1
00:00:00,700 --> 00:00:03,400
This episode of the doctors are 
running podcast is sponsored by 

2
00:00:03,400 --> 00:00:06,400
our friends at running warehouse
for this year's Earth Day 

3
00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:09,000
running Warehouse is celebrating
by amplifying sustainable 

4
00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:10,900
styles. 
From all your favorite Brands, 

5
00:00:11,400 --> 00:00:14,200
we've been loving the Nike 
Dri-FIT and Saucony outpace 

6
00:00:14,200 --> 00:00:16,400
shorts which have been 
comfortable, super breathable 

7
00:00:16,400 --> 00:00:19,500
options for spring running. 
We're also big fans of Brands 

8
00:00:19,500 --> 00:00:22,700
like John G and Patagonia which 
not only make excellent apparel 

9
00:00:23,000 --> 00:00:25,300
but also pivot some of their 
sails towards environmental 

10
00:00:25,300 --> 00:00:28,100
causes check out the sustainable
Styles today. 

11
00:00:28,100 --> 00:00:31,200
Not only will you look good but 
you also feel good knowing 

12
00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:33,900
you're running sustainably to 
find the collection, visit the 

13
00:00:33,900 --> 00:00:35,800
link in our description or head 
straight to running 

14
00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:45,900
warehouse.com. 
Everyone, welcome to the doctors

15
00:00:45,900 --> 00:00:50,100
running podcast where we a group
of doctors of physical therapy, 

16
00:00:50,600 --> 00:00:53,200
discuss the art and the science 
of the stuff we're putting on 

17
00:00:53,200 --> 00:00:56,100
our feet. 
I'm Andrea Myers and I'm here 

18
00:00:56,100 --> 00:00:59,200
during a solo episode of the 
podcast today to talk about the 

19
00:00:59,200 --> 00:01:03,100
role that Error plays in 
developing injury. 

20
00:01:03,700 --> 00:01:07,600
Unfortunately, running related, 
Intrigue remains all-too-common,

21
00:01:07,600 --> 00:01:10,300
despite improvements in 
training, methods shoe 

22
00:01:10,300 --> 00:01:12,800
technology and access to 
information. 

23
00:01:13,400 --> 00:01:16,600
Research has found that the rate
of injury and Runners really 

24
00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:20,500
hasn't changed much since the 
1970s which is shocking. 

25
00:01:20,500 --> 00:01:24,300
When you think about all of the 
improvements in training, 

26
00:01:24,300 --> 00:01:31,200
knowledge, shoes, that have come
in those decades and the 1970s, 

27
00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:34,300
but unfortunately, people are 
still getting injured quite 

28
00:01:34,300 --> 00:01:38,100
frequently. 
The numbers are up to 70% of 

29
00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:42,000
Runners experience or running 
related injury, which is way too

30
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:45,500
much. 
So training error is reasonably 

31
00:01:45,500 --> 00:01:48,400
thought to play a major role in 
running related injury. 

32
00:01:48,800 --> 00:01:52,600
So today, I'm going to discuss 
what the research says how that 

33
00:01:52,600 --> 00:01:56,100
compares to our clinical 
experience as pts and coaches 

34
00:01:56,500 --> 00:01:59,800
and what you Runners can take 
away from this. 

35
00:02:00,000 --> 00:02:03,500
Seven to, hopefully help 
yourselves avoid getting injured

36
00:02:03,500 --> 00:02:07,100
in the first place. 
I've been a PT for 17 years in a

37
00:02:07,108 --> 00:02:10,199
coach for 10 years and I can 
certainly attest. 

38
00:02:10,199 --> 00:02:11,700
That training error is a 
problem. 

39
00:02:11,700 --> 00:02:15,400
I've encountered frequently with
my patients and clients and with

40
00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:19,400
a little bit of Education, I 
think that people can really 

41
00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:22,900
avoid some of these common 
training errors and hopefully 

42
00:02:22,900 --> 00:02:27,700
avoid injury as well. 
So today's subjective is, if you

43
00:02:27,700 --> 00:02:30,700
have had a running related 
injury, Do you feel that 

44
00:02:30,700 --> 00:02:32,300
training error? 
Was a part of it. 

45
00:02:32,800 --> 00:02:35,000
If so, what was the specific 
error? 

46
00:02:35,500 --> 00:02:37,600
You can leave a comment on 
YouTube. 

47
00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:42,200
Send us an email at doctors of 
running at gmail.com or leave us

48
00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:43,800
a comment through the podcast 
apps. 

49
00:02:43,800 --> 00:02:47,600
If you can So we're going to 
move into our main segments now.

50
00:02:47,600 --> 00:02:50,900
And first we're going to talk 
about well what are the specific

51
00:02:50,900 --> 00:02:54,600
variables that are involved in 
training error and what does the

52
00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:58,700
research say about how those 
variables do or don't relate to 

53
00:02:58,700 --> 00:03:02,500
developing an injury? 
So the most common variables 

54
00:03:02,500 --> 00:03:06,000
that research looks at is volume
intensity and frequency 

55
00:03:06,700 --> 00:03:11,600
unsurprisingly and as Runners we
know that volume intensity and 

56
00:03:11,600 --> 00:03:13,300
frequency interact with each 
other. 

57
00:03:13,300 --> 00:03:17,400
So you can imagine that there is
Individual influence on running 

58
00:03:17,400 --> 00:03:21,700
related injuries. 
Hard to a man examine, as, with 

59
00:03:21,700 --> 00:03:25,500
many performance related topics.
There are too many dependent 

60
00:03:25,500 --> 00:03:28,600
variables to draw solid 
conclusions regarding the role. 

61
00:03:28,600 --> 00:03:31,300
One factor has in the 
development of injury. 

62
00:03:32,000 --> 00:03:35,100
So, let's start by just defining
these terms. 

63
00:03:35,100 --> 00:03:40,000
So, volume, of course, is 
defined as miles or kilometers 

64
00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:44,600
run per week, intensity. 
When researchers say intensity, 

65
00:03:44,600 --> 00:03:47,500
they mean pay. 
Pace so minutes per mile or 

66
00:03:47,500 --> 00:03:51,300
minutes per km depending on 
who's writing the paper and then

67
00:03:51,300 --> 00:03:55,100
frequency means how many runs 
per week, you're running five 

68
00:03:55,100 --> 00:03:58,700
times a week, two times a week, 
seven times a week. 

69
00:03:59,700 --> 00:04:03,900
We all can see how frequency 
might contribute to developing 

70
00:04:04,000 --> 00:04:07,200
an injury if it's increased too 
quickly. 

71
00:04:08,100 --> 00:04:13,800
So there was a systematic review
by Nielsen, l in 2012 called 

72
00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:17,200
training error and running. 
That entering and they looked at

73
00:04:17,200 --> 00:04:20,300
these topics. 
So a few of the things that they

74
00:04:20,300 --> 00:04:25,000
found, first of all, related to 
volume rapid increases in 

75
00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:30,700
volume, at what they found was 
more than 30%, may increase 

76
00:04:30,700 --> 00:04:34,200
injury risk. 
They also found several studies 

77
00:04:34,200 --> 00:04:37,000
that found that running more 
than 40 miles, a week, is 

78
00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:41,400
associated with an increased 
injury risk, but not all you can

79
00:04:41,400 --> 00:04:44,300
imagine depending on the type of
Runners they were looking at, 

80
00:04:44,900 --> 00:04:48,600
for some People 40 miles a week 
is like a recovery week and for 

81
00:04:48,600 --> 00:04:52,900
other people 40 miles a week is 
their biggest week leading into 

82
00:04:52,900 --> 00:04:56,100
a marathon. 
So depends on the type of 

83
00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:59,900
Runners there including in their
studies did they include a lot 

84
00:04:59,900 --> 00:05:04,100
of elite athletes where 40 miles
a week is no big deal or did 

85
00:05:04,100 --> 00:05:07,700
they include a lot of newer 
runners or if they're running 40

86
00:05:07,700 --> 00:05:12,600
miles a week that maybe their 
Peak mileage of the year and one

87
00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:15,300
that they only achieve for one 
or two weeks. 

88
00:05:15,400 --> 00:05:18,300
Weeks leading into a marathon. 
So that's where we're just 

89
00:05:18,300 --> 00:05:22,300
looking at volume or just 
looking at any one of these 

90
00:05:22,300 --> 00:05:27,900
variables can make, it difficult
to determine the influence of 

91
00:05:27,900 --> 00:05:33,100
that variable on the development
of Entry, moving on to intensity

92
00:05:33,100 --> 00:05:36,500
studies, that looked at 
intensity or Pace have 

93
00:05:36,500 --> 00:05:39,700
inconsistent results. 
And the author said that the 

94
00:05:39,700 --> 00:05:42,900
main reason for that is because 
intensity was self-report. 

95
00:05:42,900 --> 00:05:47,100
And so, first of all, The 
subjects in the studies were 

96
00:05:47,100 --> 00:05:50,400
self-reporting how fast they 
were running, and they were 

97
00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:55,200
self-reporting how fast they ran
in previous training sessions, 

98
00:05:55,700 --> 00:06:00,300
so whether or not, they 
accurately recalled how fast 

99
00:06:00,300 --> 00:06:03,800
they Grant and all of their 
sessions was one potential 

100
00:06:03,800 --> 00:06:07,100
problem. 
The other thing is studies that 

101
00:06:07,100 --> 00:06:12,500
just look at PACE don't 
completely capture Runners 

102
00:06:12,500 --> 00:06:15,900
Fitness level so they were just 
looking at well, People who are 

103
00:06:15,900 --> 00:06:19,800
in faster than eight minute, 
miles versus people who ran 

104
00:06:19,800 --> 00:06:23,400
slower than eight minute miles 
were people in one of those two 

105
00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:25,800
groups, more or less likely to 
get injured. 

106
00:06:26,400 --> 00:06:30,100
Well, depending on the runner 8 
minutes, a mile could be there, 

107
00:06:30,100 --> 00:06:33,800
easy, run Pace. 
Or it could be their 5K pace. 

108
00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:38,200
So again, you know, you need to 
get more information. 

109
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:43,400
Regarding, what those Paces mean
to have a better understanding 

110
00:06:43,400 --> 00:06:46,900
of how those pieces. 
Or may not relate to that 

111
00:06:46,900 --> 00:06:50,100
Runners injury. 
And then thinking about 

112
00:06:50,100 --> 00:06:52,500
frequency, how many runs per 
week. 

113
00:06:53,000 --> 00:06:56,200
So again, it depends on the type
of Runner you're talking about, 

114
00:06:56,600 --> 00:07:00,700
if a lot of the subjects in a 
particular study were Elite 

115
00:07:00,700 --> 00:07:06,400
Runners, then 5 to 7 days. 
A week is pretty common, but if 

116
00:07:06,400 --> 00:07:10,200
you were talking about a newer 
group of Runners who again, 

117
00:07:10,300 --> 00:07:13,700
maybe were building up to five 
days a week. 

118
00:07:14,100 --> 00:07:16,800
Those Runners might I have been 
more likely to get injured 

119
00:07:16,800 --> 00:07:21,000
running, five days a week has 
compared to more experienced or 

120
00:07:21,000 --> 00:07:22,700
Elite Runners were five days a 
week. 

121
00:07:22,708 --> 00:07:26,000
Might be like what they do on a 
recovery week. 

122
00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:31,600
So again, it's one of the major 
limitations with just looking at

123
00:07:31,600 --> 00:07:35,900
these static measurements or 
static variables is that they 

124
00:07:35,900 --> 00:07:40,400
don't give you a full picture of
that person's training. 

125
00:07:40,400 --> 00:07:47,100
So the authors and the study in 
the Review also concluded that 

126
00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:50,900
it wasn't possible to do to 
determine the relationship 

127
00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:54,500
between frequency and injury due
to inconsistent results. 

128
00:07:55,600 --> 00:07:59,500
They did find also 
unsurprisingly that newer 

129
00:07:59,500 --> 00:08:02,800
Runners are at greater risk of 
injury likely for several 

130
00:08:02,800 --> 00:08:06,000
reasons. 
So, one of the main reasons is 

131
00:08:06,000 --> 00:08:09,500
if you're new to running, your 
body is experiencing all of 

132
00:08:09,500 --> 00:08:12,700
these new. 
Stresses new stresses on your 

133
00:08:12,700 --> 00:08:17,200
muscle tendon bone fashion, your
cardiovascular system. 

134
00:08:17,600 --> 00:08:22,800
So if somebody has just started 
running, do they even possess 

135
00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:26,800
the appropriate? 
Strength range of motion, 

136
00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:32,299
flexibility to run with. 
You don't want to say proper 

137
00:08:32,299 --> 00:08:36,400
form, but to run with good 
enough form where they're less 

138
00:08:36,400 --> 00:08:38,500
likely to get injured. 
Do they have sufficient 

139
00:08:38,500 --> 00:08:42,100
dorsiflexion range of motion? 
Are they able to hop on one 

140
00:08:42,100 --> 00:08:45,200
foot? 
Can they perform 20 to 25, 

141
00:08:45,200 --> 00:08:50,600
single leg calf raises, things 
like that, make it more or less 

142
00:08:50,600 --> 00:08:54,400
likely that somebody's going to 
get injured during another 

143
00:08:54,400 --> 00:08:57,600
Factor. 
That you see in newer Runners is

144
00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:01,000
that they may have inefficient 
form or decreased running 

145
00:09:01,000 --> 00:09:02,800
economy again because they're 
new to it. 

146
00:09:02,800 --> 00:09:07,500
And so their bodies and nervous 
systems haven't figured out the 

147
00:09:07,500 --> 00:09:11,400
most efficient way to run yet. 
And as we all know that process 

148
00:09:11,400 --> 00:09:16,000
takes years, if not decades to 
really become a master of 

149
00:09:16,000 --> 00:09:20,000
running the other. 
Another thing for newer Runners 

150
00:09:20,000 --> 00:09:24,000
is that any increase in training
is going to be a big increase? 

151
00:09:24,500 --> 00:09:29,700
If Eddie starts running. 
Let's say two miles two or three

152
00:09:29,700 --> 00:09:33,300
days a week, so their weekly 
mileage has four to six miles. 

153
00:09:33,800 --> 00:09:38,000
Even just adding one mile to 
each of their runs is going to 

154
00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:41,200
be a pretty big increase 
compared to somebody who's 

155
00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:44,400
already running 20 or 30 miles a
week. 

156
00:09:44,700 --> 00:09:47,800
Adding a mile to three runs a 
week. 

157
00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:51,300
Is going to be a much smaller 
percentage of their total 

158
00:09:51,300 --> 00:09:55,700
training volume. 
The other factor that might make

159
00:09:55,700 --> 00:09:59,000
new Runners at greater risk of 
injury is that they just have 

160
00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:02,600
less knowledge regarding 
training and recovery and a lot 

161
00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:06,100
of new Runners running. 
Feels terrible to them one 

162
00:10:06,100 --> 00:10:07,800
because they're running too 
hard. 

163
00:10:08,800 --> 00:10:12,400
Their heart rate is too high for
how easy they're supposed to be 

164
00:10:12,400 --> 00:10:17,400
running, but they just don't 
know what's normal soreness or 

165
00:10:17,400 --> 00:10:22,000
what could be a sign of an 
injury new Runners are less 

166
00:10:22,000 --> 00:10:25,400
likely to have a code. 
So they're more just like 

167
00:10:25,400 --> 00:10:28,000
running with friends or doing it
on their own they don't know 

168
00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:30,900
what to expect and they don't 
know what to be on the lookout 

169
00:10:30,900 --> 00:10:34,000
for. 
So all of these factors 

170
00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:37,700
contribute to why newer Runners 
are probably a group or newer 

171
00:10:37,700 --> 00:10:39,900
Runners are at greater risk of 
injury. 

172
00:10:41,100 --> 00:10:45,400
Another thing that they found in
the systematic review in 2012 is

173
00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:49,400
that greater running experience 
May decrease the risk of injury,

174
00:10:49,900 --> 00:10:52,900
which also May bias the results 
of studies on. 

175
00:10:53,100 --> 00:10:56,400
Running related injury. 
So, if you have a study on 

176
00:10:56,400 --> 00:10:59,600
running related injury, and 
let's say, it's looking at 

177
00:10:59,900 --> 00:11:03,900
training volume. 
If you're studying includes a 

178
00:11:03,900 --> 00:11:07,900
lot of experience to Runners, 
your injury rates, may be 

179
00:11:07,900 --> 00:11:11,100
different than if your study 
included a lot of newer Runners.

180
00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:18,000
So again, anytime you hear that 
a study found something, and we 

181
00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:21,900
talk about this all the time on 
the podcast, and in the articles

182
00:11:21,900 --> 00:11:25,500
that we write You have to dive 
deeper well who were the 

183
00:11:25,500 --> 00:11:31,000
subjects are the subjects 
similar enough to you if you're 

184
00:11:31,000 --> 00:11:34,100
trying to learn about yourself 
or if you're a clinician or the 

185
00:11:34,100 --> 00:11:37,800
subjects of this study, similar 
enough to your patient 

186
00:11:37,800 --> 00:11:42,800
population that you can apply 
the study's results to your 

187
00:11:42,800 --> 00:11:46,800
patient population. 
So if you have a study that has 

188
00:11:46,900 --> 00:11:50,900
a bunch of Runners with more 
running experience, Those 

189
00:11:50,900 --> 00:11:56,200
Runners may be less likely to 
get injured then a study that 

190
00:11:56,200 --> 00:12:00,700
includes a bunch of new Runners.
Another reason that more 

191
00:12:00,700 --> 00:12:03,800
experienced Runners are less 
likely to get injured as they 

192
00:12:03,800 --> 00:12:07,900
have a larger base to build on 
which helps them absorb acute. 

193
00:12:07,900 --> 00:12:09,800
Training load better than newer 
Runners. 

194
00:12:10,100 --> 00:12:13,000
I'm going to talk about that a 
little more a little bit later, 

195
00:12:13,400 --> 00:12:17,800
but if you think about somebody 
who has been running for 15 

196
00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:22,800
years and they've been Been 
running, 50 miles a week for the

197
00:12:22,800 --> 00:12:26,500
past five years. 
Let's say those Runners have 

198
00:12:26,500 --> 00:12:31,100
such a big base to build on and 
not just in terms of their 

199
00:12:31,100 --> 00:12:34,900
cardiovascular fitness, but 
they're muscular strength or 

200
00:12:34,900 --> 00:12:40,100
neuromuscular coordination. 
Their tendons ability to absorb 

201
00:12:40,100 --> 00:12:43,800
loading, everything. 
They're running economy that 

202
00:12:43,800 --> 00:12:48,500
they're going to absorb changes 
in their training, better than 

203
00:12:48,500 --> 00:12:53,200
newer runners. 
That's something that for some 

204
00:12:53,200 --> 00:12:56,000
of these training programs. 
Look at, and, for example, 

205
00:12:56,000 --> 00:12:59,600
training Peaks, gives you at ESS
score, which is your training 

206
00:12:59,600 --> 00:13:02,300
stress score. 
And it looks at a cute training 

207
00:13:02,300 --> 00:13:06,300
load and chronic training load 
and that can help an athlete or 

208
00:13:06,300 --> 00:13:11,300
coach manage their overall 
training to make sure that 

209
00:13:11,300 --> 00:13:16,000
you're staying in that sweet 
spot of building Fitness but not

210
00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:20,200
overeating or conversely not 
doing enough to actually 

211
00:13:20,300 --> 00:13:22,900
actually build Fitness, but I'll
get to that in a minute. 

212
00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:28,000
Another reason that more 
experienced Runners may have a 

213
00:13:28,000 --> 00:13:32,800
lower risk of injury is that 
they may just be better attuned 

214
00:13:32,800 --> 00:13:36,700
to their bodies. 
So they know if they start 

215
00:13:36,700 --> 00:13:39,900
feeling a little pain in their 
foot, they need to pay more 

216
00:13:39,900 --> 00:13:43,600
attention to it and if it 
doesn't go away over a day or 

217
00:13:43,600 --> 00:13:47,100
two or if it's getting worse 
they'll probably back off if 

218
00:13:47,100 --> 00:13:50,000
they're training or they might 
cross train. 

219
00:13:50,300 --> 00:13:54,600
Whereas a new Runner might not 
know to pay that much attention 

220
00:13:54,600 --> 00:13:58,300
to little twinges that they feel
because sometimes when you're 

221
00:13:58,300 --> 00:14:01,700
near to running like I said 
everything just hurts especially

222
00:14:01,700 --> 00:14:04,500
if you're not building up slowly
enough. 

223
00:14:05,100 --> 00:14:11,200
So experienced Runners have so 
many factors going for them that

224
00:14:11,600 --> 00:14:13,900
helps decrease their risk of 
injury. 

225
00:14:14,000 --> 00:14:19,900
So when they're included in 
studies they they can skew the 

226
00:14:19,900 --> 00:14:22,000
results. 
It's in a particular direction. 

227
00:14:22,700 --> 00:14:26,400
So, overall, the authors of the 
systematic review concluded that

228
00:14:26,400 --> 00:14:30,100
it's not possible to identify, 
which training errors were 

229
00:14:30,100 --> 00:14:34,100
related to running related 
injury because again, there was 

230
00:14:34,100 --> 00:14:36,500
just too much variability in 
these studies. 

231
00:14:36,800 --> 00:14:40,700
Some studies found a 
relationship between volume and 

232
00:14:40,700 --> 00:14:42,400
injury. 
Some studies found a 

233
00:14:42,408 --> 00:14:46,300
relationship between intensity 
or Pace and injury but others 

234
00:14:46,300 --> 00:14:50,600
found the opposite and again 
just too many pounding 

235
00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:55,100
variables, particularly more 
experienced Runners versus less 

236
00:14:55,100 --> 00:14:58,700
experienced Runners types of 
runners. 

237
00:15:00,800 --> 00:15:04,800
That just made the it difficult 
for these authors of the 

238
00:15:04,800 --> 00:15:07,700
systematic review to make solid 
conclusions. 

239
00:15:08,900 --> 00:15:13,500
So, if the research on static 
variables, is inconclusive, what

240
00:15:13,500 --> 00:15:17,900
about changes in training load? 
I mean, to most people that 

241
00:15:17,900 --> 00:15:22,100
sounds logical or right. 
It's not just oh this person 

242
00:15:22,100 --> 00:15:27,700
runs 40 miles a week, so they're
more likely to get injured but 

243
00:15:27,800 --> 00:15:30,800
it might be. 
Oh, this person has been running

244
00:15:30,800 --> 00:15:34,600
40 miles a week, but they 
decided this week they're going 

245
00:15:34,600 --> 00:15:39,500
to run 65 miles a week or they 
decided they're To run 80 miles 

246
00:15:39,500 --> 00:15:42,800
a week. 
Those sudden increases in 

247
00:15:42,800 --> 00:15:48,100
training load logically would be
more likely to lead to injury 

248
00:15:48,500 --> 00:15:50,900
but what does the research say 
about that? 

249
00:15:51,500 --> 00:15:55,800
So in 2018 damn stead at all, 
did a systematic review on 

250
00:15:55,800 --> 00:15:58,200
exactly. 
That weather changes in training

251
00:15:58,200 --> 00:16:01,500
load, have a relationship with 
running late related injury. 

252
00:16:02,300 --> 00:16:05,500
And they concluded that there 
was very limited evidence that 

253
00:16:05,500 --> 00:16:08,400
changes in training loader its 
associated with injury. 

254
00:16:09,100 --> 00:16:13,900
And very interestingly they 
specifically found no evidence 

255
00:16:13,900 --> 00:16:17,400
to support the 10% rule, you 
know the rule that we've all 

256
00:16:17,400 --> 00:16:19,900
heard, we're okay. 
If you're going to increase your

257
00:16:19,900 --> 00:16:25,500
weekly mileage, don't do it by 
more than 10% that role. 

258
00:16:25,500 --> 00:16:28,100
They found no evidence to 
support that. 

259
00:16:28,600 --> 00:16:31,700
And they also found that there 
is no, well, defined threshold 

260
00:16:31,700 --> 00:16:33,600
for increases in training 
volume. 

261
00:16:34,800 --> 00:16:38,300
But one thing they said was 
future studies are needed, of 

262
00:16:38,300 --> 00:16:42,100
course, to better define the 
role of changes in training 

263
00:16:42,100 --> 00:16:44,500
parameters and their 
relationship to injury. 

264
00:16:45,100 --> 00:16:48,500
These systematic reviews are 
relying on other studies that 

265
00:16:48,500 --> 00:16:51,800
are done and they're just 
reviewing the collection of 

266
00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:55,100
evidence that's out there and 
drawing conclusions, but if 

267
00:16:55,100 --> 00:16:59,500
there aren't a lot of 
high-quality studies to review, 

268
00:17:00,100 --> 00:17:03,500
then the power of a systematic 
review is going to be reduced 

269
00:17:03,700 --> 00:17:08,099
and that was Kind of the the 
case here where there just 

270
00:17:08,099 --> 00:17:13,599
weren't a lot of studies that 
have looked at changes in 

271
00:17:13,599 --> 00:17:16,700
training load and their 
relationship to injury. 

272
00:17:16,700 --> 00:17:20,800
So it makes sense. 
That changes in training load 

273
00:17:20,800 --> 00:17:24,200
may lead to injury as opposed to
static measures like weekly 

274
00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:28,300
mileage or training Pace but 
designing studies to measure 

275
00:17:28,300 --> 00:17:31,600
changes in training load. 
May be more complicated because 

276
00:17:31,600 --> 00:17:35,400
you would need to, they would 
need to Prospective studies, 

277
00:17:35,400 --> 00:17:39,300
probably meaning your sign 
people up and then you follow 

278
00:17:39,300 --> 00:17:43,600
them for a certain period of 
time because then you'd be able 

279
00:17:43,600 --> 00:17:45,800
to capture all of their training
data. 

280
00:17:46,200 --> 00:17:51,900
I mean most of us now some of us
use Garmin Connect or Strava or 

281
00:17:51,900 --> 00:17:55,500
we upload our training somewhere
so it would be possible to do 

282
00:17:55,500 --> 00:18:00,800
like a retroactive data dump, 
but again designing these 

283
00:18:00,800 --> 00:18:03,400
studies that are looking at 
changes could be a little more 

284
00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:07,100
complicated. 
And so moving on to types of 

285
00:18:07,100 --> 00:18:11,000
injury, we know that some 
injuries are more likely to be 

286
00:18:11,000 --> 00:18:15,100
related to changes in volume and
others are more likely to be 

287
00:18:15,100 --> 00:18:20,200
related to changes in training 
pace and Nielsen at all, the 

288
00:18:20,200 --> 00:18:23,500
same researcher who wrote the 
first systematic review that I 

289
00:18:23,500 --> 00:18:26,800
discussed wrote a clinical 
commentary on this topic. 

290
00:18:26,800 --> 00:18:31,300
So interestingly, and I think 
what they wrote makes a lot of 

291
00:18:31,308 --> 00:18:33,600
sense. 
At least to me as a clinician 

292
00:18:33,600 --> 00:18:38,300
when you About it, volume-based 
injuries tend to occur at the 

293
00:18:38,300 --> 00:18:42,000
front of the knee. 
So patellofemoral pain syndrome,

294
00:18:42,200 --> 00:18:48,100
IT band syndrome, patellar 
tendinopathy, they found that. 

295
00:18:48,100 --> 00:18:52,200
These injuries were more likely 
to to occur in marathon runners 

296
00:18:52,200 --> 00:18:54,600
as compared to those running 
shorter races. 

297
00:18:55,700 --> 00:19:00,100
So then as a clinician you can 
think, okay? 

298
00:19:00,100 --> 00:19:04,400
If you have someone a runner who
comes in and they have Pain in 

299
00:19:04,400 --> 00:19:07,900
the front of their name and 
while you're talking to your 

300
00:19:07,900 --> 00:19:11,600
patient, you're trying to get an
understanding of what factors 

301
00:19:11,600 --> 00:19:14,500
could have contributed to them, 
developing this entry. 

302
00:19:14,700 --> 00:19:19,500
Knowing what these authors are 
in this clinical commentary, you

303
00:19:19,500 --> 00:19:23,000
might start thinking. 
Okay well was this a 

304
00:19:23,000 --> 00:19:26,300
volume-based entry? 
So you might start asking 

305
00:19:26,300 --> 00:19:30,700
questions related to that. 
Have you increased your weekly 

306
00:19:30,700 --> 00:19:34,200
mileage? 
Has your training changed at 

307
00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:38,100
all? 
All regarding like the volume of

308
00:19:38,100 --> 00:19:43,300
running that you're doing. 
In contrast, Pace injuries tend 

309
00:19:43,300 --> 00:19:47,400
to occur below the knee meaning 
like the calf, the ankle and the

310
00:19:47,400 --> 00:19:50,800
foot and that makes sense when 
you think about it. 

311
00:19:50,800 --> 00:19:55,800
So if somebody is doing more 
running at a higher pace, you're

312
00:19:55,800 --> 00:19:59,400
going to have greater propulsive
forces required to run it. 

313
00:19:59,400 --> 00:20:03,200
That faster Pace, the 
gastrocnemius and the Soleus are

314
00:20:03,200 --> 00:20:07,100
the greatest contributors to 
propulsion and propulsive forces

315
00:20:07,100 --> 00:20:09,800
are greatly increased at faster 
paces. 

316
00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:16,500
Plantar fasciitis is also a pace
related injury. 

317
00:20:17,500 --> 00:20:20,200
We know that the greatest 
biomechanical strain on the 

318
00:20:20,200 --> 00:20:25,300
plantar fascia occurs in late 
stance, phase meaning like right

319
00:20:25,300 --> 00:20:29,600
before push off where you're 
transitioning from your mid foot

320
00:20:29,600 --> 00:20:34,400
to your forefoot and your big 
toe is bending to help you push 

321
00:20:34,400 --> 00:20:40,000
off the ground and when your 
first MTP joint that's the joint

322
00:20:40,000 --> 00:20:42,100
your big toe joint when it's 
Extension. 

323
00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:46,600
That's when the plantar fascia 
is stretched the most and it's 

324
00:20:46,600 --> 00:20:51,300
also where you've got the most 
strain on your planter fashion. 

325
00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:56,400
So again, faster running greater
strain on the plantar fascia. 

326
00:20:57,300 --> 00:21:01,500
Another Pace related injury that
these authors identified is 

327
00:21:01,500 --> 00:21:04,900
Achilles tendinopathy, which 
interestingly, enough is the 

328
00:21:04,900 --> 00:21:09,300
most common injury in Elite 
Runners, which I guess makes 

329
00:21:09,300 --> 00:21:10,800
sense. 
If you think about Elite 

330
00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:15,300
runners, H tend to spend a lot 
of time running fast regardless 

331
00:21:15,300 --> 00:21:22,000
of what event they were doing. 
Gastrocnemius injuries are also 

332
00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:26,600
more common at age, 40 and 
that's actually the focus of 

333
00:21:26,600 --> 00:21:29,100
Matt's research. 
So definitely check out our 

334
00:21:29,100 --> 00:21:32,600
podcast episode on Masters 
Runners for more information on 

335
00:21:32,600 --> 00:21:37,300
that. 
So gastrocnemius Soleus plantar,

336
00:21:37,300 --> 00:21:41,100
fasciitis, Achilles 
tendinopathy, all of these. 

337
00:21:41,300 --> 00:21:45,000
Trees were identified as Pace 
related injuries by these 

338
00:21:45,000 --> 00:21:49,200
authors. 
So a major drawback of this 

339
00:21:49,200 --> 00:21:53,300
paper that they wrote is that 
they looked at a, you know, all 

340
00:21:53,300 --> 00:21:56,300
the studies that are out there 
on your running related injuries

341
00:21:57,200 --> 00:22:01,900
but only have actually less than
half of the running related 

342
00:22:01,900 --> 00:22:06,300
injuries that were in these 
papers were categorized as Pace 

343
00:22:06,300 --> 00:22:11,000
or volume based in trees. 
So there's this whole other mass

344
00:22:11,000 --> 00:22:14,900
of Of running a related injuries
out there that they didn't 

345
00:22:14,900 --> 00:22:20,000
consider to be related to Pace 
or volume like meniscal tears, 

346
00:22:20,000 --> 00:22:24,400
sacroiliac joint, pain, back 
pain, hip pain. 

347
00:22:24,400 --> 00:22:30,300
So their discussion is a little 
bit limited, but I think it this

348
00:22:30,400 --> 00:22:34,900
provides useful information to 
both Runners and clinicians in. 

349
00:22:34,900 --> 00:22:37,400
Just kind of guiding your 
thinking too. 

350
00:22:37,900 --> 00:22:41,200
Well, okay, they have pain here.
They have this. 

351
00:22:41,300 --> 00:22:45,100
Hurry and what potentially could
have caused in and what's the 

352
00:22:45,100 --> 00:22:49,200
solution to get rid of it. 
And then make sure that it 

353
00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:54,300
doesn't come back in the future.
There's one more article that I 

354
00:22:54,300 --> 00:22:57,600
want to discuss before getting 
into some more clinical 

355
00:22:57,700 --> 00:23:04,100
discussions of training error in
2018, Johnston at all examined, 

356
00:23:04,100 --> 00:23:07,300
95 endurance athletes. 
So they weren't all Runners. 

357
00:23:07,300 --> 00:23:10,900
They were cyclist, rowers 
swimmers triathletes and Runners

358
00:23:11,700 --> 00:23:15,500
and it was a prospective study. 
Meaning they signed these 

359
00:23:15,500 --> 00:23:19,300
athletes up for the study and 
then they followed them for 52 

360
00:23:19,300 --> 00:23:22,200
weeks. 
And they were looking at their 

361
00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:26,200
training data, they're looking 
at whether or not they developed

362
00:23:26,200 --> 00:23:30,800
a new injury during that time, 
and they actually found that 

363
00:23:30,800 --> 00:23:35,900
injury in the previous 12 months
was associated with developing, 

364
00:23:35,900 --> 00:23:39,900
a new injury, and the highest 
group highest risk was for those

365
00:23:39,900 --> 00:23:44,200
with three or more previous and 
injuries, and of course, this 

366
00:23:44,200 --> 00:23:46,700
makes logical sense. 
If you've had an injury in the 

367
00:23:46,700 --> 00:23:51,100
past, if you haven't fully 
addressed all of the actors that

368
00:23:51,100 --> 00:23:55,900
caused that previous injury, you
may be more likely to have that 

369
00:23:55,900 --> 00:24:01,200
injury, come back or develop a 
different injury as a result of 

370
00:24:01,200 --> 00:24:06,100
compensation for that old entry.
Another interesting thing they 

371
00:24:06,100 --> 00:24:10,200
found which gets us back to what
I was talking about with acute 

372
00:24:10,200 --> 00:24:13,600
and chronic training load. 
Is they found that the lowest 

373
00:24:13,600 --> 00:24:18,200
risk of injury occurred when a 
cute training load was low to 

374
00:24:18,200 --> 00:24:21,500
moderate and chronic training 
load was moderate to high. 

375
00:24:22,000 --> 00:24:25,700
What does that mean? 
So acute training load refers to

376
00:24:25,700 --> 00:24:29,800
your current weeks training and 
the way they determine that is 

377
00:24:30,000 --> 00:24:34,900
it depends on each. 
Researchers or like training, 

378
00:24:34,900 --> 00:24:39,700
Peaks uses its own proprietary 
formula, but rpe rate of 

379
00:24:39,700 --> 00:24:42,100
perceived exertion heart rate 
data. 

380
00:24:42,600 --> 00:24:48,100
If you're a cyclist, they'll use
power data, might use Pace 

381
00:24:48,100 --> 00:24:51,300
related to your lactate 
threshold, but your acute 

382
00:24:51,300 --> 00:24:55,100
training load is the sum of the 
load of your current weeks 

383
00:24:55,100 --> 00:24:59,400
training and then chronic 
training load is the average of 

384
00:24:59,400 --> 00:25:01,700
the last four to six weeks 
training. 

385
00:25:02,200 --> 00:25:05,800
For example, the researchers use
the last for training Peaks uses

386
00:25:05,800 --> 00:25:09,100
the last six. 
So, what does that mean? 

387
00:25:09,700 --> 00:25:13,400
It emphasizes the need for 
athletes to have a big training 

388
00:25:13,400 --> 00:25:16,900
base. 
Meaning, you can't just like, 

389
00:25:17,400 --> 00:25:20,100
hop off the couch and decide to 
start training for a marathon. 

390
00:25:20,100 --> 00:25:24,500
And I think we all know that, 
but it also means that if you've

391
00:25:24,500 --> 00:25:31,000
been consistently running, like 
10 to 20 miles a week, you can't

392
00:25:31,000 --> 00:25:34,000
just decide that you're going to
dive into marathon training. 

393
00:25:34,400 --> 00:25:38,800
You need to slowly. 
Build up to To Greater mileage 

394
00:25:38,800 --> 00:25:41,000
before starting to train for 
something hard. 

395
00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:46,900
Like a marathon, it's also means
that people who have a high 

396
00:25:46,900 --> 00:25:52,600
chronic training load are more 
able to absorb increases in 

397
00:25:52,600 --> 00:25:56,200
their acute training load 
because they have that bigger 

398
00:25:56,200 --> 00:25:59,200
base. 
So an increase in their training

399
00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:03,600
load is not going to be as 
impactful as an as for somebody 

400
00:26:03,600 --> 00:26:08,000
who's maybe been running 15 or 
20 miles a week and then Let's 

401
00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:13,100
say suddenly jumps to 40 miles a
week or someone who's been doing

402
00:26:13,100 --> 00:26:18,200
one faster, training session a 
week, suddenly jumps to 3. 

403
00:26:18,800 --> 00:26:25,100
So building up that bass long 
before you have a goal event is 

404
00:26:25,100 --> 00:26:29,700
really key for helping reduce 
injury risk. 

405
00:26:29,700 --> 00:26:32,400
And I would really encourage 
people who are thinking about 

406
00:26:32,800 --> 00:26:36,900
running a marathon someday. 
Don't just think about it, as 

407
00:26:37,500 --> 00:26:40,800
Okay, I'm going to get my twelve
to sixteen week plan and then 

408
00:26:40,800 --> 00:26:43,300
I'll be ready. 
If you know you want to do a 

409
00:26:43,300 --> 00:26:47,800
marathon in 2024, start 
gradually building up your 

410
00:26:47,800 --> 00:26:52,500
training base now like slowly 
increase your weekly volume 

411
00:26:53,200 --> 00:26:57,500
slowly increase. 
Some longer Tempo, runs that way

412
00:26:57,500 --> 00:27:03,000
when it's time to actually do 
that 12 or 16 week Marathon 

413
00:27:03,000 --> 00:27:06,400
specific training block, you're 
going to have that base. 

414
00:27:06,400 --> 00:27:09,400
That's going to let your Body 
absorb that training so much 

415
00:27:09,400 --> 00:27:12,500
more easily. 
So just keep that in mind. 

416
00:27:12,500 --> 00:27:16,000
If, you know, you've got a 
marathon as your goal or even, 

417
00:27:16,000 --> 00:27:18,900
if a half marathons, your goal 
and you've been running five, 

418
00:27:18,900 --> 00:27:23,000
k's the better base, you build, 
before you start doing that 

419
00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:26,600
specific work, the more 
successful, you're likely to be 

420
00:27:28,000 --> 00:27:31,800
So I've talked a lot about the 
research that's out there 

421
00:27:31,800 --> 00:27:34,600
regarding training error and 
development of entry. 

422
00:27:35,000 --> 00:27:37,900
And the research is, you know, 
kind of disappointing. 

423
00:27:38,900 --> 00:27:42,900
There aren't a lot of solid 
conclusions that can be taken 

424
00:27:42,900 --> 00:27:46,500
from the research which is often
the case, anytime you're talking

425
00:27:46,500 --> 00:27:50,700
about medicine or sport 
performance because when you're 

426
00:27:50,700 --> 00:27:55,600
dealing with people it's so hard
to reduce people to a single 

427
00:27:55,600 --> 00:28:00,200
variable there are so So many 
factors that go into why 

428
00:28:00,200 --> 00:28:04,400
somebody might get injured and 
it's hard to design a study to 

429
00:28:04,400 --> 00:28:09,900
tease out, just the effect of 
one variable on the rate of 

430
00:28:09,900 --> 00:28:14,900
injury. 
So as often occurs in healthcare

431
00:28:14,900 --> 00:28:19,700
and Medicine, the research might
not be super strong for a given 

432
00:28:19,700 --> 00:28:24,800
intervention, but our clinical 
experience can help guide us in 

433
00:28:24,800 --> 00:28:29,300
what to do for somebody. 
When the research doesn't have a

434
00:28:29,300 --> 00:28:33,500
clear answer and certainly 
physical therapists, and coaches

435
00:28:34,800 --> 00:28:39,400
have lots of experience in. 
Well, what factors tend to lead 

436
00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:44,800
to somebody getting injured and 
I can say in my experience, both

437
00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:50,300
as a physical therapist, and as 
a coach and as an athlete and 

438
00:28:50,300 --> 00:28:54,700
adequate recovery in general is 
one of the biggest factors in 

439
00:28:54,700 --> 00:28:58,600
people getting in turn and when 
I I see a recovery. 

440
00:28:58,600 --> 00:29:02,600
I'm not just talking about like 
recovery days or rest days, rest

441
00:29:02,600 --> 00:29:05,900
days are important, but so is 
active recovery. 

442
00:29:06,000 --> 00:29:10,800
Meaning instead of taking a day,
completely off exercise, still, 

443
00:29:10,800 --> 00:29:15,100
get out and move whether that's 
going for a walk or going for an

444
00:29:15,100 --> 00:29:20,700
easy bike ride or an easy swim. 
I have certainly found since 

445
00:29:20,700 --> 00:29:24,900
getting them back into running 
the past few years that I need 

446
00:29:24,900 --> 00:29:30,000
active recovery days as opposed 
to Days off when I was cycling. 

447
00:29:30,400 --> 00:29:35,200
I needed a day off a week and I 
was also training, you know, 15 

448
00:29:35,200 --> 00:29:38,400
to 20 hours a week. 
So I didn't need a day off, but 

449
00:29:38,500 --> 00:29:43,100
for running, I think because of 
the high impact nature of 

450
00:29:43,100 --> 00:29:48,200
running, I do better when I have
active recovery days as opposed 

451
00:29:48,200 --> 00:29:51,800
to days completely off. 
So that's something to learn 

452
00:29:51,800 --> 00:29:55,500
about yourself. 
When the goal of a rest or 

453
00:29:55,508 --> 00:29:59,200
recovery day is recovery. 
You what helps you get? 

454
00:29:59,200 --> 00:30:06,000
There isn't doing nothing or is 
it doing something very easy, 

455
00:30:06,000 --> 00:30:10,200
that moves your body and helps 
you recover helps you recover 

456
00:30:10,200 --> 00:30:14,100
for the next day's training and 
in a couple days for your next 

457
00:30:14,100 --> 00:30:16,200
hard day. 
So that's something to think 

458
00:30:16,200 --> 00:30:20,100
about, with regard to yourself 
because what works for me, isn't

459
00:30:20,100 --> 00:30:21,600
going to work for the next 
person. 

460
00:30:21,600 --> 00:30:24,700
So the better, you understand 
how you respond to training the 

461
00:30:24,700 --> 00:30:27,400
better, another really 
important. 

462
00:30:27,500 --> 00:30:31,400
Factor in recovery is sleep. 
You can do the best training in 

463
00:30:31,400 --> 00:30:35,800
the world, but if you're only 
sleeping for hours a night, your

464
00:30:35,800 --> 00:30:39,100
body isn't going to be able to 
absorb the training you're 

465
00:30:39,100 --> 00:30:41,700
doing. 
Because of course, sleep is when

466
00:30:41,700 --> 00:30:45,400
our bodies actually repair. 
So that's when our muscles get 

467
00:30:45,400 --> 00:30:48,000
built back up. 
Again, that's when our immune 

468
00:30:48,000 --> 00:30:51,300
system goes to work, that's when
growth hormone goes to work. 

469
00:30:51,800 --> 00:30:56,800
So if, if you're sleeping for 
hours a night, and you have a 

470
00:30:56,800 --> 00:31:00,300
big, And goal. 
You really need to figure out 

471
00:31:00,300 --> 00:31:02,500
how you're cutting, get a little
more sleep. 

472
00:31:02,600 --> 00:31:06,000
Otherwise you're setting 
yourself up for injury. 

473
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:09,300
Burnout getting sick. 
So sleep is key. 

474
00:31:10,100 --> 00:31:14,000
Another thing that's related to 
recovery that, I don't think a 

475
00:31:14,000 --> 00:31:16,200
lot of people acknowledge is 
stress. 

476
00:31:16,900 --> 00:31:23,100
So if you have a crazy job or if
life at home, is really crazy, 

477
00:31:23,100 --> 00:31:26,600
or if it's a combination of all 
of the above, if you're stressed

478
00:31:26,600 --> 00:31:30,900
all the time, You're not going 
to be able to absorb the 

479
00:31:30,900 --> 00:31:34,900
training you're doing, because 
the hormones that are involved 

480
00:31:34,900 --> 00:31:38,600
in, stress are going to 
interfere with your training. 

481
00:31:38,600 --> 00:31:43,100
So if you have, if you know that
the next three months are, just 

482
00:31:43,100 --> 00:31:46,600
going to be super stressful 
because of what's going on at 

483
00:31:46,600 --> 00:31:50,900
work or what's going on in your 
family or whatever, that might 

484
00:31:50,900 --> 00:31:53,500
not be the best time to train 
for a marathon. 

485
00:31:53,508 --> 00:31:59,000
So and I think it also is 
Important to just give yourself 

486
00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:02,800
some Grace in terms of. 
You really can't do everything 

487
00:32:02,800 --> 00:32:06,900
all at once. 
So if you've got a lot going on 

488
00:32:06,900 --> 00:32:11,500
in your life let yourself back 
off a little bit on training 

489
00:32:11,500 --> 00:32:16,500
don't stop because exercise is a
great stress reliever but you 

490
00:32:16,500 --> 00:32:20,100
can't expect that. 
You're going to perform at 100%.

491
00:32:20,300 --> 00:32:24,000
If you're majorly stressed out 
in a bunch of other factors. 

492
00:32:24,000 --> 00:32:28,000
So now just take all of that 
into account when Planning your 

493
00:32:28,000 --> 00:32:31,800
training and thinking about how 
you're responding to training 

494
00:32:32,100 --> 00:32:36,800
and how well you're a covering 
on a similar topic of rest. 

495
00:32:38,300 --> 00:32:42,500
I it's a pretty common thing the
weekend warrior, right? 

496
00:32:42,500 --> 00:32:45,900
People who are super busy during
the week, they maybe get a 

497
00:32:45,900 --> 00:32:50,000
couple like 30 minute runs and 
and then on Saturday and Sunday,

498
00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:52,700
they really hit it hard. 
They do a hard workout on 

499
00:32:52,700 --> 00:32:56,300
Saturday with intervals, then 
they go do their long run on 

500
00:32:56,300 --> 00:33:01,100
Sunday. 
And that is setting you up for 

501
00:33:01,100 --> 00:33:07,100
getting intern because your body
is just not accustomed to that 

502
00:33:07,100 --> 00:33:12,800
huge dose of exercise Saturday 
and Sunday, followed by low 

503
00:33:12,800 --> 00:33:19,200
activity during the week. 
So if like some people just have

504
00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:24,000
lives and jobs where it's 
impossible to exercise during 

505
00:33:24,000 --> 00:33:28,700
the week, you might think about 
how you can Balance out what you

506
00:33:28,700 --> 00:33:32,700
do on the weekend so that you're
less likely to get injured. 

507
00:33:33,100 --> 00:33:38,600
And that might mean, maybe doing
a shorter interval day on 

508
00:33:38,600 --> 00:33:42,800
Saturday and then doing your 
long run, but making sure that 

509
00:33:42,800 --> 00:33:46,600
you keep it really easy because 
I know that a lot of us. 

510
00:33:46,800 --> 00:33:51,100
It's so easy to run a little too
fast on our easy, long run days,

511
00:33:51,500 --> 00:33:55,600
but it's those long, slow days. 
That give us the best metabolic 

512
00:33:55,600 --> 00:34:01,100
benefits in terms of fat burning
and other factors that help 

513
00:34:01,100 --> 00:34:05,700
improve our interns. 
Another thing that I see all the

514
00:34:05,700 --> 00:34:09,900
time is people training it in 
appropriate places. 

515
00:34:10,400 --> 00:34:15,199
So your training Paces should be
based on your current Fitness, 

516
00:34:15,900 --> 00:34:20,000
not a goal race time. 
Like, if you're doing a marathon

517
00:34:20,000 --> 00:34:26,400
in four months and your goal is 
to run, let's say, 3:30, your 

518
00:34:26,400 --> 00:34:30,000
pace is four months out. 
Shouldn't be based on what 

519
00:34:30,000 --> 00:34:33,199
you're hoping to run. 
Your pace is, should be based 

520
00:34:33,199 --> 00:34:34,300
on. 
Current Fitness. 

521
00:34:34,300 --> 00:34:37,199
And how do you figure out your 
current Fitness? 

522
00:34:37,199 --> 00:34:43,500
Well, you could do a time trial 
like a mile or even like a mile 

523
00:34:43,500 --> 00:34:46,500
and a half time. 
Trial can be a good test of your

524
00:34:46,500 --> 00:34:49,199
aerobic fitness. 
And then there are a bunch of 

525
00:34:49,199 --> 00:34:54,900
calculators online where you can
input that time and get your 

526
00:34:54,900 --> 00:34:59,500
training Paces because they're 
basically using those Paces to 

527
00:34:59,500 --> 00:35:03,400
estimate your VO2 max and 
setting your Paces from the 

528
00:35:03,400 --> 00:35:08,700
They're the other thing I've 
seen is some people are using 

529
00:35:08,700 --> 00:35:13,800
training Paces based on a race 
that they did six months ago or 

530
00:35:13,800 --> 00:35:18,800
even a year ago and that may or 
may not be their current Fitness

531
00:35:18,800 --> 00:35:23,100
level, you might be fitter than 
you were the at that time or you

532
00:35:23,100 --> 00:35:25,800
might be less fit. 
And now all of your training 

533
00:35:25,800 --> 00:35:29,900
Paces are too aggressive meaning
when you're doing, what you 

534
00:35:29,900 --> 00:35:32,900
think is like elect a threshold 
interval. 

535
00:35:33,500 --> 00:35:37,900
You're really doing an interval 
like your 5K pace and that can 

536
00:35:37,900 --> 00:35:41,400
lead to a lot of frustration. 
Because, of course, you're not 

537
00:35:41,400 --> 00:35:46,500
going to be able to do threshold
type intervals at 5K Pace. 

538
00:35:46,500 --> 00:35:48,100
It's going to feel like you're 
dying. 

539
00:35:48,600 --> 00:35:54,500
So I really encourage people 
test yourself often to determine

540
00:35:54,500 --> 00:35:59,200
your current Fitness, like I 
have my athletes test every 8 to

541
00:35:59,200 --> 00:36:03,200
12 weeks, if they're not racing,
sometimes more. 

542
00:36:03,400 --> 00:36:07,900
Often that depending on their 
situations just so you can get a

543
00:36:07,900 --> 00:36:11,500
sense of where the current 
Fitness is and make sure that 

544
00:36:11,500 --> 00:36:17,000
those zones are correct. 
Another common training error 

545
00:36:17,000 --> 00:36:21,100
that I see is people use an 
inappropriate mix of high and 

546
00:36:21,100 --> 00:36:25,500
low intensity sessions. 
So some people can handle three 

547
00:36:25,500 --> 00:36:30,600
workouts a week and recover 
between them just fine and get 

548
00:36:30,600 --> 00:36:33,200
fitter and they don't get 
injured and they don't get sick.

549
00:36:33,400 --> 00:36:38,900
And some people need to and some
people need, maybe one every 

550
00:36:38,900 --> 00:36:43,400
five days and the only way to 
figure that out is to try but 

551
00:36:43,400 --> 00:36:47,900
it's always better to start on 
the easier side than the harder 

552
00:36:47,900 --> 00:36:51,000
side. 
I think for most people to 

553
00:36:51,000 --> 00:36:55,500
harder workouts a week is the 
right amount, but you have to 

554
00:36:55,500 --> 00:36:57,800
recover enough between hard 
sessions. 

555
00:36:58,100 --> 00:37:02,100
Otherwise your again could be 
setting yourself up for injury. 

556
00:37:03,900 --> 00:37:07,500
I've seen a lot of posts on 
social media lately about the 

557
00:37:07,500 --> 00:37:10,900
importance of consistency and 
training and I really liked that

558
00:37:10,900 --> 00:37:13,000
people are talking about 
consistency. 

559
00:37:13,600 --> 00:37:19,800
So if you can't do your 
prescribed training because 

560
00:37:20,300 --> 00:37:25,700
every few weeks, you either get 
sick or something starts hurting

561
00:37:25,700 --> 00:37:30,100
or you just feel exhausted. 
That is a sign that something in

562
00:37:30,100 --> 00:37:33,800
your training needs to be 
adjusted, you shouldn't have of 

563
00:37:33,800 --> 00:37:37,400
these like high peaks where 
you're training a ton and then 

564
00:37:37,400 --> 00:37:41,400
crashes where you have to take 
three or four days off because 

565
00:37:42,100 --> 00:37:48,200
you're tired or sick or injured,
that is a sign that your 

566
00:37:48,200 --> 00:37:51,000
training volume, your training 
intensity, the amount of 

567
00:37:51,000 --> 00:37:55,100
recovery or getting something 
needs to change, or it could be 

568
00:37:55,100 --> 00:37:57,600
a sign that you're not sleeping 
enough or you're not eating 

569
00:37:57,600 --> 00:38:01,600
enough or, you know, one of 
those recovery factors is 

570
00:38:01,600 --> 00:38:05,400
missing in your training. 
But if you are one of those 

571
00:38:05,400 --> 00:38:09,800
people who has that pattern, a 
lot where you're needing to take

572
00:38:09,800 --> 00:38:13,800
several days off, because you 
just feel totally exhausted. 

573
00:38:14,500 --> 00:38:17,300
Talk to your coach. 
If you have one, if you don't 

574
00:38:17,300 --> 00:38:20,900
have a coach think about where 
you could dial back your 

575
00:38:20,900 --> 00:38:25,200
training so that it's something 
you can handle consistently 

576
00:38:25,200 --> 00:38:29,600
rather than having to take all 
of this unplanned time off. 

577
00:38:30,900 --> 00:38:35,000
Another thing I see a lot in the
clinic is people who get injured

578
00:38:35,100 --> 00:38:36,800
adding a new variable and 
training. 

579
00:38:37,200 --> 00:38:40,600
And when I say new variable, it 
could be someone who's a 

580
00:38:40,600 --> 00:38:44,600
roadrunner suddenly decided to 
take up trail running, or 

581
00:38:44,600 --> 00:38:50,300
someone who normally only rides 
on or runs on flat roads starts 

582
00:38:50,300 --> 00:38:55,900
running in the Hills or someone 
who always used to run on this 

583
00:38:55,900 --> 00:39:00,300
nice perfect bike. 
Path is now running on. 

584
00:39:00,400 --> 00:39:03,300
Uncrowned Country Roads, you 
know that are higher in the 

585
00:39:03,300 --> 00:39:08,100
middle could be shoes that are 
significantly different from 

586
00:39:08,100 --> 00:39:10,700
their usual shoes. 
Let's say somebody decided to 

587
00:39:10,700 --> 00:39:14,700
try minimal shoes, whereas 
previously they were running in 

588
00:39:14,700 --> 00:39:19,300
more traditional like 10 or 12. 
Mm, drops use any of these new 

589
00:39:19,300 --> 00:39:22,800
variables, have the potential to
cause injury. 

590
00:39:23,500 --> 00:39:27,600
If some for the first example, 
someone suddenly starts trail 

591
00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:31,800
running, you can immediately 
think about Of the new physical 

592
00:39:31,800 --> 00:39:33,700
challenges related to doing 
that. 

593
00:39:34,200 --> 00:39:38,400
Now, you're on uneven terrain 
often Trails have a lot of 

594
00:39:38,400 --> 00:39:42,800
elevation change. 
The softness of the terrain is 

595
00:39:42,800 --> 00:39:46,800
variable so you could be running
on really hard packed dirt for a

596
00:39:46,800 --> 00:39:49,800
half mile and then you're on 
Sand that has your sliding all 

597
00:39:49,800 --> 00:39:53,000
over. 
So these new challenges. 

598
00:39:53,300 --> 00:39:59,600
If you start doing too much of 
it too fast could lead to an 

599
00:39:59,600 --> 00:40:02,600
injury. 
Similarly, if the type of 

600
00:40:02,600 --> 00:40:06,600
terrain you're running on 
changes, whether you're doing 

601
00:40:06,600 --> 00:40:10,500
more Hills, which is often the 
case people suddenly decide, 

602
00:40:10,500 --> 00:40:14,600
they need to add more elevation 
change into their training like 

603
00:40:14,600 --> 00:40:18,800
if they're training for a hilly 
race that could cause muscle 

604
00:40:18,800 --> 00:40:23,000
strain. 
Also, I am so living here in 

605
00:40:23,000 --> 00:40:26,000
Connecticut, it's pretty hilly, 
but I've had a number of 

606
00:40:26,000 --> 00:40:29,900
patients, who let's say go on 
vacation to somewhere flat like 

607
00:40:29,900 --> 00:40:33,800
Florida. 
And they come back with often IT

608
00:40:33,800 --> 00:40:37,600
band pain because they're not 
used to running on dead flat 

609
00:40:37,600 --> 00:40:41,000
terrain. 
They're used to that variability

610
00:40:41,000 --> 00:40:46,500
in Step length, joint, angles, 
muscle challenge. 

611
00:40:46,600 --> 00:40:51,900
And all of a sudden they're on 
dead flat roads with no change 

612
00:40:51,900 --> 00:40:56,200
in any of those running factors 
and now they're feeling pain 

613
00:40:56,200 --> 00:40:59,600
somewhere. 
So, keep that in mind, if you 

614
00:40:59,600 --> 00:41:02,700
sign up for it, A dead flat 
marathon and you live somewhere 

615
00:41:02,700 --> 00:41:05,700
hilly. 
You need to start doing a lot of

616
00:41:05,700 --> 00:41:09,400
training on flat terrain but you
need to ease into it. 

617
00:41:09,400 --> 00:41:15,100
So your body gets used to then 
crowned roads are another common

618
00:41:15,500 --> 00:41:19,900
problem here in Connecticut. 
They're everywhere, they make 

619
00:41:19,900 --> 00:41:23,500
you run kind of crooked. 
So I encourage people to switch 

620
00:41:23,500 --> 00:41:28,600
sides when they can safely or 
drive somewhere where the maybe 

621
00:41:28,600 --> 00:41:31,100
they can run on a bike path or 
There are sidewalks. 

622
00:41:31,100 --> 00:41:34,200
It's okay to run on crowned 
roads a little bit. 

623
00:41:34,200 --> 00:41:38,500
But if all of your training is 
done on a crowned road, you 

624
00:41:38,500 --> 00:41:42,000
could be setting yourself up for
an injury, just due to the 

625
00:41:42,000 --> 00:41:46,000
asymmetry of those roads. 
And, you know, we've talked 

626
00:41:46,000 --> 00:41:51,600
plenty about shoe changes, and 
we know that shoes themselves do

627
00:41:51,600 --> 00:41:55,200
not cause injury, but it's the 
biomechanical factors, 

628
00:41:55,200 --> 00:41:59,900
associated with those shoes that
could contribute to developing 

629
00:41:59,900 --> 00:42:00,600
an interest. 
Hurry. 

630
00:42:01,200 --> 00:42:05,300
So the main thing is, if you're 
running in one type of shoe, 

631
00:42:05,900 --> 00:42:10,100
don't suddenly change to a shoe 
that is different enough. 

632
00:42:10,100 --> 00:42:14,200
In terms of the biomechanical 
challenges, it's going to put on

633
00:42:14,200 --> 00:42:16,000
your body, the minimal 
Minimalist. 

634
00:42:16,000 --> 00:42:20,100
Shoes are a great example of 
that, but even so let's say 

635
00:42:20,100 --> 00:42:23,000
you've been running in 
Minimalist Shoes and you decide 

636
00:42:23,000 --> 00:42:25,000
that your feet need a little 
more protection. 

637
00:42:25,500 --> 00:42:28,800
And you go from a zero, drop 
shoe to a 12 millimeter drop 

638
00:42:28,800 --> 00:42:31,800
shoe that could potentially. 
Really cause an injury as well 

639
00:42:31,800 --> 00:42:33,800
because again, it's a new 
stimulus. 

640
00:42:33,800 --> 00:42:38,800
And if your body isn't ready for
that stimulus, it could cause 

641
00:42:38,800 --> 00:42:45,300
some pain and lastly which and 
this is a huge topic which I 

642
00:42:45,300 --> 00:42:50,100
won't get into but inadequate 
nutrition under fueling you 

643
00:42:50,100 --> 00:42:52,400
could be doing everything in the
world, right? 

644
00:42:52,700 --> 00:42:57,000
But if you aren't taking in 
enough food, hydration 

645
00:42:57,000 --> 00:43:01,000
electrolytes you could easily 
set yourself up for For entry. 

646
00:43:01,600 --> 00:43:05,300
And I would really encourage you
to check out our podcast that we

647
00:43:05,300 --> 00:43:09,500
did with saline Yeager and 
Gentiles in 2022. 

648
00:43:09,800 --> 00:43:12,700
So we talked a lot about the 
importance of nutrition, 

649
00:43:12,700 --> 00:43:17,400
particularly for female athletes
and we've also got our nutrition

650
00:43:17,400 --> 00:43:21,300
reviews on the doctors running 
website and Jen. 

651
00:43:21,300 --> 00:43:26,000
Explain it breaks down what the 
different macronutrients are why

652
00:43:26,000 --> 00:43:30,100
we need them, how much we need 
and what are some good sources 

653
00:43:30,100 --> 00:43:33,500
of them. 
But if you're not feeling your 

654
00:43:33,500 --> 00:43:38,000
body, your body is going to 
start taking from your own body 

655
00:43:38,000 --> 00:43:41,300
to fuel your training and 
eventually your body will start 

656
00:43:41,300 --> 00:43:44,500
to break down. 
So make sure that you're getting

657
00:43:44,500 --> 00:43:48,400
enough nutrition for what you're
doing so that you can keep 

658
00:43:48,400 --> 00:43:51,000
training and not get sidelined 
by an issue. 

659
00:43:52,600 --> 00:43:57,800
So I hope that you found some 
useful information today about 

660
00:43:57,800 --> 00:44:02,100
how training error can possibly 
contribute to injury. 

661
00:44:02,800 --> 00:44:06,600
I hope I've cleared up some 
misconceptions that are out 

662
00:44:06,600 --> 00:44:10,900
there about what does or does 
not contribute to injury. 

663
00:44:11,400 --> 00:44:14,800
Thank you so much for listening.
I hope you'll leave us a review 

664
00:44:14,800 --> 00:44:19,300
on YouTube. 
Facebook, Instagram, send us an 

665
00:44:19,300 --> 00:44:21,500
email at doctors of running 
head. 

666
00:44:21,700 --> 00:44:24,900
Gmail.com, we love to hear your 
feedback. 

667
00:44:24,900 --> 00:44:27,100
Thank you for listening and see 
you next time.

