place. 

350
00:20:47,560 --> 00:20:50,720
And there are things that we can
look for in our data that keep 

351
00:20:50,720 --> 00:20:52,760
tabs on that. 
And a great example of one would

352
00:20:52,760 --> 00:20:56,200
be a geomagnetic reversal. 
This is where Earth's North and 

353
00:20:56,200 --> 00:20:58,240
South magnetic poles switch 
places. 

354
00:20:58,240 --> 00:21:01,520
And this happens pretty 
frequently on the modern Earth 

355
00:21:01,600 --> 00:21:07,600
and a few to a few 10s of times 
per million years or so, one to 

356
00:21:07,600 --> 00:21:10,640
10 times per million years. 
And excitingly, we actually 

357
00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:14,600
found a reversal in our data 
that happened about 3.46 billion

358
00:21:14,600 --> 00:21:17,040
years ago. 
You can see its signature in the

359
00:21:17,040 --> 00:21:20,960
Pilbara data and the data from 
the Kopfall Craton as well at 

360
00:21:20,960 --> 00:21:23,520
the same time. 
And that's actually the oldest 

361
00:21:23,520 --> 00:21:26,920
example of a reversal that's 
ever been identified. 

362
00:21:27,320 --> 00:21:30,160
And so you wouldn't be wrong to 
conclude that Earth's score 

363
00:21:30,160 --> 00:21:33,440
could circulate in a pattern 
that makes a modern like 

364
00:21:33,440 --> 00:21:36,560
magnetic field. 
And also could conveniently 

365
00:21:36,560 --> 00:21:40,760
enables us to do this geographic
analysis that traces how things 

366
00:21:40,760 --> 00:21:44,040
moved around on Earth's surface.
The other thing that I'd point 

367
00:21:44,040 --> 00:21:48,280
out here is that I'm working on 
another also unpublished data 

368
00:21:48,280 --> 00:21:51,480
set here, also from the Pilbara 
that likely tells us actually 

369
00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:55,040
about how the atmosphere 
circulated 3.4 billion years 

370
00:21:55,040 --> 00:21:56,960
ago. 
So that's the age of a bunch of 

371
00:21:56,960 --> 00:22:00,160
deposits that are in the Pilbara
called evaporites. 

372
00:22:00,440 --> 00:22:03,280
Evaporites form inside of 
sediments that are exposed to 

373
00:22:03,480 --> 00:22:05,760
arid air and arid surface 
conditions. 

374
00:22:05,760 --> 00:22:10,280
And what we're finding is that 
those evaporites formed at 

375
00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:15,440
roughly the same subtropical 
latitudes, like 15 to 35° or so,

376
00:22:16,240 --> 00:22:18,920
that most of Earth's deserts 
form in today. 

377
00:22:19,400 --> 00:22:23,120
And that latitude relationship 
is actually governed today by 

378
00:22:23,120 --> 00:22:25,960
how the atmosphere circulates 
from equator to pole. 

379
00:22:26,800 --> 00:22:29,680
And so it's a great 
illustration, I think, of how 

380
00:22:29,680 --> 00:22:32,600
powerful paleomagnetism can be 
as a technique, because it can 

381
00:22:32,600 --> 00:22:37,520
tell you about dynamical 
processes on Earth deep in the 

382
00:22:37,520 --> 00:22:42,160
past, all the way from the core 
to the mantle and the crust and 

383
00:22:42,160 --> 00:22:44,240
even the atmosphere. 
Wow, that's amazing. 

384
00:22:44,240 --> 00:22:50,160
So the subtropical desert 
regions are the result of a 

385
00:22:50,160 --> 00:22:54,320
certain kind of atmospheric 
circulation pattern that is of 

386
00:22:54,320 --> 00:22:57,360
the type that we have today. 
That's what it appears to be. 

387
00:22:57,560 --> 00:23:00,280
The type of circulation pattern 
here is called the Hadley 

388
00:23:00,280 --> 00:23:04,000
circulation, after I believe 
George Hadley in the 1700s came 

389
00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:07,560
up with it. 
But it's basically that warm air

390
00:23:07,560 --> 00:23:12,240
rises and drops all of its 
moisture at the equator and then

391
00:23:12,720 --> 00:23:17,560
makes its way northward at high 
altitude and eventually sinks 

392
00:23:17,560 --> 00:23:22,400
back down to Earth's surface at 
roughly about 30° latitude. 

393
00:23:22,920 --> 00:23:26,440
And that's responsible for the 
subtropical jet stream. 

394
00:23:26,440 --> 00:23:29,320
It's responsible for the trade 
winds at those latitudes. 

395
00:23:29,840 --> 00:23:32,920
And also, again, because all of 
that air had dropped its 

396
00:23:32,920 --> 00:23:35,320
moisture at the equator, it's 
dry. 

397
00:23:35,440 --> 00:23:38,840
And so when it gets back to 
Earth's surface, it dries out 

398
00:23:38,840 --> 00:23:42,120
that part of the Earth again. 
Hence why if you look at a map 

399
00:23:42,120 --> 00:23:45,240
of the Earth and look at where 
all the large deserts are, the 

400
00:23:45,240 --> 00:23:50,040
Sahara, the Kalahari in Africa, 
Australia, a match of the Middle

401
00:23:50,040 --> 00:23:53,360
East, the desert southwest and 
and parts of northern Central 

402
00:23:53,360 --> 00:23:56,480
America. 
These are all deserts in that 

403
00:23:56,480 --> 00:24:00,360
latitude band for a reason. 
It's where that air is is coming

404
00:24:00,360 --> 00:24:02,080
from high altitude and drying 
things out. 

405
00:24:02,080 --> 00:24:05,960
And it looks like we can see the
same thing happening 3.4 billion

406
00:24:05,960 --> 00:24:09,520
years ago. 
It's striking also that the time

407
00:24:09,520 --> 00:24:12,440
period you're studying coincides
with the time when we see 

408
00:24:12,440 --> 00:24:16,320
evidence in the rock record of 
the very first life forms. 

409
00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:20,160
I talked about this and about 
traumatolites in particular in 

410
00:24:20,160 --> 00:24:23,440
an earlier podcast episode with 
Martin Van Kraenndonk. 

411
00:24:24,120 --> 00:24:28,520
Have you seen any evidence for 
life associated with the the 

412
00:24:28,520 --> 00:24:31,600
rocks that you've been studying?
Yeah, it's it's kind of perfect 

413
00:24:31,600 --> 00:24:34,440
actually that you mentioned 
Martin here, because it turns 

414
00:24:34,440 --> 00:24:37,440
out the stromatolites he's 
worked on for the last few 

415
00:24:37,440 --> 00:24:41,440
decades, among other things, are
actually right in between the 

416
00:24:41,440 --> 00:24:43,640
rocks that I'm studying for this
this paper. 

417
00:24:43,640 --> 00:24:47,280
So they're the oldest well 
established fossils on Earth, 

418
00:24:47,280 --> 00:24:52,000
and some of them even grew in a 
hot Springfield that Martin and 

419
00:24:52,000 --> 00:24:56,400
his colleagues were responsible 
for documenting that was fed by 

420
00:24:56,400 --> 00:25:00,200
one of the hydrothermal systems 
that gave our lavas their 

421
00:25:00,200 --> 00:25:03,840
magnetic signals. 
And so that means that now we 

422
00:25:03,840 --> 00:25:07,440
have a little bit of direct 
tectonic context for those life 

423
00:25:07,440 --> 00:25:10,000
forms. 
They grew on a tectonic plate 

424
00:25:10,000 --> 00:25:12,120
either in motion already or 
about to be. 

425
00:25:12,800 --> 00:25:15,920
And that's really intriguing 
because plate tectonics is 

426
00:25:16,160 --> 00:25:19,400
intimately linked with all sorts
of processes that foster 

427
00:25:19,400 --> 00:25:22,080
habitable conditions. 
It plays a role in keeping 

428
00:25:22,080 --> 00:25:26,000
surface temperature stable for 
billions of years by modulating 

429
00:25:26,000 --> 00:25:27,560
them out of CO2 in the 
atmosphere. 

430
00:25:27,920 --> 00:25:31,560
It creates environments with 
sources and gradients of 

431
00:25:31,560 --> 00:25:35,680
chemical elements that living 
things can metabolize and build 

432
00:25:35,680 --> 00:25:38,040
from, for instance, in 
hybrothermal systems. 

433
00:25:38,560 --> 00:25:41,800
And to be clear, I should point 
out that the fossils that 

434
00:25:41,800 --> 00:25:44,960
Martin's worked on, the plate 
motion I found, they're probably

435
00:25:44,960 --> 00:25:48,720
not the oldest examples of those
things, full stop, right? 

436
00:25:48,720 --> 00:25:51,640
There are other even older 
examples almost certainly came 

437
00:25:51,640 --> 00:25:55,520
before them. 
But still, I find it profound 

438
00:25:55,520 --> 00:25:59,880
that in the endless quest of 
geologists to look further back 

439
00:25:59,880 --> 00:26:05,080
in geologic time, the oldest 
records of life, habitable 

440
00:26:05,080 --> 00:26:08,720
energy rich environments for 
that life, and the tectonic 

441
00:26:08,720 --> 00:26:12,200
plates that might have generated
such environments all just 

442
00:26:12,200 --> 00:26:15,800
coincide pretty much perfectly. 
I I can't help but imagine that 

443
00:26:15,800 --> 00:26:18,840
early Earth might have dealt 
life a really great hand to get 

444
00:26:18,840 --> 00:26:23,440
started and develop. 
You spent quite a bit of time in

445
00:26:23,440 --> 00:26:27,920
the Pilbara region of WA 
collecting all those thousands 

446
00:26:27,920 --> 00:26:31,760
of samples you talked about. 
What's it like to spend time in 

447
00:26:31,760 --> 00:26:35,000
the wilderness there? 
On a practical level, it's a 

448
00:26:35,000 --> 00:26:38,520
place what you might call 
ruggedly beautiful, I guess so 

449
00:26:38,520 --> 00:26:42,520
it's it's hot, it's dry. 
Pilbara comes from a local 

450
00:26:42,520 --> 00:26:44,600
Aboriginal word meaning dry 
country. 

451
00:26:45,160 --> 00:26:48,720
It's very hilly terrain that 
it's pockmarked by all these 

452
00:26:48,720 --> 00:26:52,600
spiky bushes of grass 
everywhere, scraggly desert 

453
00:26:52,600 --> 00:26:56,640
trees, the occasional kangaroo, 
sometimes an eagle if you're 

454
00:26:56,640 --> 00:26:59,840
lucky. 
And under all that desert is 

455
00:26:59,840 --> 00:27:02,840
like this deep sense of 
antiquity that you can't really 

456
00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:04,520
escape from. 
You're always aware of it. 

457
00:27:04,520 --> 00:27:07,280
The rocks, of course, are crazy 
old and they look like it too. 

458
00:27:07,280 --> 00:27:09,960
They've been out in the weather 
for billions of years and that 

459
00:27:09,960 --> 00:27:14,600
stained them all these weathered
hues of red and orange, much 

460
00:27:14,600 --> 00:27:17,040
like a lot of the continent of 
Australia. 

461
00:27:17,720 --> 00:27:20,440
But you also get hints of a 
history that's a lot closer to 

462
00:27:20,440 --> 00:27:23,160
home. 
So during my field work, I've 

463
00:27:23,200 --> 00:27:26,560
had the great privilege of 
stumbling into prehistoric rock 

464
00:27:26,560 --> 00:27:29,360
art sites. 
Petroglyphs and chippings in the

465
00:27:29,360 --> 00:27:33,480
rock, faces that depict people, 
human figures, interacting 

466
00:27:33,800 --> 00:27:36,960
animals. 
You'll see dingoes and Kangaroos

467
00:27:36,960 --> 00:27:41,360
and emus all depicted there, 
parts of the landscape, maps of 

468
00:27:41,360 --> 00:27:45,360
river systems. 
And having had a chance to talk 

469
00:27:45,360 --> 00:27:47,440
with some of the modern 
descendants of those ancient 

470
00:27:47,440 --> 00:27:51,720
artists, they were clearly all 
trying to understand their place

471
00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:54,200
in the world around them 10s of 
thousands of years ago. 

472
00:27:54,960 --> 00:27:58,800
And in a weird way, that's kind 
of what my colleagues and I do 

473
00:27:58,800 --> 00:28:00,760
out there too. 
We're trying to understand our 

474
00:28:00,760 --> 00:28:04,160
place in the world around us and
how we got here, just using 

475
00:28:04,160 --> 00:28:06,440
different tools. 
And 10s of thousands of years 

476
00:28:06,440 --> 00:28:10,800
later and walking around the 
Pilbara really gives you an 

477
00:28:11,280 --> 00:28:15,160
immense sense of timelessness 
and heritage. 

478
00:28:15,720 --> 00:28:19,240
Some of the oldest art made by 
human beings to the oldest known

479
00:28:19,240 --> 00:28:21,440
life forms that are right there 
next to each other. 

480
00:28:21,960 --> 00:28:24,480
And it makes you feel small in 
all the right ways. 

481
00:28:25,560 --> 00:28:27,480
Alec Brenner, thank you very 
much. 

482
00:28:27,640 --> 00:28:28,960
Thanks, Oliver. 
It's been my pleasure. 

483
00:28:30,240 --> 00:28:32,920
To see pictures and 
illustrations that support this 

484
00:28:32,920 --> 00:28:38,200
podcast, go to geologybytes.com,
where you'll also find a subject

485
00:28:38,200 --> 00:28:40,120
matter index of all the 
episodes. 

486
00:28:40,560 --> 00:28:43,920
There you can also give me 
feedback which I welcome, as 

487
00:28:43,920 --> 00:28:46,920
well as sign up to get my emails
about new episodes.

