1
00:00:04,840 --> 00:00:07,720
This is Geology Bites with 
Oliver Strumpel. 

2
00:00:09,120 --> 00:00:12,360
We've all heard of the San 
Andreas Fault that runs along 

3
00:00:12,360 --> 00:00:15,960
the coast of California. 
It represents the boundary 

4
00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:19,040
between the North American plate
and the Pacific plate. 

5
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:24,200
It's 800 mile long extent is 
visible from space and it has 

6
00:00:24,200 --> 00:00:27,040
caused some powerful 
earthquakes, one of which 

7
00:00:27,040 --> 00:00:29,640
devastated San Francisco in 19 O
6. 

8
00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:34,360
Most faults leave little or no 
trace of their localities on the

9
00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:38,680
Earth's surface, but it is still
vital to know where they are for

10
00:00:38,680 --> 00:00:41,880
both hazard assessment and 
scientific reasons. 

11
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:46,600
Rufus Catchings has been hunting
down Californian faults for over

12
00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:50,480
40 years. 
He is a research geophysicist at

13
00:00:50,480 --> 00:00:55,040
the US Geological Survey. 
Rufus Catchings, Welcome to 

14
00:00:55,040 --> 00:00:57,080
Geology Bites. 
Thank you, Oliver. 

15
00:00:57,200 --> 00:01:01,000
It's a pleasure to join you. 
In your research, you've used 

16
00:01:01,000 --> 00:01:04,440
many different approaches to pin
down the locations of faults. 

17
00:01:05,120 --> 00:01:07,920
Do these all rely on seismic 
waves? 

18
00:01:08,320 --> 00:01:10,120
Would you use other methods as 
well? 

19
00:01:10,560 --> 00:01:15,000
Most methods I use involve 
seismology, but I also use other

20
00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:18,120
methods as appropriate. 
For example, in many places we 

21
00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:22,520
use geomorphology or changes in 
the Earth's landform or surface 

22
00:01:23,120 --> 00:01:25,760
to infer that there are likely 
faults there. 

23
00:01:26,080 --> 00:01:29,680
Sometimes we can see them at the
surface and it's obvious and we 

24
00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:33,560
act accordingly there. 
For example, using 

25
00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:37,200
geomorphology, sometimes there's
a long linear valley within a 

26
00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:41,880
mountain chain, and we suspect 
that those are likely faults. 

27
00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:45,600
There are geologists who 
specialize in geomorphology and 

28
00:01:45,600 --> 00:01:50,800
they also help me in my efforts.
OK, let's talk about the seismic

29
00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:54,720
methods that you use and how 
they work, and then we'll talk 

30
00:01:54,720 --> 00:01:58,280
about the results. 
There are two kinds of seismic 

31
00:01:58,280 --> 00:02:02,880
wave, primary or pressure waves 
called P waves, which are akin 

32
00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:07,720
to sound waves in air, and 
secondary or shear waves called 

33
00:02:07,760 --> 00:02:11,520
S waves. 
Both types of waves are affected

34
00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:14,840
by the presence of faults. 
Can you tell us how they're 

35
00:02:14,840 --> 00:02:18,320
affected? 
Yes, within the subsurface, S 

36
00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:21,680
waves slow down once it 
encounters a fault zone. 

37
00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:25,760
So relative to the rocks on 
either side, the velocity of the

38
00:02:26,080 --> 00:02:31,640
S waves are much slower in the 
faulted rock body than the 

39
00:02:31,640 --> 00:02:35,960
outside rocks. 
So faulting essentially damages 

40
00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:39,880
the rock, and this changes the 
rigidity of the rock, which 

41
00:02:39,960 --> 00:02:43,520
makes the velocity slower. 
It's the same way for P waves, 

42
00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:46,800
but one complicating factor is 
in the near surface. 

43
00:02:47,120 --> 00:02:51,360
Groundwater can saturate these 
materials, the rocks as well as 

44
00:02:51,400 --> 00:02:55,080
the faulted material, and that 
actually causes an increase in 

45
00:02:55,080 --> 00:02:58,160
velocity, which makes it a 
little more complicated when we 

46
00:02:58,160 --> 00:03:03,120
use just P waves alone. 
OK, so how does this change in 

47
00:03:03,120 --> 00:03:08,400
velocity of the S waves and the 
P waves enable you to pin down 

48
00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:12,440
the location of faults? 
So what we typically do is put 

49
00:03:12,440 --> 00:03:17,800
out an array of seismometers 
across the fault and then we 

50
00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:21,120
import some type of source into 
the ground so that we can 

51
00:03:21,120 --> 00:03:24,600
measure these waves. 
And from that we measure the 

52
00:03:24,600 --> 00:03:28,880
travel times, usually to within 
milliseconds, and then we can 

53
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:32,600
locate the fault themselves. 
Using methods like tomography, 

54
00:03:32,600 --> 00:03:36,040
we can actually see or get an 
image of where these low 

55
00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:39,480
velocities are located. 
We can do the same thing for 

56
00:03:39,480 --> 00:03:43,880
both P&S waves, but one of the 
most powerful techniques is to 

57
00:03:43,880 --> 00:03:47,400
use the ratio of the 2P waves to
S waves. 

58
00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:51,840
Because S waves are slower, P 
waves are faster. 

59
00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:57,400
Even if it's saturated, we get 
VPVS ratios that are very high 

60
00:03:57,520 --> 00:04:01,920
in fault zones, so that shows us
very nicely where the fault is 

61
00:04:01,920 --> 00:04:05,720
in the subsurface. 
Also, typically a fault is a 

62
00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:10,840
barrier to groundwater flow, and
we use these seismic waves to 

63
00:04:11,200 --> 00:04:14,480
map out the top of groundwater. 
The top of groundwater's 

64
00:04:14,480 --> 00:04:18,000
velocity contour is typically 
1500 meters per second. 

65
00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:22,520
In sediments, a fault is often a
barrier to the flow of 

66
00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:25,840
groundwater. 
So one side of the fault 

67
00:04:26,280 --> 00:04:28,240
groundwater will be lower than 
the other. 

68
00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:33,560
And using the tomographic 
methods, we can actually see 

69
00:04:33,560 --> 00:04:37,000
this step and that's another 
indicator of faulting. 

70
00:04:37,560 --> 00:04:40,920
So there are multiple methods 
that we use. 

71
00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:44,680
We use the low P wave 
velocities, the low S wave 

72
00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:49,200
velocities, the high VPVS 
ratios, the sudden change in 

73
00:04:49,200 --> 00:04:52,520
depth of the 1500m per second 
velocity contour. 

74
00:04:53,240 --> 00:04:56,520
All of these are strong evidence
of faulting, and when you have 

75
00:04:56,520 --> 00:05:00,360
them all in one place, you're 
quite certain of the location of

76
00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:02,240
the fault. 
And all the waves that you're 

77
00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:07,200
picking up, typically waves that
have been refracted by the fault

78
00:05:07,200 --> 00:05:09,880
zone or reflected at the edges 
of the fault zone. 

79
00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:13,840
For the tomographic methods, 
we're using waves that have been

80
00:05:13,840 --> 00:05:18,040
refracted as they move through 
the subsurface, but we do use 

81
00:05:18,040 --> 00:05:21,000
the reflection method as well. 
Tell us a bit about the 

82
00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:24,560
reflection method as well. 
The reflection method is a very 

83
00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:26,560
powerful method and it's very 
precise. 

84
00:05:26,720 --> 00:05:30,600
The oil industry have used this 
method for exploration for oil 

85
00:05:30,680 --> 00:05:35,400
for many, many decades. 
But if we do it at very high 

86
00:05:35,400 --> 00:05:40,080
resolution, what we can see is 
the seismic waves go down. 

87
00:05:40,080 --> 00:05:44,040
They reflect off surfaces. 
Faults typically also cause the 

88
00:05:44,560 --> 00:05:48,480
layers of the earth on either 
side of the fault to be offset 

89
00:05:48,480 --> 00:05:51,440
somewhat. 
And reflection methods very good

90
00:05:51,440 --> 00:05:54,480
at showing a visual image of 
this offset. 

91
00:05:54,880 --> 00:05:57,480
But unfortunately you can't use 
it everywhere. 

92
00:05:57,480 --> 00:06:01,000
Many places you don't have this 
layered subsurface. 

93
00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:04,840
What kind of spatial resolutions
can you get for these fault 

94
00:06:04,840 --> 00:06:08,040
locations? 
Well, it really depends on the 

95
00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:11,720
myth that we're using. 
And as I mentioned, reflection 

96
00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:14,680
seismology is one of the most 
accurate, particularly at 

97
00:06:14,680 --> 00:06:18,400
greater depths. 
And if we used very dense 

98
00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:23,360
spacing on our seismometers, 
very high frequency seismometers

99
00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:26,920
and the energy that we input 
into the ground is high 

100
00:06:26,920 --> 00:06:30,760
frequency, we can typically 
image quite deep to within a 

101
00:06:30,760 --> 00:06:35,440
meter or so where the fault is. 
But as we get deeper, we lose 

102
00:06:35,440 --> 00:06:41,080
frequency and so the resolution 
becomes less and we can probably

103
00:06:41,080 --> 00:06:45,600
go to several meters to several 
10s of meters at great depth in 

104
00:06:45,600 --> 00:06:47,960
our accuracy. 
But there are other methods as 

105
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:52,840
well that we can use to get high
accuracy, particularly in the 

106
00:06:52,840 --> 00:06:56,920
shallow subsurface. 
How deep can you track a fault? 

107
00:06:56,960 --> 00:06:59,280
I mean, if a fault's going all 
the way down to the Moho, for 

108
00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:01,880
example, could you see it all 
the way down? 

109
00:07:02,080 --> 00:07:04,760
Yes, you can. 
The resolution of course once 

110
00:07:04,760 --> 00:07:07,560
you get down, you know 3040 
kilometers is off. 

111
00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:09,920
But yes, you can see these 
faults quite deep. 

112
00:07:10,760 --> 00:07:15,120
I'm reminded of a recent episode
of Geology Bytes with Bob White 

113
00:07:15,360 --> 00:07:19,320
in which he described using a 
dense array of seismometers to 

114
00:07:19,320 --> 00:07:23,320
pinpoint the locations of 
thousands of micro quakes and 

115
00:07:23,320 --> 00:07:26,440
track the movement of magma 
within the crusts of Iceland. 

116
00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:31,360
Do you also rely on naturally 
occurring earthquakes as the 

117
00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:34,120
source of the seismic waves? 
Yes, we do. 

118
00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:38,560
We use both the naturally 
occurring earthquakes or ambient

119
00:07:38,560 --> 00:07:42,600
noise, and we also use 
artificial sources, man made 

120
00:07:42,640 --> 00:07:45,000
sources. 
How did the man made sources 

121
00:07:45,000 --> 00:07:47,520
work? 
In the shallow subsurface, it's 

122
00:07:47,520 --> 00:07:51,960
as simple as, say, striking the 
ground with a hammer. 

123
00:07:52,480 --> 00:07:55,840
We just input energy into the 
ground and that generates 

124
00:07:55,840 --> 00:07:58,960
seismic waves. 
But there's also another way we 

125
00:07:58,960 --> 00:08:01,400
use what's called accelerated 
weight drops. 

126
00:08:01,400 --> 00:08:04,800
It's essentially a heavyweight. 
We just drop on the ground. 

127
00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:06,640
It's imparting energy into the 
ground. 

128
00:08:07,160 --> 00:08:11,960
We use shotguns and rifles, 
sometimes shooting blanks into 

129
00:08:11,960 --> 00:08:14,000
the ground. 
That generates a lot of energy. 

130
00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:17,800
We can use small vibrators, 
essentially anything that is 

131
00:08:17,800 --> 00:08:19,400
imparting energy into the 
ground. 

132
00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:24,600
But for the deeper imaging, say 
kilometers to 10s of kilometers,

133
00:08:25,040 --> 00:08:30,000
we typically use repeated 
heavyweight drops or some type 

134
00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:34,600
of truck mounted huge vibrator 
or explosions. 

135
00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:38,200
Any of those can generate the 
kind of energy that we need to 

136
00:08:38,240 --> 00:08:41,240
map out the faults. 
I suppose a big explosion is 

137
00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:43,600
fine if you're in the middle of 
the desert, but that wouldn't go

138
00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:45,320
down too well in the middle of 
Los Angeles. 

139
00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:50,440
That is correct. 
So we tend to use other methods 

140
00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:54,800
when we're in urban areas. 
Apart from the effect of faults 

141
00:08:54,960 --> 00:09:00,000
on seismic wave velocities, you 
also use another property of 

142
00:09:00,000 --> 00:09:03,160
fault zones, namely they can act
as wave guides. 

143
00:09:03,480 --> 00:09:07,440
Can you explain how that works? 
Yes, as I mentioned earlier, 

144
00:09:07,480 --> 00:09:11,080
fault zones, due to the shearing
of the fault, the movement on 

145
00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:13,920
either side, it really damages 
the rock. 

146
00:09:14,280 --> 00:09:18,600
And so these are low velocity 
zones relative to the 

147
00:09:18,680 --> 00:09:22,240
surrounding rock. 
And so that's effectively like a

148
00:09:22,240 --> 00:09:25,240
waveguide. 
Once you get energy into that 

149
00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:30,320
fault zone, it acts like a 
waveguide and energy moves about

150
00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:33,280
in the fault zone reflecting off
the internal surfaces of the 

151
00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:36,400
fault as it moves forward. 
You can think of this like an 

152
00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:40,880
electromagnetic waveguide or 
think of a fault as very similar

153
00:09:40,880 --> 00:09:45,040
to a coaxial cable or fiber 
optic cable where this energy 

154
00:09:45,040 --> 00:09:48,400
just once it gets in there, it 
stays in there and it travels 

155
00:09:48,560 --> 00:09:53,960
discreetly in there. 
So if we impart that energy, it 

156
00:09:53,960 --> 00:09:58,560
travels at very high amplitudes 
and it's typically much stronger

157
00:09:58,560 --> 00:10:02,360
than either the P or the S wave 
and we can take advantage of 

158
00:10:02,360 --> 00:10:05,000
that because it only travels 
within default zone. 

159
00:10:05,280 --> 00:10:10,240
Then if we can map out that high
amplitude area, that shows us 

160
00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:15,200
exactly where the fault is. 
And is that another way that's 

161
00:10:15,280 --> 00:10:20,360
useful for finding the location 
of the faults, or do you use it 

162
00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:23,280
for other purposes as well? 
Yeah, it's very powerful 

163
00:10:23,280 --> 00:10:25,840
technique for getting the 
location of the faults. 

164
00:10:25,840 --> 00:10:29,760
If we place those seismometers 
across, and if we want very 

165
00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:34,840
precise location, we space our 
seismometers at a meter spacing 

166
00:10:35,120 --> 00:10:38,080
as they go across the fault, 
then that's usually the 

167
00:10:38,080 --> 00:10:41,720
resolution we can get. 
If it's submeter, we can get 

168
00:10:41,720 --> 00:10:45,400
submeter. 
So just by looking at those high

169
00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:50,520
amplitudes or what I call the 
peak ground velocity of the wave

170
00:10:50,680 --> 00:10:55,200
as it comes through and I look 
at it after the S wave has 

171
00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:59,560
passed, this gives us a lot of 
information about absolutely 

172
00:10:59,560 --> 00:11:02,280
precisely where that fault is 
coming to the surface. 

173
00:11:02,680 --> 00:11:07,680
And the nice thing that we find 
is that it's often that there's 

174
00:11:07,680 --> 00:11:11,000
more than just one strand. 
And we can see that using this 

175
00:11:11,000 --> 00:11:12,920
technique. 
So it's a very powerful 

176
00:11:12,920 --> 00:11:16,400
technique. 
It tells us precisely where it 

177
00:11:16,400 --> 00:11:20,240
is near the surface, but it can 
also tell us, say, if you have 

178
00:11:20,240 --> 00:11:23,520
two different fault strands, if 
they're connected to each other.

179
00:11:23,880 --> 00:11:28,000
And we use it both for 
determining connectivity as well

180
00:11:28,000 --> 00:11:30,880
as the individual location of 
the fault near the surface. 

181
00:11:31,760 --> 00:11:34,200
So how do you use this method to
determine connectivity? 

182
00:11:34,200 --> 00:11:36,960
Is it that like if there's a 
break in a fault, the energy 

183
00:11:36,960 --> 00:11:40,760
leaks out in between and you 
wouldn't see the continuity from

184
00:11:40,760 --> 00:11:43,080
one fault zone to the other? 
Absolutely. 

185
00:11:43,120 --> 00:11:46,040
Just like if you were to take a 
fiber optic cable and you break 

186
00:11:46,040 --> 00:11:49,720
that cable and it's separated, 
the energy no longer travels. 

187
00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:55,080
So if we see energy, say from an
earthquake input into one fault 

188
00:11:55,280 --> 00:11:59,000
and there's another fault, say 
to the South of there and we 

189
00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:02,160
have an array across there and 
we don't see that same guided 

190
00:12:02,160 --> 00:12:05,600
wave energy traveling onto the 
second fault, we know they're 

191
00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:08,760
not connected. 
But if we see that same energy 

192
00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:11,640
traveling, we generally know the
speed at which it travels. 

193
00:12:11,720 --> 00:12:15,600
We know that they are connected.
So are there some instances then

194
00:12:15,600 --> 00:12:19,560
when you've seen two faults 
which initially look like they 

195
00:12:19,560 --> 00:12:22,960
might be two separate faults, 
you put the energy into one of 

196
00:12:22,960 --> 00:12:25,240
them and you find it's travelled
to the other one, and then you 

197
00:12:25,240 --> 00:12:27,320
learn for the first time that 
actually they're part of the 

198
00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:29,320
same fault system? 
Has that happened to you? 

199
00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:33,120
Yes, yes, that has. 
And we've done that in multiple 

200
00:12:33,120 --> 00:12:35,240
places. 
You might want to say, why does 

201
00:12:35,240 --> 00:12:39,000
it matter if there are two 
faults that are connected or 

202
00:12:39,000 --> 00:12:40,880
not? 
And it makes a big difference, 

203
00:12:41,480 --> 00:12:46,000
because a short fault, for 
example a fault that's only say 

204
00:12:46,000 --> 00:12:49,320
10 or 12 kilometers long, can 
only generate about a magnitude 

205
00:12:49,320 --> 00:12:52,520
6. 
But if you have one long 

206
00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:57,800
continuous fault, it can 
generate magnitude 7-8 and 

207
00:12:57,800 --> 00:13:00,480
above. 
So the length of the fault is 

208
00:13:00,480 --> 00:13:04,160
very important. 
You study faults in dense urban 

209
00:13:04,160 --> 00:13:09,480
areas where humans generate lots
of vibrations, not least from 18

210
00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:12,240
Wheeler trucks that might be 
thundering along the freeways. 

211
00:13:12,920 --> 00:13:16,560
How do you manage to subtract 
out what you rather charitably 

212
00:13:16,560 --> 00:13:23,280
refer to as cultural noise? 
With some difficulty, often in 

213
00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:27,040
some cases we can actually use 
the noise as an exploration tool

214
00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:29,720
itself, particularly if it's 
coming from many different 

215
00:13:29,720 --> 00:13:31,720
directions, and we sometimes do 
that. 

216
00:13:32,200 --> 00:13:34,800
However, in most cases, the 
cultural noise is a major 

217
00:13:34,800 --> 00:13:39,240
headache and it's something that
we want to try to mitigate. 

218
00:13:39,920 --> 00:13:44,520
So for active source imaging, 
we're actually inputting energy 

219
00:13:44,520 --> 00:13:48,240
into the ground ourselves with a
weight drop, with vibrators, 

220
00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:51,000
etcetera. 
We've found that if you 

221
00:13:51,200 --> 00:13:55,800
continually input that source 
into the ground over and over 

222
00:13:55,800 --> 00:13:59,000
again, say we're using a weight 
drop and we just keep dropping 

223
00:13:59,000 --> 00:14:02,360
that same weight, it's the same 
signal over and over again. 

224
00:14:03,080 --> 00:14:06,520
Where is the noise from? 
All the cultural activity is 

225
00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:12,240
kind of random. 
And so if we stack that seismic 

226
00:14:12,240 --> 00:14:18,200
wave over and over again, then 
the energy stacks in, all that 

227
00:14:18,200 --> 00:14:23,240
noise stacks out and we can get 
a beautiful signal through even 

228
00:14:23,240 --> 00:14:26,640
very noisy areas. 
One example was where we did 

229
00:14:26,640 --> 00:14:30,000
this in Hollywood and Los 
Angeles area. 

230
00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:34,480
We just continuously dropped the
weight twice a minute for an 

231
00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:37,480
hour and a half. 
And there was a freeway nearby, 

232
00:14:37,480 --> 00:14:41,560
there were local traffic, there 
were tall buildings, there was 

233
00:14:41,560 --> 00:14:45,800
all kinds of noise going on. 
So by doing this stack, all of 

234
00:14:45,800 --> 00:14:48,720
that freeway traffic just 
disappeared, all that other 

235
00:14:48,720 --> 00:14:51,640
noise just disappeared, and we 
got this huge signal. 

236
00:14:51,640 --> 00:14:55,040
So it really works well in 
certain environments. 

237
00:14:55,160 --> 00:14:58,440
If you're in a dense urban area 
with this thumping, is that 

238
00:14:58,440 --> 00:15:00,360
something that somebody living 
in the neighborhood would be 

239
00:15:00,360 --> 00:15:02,920
able to feel? 
They probably wouldn't feel it, 

240
00:15:02,960 --> 00:15:06,360
they may hear some of it and 
we're not talking about dropping

241
00:15:06,360 --> 00:15:09,360
huge weights, maybe we're 
talking about a £500 weight 

242
00:15:09,360 --> 00:15:13,160
that's dropping a couple feet. 
That's not very much compared to

243
00:15:13,160 --> 00:15:17,000
vehicular traffic. 
OK, so let's turn to what these 

244
00:15:17,040 --> 00:15:20,520
various methods have revealed. 
Which faults have you 

245
00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:26,800
principally studied? 
I have studied a very large 

246
00:15:26,800 --> 00:15:29,800
number of faults. 
It would take me a long time to 

247
00:15:29,800 --> 00:15:32,440
name them all. 
I guess I've never really 

248
00:15:32,440 --> 00:15:34,760
counted the number of faults 
that we've studied. 

249
00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:38,720
Just say here in in California, 
these would include the San 

250
00:15:38,720 --> 00:15:42,640
Andreas Fault, the Hayward 
Fault, the Rogers Creek Fault, W

251
00:15:42,640 --> 00:15:49,240
Napa, Silver Creek, Calaveras, 
Monte Vista, Garlock Fault. 

252
00:15:49,600 --> 00:15:55,680
There is a very, very long list,
but we've studied a lot of these

253
00:15:55,680 --> 00:15:58,240
faults and we see a lot of 
similarities no matter where we 

254
00:15:58,240 --> 00:16:01,040
go. 
Yeah, California's got no lack 

255
00:16:01,040 --> 00:16:04,040
of faults. 
There is no shortage of faults 

256
00:16:04,200 --> 00:16:07,240
and I've also studied faults 
outside of California and 

257
00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:11,840
Oregon, Nevada, Washington, 
Arizona, Alaska, Hawaii, 

258
00:16:12,200 --> 00:16:17,000
Virginia, Delaware, Tennessee, 
Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri 

259
00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:21,440
and internationally too. 
Let's focus on the San Andreas 

260
00:16:21,440 --> 00:16:25,120
Fault for a moment, then. 
Naively, one might think that as

261
00:16:25,120 --> 00:16:29,320
a strike slip fault, the fault 
plane would be roughly vertical.

262
00:16:29,840 --> 00:16:35,320
Is that what you found? 
Well, generally it's vertical to

263
00:16:35,320 --> 00:16:37,520
sub vertical. 
And we've looked at the San 

264
00:16:37,520 --> 00:16:40,560
Andreas pretty much along its 
entire length, Southern 

265
00:16:40,560 --> 00:16:43,960
California all the way up to 
Northern California where it 

266
00:16:43,960 --> 00:16:46,240
goes off to the Mendocino triple
junction. 

267
00:16:46,960 --> 00:16:51,080
And yes, there are places where 
the fault is sub vertical. 

268
00:16:51,080 --> 00:16:54,160
It has a depth to it and there 
are places where it's vertical. 

269
00:16:54,840 --> 00:16:58,440
But what we also find is that 
frequently there are sub 

270
00:16:59,080 --> 00:17:02,280
parallel faults to it. 
There may be a main trace and 

271
00:17:02,280 --> 00:17:07,359
then there are many sub parallel
faults and those often dip into 

272
00:17:07,359 --> 00:17:11,359
the main fault or sometimes 
they're just their own fault 

273
00:17:11,359 --> 00:17:14,440
that goes spare a little to it. 
Any of these can move during a 

274
00:17:14,440 --> 00:17:18,680
major earthquake and even if 
they don't move, they can carry 

275
00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:23,160
that guided wave energy that I 
explained and they can be quite 

276
00:17:23,160 --> 00:17:26,440
dangerous. 
California has something called 

277
00:17:26,440 --> 00:17:32,320
the Alquispio Act, which 
prohibits building on a known 

278
00:17:32,320 --> 00:17:35,880
fault within a certain distance 
of a known active fault. 

279
00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:39,760
And if you have all these 
subparallel faults to it, you 

280
00:17:39,760 --> 00:17:43,080
often don't know if you're on an
active trace of a main fault. 

281
00:17:43,640 --> 00:17:47,800
So that's one of the reasons why
we do so much of this imaging is

282
00:17:47,800 --> 00:17:51,360
to try to find every fault so 
that we don't put something like

283
00:17:51,360 --> 00:17:54,360
a huge apartment building or a 
hospital or something like that 

284
00:17:54,360 --> 00:17:57,160
on top of these faults because 
it can be very dangerous. 

285
00:17:57,920 --> 00:18:00,120
So you said earlier that you can
actually measure the fault 

286
00:18:00,120 --> 00:18:02,120
location to some considerable 
depth. 

287
00:18:02,760 --> 00:18:08,960
Does the subsurface geometry of 
a fault affect how violent the 

288
00:18:08,960 --> 00:18:11,360
shaking is on the fault when it 
moves? 

289
00:18:11,440 --> 00:18:13,320
Yes it does. 
I should point out that there 

290
00:18:13,320 --> 00:18:16,240
are multiple types of faults. 
The San Andreas is a strike slip

291
00:18:16,240 --> 00:18:19,520
fault where the two pieces are 
moving kind of parallel to each 

292
00:18:19,520 --> 00:18:22,960
other. 
But there are also normal faults

293
00:18:22,960 --> 00:18:26,560
where one fault goes down 
relative to the other, reverse 

294
00:18:26,560 --> 00:18:29,560
faults where one fault goes up 
relative to the other. 

295
00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:33,240
And that's often at an angle. 
And there are many combinations 

296
00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:36,680
of those. 
And generally among the most 

297
00:18:36,680 --> 00:18:40,280
violently shaking for the same 
size earthquake are the reverse 

298
00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:43,120
faults. 
And sometimes there are places 

299
00:18:43,120 --> 00:18:46,480
even along the San Andreas where
there's reverse faulting going 

300
00:18:46,480 --> 00:18:48,600
on, or strands of it are 
reverse. 

301
00:18:49,000 --> 00:18:53,240
And so we really want to find 
that and know what type of 

302
00:18:53,240 --> 00:18:57,520
fault, what type of movement on 
it, because again, the reverse 

303
00:18:57,520 --> 00:18:59,760
faults tend to give us the 
strongest shaking. 

304
00:18:59,800 --> 00:19:03,400
If you're not on the foot wall, 
if you're on the hanging wall, 

305
00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:05,920
that's where you're going to get
the most violent. 

306
00:19:05,920 --> 00:19:10,640
Shaking. 
In 2014, I think you used guided

307
00:19:10,640 --> 00:19:14,320
waves resulting from an 
earthquake near San Francisco to

308
00:19:14,320 --> 00:19:17,680
learn that certain faults that 
were previously thought to be 

309
00:19:17,680 --> 00:19:20,480
distinct from each other were 
actually connected. 

310
00:19:20,600 --> 00:19:22,720
Can you tell us about that 
instance? 

311
00:19:23,040 --> 00:19:25,880
Yes. 
In 2014, there was an earthquake

312
00:19:26,200 --> 00:19:30,680
in Napa Valley, which is a 
region famous for wine. 

313
00:19:30,840 --> 00:19:34,640
And it was a magnitude 6 
earthquake and it occurred on a 

314
00:19:34,640 --> 00:19:39,560
fault that ruptured the surface 
for about 12 kilometers. 

315
00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:44,920
And there was a lot of questions
about, well, is this just a 

316
00:19:45,800 --> 00:19:49,400
single small fault? 
And if it's only 12 kilometers 

317
00:19:49,400 --> 00:19:52,120
long, that's about the maximum 
magnitude earthquake it can 

318
00:19:52,120 --> 00:19:57,080
generate magnitude 6. 
So we wanted to know, well, is 

319
00:19:57,080 --> 00:19:59,520
it longer? 
So we did this guided wave 

320
00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:03,400
technique where we put a rays 
across faults to the South, 

321
00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:08,040
faults to the north. 
And we looked to see if the 

322
00:20:08,040 --> 00:20:11,680
guided waves were continuously 
coming through onto those other 

323
00:20:11,680 --> 00:20:13,880
faults, and we found that they 
were. 

324
00:20:14,040 --> 00:20:19,280
In fact, instead of being just 
12 to 14 kilometers long, we 

325
00:20:19,280 --> 00:20:21,920
found that it was connected to a
fault to the South. 

326
00:20:22,240 --> 00:20:26,160
And that made the entire fault 
zone at least 128 kilometers 

327
00:20:26,160 --> 00:20:30,400
long, which is about 10 times 
what we suspected originally. 

328
00:20:31,040 --> 00:20:35,280
And because we know that some of
those faults are also connected 

329
00:20:35,280 --> 00:20:39,440
to some of the larger faults, 
for example to Calaveras Fault, 

330
00:20:39,640 --> 00:20:43,760
it's possible and likely that 
there's a continuous connection 

331
00:20:43,760 --> 00:20:46,400
of faults that as much as 300 
kilometers long. 

332
00:20:47,000 --> 00:20:51,400
And to put that in perspective, 
the 19 O 6 earthquake that 

333
00:20:51,400 --> 00:20:55,880
destroyed San Francisco occurred
along the San Andreas along an 

334
00:20:55,880 --> 00:21:00,280
area about 300 kilometers long. 
So that's saying that this other

335
00:21:00,280 --> 00:21:04,000
fault that we thought was 
relatively minor might be quite 

336
00:21:04,280 --> 00:21:07,240
a major fault that could 
generate a very large magnitude 

337
00:21:07,240 --> 00:21:10,640
earthquake if it did a 
continuous rupture as the San 

338
00:21:10,640 --> 00:21:14,200
Andreas did in 19 O 6. 
Wow, that finding really could 

339
00:21:14,200 --> 00:21:16,000
have pretty serious 
implications. 

340
00:21:16,360 --> 00:21:21,080
I'm wondering if as a result of 
this kind of work, there are new

341
00:21:21,080 --> 00:21:25,320
regulations or building codes 
that are put in place in the 

342
00:21:25,320 --> 00:21:28,040
danger zone that might not have 
been there before. 

343
00:21:28,440 --> 00:21:32,080
All of these faults are within 
close proximity and they are 

344
00:21:32,080 --> 00:21:37,200
part of the San Andreas Fault 
system that's largely in place. 

345
00:21:37,680 --> 00:21:41,760
But for people say you're within
10 kilometers, you may think 

346
00:21:41,760 --> 00:21:45,320
that oh, I'm quite a ways I'm 30
kilometers from the San Andreas.

347
00:21:45,320 --> 00:21:47,640
It's going to generate a large 
magnitude earthquake, can be 

348
00:21:47,640 --> 00:21:51,440
very damaging, but at least it 
may not rupture the ground 

349
00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:55,600
underneath me. 
Well, I think people have to 

350
00:21:55,600 --> 00:21:57,960
start thinking a little 
differently when you have these 

351
00:21:57,960 --> 00:22:01,000
long faults that are subparallel
to the San Andreas and they go 

352
00:22:01,000 --> 00:22:03,920
for a long way. 
So people have considered it. 

353
00:22:03,920 --> 00:22:09,120
The USGS does this probability 
map or where earthquakes are 

354
00:22:09,120 --> 00:22:14,000
likely to occur over the next 20
years, 30 years, and it 

355
00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:16,720
certainly takes those kind of 
things into consideration. 

356
00:22:17,440 --> 00:22:21,360
I've seen some of your results 
in which you overlay fault lines

357
00:22:21,360 --> 00:22:25,600
onto an aerial shot of an urban 
neighborhood, and I must say I'd

358
00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:30,720
be very disturbed if the red 
line delineating a fault ran 

359
00:22:30,720 --> 00:22:33,840
right through my home. 
Do you recommend that people 

360
00:22:33,840 --> 00:22:37,920
take some action if they live 
that close to or right on top of

361
00:22:37,920 --> 00:22:40,520
one of the fault splays that 
you've located? 

362
00:22:40,840 --> 00:22:45,640
Absolutely, if you live in close
proximity to an active fault, 

363
00:22:46,360 --> 00:22:49,840
you should take every precaution
such as making sure you have 

364
00:22:49,840 --> 00:22:53,520
water, food, shelter, the 
medicines that you need stocked 

365
00:22:53,520 --> 00:22:56,280
up and that you can have access 
to them. 

366
00:22:56,360 --> 00:22:59,320
Be prepared to leave. 
You may not be able to live in 

367
00:22:59,320 --> 00:23:01,000
your home. 
Have a plan. 

368
00:23:01,080 --> 00:23:03,160
You and your family, where are 
you going to meet? 

369
00:23:03,320 --> 00:23:05,000
Are you going to contact each 
other? 

370
00:23:05,120 --> 00:23:08,240
And maybe you contacted a 
relative across the country and 

371
00:23:08,240 --> 00:23:11,880
that relative across the country
contacts your other significant 

372
00:23:11,880 --> 00:23:13,880
person. 
Also, if you live in one of 

373
00:23:13,880 --> 00:23:17,400
these areas, retrofit your home.
Even if the fault doesn't run 

374
00:23:17,400 --> 00:23:21,200
directly beneath your home, the 
strong shaking from the fault, 

375
00:23:21,200 --> 00:23:24,040
even if you are 10s of 
kilometers away, can still 

376
00:23:24,040 --> 00:23:27,200
destroy your home. 
If you live right on top of the 

377
00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:29,720
fault itself. 
You may rethink where you're 

378
00:23:29,720 --> 00:23:33,400
living, or I would. 
As you mentioned earlier, you've

379
00:23:33,400 --> 00:23:38,000
worked on faults outside 
California, both in the US and 

380
00:23:38,000 --> 00:23:40,120
abroad. 
One of the areas that you 

381
00:23:40,120 --> 00:23:43,560
studied, surprisingly, is 
located right in the middle of 

382
00:23:43,560 --> 00:23:46,720
the North American plate. 
Can you tell us about that? 

383
00:23:46,800 --> 00:23:51,320
Yes, for a very long time it's 
been known this area called New 

384
00:23:51,320 --> 00:23:55,280
Madrid Seismic Zone, or the 
locals call it New Madrid 

385
00:23:55,280 --> 00:23:57,440
Seismic Zone. 
It's perhaps the most 

386
00:23:57,440 --> 00:24:01,360
seismically active area in the 
US east of the Rocky Mountains. 

387
00:24:01,520 --> 00:24:07,280
In the winter of 18111812, it 
generated 3 large magnitude 

388
00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:11,680
earthquakes and they were so 
strong that it reportedly rang 

389
00:24:11,680 --> 00:24:16,120
church bells in Boston and in 
places it's reported that the 

390
00:24:16,240 --> 00:24:19,160
Mississippi River actually ran 
backward for a while. 

391
00:24:20,080 --> 00:24:23,880
It's mainly located along the 
Mississippi River in Missouri, 

392
00:24:23,880 --> 00:24:27,760
Arkansas, Tennessee and it's 
believed to be the third leg or 

393
00:24:27,760 --> 00:24:32,560
the failed rift of a rift system
that goes down to the Gulf and 

394
00:24:32,800 --> 00:24:36,160
the faults are believed to be 
reactivated due to slight 

395
00:24:36,160 --> 00:24:40,040
changes in stress from the North
American plate reorienting. 

396
00:24:40,160 --> 00:24:44,040
But the true 'cause is not well 
known, but there are some 

397
00:24:44,040 --> 00:24:49,840
speculation that there is a very
dense lower crust in this area 

398
00:24:49,920 --> 00:24:54,240
and the pull down effect could 
also be adding a stress to the 

399
00:24:54,240 --> 00:24:56,720
system to generate these 
earthquakes. 

400
00:24:56,800 --> 00:25:01,960
So it's important because if we 
have a repeat of the 18111812 

401
00:25:01,960 --> 00:25:04,960
sequence, it could be 
devastating to the whole mid 

402
00:25:04,960 --> 00:25:09,600
continent area for two reasons. 
One, seismic energy propagates 

403
00:25:09,600 --> 00:25:13,440
much more efficiently east of 
the Rocky Mountains then say in 

404
00:25:13,440 --> 00:25:17,400
California. 
So the area of damage and strong

405
00:25:17,400 --> 00:25:21,080
shaking would be much wider for 
the same size earthquake there 

406
00:25:21,160 --> 00:25:27,120
than say in California. 
And in 18111812, there were very

407
00:25:27,120 --> 00:25:30,840
little population there. 
So there wasn't a lot of deaths 

408
00:25:30,880 --> 00:25:34,160
related to this. 
But given the large population, 

409
00:25:34,160 --> 00:25:37,360
the millions of people who live 
in this area now, it could be 

410
00:25:37,360 --> 00:25:39,960
devastating. 
So this is a very important 

411
00:25:39,960 --> 00:25:42,120
zone. 
We at USGS have been studying it

412
00:25:42,120 --> 00:25:44,840
for some time. 
The seismic surveys I did in the

413
00:25:44,840 --> 00:25:51,000
area, we can see that very dense
high velocity lower crust and it

414
00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:55,080
actually wells up, looks like a 
bell shaped feature. 

415
00:25:55,840 --> 00:26:00,520
And we can also see that the 
fault zone is very wide. 

416
00:26:00,600 --> 00:26:03,400
There are multiple, multiple 
faults in the surface. 

417
00:26:04,160 --> 00:26:07,440
So you tend to think of 
earthquakes in California 

418
00:26:07,440 --> 00:26:12,040
primarily or Alaska or some 
other places, but you don't tend

419
00:26:12,040 --> 00:26:15,040
to think of it that much in the 
center of the continent. 

420
00:26:15,040 --> 00:26:18,160
But this is one very, very 
active area. 

421
00:26:18,720 --> 00:26:20,920
Yeah, it's surprising. 
You mentioned that it may be the

422
00:26:20,920 --> 00:26:23,960
remnants of a formal rifting 
system or failed rift. 

423
00:26:24,120 --> 00:26:27,440
Do we understand that tectonic 
history that led to the 

424
00:26:27,440 --> 00:26:30,560
existence of this fault zone? 
Yeah, there are many papers on 

425
00:26:30,560 --> 00:26:32,640
it. 
A rifting system typically has 

426
00:26:32,640 --> 00:26:36,800
three arms. 
The two successful arms form an 

427
00:26:36,800 --> 00:26:38,680
ocean. 
So you can think of the gulf 

428
00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:41,720
like that. 
And the third arm, you can't 

429
00:26:41,720 --> 00:26:45,080
have all three be successful. 
So one that does not quite make 

430
00:26:45,080 --> 00:26:48,440
it to a rift. 
We've seen that many places in 

431
00:26:48,440 --> 00:26:51,960
the world, and that's likely 
what's going on there. 

432
00:26:52,280 --> 00:26:54,240
Is that like a geometric 
constraint? 

433
00:26:54,400 --> 00:26:57,640
Yes, yes. 
That split apart the pace at one

434
00:26:57,960 --> 00:27:01,200
point, there's no room for it to
do so in the third location. 

435
00:27:01,280 --> 00:27:02,440
Correct. 
Yes. 

436
00:27:02,760 --> 00:27:06,640
You've also worked on zones sort
of seismically active because of

437
00:27:06,640 --> 00:27:10,400
human activity, and in 
particular a zone in India's 

438
00:27:10,400 --> 00:27:16,480
Deccan Traps where a damaging 
earthquake of magnitude 6.3 was 

439
00:27:16,480 --> 00:27:19,720
induced. 
Fracking has received the most 

440
00:27:19,720 --> 00:27:23,800
publicity, but is that the human
activity involved there? 

441
00:27:24,240 --> 00:27:27,880
There are several types of human
activity that are known to cause

442
00:27:27,960 --> 00:27:30,280
earthquakes. 
That includes hydraulic 

443
00:27:30,280 --> 00:27:34,720
fracking, wastewater disposal at
high pressures, water reservoir 

444
00:27:34,720 --> 00:27:38,400
impoundment, mining, geothermal 
extraction, among others. 

445
00:27:39,120 --> 00:27:43,200
So basically these activities 
altered the existing stresses in

446
00:27:43,200 --> 00:27:47,600
the earth and the induced 
earthquakes are generally rather

447
00:27:47,600 --> 00:27:50,440
small. 
However, in Special Situations, 

448
00:27:50,680 --> 00:27:54,000
significant damaging earthquakes
are known to have occurred. 

449
00:27:54,480 --> 00:27:59,000
And for the India area, the 
induced seismicity was caused by

450
00:27:59,000 --> 00:28:00,800
the impoundment of this 
reservoir. 

451
00:28:01,160 --> 00:28:04,120
It started in the 60s. 
We refer to this type of 

452
00:28:04,120 --> 00:28:06,560
activity as reservoir induced 
seismicity. 

453
00:28:06,960 --> 00:28:11,640
Shortly after the dam was put up
in the 1960s, earthquake started

454
00:28:11,640 --> 00:28:13,960
to occur. 
It didn't take very long at all,

455
00:28:14,360 --> 00:28:17,640
maybe six months or so after 
they first did it, and then they

456
00:28:17,640 --> 00:28:23,480
got progressively more and more.
And in 1967 a magnitude 6.3 

457
00:28:23,480 --> 00:28:26,480
earthquake occurred, which was 
quite destructive and killed 

458
00:28:26,480 --> 00:28:29,400
quite a few people. 
The earthquake even continued to

459
00:28:29,400 --> 00:28:32,400
this day, particularly following
large monsoons. 

460
00:28:32,920 --> 00:28:37,040
So our data indicate that the 
reservoir was impounded at a 

461
00:28:37,040 --> 00:28:40,640
step over between two fault 
systems, strike slip type 

462
00:28:40,640 --> 00:28:43,640
faults. 
And when that happens, you have 

463
00:28:43,640 --> 00:28:47,160
many perpendicular faults to the
two main fault systems. 

464
00:28:47,680 --> 00:28:51,520
And when you put a lot of water 
on that, just the weight of the 

465
00:28:51,520 --> 00:28:55,680
water put stress on it. 
The water going down also gets 

466
00:28:55,680 --> 00:28:59,120
into the pores of the rocks. 
That changes the pore pressure. 

467
00:28:59,440 --> 00:29:02,040
And so that can generate these 
earthquakes. 

468
00:29:02,120 --> 00:29:05,560
And we see that again after a 
very large monsoon. 

469
00:29:06,120 --> 00:29:09,800
You will see say six months 
later, a flurry of activity. 

470
00:29:09,800 --> 00:29:11,400
We've seen that over and over 
again. 

471
00:29:12,280 --> 00:29:16,560
There are other areas in the US 
where we've seen similar things.

472
00:29:16,560 --> 00:29:20,000
If you have these step over in 
the faults, you can get some 

473
00:29:20,160 --> 00:29:23,640
induced seismicity there. 
Nothing the size that we've seen

474
00:29:23,640 --> 00:29:27,360
from India, but they can occur. 
So you have to pay special 

475
00:29:27,360 --> 00:29:30,440
attention to the geometry of the
faults if you're doing certain 

476
00:29:30,440 --> 00:29:33,560
activities. 
We have reservoirs all over the 

477
00:29:33,560 --> 00:29:36,240
world, and in fact, 
hydroelectric powers, if 

478
00:29:36,240 --> 00:29:39,360
anything, is becoming more 
important as we're going through

479
00:29:39,360 --> 00:29:44,840
this energy transition. 
So does this kind of work give 

480
00:29:44,840 --> 00:29:50,360
us more precise pointers to dam 
engineers and surveyors and so 

481
00:29:50,360 --> 00:29:55,040
on, as to where and where not to
place dams? 

482
00:29:55,400 --> 00:29:58,360
I would hope so if the study is 
done ahead of time. 

483
00:29:58,480 --> 00:30:02,040
That's not always the case, but 
I think we're learning a lot 

484
00:30:02,040 --> 00:30:06,040
more about fault systems and how
they're oriented, how they're 

485
00:30:06,040 --> 00:30:09,160
shaped and relative to the 
stresses that are there. 

486
00:30:09,520 --> 00:30:13,400
I should point out that most of 
the induced sites, Misty, in the

487
00:30:13,640 --> 00:30:20,720
US, particularly in Oklahoma and
Kansas, Ohio, Texas, Colorado, 

488
00:30:21,320 --> 00:30:27,200
they're caused by the injection 
of wastewater related to 

489
00:30:27,200 --> 00:30:30,840
petroleum production. 
So when you inject this 

490
00:30:30,840 --> 00:30:34,840
wastewater at high pressures, it
tends to change the stresses on 

491
00:30:34,840 --> 00:30:37,200
the faults and you can generate 
these earthquakes. 

492
00:30:37,200 --> 00:30:42,440
And for example, in 2011, there 
was a magnitude 5.7 in Oklahoma 

493
00:30:42,600 --> 00:30:45,720
that was quite a strong 
earthquake that was felt all 

494
00:30:45,720 --> 00:30:49,160
throughout much of the Midwest. 
And that was definitely an 

495
00:30:49,160 --> 00:30:51,440
induced earthquake. 
And there were two other 

496
00:30:51,440 --> 00:30:55,320
magnitude 5 earthquakes in that 
sequence that occurred and they 

497
00:30:55,320 --> 00:30:58,840
all occurred very close to where
they were injecting wastewater 

498
00:30:58,840 --> 00:31:01,880
at very high pressures. 
What are you working on at the 

499
00:31:01,880 --> 00:31:05,560
moment? 
I've been working on data that I

500
00:31:05,600 --> 00:31:11,200
acquired in Turkey in February 
of last year 2023. 

501
00:31:11,200 --> 00:31:15,520
There was a magnitude 7.8 
earthquake and that earthquake 

502
00:31:15,520 --> 00:31:19,680
was followed by a magnitude 7.6 
in the same province, same 

503
00:31:19,680 --> 00:31:24,000
general area in Turkey and the 
shaking was devastating. 

504
00:31:24,000 --> 00:31:29,120
It resulted in more than 60,000 
deaths in eastern Turkey, in 

505
00:31:29,120 --> 00:31:33,080
northern Syria. 
And Turkey has two major fault 

506
00:31:33,080 --> 00:31:37,160
systems and they're both very 
similar to the San Andreas one's

507
00:31:37,160 --> 00:31:40,320
called the North Anatolian fault
near the East Anatolian. 

508
00:31:40,320 --> 00:31:42,680
This earthquake occurred on the 
East Anatolian. 

509
00:31:43,440 --> 00:31:46,680
And so we need to understand 
what happened there. 

510
00:31:46,760 --> 00:31:50,360
It will help the Turks. 
It will also help us to 

511
00:31:50,360 --> 00:31:54,720
understand the San Andreas, and 
it will help people worldwide if

512
00:31:54,720 --> 00:31:58,560
we understand these things 
better, because such large 

513
00:31:58,560 --> 00:32:01,520
terrestrial earthquakes, no 
matter where they occur, they're

514
00:32:01,520 --> 00:32:05,160
going to be devastating. 
So I LED a group of scientists. 

515
00:32:05,160 --> 00:32:09,440
We went over and we deployed a 
lot of seismometers there to try

516
00:32:09,440 --> 00:32:12,520
just see in three dimensions 
what's going on in the 

517
00:32:12,520 --> 00:32:16,880
subsurface, understand how this 
energy propagated so far away 

518
00:32:16,880 --> 00:32:20,200
and killed so many people. 
And we're working, of course, 

519
00:32:20,200 --> 00:32:23,160
with the Turkish government and 
with our colleagues nationally 

520
00:32:23,160 --> 00:32:25,920
and internationally. 
We have, I think, an incredible 

521
00:32:25,920 --> 00:32:29,640
data set and we hope to get a 
lot of information from that. 

522
00:32:30,360 --> 00:32:33,800
I'm reminded of an early episode
of the podcast that I did with 

523
00:32:33,800 --> 00:32:37,120
Roman Jolivet fairly soon after 
the earthquake. 

524
00:32:37,280 --> 00:32:40,000
And although there were some 
preliminary conclusions, he was 

525
00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:43,520
very much telling us about the 
need to do some serious follow 

526
00:32:43,520 --> 00:32:46,560
up studies on that very complex 
fault system there. 

527
00:32:47,000 --> 00:32:50,360
So it's great to see that you're
doing just that. 

528
00:32:50,840 --> 00:32:52,680
Rufus Catchings, thank you very 
much. 

529
00:32:52,720 --> 00:33:07,080
Thank you, I enjoy it. 
To see pictures and 

530
00:33:07,080 --> 00:33:12,440
illustrations that support this 
podcast, go to geologybytes.com,

531
00:33:13,040 --> 00:33:16,320
where you'll also find 
transcripts and a subject matter

532
00:33:16,320 --> 00:33:19,640
index of all the episodes. 
There you can also give me 

533
00:33:19,640 --> 00:33:23,600
feedback which I welcome, as 
well as sign up to get my emails

534
00:33:23,600 --> 00:33:24,840
about new episodes.
