1
00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,200
Hey everyone, and welcome to the
Doctors and running podcast 

2
00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:13,640
where we a group of doctors in 
physical therapy, talk about the

3
00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:16,200
art and the science of the 
things that we put on their feet

4
00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:18,880
today. 
I've got doctor Andrew Myers 

5
00:00:18,880 --> 00:00:23,560
here with me and we are going to
do some deep dives on the Nike 

6
00:00:23,560 --> 00:00:25,880
Vapor Flight 4 because we've 
gotten some miles on it. 

7
00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:29,200
We have a review up, but after 
reading through the reviews, 

8
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:31,720
because as we write these, for 
those who don't know, we do 

9
00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:35,000
obviously read what everybody 
else is saying on our team and 

10
00:00:35,000 --> 00:00:36,640
it's always really curious and 
anginized. 

11
00:00:36,640 --> 00:00:40,640
Sometimes I feel like we we do 
agree on some things, but if 

12
00:00:40,800 --> 00:00:43,360
every shoe, we typically have 
some kind of different 

13
00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:46,760
experience frequently, although 
there might be 1 coming up that 

14
00:00:46,760 --> 00:00:49,080
we actually very, very much 
agree on that we seem to be 

15
00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:51,520
enjoying, but that's a different
story. 

16
00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:55,080
Has there been any shoes that 
we've like fully agreed on so 

17
00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:57,560
far? 
I feel like there was one 

18
00:00:57,800 --> 00:01:01,160
recently. 
Well, when you and I discussed 

19
00:01:01,160 --> 00:01:06,680
the Hoka CLO X12 point zero, I 
think we found that we had more 

20
00:01:06,680 --> 00:01:08,440
that we agreed on than we 
thought. 

21
00:01:09,640 --> 00:01:12,800
That's very fair. 
So we are going to do an episode

22
00:01:12,800 --> 00:01:16,960
because as we were both reading 
through our our different takes 

23
00:01:16,960 --> 00:01:21,840
on the Vaporfly 4 from Nike, 
which is a very big change from 

24
00:01:21,840 --> 00:01:23,400
what the series has been 
previously. 

25
00:01:23,400 --> 00:01:25,320
Although there's different 
opinions on that. 

26
00:01:26,480 --> 00:01:29,840
We found that we were having 
some very opposite experiences 

27
00:01:29,840 --> 00:01:32,400
with the how the shoe was 
writing and then realized we 

28
00:01:32,400 --> 00:01:34,800
actually had different 
experiences with several the 

29
00:01:34,800 --> 00:01:36,960
previous versions. 
So we thought we'd do an episode

30
00:01:37,680 --> 00:01:41,960
deep diving into the Vapor Fly 
4, but also talking about why 

31
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:44,400
different runners might 
experience these things. 

32
00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:46,520
We're going to use our 
experiences as an educational 

33
00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:49,280
platform to go, hey, just FYI, 
when you see your views, you're 

34
00:01:49,320 --> 00:01:51,560
going to have to figure out, are
the mechanics of the individual 

35
00:01:51,560 --> 00:01:54,400
reviewing similar to you and 
that's something you pay 

36
00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:56,480
attention to, or is this going 
to be a different experience 

37
00:01:56,480 --> 00:01:58,240
because different people are 
going to choose differently? 

38
00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:01,400
However, before we do that, we 
of course are going to do a 

39
00:02:01,400 --> 00:02:04,400
short segment on what are you 
running in right now? 

40
00:02:04,400 --> 00:02:06,200
So Andrew, what are you running 
in right now? 

41
00:02:06,760 --> 00:02:09,199
So I had a really fun track 
workout this morning. 

42
00:02:09,199 --> 00:02:13,480
I got to do my first run in the 
Nike Streak Fly 2, which I don't

43
00:02:13,480 --> 00:02:18,160
have up here, but I'm glad you 
have it and Oh my gosh, I love 

44
00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:22,040
running in this shoe. 
I've got a track mile race that 

45
00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:25,040
I'm doing Thursday and I'm 
actually thinking about using 

46
00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:28,160
Streak Fly 2IN it just because 
it's kind of like a rust Buster 

47
00:02:28,160 --> 00:02:32,920
track race and actually because 
that shoes just as light as the 

48
00:02:32,920 --> 00:02:34,760
track spikes I've been racing 
in. 

49
00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:37,960
What is it? 
4.5 oz I think. 

50
00:02:38,120 --> 00:02:42,080
I think it's either 4.5 or 4.8 
oz for men's size 9. 

51
00:02:42,080 --> 00:02:45,600
I might be saying 4.8 because I 
think I measured actually no, 

52
00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:48,680
that might be my size 10 because
I, I put this on the scale. 

53
00:02:48,680 --> 00:02:50,680
I think it was 4.8 oz for men's 
size 10. 

54
00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:53,680
So I think it's you're right, 
it's 4.5 oz which it's a track 

55
00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:57,400
spike that can handle the row. 
I took this on bark dust and 

56
00:02:57,400 --> 00:03:02,560
gravel and it did fine. 
I'm like Rd. trail or cross 

57
00:03:02,560 --> 00:03:05,480
country track. 
It's and then the zoom XI think 

58
00:03:05,480 --> 00:03:08,920
we both like really enjoying 
especially the four foot heal. 

59
00:03:09,240 --> 00:03:11,480
I mean, the design of this you 
can see is pretty aggressive. 

60
00:03:11,480 --> 00:03:14,640
So you're going to be up on your
toes for this, but my first 

61
00:03:14,640 --> 00:03:17,120
thought when I I am also running
in it right now I'm like oh it's

62
00:03:17,120 --> 00:03:21,760
nice to have like real racing 
flats yes back like with the 

63
00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:24,240
zoom X, which is great, but yeah
didn't mean interrupt you so. 

64
00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:27,440
Oh no, it's OK. 
One thing that I know you said, 

65
00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:30,920
you said that earlier in our 
little Dor chat that it feels 

66
00:03:30,920 --> 00:03:33,800
like a racing flat, but even 
though the stack height, I 

67
00:03:33,800 --> 00:03:38,160
believe it's 2622, it doesn't 
feel that low. 

68
00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:44,040
Like it I'm the last Rd. flat I 
raced in was the Saucony Type A8

69
00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:47,920
and I think that stack is like 
in the teens. 

70
00:03:47,920 --> 00:03:49,960
So definitely doesn't feel as 
low as that. 

71
00:03:50,320 --> 00:03:53,120
But I never really felt like the
shoe was bottoming out like I 

72
00:03:53,120 --> 00:03:57,560
didn't feel like it. 
It's not nearly as aggressive or

73
00:03:57,560 --> 00:04:00,360
low to the ground as the Type A8
is for sure. 

74
00:04:01,560 --> 00:04:04,000
The four foot cushioning is 
amazing. 

75
00:04:04,160 --> 00:04:06,520
I you know, all of the running I
did in it today was on the 

76
00:04:06,520 --> 00:04:07,880
track. 
So of course it might feel 

77
00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:11,240
different on pavement, but it 
just I'm excited to race in it. 

78
00:04:11,240 --> 00:04:15,160
I've got 2 road miles over 
Memorial Weekend and I think 

79
00:04:15,160 --> 00:04:17,880
it's going to be my racing shoot
just because it's kind of 

80
00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:20,399
designed for that. 100% agree 
with you on that. 

81
00:04:20,399 --> 00:04:23,040
I think maybe where I mean 
aggressive, and I should have 

82
00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:24,480
clarified, cushioning is 
phenomenal. 

83
00:04:24,480 --> 00:04:27,240
It's definitely not traditional 
in that sense, but it almost 

84
00:04:27,240 --> 00:04:30,040
feels like a negative drop. 
I think it's listed at a 4mm 

85
00:04:30,040 --> 00:04:33,160
drop, but it feels it's almost 
like a negative drop shoe, which

86
00:04:33,160 --> 00:04:36,600
is how aggressive it's almost 
like I was trying to remember. 

87
00:04:36,600 --> 00:04:38,880
It's like looks like it was 
designed for like an Aquinas 

88
00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:42,120
foot where you have like the and
for those who don't know who 

89
00:04:42,120 --> 00:04:44,400
aren't what, who aren't watching
or listening, an Aquinas type 

90
00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:47,240
foot is where you know you have 
your calcaneus and heel, but 

91
00:04:47,240 --> 00:04:50,760
then the mid foot and fore foot 
actually sit lower and really 

92
00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,160
angle downwards. 
And you can have certain people 

93
00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:54,560
that they have that kind of foot
position. 

94
00:04:54,560 --> 00:04:57,200
That kind of is what it looks 
like, but it also makes sense to

95
00:04:57,200 --> 00:05:00,200
be designed for a mile, things 
like that where, yeah, a lot of 

96
00:05:00,200 --> 00:05:02,640
people are going to be up more 
on their forefoot naturally in 

97
00:05:02,640 --> 00:05:05,080
that position just. 
I do have to disagree with you 

98
00:05:05,080 --> 00:05:06,760
on that. 
It doesn't feel negative drop to

99
00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:08,440
me at all. 
I see we already. 

100
00:05:08,480 --> 00:05:13,600
Started like for like my very 
slow jog recoveries today, you 

101
00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:16,640
know, didn't feel like I was 
jogging in a spike like I 

102
00:05:16,640 --> 00:05:21,360
definitely would feel in spike. 
So yeah, it's it's a nice shoe. 

103
00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:23,440
I'm excited to run more in it. 
Sweet. 

104
00:05:23,520 --> 00:05:25,720
All right, we may have to have a
separate X episode on the The 

105
00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:28,840
Drop of the Street played too. 
I'm just kidding. 

106
00:05:28,840 --> 00:05:30,280
All right? 
What else are you running in? 

107
00:05:30,880 --> 00:05:35,360
Let's see similarly on the 
track, I just started testing 

108
00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:41,840
the Hoka CLO X2 point OMD, their
mid distance spike. 

109
00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:44,960
Yeah, yeah. 
And what did I do in that shoe? 

110
00:05:44,960 --> 00:05:49,440
I did some mile pace intervals, 
some 800 pace intervals and 

111
00:05:49,440 --> 00:05:52,280
like, you know, a little faster 
than 400 pace. 

112
00:05:52,600 --> 00:05:58,400
I've got to say, compared to the
Nike V2 spikes, which I've been 

113
00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:03,000
training and racing in all 
winter and indoor track, the CLO

114
00:06:03,000 --> 00:06:06,560
X2 MD is definitely less 
aggressive. 

115
00:06:06,560 --> 00:06:11,040
Like you, it doesn't feel 
negative drop the way the V2 

116
00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:14,040
does. 
One thing I really notice about 

117
00:06:14,040 --> 00:06:19,640
the the Hoka spike is it has a 
really severe and early toe 

118
00:06:19,640 --> 00:06:23,120
spring. 
So it it definitely feels better

119
00:06:23,120 --> 00:06:25,600
for me at mile pace. 
It felt like it was holding me 

120
00:06:25,600 --> 00:06:27,720
back if I tried to run any 
faster in it. 

121
00:06:27,720 --> 00:06:31,000
But it for me, it definitely 
felt like the mile would be like

122
00:06:31,000 --> 00:06:34,560
the sweet spot for that shoe. 
So I haven't gotten more 

123
00:06:34,560 --> 00:06:37,200
workouts in it just because of 
my training schedule, but I'm 

124
00:06:37,200 --> 00:06:39,360
excited to test it out a little 
more. 

125
00:06:39,800 --> 00:06:42,200
Sweet. 
What are you doing training shoe

126
00:06:42,200 --> 00:06:46,920
wise? 
Let's see well I just got the 

127
00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:54,360
topo fly light 6IN which I don't
even it might be under embargo. 

128
00:06:54,360 --> 00:06:55,880
So it's good that I don't have 
it up here. 

129
00:06:55,880 --> 00:07:00,680
But I have to say, just walking 
around in it, it is possible 

130
00:07:00,680 --> 00:07:04,440
that it could replace my all 
time favorite shoe, the new 

131
00:07:04,440 --> 00:07:07,400
bounds beacon. 
Maybe not be better than it, but

132
00:07:07,400 --> 00:07:11,480
it could replace it so I cannot.
I'm going to run in it tomorrow,

133
00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:13,640
but I can't wait to test that 
out. 

134
00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:18,240
So you heard it here first. 
This might be a beacon 

135
00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:21,560
replacement. 
That's that's pretty high 

136
00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:23,920
praise. 
So we'll have to see how this 

137
00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:25,040
goes. 
Yeah, we'll see. 

138
00:07:25,200 --> 00:07:27,560
Yes. 
And the other stuff you're 

139
00:07:27,560 --> 00:07:30,320
running in right now. 
You know, most of when I'm not 

140
00:07:30,320 --> 00:07:33,400
testing shoes kind of my go TOS 
for easy runs. 

141
00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:37,040
I love the topo Atmos. 
I think I've got close to 300 

142
00:07:37,040 --> 00:07:40,560
miles on my pair and it 
basically feels the same as it 

143
00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:43,360
did new. 
So that she was like definitely 

144
00:07:43,360 --> 00:07:47,840
a beast in terms of just holding
up to a lot of like slog easy 

145
00:07:47,840 --> 00:07:50,920
runs. 
The Brooks Hyperion 2 is still 

146
00:07:50,920 --> 00:07:56,520
one of my like top go to easy 
workout, you know, pick up 

147
00:07:56,520 --> 00:08:00,440
shoes. 
What else do I have for testing?

148
00:08:01,240 --> 00:08:06,880
I just got the Solomon Aeroglide
3IN yes, and I know how much you

149
00:08:06,880 --> 00:08:10,160
loved that shoe. 
And I am like again, I haven't 

150
00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:12,680
gotten to run it yet, but just 
walking around the house, it's 

151
00:08:12,680 --> 00:08:15,520
like, wow, this is a special 
shoe. 

152
00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:19,640
Like I can see why you rated it 
so highly and like some of the 

153
00:08:19,640 --> 00:08:23,000
nice things you said about it. 
So I've got some exciting things

154
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:25,880
to test for sure. 
Yeah, that shoe was a very big 

155
00:08:25,880 --> 00:08:27,560
surprise. 
The previous two versions were 

156
00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:31,160
very mad and like, I don't know 
why you're charging 160 and 

157
00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:34,039
doing a bunch of hype, but then 
version 3, I feel like there 

158
00:08:34,039 --> 00:08:37,080
wasn't as much type around their
glide three, maybe I'm not on 

159
00:08:37,080 --> 00:08:40,400
social media enough. 
And then it was like, whoa, like

160
00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:42,720
people need to talk about this. 
This is really good. 

161
00:08:42,720 --> 00:08:44,960
Like you got the foam finally 
figured out. 

162
00:08:45,240 --> 00:08:48,080
Upper still has some like mild 
things that need to be kind of 

163
00:08:48,080 --> 00:08:51,080
fixed, but it's like great, 
great, great, great shoe. 

164
00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:53,320
So I'm very, very impressed. 
So great. 

165
00:08:53,360 --> 00:08:54,840
Awesome. 
Yeah, and how about you? 

166
00:08:55,040 --> 00:08:57,840
What are? 
So I've got obviously the big, 

167
00:08:57,920 --> 00:09:01,960
big one that the RE we just 
dropped is the Brooklyn GTS 22, 

168
00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:05,320
which I really didn't enjoy when
I first started running. 

169
00:09:05,320 --> 00:09:08,040
I'm like, this is like your 
classic bulky, somewhat 

170
00:09:08,040 --> 00:09:12,240
uncomfortable stability shoe. 
Jen and Evan, I promise this is 

171
00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:13,640
going to get better If you guys 
are listening. 

172
00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:17,680
This is too awesome about 
mechanism over at Brooks, but it

173
00:09:17,680 --> 00:09:20,280
actually has really grown on me 
where it's a good stability 

174
00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:21,880
shoe. 
I do have a slightly irritated 

175
00:09:21,880 --> 00:09:23,840
post tib that's getting better 
as I rehab it. 

176
00:09:24,080 --> 00:09:26,880
And part of it is also I I also 
irritate it because I'm like, I 

177
00:09:26,880 --> 00:09:29,840
know I have a tendinopathy. 
I need to rehab this even though

178
00:09:29,840 --> 00:09:32,680
I don't have symptoms right now.
And then I passed it off going 

179
00:09:32,720 --> 00:09:35,320
Oh yeah, there we go. 
Like I know it's there. 

180
00:09:35,680 --> 00:09:39,200
So it's been helpful to have 
this shoe and it just got it 

181
00:09:39,200 --> 00:09:42,120
just broken really nice. 
It is heavy, but the DNA tune 

182
00:09:42,120 --> 00:09:46,920
really offsets that and just 
been a good mile slog of a shoe 

183
00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:48,880
to kind of go and it's been and 
I've really enjoyed it. 

184
00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:52,360
Uppers broken and really nicely.
And I've got 60 miles on this 

185
00:09:52,360 --> 00:09:55,160
and this is my left shoe and 
everything is so intact. 

186
00:09:55,160 --> 00:09:57,400
So that's a big deal. 
So that impressive. 

187
00:09:57,400 --> 00:10:01,840
That one's a big one. 
I just did a long run in the 

188
00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:05,080
Brooks Hyperion Max 3, which is 
the 1st of this series that I've

189
00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:07,280
actually enjoyed as opposed to 
Andrew. 

190
00:10:07,280 --> 00:10:11,040
We might talk about that at some
point, but uppers really snug. 

191
00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:13,960
It's definitely a good super 
trainer and competes with shoes 

192
00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:17,960
like the Super blast heel. 
Oh my gosh is so much better 

193
00:10:17,960 --> 00:10:20,040
than any of the other super 
trainers, so that's good. 

194
00:10:20,280 --> 00:10:23,520
I'm just trying to get over that
mid foot medial cut out, which 

195
00:10:23,800 --> 00:10:26,040
didn't bother me on a long run 
today, which is really 

196
00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:28,200
surprising, but it's been doing 
pretty good. 

197
00:10:28,560 --> 00:10:31,880
Let's see Oh yeah the last one 
other than the streak flight 2 

198
00:10:31,880 --> 00:10:35,040
that I'm running in right now is
let's see if I can say this 

199
00:10:35,040 --> 00:10:42,320
correctly, the Adidas addi 0 
audios evo Pro 2, which the heel

200
00:10:42,320 --> 00:10:46,280
is still intact at 2 workouts. 
I've got about 15 miles on 

201
00:10:46,280 --> 00:10:50,200
these, so that has this piece 
hasn't come off, but it's a sun.

202
00:10:50,200 --> 00:10:54,200
It's it's just a teeny bit off 
at this point, but still there 

203
00:10:55,560 --> 00:10:58,000
better than the original 1 by 
quite a bit like there's 

204
00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:02,440
actually a little bounce to the 
midsole, which is nice, but it's

205
00:11:02,440 --> 00:11:05,160
very light. 
But Adidas, you guys got to be 

206
00:11:05,160 --> 00:11:06,480
careful. 
There is a lot of companies who 

207
00:11:06,480 --> 00:11:08,200
are about ready to drop stuff 
that are similar weights. 

208
00:11:08,200 --> 00:11:10,480
It's not 500 bucks, so it's a 
good shoe. 

209
00:11:10,480 --> 00:11:13,160
I am going to go racing this at 
some point in the next month or 

210
00:11:13,160 --> 00:11:16,480
so and I'll report back what the
racing experience feels like. 

211
00:11:16,480 --> 00:11:19,320
But so far, by some miracle, the
outsole is still intact. 

212
00:11:19,320 --> 00:11:21,880
So big. 
That is a miracle, yeah. 

213
00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:26,000
All right, are we ready for the 
star of the show? 

214
00:11:26,600 --> 00:11:28,960
Yes. 
All right, so as we mentioned 

215
00:11:28,960 --> 00:11:32,000
earlier, we are going to do a 
comparison of the Nike Vapor Fly

216
00:11:32,000 --> 00:11:35,400
4. 
This is Nike's kind of premier 

217
00:11:35,480 --> 00:11:38,000
super racing shoe and also 
there's two other ones 

218
00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:41,360
technically 3. 
The Nike streak fly 2 is kind of

219
00:11:41,360 --> 00:11:43,120
the lighter weight, shorter 
distance shoe. 

220
00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:48,280
The Nike alpha Fly 3 is the long
distance half marathon shoe and 

221
00:11:48,280 --> 00:11:51,680
the Vapor fly 4 is kind of 
supposed to be the do it all 

222
00:11:51,680 --> 00:11:54,440
racing shoe where I can do 
everything from the mile up to 

223
00:11:54,440 --> 00:11:56,280
the marathon. 
Although I might not suggest up 

224
00:11:56,280 --> 00:11:58,400
to the marathon even though 
that's what it's claimed to be. 

225
00:11:58,840 --> 00:12:02,240
This is the original super shoe 
like original version was the OG

226
00:12:02,240 --> 00:12:06,520
that came out what 2016? 
It's been almost a decade of 

227
00:12:06,520 --> 00:12:10,120
super shoes now at this point so
that's crazy think about. 

228
00:12:10,120 --> 00:12:12,800
But so lot of change in the 
shoe. 

229
00:12:12,800 --> 00:12:15,960
So biggest thing is the weight 
dropped by a significant amount.

230
00:12:15,960 --> 00:12:18,000
It's now down to correct me if 
I'm wrong because I'm not 

231
00:12:18,000 --> 00:12:22,160
looking at the specs off my the 
top of my head is 5.8 oz. 

232
00:12:22,160 --> 00:12:27,400
I think for men's size 9 stack 
height is 36mm in the heel, 30 

233
00:12:27,400 --> 00:12:30,600
in the 446mm drop. 
So they drop the heel stack 

234
00:12:30,600 --> 00:12:34,600
height a little bit and it's 
been, you know, at that 38 + 40 

235
00:12:34,600 --> 00:12:36,920
for a while now. 
So that's a very big difference,

236
00:12:37,840 --> 00:12:41,680
different design in the outsole 
where they have a central cut 

237
00:12:41,680 --> 00:12:45,360
out now, it's not as curved of a
last as it was previously. 

238
00:12:45,680 --> 00:12:49,200
And some design changes with how
the outsole was set up and 

239
00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:51,880
definitely some big upper 
changes in terms of fit that 

240
00:12:51,880 --> 00:12:53,040
we'll talk about in just a 
second. 

241
00:12:53,040 --> 00:12:56,320
But anything that I missed on 
specs, they're still using Zoom 

242
00:12:56,320 --> 00:13:00,120
X, They're still using a carbon 
fiber fly plate, but very a 

243
00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:02,760
different shoe in my opinion 
than the last couple versions. 

244
00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:05,360
Yeah, just a quick spec 
correction. 

245
00:13:06,000 --> 00:13:10,200
The ones that I looked up, 5.9 
got it in the 4 compared to the 

246
00:13:10,200 --> 00:13:13,480
three 6.5 oz, So that's a pretty
big weight drop. 

247
00:13:13,680 --> 00:13:17,440
Yeah, yeah. 
So OK, a little a team of 

248
00:13:17,440 --> 00:13:21,560
higher, but yeah, it's it's a 
very different chew than. 

249
00:13:21,560 --> 00:13:23,360
What has been? 
Experienced differently, 

250
00:13:23,360 --> 00:13:25,520
although that's The thing is 
we've experienced the 

251
00:13:25,520 --> 00:13:27,440
differences differently, 
differently. 

252
00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:28,520
Which is. 
Interesting. 

253
00:13:28,520 --> 00:13:31,360
So let's start with the upper. 
What were your initial 

254
00:13:31,360 --> 00:13:34,240
experiences with the upper? 
And then I'll talk about how I 

255
00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:36,600
experienced them because 
somewhat similar, but some mild 

256
00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:38,080
differences here. 
Sure. 

257
00:13:38,200 --> 00:13:43,080
So I'm basically on the edge of 
women's 9.5 and 10 in a lot of 

258
00:13:43,080 --> 00:13:45,200
shoes. 
And then the Vapor Fly, I've 

259
00:13:45,200 --> 00:13:49,080
worn both. 
The nine point 9.5 I had to go 

260
00:13:49,080 --> 00:13:55,040
up to A10IN version 2. 
So Nike originally sent me a 9.5

261
00:13:55,040 --> 00:13:57,920
and it was just so short. 
I was like, oh gosh, I'm going 

262
00:13:57,920 --> 00:14:01,560
to lose my toenails immediately.
So I did, I did a workout in 

263
00:14:01,560 --> 00:14:05,720
them and I had some toenail pain
and luckily Nathan reached out 

264
00:14:05,720 --> 00:14:08,280
to Nike and they were willing to
send me a 10. 

265
00:14:08,360 --> 00:14:11,440
And then the 10 definitely fits 
correctly for me. 

266
00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:16,240
So anyone who is similarly on 
the border of sizing in 

267
00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:19,560
Vaporfly, I would recommend 
going up for length. 

268
00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:28,240
Now even comparing my women's 
size 10 to my women's size 9.5 

269
00:14:28,280 --> 00:14:32,280
of version 3, there's pretty 
significant differences just in 

270
00:14:32,280 --> 00:14:35,000
how it fits. 
So first of all, the mesh upper 

271
00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:37,520
is a lot different. 
It's much snugger. 

272
00:14:37,520 --> 00:14:43,520
It doesn't have as much stretch.
You can see like big mesh holes 

273
00:14:43,520 --> 00:14:46,440
in version 3, this weave is a 
lot tighter. 

274
00:14:46,760 --> 00:14:49,440
So there's just not much give it
all in this upper. 

275
00:14:50,560 --> 00:14:56,440
Overall, the toe box is a lot 
lower volume and in version 4, 

276
00:14:56,480 --> 00:15:00,160
which I've not experienced in 
any of the previous versions, I 

277
00:15:00,160 --> 00:15:05,280
actually had a lot of pressure 
here, like over my 4th toe to 

278
00:15:05,280 --> 00:15:08,960
the point where I actually had 
like bruising over my toes. 

279
00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:12,000
After the runs that I did, I was
like, why does my toe hurt? 

280
00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:14,640
And then I remembered what I had
done earlier that day. 

281
00:15:15,080 --> 00:15:20,720
So that definitely would keep me
from using the Vaporfly 4 for 

282
00:15:20,720 --> 00:15:25,200
anything probably longer than a 
5K because both of the workouts 

283
00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:28,440
I did in the shoe were like 9 to
10 miles in total, like warm up 

284
00:15:28,720 --> 00:15:32,560
workout, cool down and I could 
feel like the irritation on the 

285
00:15:32,560 --> 00:15:35,840
top of my 4th toes, you know, 
mid workout. 

286
00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:39,720
So I certainly wouldn't use 
vapor fly for for 1/2, probably 

287
00:15:39,720 --> 00:15:43,560
not even a 10K, but I'd use it 
for a 5K or a road mile. 

288
00:15:43,560 --> 00:15:47,800
Although now with streak Fly, I 
think you know, and streak fly 

289
00:15:47,800 --> 00:15:52,760
fits much differently than Vapor
fly for so I'm not sure I would 

290
00:15:52,760 --> 00:15:55,720
use this for anything but a 5K 
if I did race in it. 

291
00:15:56,160 --> 00:16:01,200
So besides the tighter fitting 
toe box, it's also a little 

292
00:16:01,200 --> 00:16:03,760
narrower here. 
I didn't get any. 

293
00:16:04,120 --> 00:16:07,280
A lot of shoes will rub like on 
my first MTP. 

294
00:16:07,440 --> 00:16:09,840
Sometimes they'll rub at my 5th.
I didn't get that. 

295
00:16:09,840 --> 00:16:14,080
But it's just definitely overall
a more snug fitting shoe. 

296
00:16:14,720 --> 00:16:20,720
The tongue reminds me more of 
the tongue of the original next 

297
00:16:20,720 --> 00:16:23,240
percent. 
Like it's that plasticky 

298
00:16:23,240 --> 00:16:26,400
feeling. 
It's really it's a lot stiffer 

299
00:16:26,400 --> 00:16:29,280
than like the tongue of version 
3. 

300
00:16:30,480 --> 00:16:33,280
But I felt that it it sat pretty
well. 

301
00:16:33,560 --> 00:16:35,440
I didn't get any lace 
irritation. 

302
00:16:35,440 --> 00:16:40,080
So overall my main issues with 
the fit were in the toe box. 

303
00:16:41,400 --> 00:16:44,160
The midfoot and the rear foot 
are snug, just like all vapor 

304
00:16:44,160 --> 00:16:47,400
flies. 
The heel cushioning is pretty 

305
00:16:47,400 --> 00:16:54,520
similar to version 3, so I would
say for me the definitely the 

306
00:16:54,520 --> 00:16:57,840
biggest difference was just how 
tight the toe box fits. 

307
00:16:58,560 --> 00:17:00,600
I would definitely agree with 
you on that and I have very 

308
00:17:00,600 --> 00:17:04,880
little to disagree. 
I sit between a 10 and 10 1/2 as

309
00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:07,920
I found, but I'm still on the 
side of a 10 and for sure when I

310
00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:10,280
put the favorite flight 4 on the
first time, I'm like, oh, this 

311
00:17:10,720 --> 00:17:14,839
is a lot snugger and a lot lower
volume where I feel like version

312
00:17:14,839 --> 00:17:21,079
3/2 and even a little bit of the
OG necks like just had more 

313
00:17:21,079 --> 00:17:23,920
volume in the upper where I was 
like, oh, this is like kind of 

314
00:17:23,920 --> 00:17:26,680
wide like this isn't what I'm 
used to with a racing flat. 

315
00:17:26,680 --> 00:17:29,560
I'm used to these fitting much 
more snug and this is the first 

316
00:17:29,560 --> 00:17:33,560
time of the series where it 
really fit much closer and has 

317
00:17:33,560 --> 00:17:35,680
stayed that way. 
I'm fortunate I've been. 

318
00:17:35,680 --> 00:17:39,640
I think I would the Max I would 
use this up to is like 10K, 

319
00:17:39,640 --> 00:17:44,040
maybe half marathon, although 
the midsole for different 

320
00:17:44,040 --> 00:17:45,440
reasons. 
I probably wouldn't do that just

321
00:17:45,440 --> 00:17:49,400
for me personally, but I think 
the upper has stretched a little

322
00:17:49,400 --> 00:17:52,040
bit, but I got that same very 
low feeling across the top of my

323
00:17:52,040 --> 00:17:53,400
toes. 
It is much more. 

324
00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:57,200
It's still not super narrow, but
the volume just makes it feel 

325
00:17:57,200 --> 00:18:00,480
much more snug, which I felt was
great and the forefoot and the 

326
00:18:00,480 --> 00:18:01,960
midfoot because there's a lot of
good security. 

327
00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:04,960
The tongue was also good. 
There's light padding because I 

328
00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:07,240
definitely need that, but the 
thing that I'm getting is my 

329
00:18:07,240 --> 00:18:09,960
heel is slipping out of this 
thing like no other. 

330
00:18:09,960 --> 00:18:11,800
I have not had that in a Vapor 
Fly. 

331
00:18:11,800 --> 00:18:14,920
I know the design is very 
similar in this but I don't know

332
00:18:14,920 --> 00:18:18,120
if it's the socks that I use or 
what because I use I've got from

333
00:18:18,120 --> 00:18:23,080
Salomon from Adidas from gosh 
who am I forgetting is so nice 

334
00:18:23,080 --> 00:18:26,080
that sends us socks. 
Oh my gosh, I'm moving a brain 

335
00:18:26,080 --> 00:18:30,120
fart. 
Oh, oh, gosh. 

336
00:18:30,680 --> 00:18:32,240
Swiftwick. 
Yeah, Swiftwick. 

337
00:18:32,800 --> 00:18:34,160
Yeah, they're on. 
Yes, thank you. 

338
00:18:34,160 --> 00:18:36,000
So I'm sorry I forgot I've been 
doing that. 

339
00:18:36,000 --> 00:18:38,880
There's one opportunity every 
episode so but I forget 

340
00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:40,600
something obvious. 
But Swiftwick has been really 

341
00:18:40,600 --> 00:18:42,480
nice and set up some socks that 
are phenomenal. 

342
00:18:42,720 --> 00:18:45,280
But it doesn't seem to matter 
which sock I use. 

343
00:18:45,280 --> 00:18:49,120
I've just my heel slips out and 
I it's not horrible, but it's 

344
00:18:49,120 --> 00:18:50,960
annoying. 
I haven't had any like chafing 

345
00:18:50,960 --> 00:18:55,120
from it, even though I've used 
it on up to 10 miles, but I just

346
00:18:55,120 --> 00:18:58,800
had the lace lock these shoes 
this the the laces down and 

347
00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:01,240
luckily the the tongue is padded
enough that hasn't been an 

348
00:19:01,240 --> 00:19:03,680
issue. 
But it's a very different fit 

349
00:19:03,800 --> 00:19:06,880
than the previous vapor fly. 
So I think people that want to 

350
00:19:06,880 --> 00:19:10,160
use it for longer distances, you
should definitely try this 

351
00:19:10,160 --> 00:19:12,000
before you buy it. 
And you should really think, 

352
00:19:12,200 --> 00:19:14,720
hey, if I'm getting that toe 
pressure, you might want to do a

353
00:19:14,720 --> 00:19:17,720
half size up. 
So fairly similar upper 

354
00:19:17,720 --> 00:19:20,360
experiences on that, even though
typically we have somewhat 

355
00:19:20,360 --> 00:19:23,520
different experiences with the 
upper frequently, but the 

356
00:19:23,520 --> 00:19:25,520
biggest difference we usually 
feel is the soul. 

357
00:19:25,520 --> 00:19:30,200
So how did you feel about that? 
So I felt the versions one 

358
00:19:30,200 --> 00:19:35,400
through three out of 1-2 or 
three, the firmest version was 

359
00:19:35,400 --> 00:19:37,880
version 3. 
Like I always felt in one and 

360
00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:41,200
two that there was like a little
bit of like a sinking and 

361
00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:42,880
feeling for me at initial 
contact. 

362
00:19:42,880 --> 00:19:46,480
But version 3 was the first one 
that I really felt like I just 

363
00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:49,520
like landed and went. 
And I really liked that about 

364
00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:53,360
version three. 
I've run a marathon in the next 

365
00:19:53,360 --> 00:19:58,640
Percent and version 3, version 
2, I bought it like when it went

366
00:19:58,640 --> 00:20:01,280
on sale. 
So I've put probably 200 miles 

367
00:20:01,280 --> 00:20:04,240
on it, but just with long runs, 
I haven't erased it. 

368
00:20:05,160 --> 00:20:07,440
So I have a lot of miles on 
these shoes. 

369
00:20:07,720 --> 00:20:11,080
I'm on my third pair of Vapor 
Fly Threes, so I definitely I 

370
00:20:11,080 --> 00:20:14,040
know how they feel. 
Yes, I know. 

371
00:20:15,120 --> 00:20:16,280
How did I not? 
Know this? 

372
00:20:16,560 --> 00:20:18,000
I don't know. 
I don't know either. 

373
00:20:18,320 --> 00:20:19,680
Yeah. 
Yeah, I've got some. 

374
00:20:20,320 --> 00:20:24,160
This is my second pair. 
You can see I ruined the upper. 

375
00:20:24,160 --> 00:20:26,520
It's nice and Gray. 
But this is what the outsole 

376
00:20:26,520 --> 00:20:31,000
looks like after I think I've 
got 175 miles on these. 

377
00:20:31,640 --> 00:20:33,320
Like, they're in pretty good 
shape. 

378
00:20:34,400 --> 00:20:39,040
Now compare these, which have 20
miles on them, and you can 

379
00:20:39,040 --> 00:20:42,040
already see I'm starting to, 
like, wear down that exposed 

380
00:20:42,040 --> 00:20:45,080
midsole, which is actually 
pretty unusual for me. 

381
00:20:45,360 --> 00:20:48,920
So. 
And yeah, Oh yeah, yeah. 

382
00:20:48,920 --> 00:20:51,800
So. 
You have 130 miles on these, so 

383
00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:53,720
yeah, I'm with you on that. 
But yeah. 

384
00:20:53,920 --> 00:20:58,480
I just, Oh no, don't pick it. 
It will come off sooner. 

385
00:20:59,680 --> 00:21:02,960
I think we both agreed that like
the durability of the four is 

386
00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:08,600
not going to be as good because 
of this lack of rubber coverage 

387
00:21:08,600 --> 00:21:13,240
in the outsole compared to the 
three which really had both very

388
00:21:13,240 --> 00:21:15,640
good rubber coverage and very 
good traction. 

389
00:21:15,840 --> 00:21:19,240
I know a lot of people used 
three like for cross country. 

390
00:21:20,800 --> 00:21:23,640
And I mentioned that some P on 
on my initial comparison review 

391
00:21:23,640 --> 00:21:25,840
of four versus 3. 
And I, I totally agree with you 

392
00:21:25,840 --> 00:21:28,080
that traction wise, this is a 
road shoe. 

393
00:21:28,120 --> 00:21:30,840
This is the traction is not good
enough to be used for cross 

394
00:21:30,840 --> 00:21:33,360
country. 
Whereas version 3 was probably 

395
00:21:33,360 --> 00:21:35,600
the only vapor fly that was 
like, OK, yeah, there's some 

396
00:21:35,600 --> 00:21:39,760
good like they're not trail 
shoes, but the lugs were so much

397
00:21:39,760 --> 00:21:41,400
better. 
And like it'll grip really, 

398
00:21:41,400 --> 00:21:43,120
really well. 
So like if you want to use and 

399
00:21:43,120 --> 00:21:44,680
you have stable mechanics, go 
for it. 

400
00:21:44,840 --> 00:21:47,680
Probably wouldn't use it on 
grass, but for dirt, yeah, like 

401
00:21:47,720 --> 00:21:50,040
absolutely. 
So 100% agree with you on that. 

402
00:21:50,840 --> 00:21:52,960
Oh, so back to your original 
question though. 

403
00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:58,760
So the four, I definitely feel 
the most sinking in at initial 

404
00:21:58,760 --> 00:22:01,160
contact out of any of the 
previous versions. 

405
00:22:01,160 --> 00:22:03,000
And I think there's a couple of 
reasons for that. 

406
00:22:03,000 --> 00:22:09,080
One, the stack heights lower. 
So this shoe is 36, 30, whereas 

407
00:22:09,080 --> 00:22:15,280
the three was 3830 and the two 
previous were 4032. 

408
00:22:15,720 --> 00:22:19,240
So of course there's just less 
foam where I'm landing here. 

409
00:22:19,680 --> 00:22:23,920
But I think actually upon 
further inspection of the shoe, 

410
00:22:24,480 --> 00:22:28,240
there's a big difference in the 
amount of sole flare in the 

411
00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:31,600
midfoot where I land in the 
four. 

412
00:22:32,280 --> 00:22:37,440
So if you can see, there's just 
not much soul flaring here, 

413
00:22:38,040 --> 00:22:44,120
whereas in the three, there's a 
lot of lateral soul flare in the

414
00:22:44,120 --> 00:22:47,760
midfoot here. 
And I think that that just made 

415
00:22:47,760 --> 00:22:54,440
me when I landed, you know, 
here, it made me stay there a 

416
00:22:54,440 --> 00:22:58,200
little bit longer because the 
foam was able to compress more 

417
00:22:58,440 --> 00:23:05,000
because there's nothing under 
here compared to how the three 

418
00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:09,040
is designed. 
So I think, and that's one of 

419
00:23:09,040 --> 00:23:11,800
like our big disagreements is 
like, I felt like this was a 

420
00:23:11,800 --> 00:23:13,800
softer version and you felt like
it was firmer. 

421
00:23:14,160 --> 00:23:18,080
But I think it a big part of 
that is where you and I land. 

422
00:23:18,640 --> 00:23:22,920
But also, you know, but the 
angle at which our foot is when 

423
00:23:22,920 --> 00:23:24,640
we land, that makes a 
difference. 

424
00:23:24,720 --> 00:23:26,400
Our body weight makes a 
difference. 

425
00:23:26,760 --> 00:23:28,960
I'm not going to load. 
I mean, you don't weigh that 

426
00:23:28,960 --> 00:23:31,320
much more than me, but I'm not 
going to load a shoe quite as 

427
00:23:31,320 --> 00:23:36,640
much as you. 
Well, how famous I've gotten for

428
00:23:36,640 --> 00:23:40,240
just wrecking shoes. 
I'm out of like like force that 

429
00:23:40,240 --> 00:23:43,000
I put to the somehow put that 
much force to the ground. 

430
00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:45,800
It's not really known how, but 
I've had people tell me, like, 

431
00:23:45,800 --> 00:23:47,400
I'm not when I watch you run. 
I'm not really sure how you're 

432
00:23:47,400 --> 00:23:49,480
going forward, but you somehow 
do that. 

433
00:23:49,480 --> 00:23:51,840
Yeah, you're doing. 
And quite quite quickly. 

434
00:23:51,840 --> 00:23:54,200
So yeah, it. 
Didn't look good, but this is 

435
00:23:54,200 --> 00:23:55,040
quick. 
Doesn't. 

436
00:23:55,040 --> 00:23:55,880
Matter. 
Yeah. 

437
00:23:56,560 --> 00:24:00,960
So you know, beyond like initial
contact, I really like the the 

438
00:24:00,960 --> 00:24:04,760
rocker geometry of the shoe 
similar to previous versions 

439
00:24:04,760 --> 00:24:08,000
like you land and then it like 
really immediately just shoots 

440
00:24:08,000 --> 00:24:13,200
you forward and to push off. 
It just felt well, it felt a 

441
00:24:13,200 --> 00:24:16,480
little slower because it was 
softer at initial contact. 

442
00:24:16,480 --> 00:24:19,520
It still felt just as good at 
faster paces. 

443
00:24:19,520 --> 00:24:24,880
So I used the size 10 for two 
workouts where I basically did 

444
00:24:24,880 --> 00:24:28,320
like a progression run from like
half marathon down to 5K pace. 

445
00:24:28,720 --> 00:24:32,120
And I used the size 9 1/2 for a 
similar workout that she 

446
00:24:32,120 --> 00:24:35,000
responded perfectly whatever 
pace I was running. 

447
00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:38,200
And actually it wasn't terrible 
like warm up or cool down 

448
00:24:38,280 --> 00:24:41,600
either. 
So it's not like this, that 

449
00:24:41,600 --> 00:24:44,760
softer feel made it feel less 
responsive. 

450
00:24:45,000 --> 00:24:47,560
It actually feels really 
responsive to me. 

451
00:24:47,880 --> 00:24:51,840
It just felt like the foam has 
more compliance where I land 

452
00:24:52,200 --> 00:24:56,960
compared to the three and 
actually even more so compared 

453
00:24:56,960 --> 00:24:59,520
to the two and the one. 
Got it. 

454
00:25:00,000 --> 00:25:03,160
So I had the opposite 
experience, although I'll be 

455
00:25:03,160 --> 00:25:06,760
honest that I actually do like 
version 4 better than version 3 

456
00:25:07,920 --> 00:25:11,320
and ironically for things people
wouldn't expect, but we'll talk 

457
00:25:11,320 --> 00:25:13,840
about that. 
But yeah, I found version 4 to 

458
00:25:13,840 --> 00:25:15,600
be much firmer than I was 
expecting. 

459
00:25:15,600 --> 00:25:18,360
Where typically with a lot of 
vapor flies, I've always 

460
00:25:18,360 --> 00:25:22,320
expected the, you know, soft 
heel bouncy zoom X foam. 

461
00:25:22,320 --> 00:25:24,880
And I'm not saying this is not 
bouncy, but I found the foam to 

462
00:25:24,880 --> 00:25:28,600
be much less resilient. 
And I'm still trying to figure 

463
00:25:28,600 --> 00:25:31,320
out why, as you can obviously 
see by the where. 

464
00:25:31,320 --> 00:25:35,160
So I typically am a heel striker
and then my mechanics have 

465
00:25:35,160 --> 00:25:39,160
changed a little bit where I 
scuff the lateral midfoot and 

466
00:25:39,160 --> 00:25:40,840
heel. 
And I actually know the answer 

467
00:25:40,840 --> 00:25:44,720
as to why I do that because I 
was not bored but was like was 

468
00:25:44,720 --> 00:25:47,320
testing some stuff for our lab 
at George Fox and I was like 

469
00:25:47,320 --> 00:25:49,200
let's take a look at what my 
running mechanics look like. 

470
00:25:49,480 --> 00:25:53,600
I have 20° less peak knee 
flexion on my left side compared

471
00:25:53,600 --> 00:25:56,480
to my right. 
Wow, that's very interesting. 

472
00:25:56,840 --> 00:25:57,520
Oh. 
Yeah. 

473
00:25:57,880 --> 00:26:00,680
And so it's very obvious during 
swing phase. 

474
00:26:00,680 --> 00:26:02,720
Those don't know swing phase 
during running is when your legs

475
00:26:02,720 --> 00:26:05,680
off the ground, you'll bend your
knee to help it get forwards, 

476
00:26:05,680 --> 00:26:09,400
right to start another landing. 
Yeah, that left leg doesn't bend

477
00:26:09,400 --> 00:26:12,120
very much. 
And I can, I knew that like 

478
00:26:12,320 --> 00:26:15,080
subconsciously. 
And then just I'll have to post 

479
00:26:15,080 --> 00:26:18,360
the video from Qualisis that we 
pulled up. 

480
00:26:18,360 --> 00:26:20,680
But it's like very noticeable 
asymmetry. 

481
00:26:20,680 --> 00:26:22,280
I'm like, how have I been 
running like this? 

482
00:26:22,480 --> 00:26:25,000
Which I think I don't know if 
it's a tendinopathy or just an 

483
00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:27,480
old. 
I definitely had a long, a long 

484
00:26:27,480 --> 00:26:29,960
ago hamstring strain just never 
probably got. 

485
00:26:30,040 --> 00:26:32,080
I've known it's a little bit 
weaker on that left side, but 

486
00:26:32,080 --> 00:26:33,680
haven't fully taken the time to 
rehab it. 

487
00:26:34,080 --> 00:26:36,360
So also like the post tip, by 
the way, I was like, let me 

488
00:26:36,360 --> 00:26:38,680
start really work on this. 
And then also pissed it off And 

489
00:26:38,680 --> 00:26:41,240
I was like, oh, there's some 
underlying stuff that I've been 

490
00:26:41,240 --> 00:26:43,360
compensating for. 
So let's see, I have a slightly 

491
00:26:43,360 --> 00:26:45,920
annoyed hamstring and a slightly
annoyed post tip on opposite 

492
00:26:45,920 --> 00:26:49,160
sides that you know, I'm, I'm 
working on and it's improving. 

493
00:26:49,160 --> 00:26:51,160
Hasn't stopped me running, but 
it's like, oh, this is 

494
00:26:51,800 --> 00:26:53,920
different. 
So we'll see if this makes a 

495
00:26:53,920 --> 00:26:56,400
change in the durability of some
shoes, which totally throws some

496
00:26:56,400 --> 00:26:58,880
stuff off. 
But anyway, so I have a very 

497
00:26:58,880 --> 00:27:03,480
wonky landing pattern on my left
side obviously, but and I land 

498
00:27:03,480 --> 00:27:07,560
really really really hard that 
shoes don't last very long for 

499
00:27:07,560 --> 00:27:11,560
me and they never have. 
So even before I was scuffing I 

500
00:27:11,560 --> 00:27:14,800
would run through shoes really 
quick and they would just get 

501
00:27:14,800 --> 00:27:19,160
destroyed. 
So I compress stuff a lot for me

502
00:27:19,160 --> 00:27:21,560
where I land. 
I think cuz you land up a little

503
00:27:21,560 --> 00:27:23,520
bit, you land a little bit 
farther forward. 

504
00:27:23,680 --> 00:27:26,960
I can totally see why they're 
being more stuff for you to land

505
00:27:26,960 --> 00:27:29,240
on at this latter S with 
forefoot would feel a lot 

506
00:27:29,240 --> 00:27:32,080
better. 
The midfoot is, I don't know if 

507
00:27:32,080 --> 00:27:36,160
narrower is the right term, but 
version 3 was a much more curved

508
00:27:36,160 --> 00:27:38,920
last where there was stuff for 
me to land on even though it was

509
00:27:38,920 --> 00:27:41,560
very unstable, like I found it 
soft. 

510
00:27:41,800 --> 00:27:44,680
That midfoot like killed me. 
I could not really take that 

511
00:27:44,680 --> 00:27:46,960
thing. 
Like race distance wise I took 

512
00:27:46,960 --> 00:27:49,200
it for a 5K and even that was a 
bit of a struggle. 

513
00:27:49,480 --> 00:27:54,520
The sole of the heel and midfoot
in version 4 is much more 

514
00:27:54,520 --> 00:27:58,320
centered which ironically makes 
this shoe feel a teeny bit more 

515
00:27:58,320 --> 00:27:59,720
stable for me. 
Or at least it makes me feel 

516
00:27:59,720 --> 00:28:03,560
less biased immediately, like 
it's not stable by any means at 

517
00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:06,560
the heel, mid foot still very 
narrow for a shoe this tall, but

518
00:28:06,560 --> 00:28:08,760
it's less biased in One 
Direction, which is actually 

519
00:28:08,760 --> 00:28:11,040
allowed me to take this longer. 
I would have never done a long 

520
00:28:11,040 --> 00:28:15,360
run in version 3 and I did what 
is now a long run for me, about 

521
00:28:15,360 --> 00:28:18,160
10:50 miles in it. 
And it was like oh this is 

522
00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:20,280
actually not bad. 
It wouldn't be my choice. 

523
00:28:20,280 --> 00:28:23,360
I would still choose the out fly
which I did for 1/2 marathon 

524
00:28:23,360 --> 00:28:26,920
push in the stroller recently. 
But the more centered sole I 

525
00:28:26,920 --> 00:28:29,720
think makes it a teeny bit more 
stable, but it also makes it a 

526
00:28:29,720 --> 00:28:32,920
little bit feel firmer because I
think there's less material 

527
00:28:32,920 --> 00:28:35,400
where I typically land on this 
lateral aspect, either lateral 

528
00:28:35,400 --> 00:28:38,560
heel or midfoot. 
And that just makes it feel 

529
00:28:38,560 --> 00:28:41,200
firmer for me. 
Does it make it feel less fast? 

530
00:28:41,200 --> 00:28:43,800
In fact, to me, because I can 
take it longer and I could feel 

531
00:28:43,800 --> 00:28:46,840
like I can actually get to the 
forefoot and push off better, it

532
00:28:46,840 --> 00:28:49,040
feels a lot better. 
I felt like with version three, 

533
00:28:49,040 --> 00:28:52,040
I would sink into it probably 
because I would pronate pronate 

534
00:28:52,040 --> 00:28:55,720
so much and get stuck because I 
perceive the soft for him to be 

535
00:28:55,840 --> 00:28:59,840
the sole to be softer that I it 
was harder for me to get off 

536
00:28:59,840 --> 00:29:02,680
that forefoot because when you 
land, you need, whether you land

537
00:29:02,680 --> 00:29:05,680
at the heel or the midfoot 
forefoot, you need to be able to

538
00:29:05,680 --> 00:29:08,800
pronate and then you need to be 
able to re supinate out of it. 

539
00:29:08,800 --> 00:29:11,520
So how much you pronate isn't 
necessarily as important as the 

540
00:29:11,520 --> 00:29:14,440
quality of can you get into and 
out of it. 

541
00:29:14,760 --> 00:29:17,440
And I just felt like I could not
get out of it with version 

542
00:29:17,440 --> 00:29:19,840
three. 
I think with version four I am 

543
00:29:19,840 --> 00:29:22,320
able to just because a little 
more soul flare. 

544
00:29:22,360 --> 00:29:25,240
What feels like more soul flare 
for the forefoot what 4 foot is 

545
00:29:25,640 --> 00:29:27,560
just feels a little. 
So getting up my toes feels a 

546
00:29:27,560 --> 00:29:29,440
lot better when I pick up the 
pace. 

547
00:29:30,160 --> 00:29:32,480
And I would agree with you that 
the pace versatility feels 

548
00:29:32,720 --> 00:29:34,560
pretty good. 
Where I could I felt like I 

549
00:29:34,560 --> 00:29:37,280
could easily crank a 5K, but 
half marathon pace still felt 

550
00:29:37,280 --> 00:29:40,600
good and running slightly easier
felt okay because I typically 

551
00:29:40,600 --> 00:29:43,800
like firmer shoes and it was 
just relatively less biased. 

552
00:29:43,800 --> 00:29:48,720
But I think from the firmer 
midsole feel if I was going to 

553
00:29:48,720 --> 00:29:51,200
race in this shoe I would 
definitely take it more for 

554
00:29:51,200 --> 00:29:53,040
ironically we're going to agree 
on this, but for different 

555
00:29:53,040 --> 00:29:55,120
reasons. 
I would be more likely to take 

556
00:29:55,120 --> 00:30:00,480
this for a 5K, maybe a 10 bit 
10K5K10K, probably not 1/2 just 

557
00:30:00,480 --> 00:30:04,160
because it's to me doesn't feel 
soft enough on. 

558
00:30:04,400 --> 00:30:07,040
But I also agree that part of 
that is to the fact that it fits

559
00:30:07,040 --> 00:30:10,160
snug and I don't feel like I 
have quite enough room to want 

560
00:30:10,160 --> 00:30:11,360
to take it that far unless I 
want to. 

561
00:30:11,520 --> 00:30:15,000
It was a toenail. 
Yeah, I think it's important for

562
00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:19,080
me to note one of my runs in the
shoe was basically 10 miles at 

563
00:30:19,080 --> 00:30:22,040
like 15 seconds slower than 
marathon pace, which was not the

564
00:30:22,040 --> 00:30:24,600
plan, but I just ended up 
running a little too fast. 

565
00:30:25,080 --> 00:30:30,720
But the Zoom X felt awesome, 
like if the shoe fit better, I 

566
00:30:30,760 --> 00:30:34,320
would consider running a 
marathon in vapor fly form. 

567
00:30:34,320 --> 00:30:37,360
But there's no way that I could 
take it longer because I would 

568
00:30:37,360 --> 00:30:40,240
probably have a hole in my 4th 
toes by the you know what I 

569
00:30:40,240 --> 00:30:44,640
mean. 
But the the increase softness or

570
00:30:44,640 --> 00:30:48,600
compliance that initial contact 
wouldn't make it like a deal 

571
00:30:48,600 --> 00:30:52,760
breaker for like the marathon 
distance or marathon pace 

572
00:30:52,760 --> 00:30:55,920
because it felt super 
comfortable just settling into a

573
00:30:55,920 --> 00:31:01,360
rhythm and going for 10 miles. 
So if they fixed the fit, maybe 

574
00:31:01,360 --> 00:31:04,640
for version five, maybe it would
also be a marathon shoe for me. 

575
00:31:05,520 --> 00:31:08,640
I will say though, what I do 
really enjoy about it is the 

576
00:31:08,640 --> 00:31:12,680
noticeable weight decrease 
compared to version 3, and maybe

577
00:31:12,680 --> 00:31:15,320
that's also a piece of it that 
makes it feel a little bit 

578
00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:17,280
firmer and a little bit quicker 
on foot. 

579
00:31:17,560 --> 00:31:19,720
Is it? 
It's noticeably lighter and it's

580
00:31:19,720 --> 00:31:23,320
nice to finally see racing 
shoes, not all of them, but see 

581
00:31:23,320 --> 00:31:26,560
some racing shoes getting back 
into that sub six out range and 

582
00:31:26,560 --> 00:31:30,200
being like, oh, this is nice. 
Like I feel like I can turn over

583
00:31:30,200 --> 00:31:33,240
again and I can move quicker. 
And the two of us are obviously 

584
00:31:33,240 --> 00:31:35,480
biased because at this point 
we're focusing on shorter 

585
00:31:35,480 --> 00:31:37,280
distances and not focusing on 
the marathon. 

586
00:31:37,280 --> 00:31:40,280
So it's just nice to have like 
just to have that snappiness and

587
00:31:40,280 --> 00:31:42,320
I agree. 
Like that's what the four foot 

588
00:31:42,320 --> 00:31:45,920
feels a lot better than version 
3 where it just feels more 

589
00:31:45,920 --> 00:31:49,160
snappy off the front. 
Off the front just feels like I 

590
00:31:49,160 --> 00:31:51,560
could turn over so much better. 
Yeah, I. 

591
00:31:51,560 --> 00:31:54,640
I agree with that. 
I did it my workout like my 

592
00:31:54,640 --> 00:31:58,760
progression run this week in the
three just like refresh my 

593
00:31:58,760 --> 00:32:06,440
memory and I love the three and 
I've raced mile races 5K10K 

594
00:32:06,840 --> 00:32:11,280
every distance in it. 
But the the geometry of the four

595
00:32:11,280 --> 00:32:13,960
foot of the four feels snappier 
than the three for sure. 

596
00:32:14,360 --> 00:32:17,280
And I could definitely feel 
there was a different like in my

597
00:32:17,680 --> 00:32:20,600
difference in my foot angle at 
initial contact in the three. 

598
00:32:21,200 --> 00:32:27,000
Probably I'm the difference in 
drop maybe, but I think also 

599
00:32:27,000 --> 00:32:32,160
because of the difference in the
soul flare where I land it just 

600
00:32:32,600 --> 00:32:37,240
I feel like I land more planner 
flexed in the three than I do in

601
00:32:37,240 --> 00:32:41,880
the four and the four feels more
comfortable to me in that regard

602
00:32:42,320 --> 00:32:43,760
and can. 
You clarify again, you said you 

603
00:32:43,760 --> 00:32:46,640
feel like there you so you have 
a different foot contact angle. 

604
00:32:47,720 --> 00:32:49,200
Gosh, what is it called? 
Contact angle? 

605
00:32:49,200 --> 00:32:54,600
What's the term? 
It's I think that's it. 

606
00:32:54,680 --> 00:32:56,080
I think I'm never thinking this.
Yeah. 

607
00:32:57,480 --> 00:32:59,080
And you said it's because of the
soul flare. 

608
00:32:59,080 --> 00:33:01,480
Can you explain why you think 
why that you think that's 

609
00:33:01,480 --> 00:33:03,720
happening if it? 
What if I thought it was the 

610
00:33:03,720 --> 00:33:05,920
drop? 
I feel like in the three I would

611
00:33:05,920 --> 00:33:09,440
feel like the heel is in the way
and I've never really felt like 

612
00:33:09,440 --> 00:33:12,800
that's the case. 
But I think because the three is

613
00:33:12,800 --> 00:33:16,880
more stable for me because of 
the extra lateral soul flare 

614
00:33:16,880 --> 00:33:23,040
where where I land it just it 
lets me land more I and I could 

615
00:33:23,040 --> 00:33:25,720
be totally wrong about this, but
the whole point of this. 

616
00:33:25,800 --> 00:33:26,200
Episode. 
Yeah. 

617
00:33:26,600 --> 00:33:31,720
Yeah, it, it just feels like it.
It doesn't force me to land in a

618
00:33:31,720 --> 00:33:36,240
more dorsiflex position to 
accept my weight as compared to 

619
00:33:36,240 --> 00:33:39,200
version four. 
I can't say that it necessarily 

620
00:33:39,200 --> 00:33:42,360
feels better. 
You know, like I like the way 

621
00:33:42,360 --> 00:33:48,280
the four feels, but the three 
feels like, well, actually like 

622
00:33:48,280 --> 00:33:51,840
I said, the four, it feels like 
there's a little bit of a pause 

623
00:33:51,840 --> 00:33:55,040
at initial contact before I roll
forward in this shoe. 

624
00:33:55,040 --> 00:33:57,400
I really feel like I land and 
then just go. 

625
00:33:57,760 --> 00:34:01,920
So perhaps it's not actually 
that my foot angle is different.

626
00:34:02,240 --> 00:34:05,960
I'm just perceiving 
transitioning from initial 

627
00:34:05,960 --> 00:34:11,360
contact to mid stands faster and
of course as you do that your 

628
00:34:11,360 --> 00:34:13,840
planner flexing. 
So maybe that's more of what I'm

629
00:34:13,840 --> 00:34:16,400
feeling I'm going to. 
Try something you can totally 

630
00:34:16,400 --> 00:34:17,920
disagree with me. 
Do you think because you don't, 

631
00:34:17,920 --> 00:34:22,840
you're not like a pure 4 foot 
and you're like far like mid, 

632
00:34:23,400 --> 00:34:27,679
right basically. 
Where basically I'm landing like

633
00:34:27,719 --> 00:34:30,280
right at this transition here. 
Got it. 

634
00:34:30,440 --> 00:34:32,800
Yeah. 
So almost wondering if because 

635
00:34:32,800 --> 00:34:34,920
you land there, you're going 
from a point where it's more 

636
00:34:34,920 --> 00:34:38,560
narrow and the width of the sole
can actually impact stiffness of

637
00:34:38,560 --> 00:34:41,639
a shoe. 
Like a more narrow sole can 

638
00:34:41,639 --> 00:34:44,719
actually feel like it 
transitions really, really quick

639
00:34:44,719 --> 00:34:47,040
and a wider 1 can actually add 
stiffness. 

640
00:34:47,040 --> 00:34:50,800
I'm wondering if you're going 
from here and what you're doing 

641
00:34:50,800 --> 00:34:54,440
is you're perceiving a change in
some level of stiffness and 

642
00:34:54,440 --> 00:34:58,880
whatever reasoning that's that's
because it's going from narrow 

643
00:34:59,280 --> 00:35:03,520
to thicker. 
And this like lateral piece here

644
00:35:03,800 --> 00:35:06,400
that I wonder if that's slowing 
you down because you're going 

645
00:35:06,400 --> 00:35:09,360
from a quicker transition to 
slower and you're and that's 

646
00:35:09,360 --> 00:35:13,400
showing up as feeling like it's 
a more compliant foam. 

647
00:35:13,640 --> 00:35:18,880
It could. 
Be and you know the Hoka Mach X2

648
00:35:19,120 --> 00:35:25,440
that we tested last fall? 
No, not the Mach X2 was it? 

649
00:35:26,320 --> 00:35:32,520
No, the New Balance Racing. 
Flat the OR was it trainer the 

650
00:35:32,520 --> 00:35:34,680
Super trainer? 
Lightweight trainer V3. 

651
00:35:36,440 --> 00:35:37,960
Not the rebel. 
Yeah, the. 

652
00:35:37,960 --> 00:35:40,560
Rebel. 
The rebel we tested last year. 

653
00:35:40,840 --> 00:35:45,720
Yeah, that shoe, because of 
there's like a rubber piece in 

654
00:35:45,720 --> 00:35:50,120
the forefoot and there's, you 
know, expose midsole in the 

655
00:35:50,120 --> 00:35:53,560
midfoot. 
I land right at that transition 

656
00:35:53,560 --> 00:35:56,120
from the expose midsole to the 
forefoot. 

657
00:35:56,520 --> 00:35:59,800
And that shoe is like the only 
shoe I've ever ran in that 

658
00:35:59,800 --> 00:36:02,680
actually irritated my Achilles 
because it felt like when I 

659
00:36:02,680 --> 00:36:08,040
landed, I actually rocked 
backwards because I was landing 

660
00:36:08,040 --> 00:36:13,280
on that soft part. 
And if I remember right, the 

661
00:36:13,280 --> 00:36:17,560
geometry, like there's a pretty 
severe, severe heel bevel in 

662
00:36:17,560 --> 00:36:20,840
that shoe as well. 
So just the angle at which my 

663
00:36:20,840 --> 00:36:25,480
foot landed combined with that 
softness, I felt like it made me

664
00:36:25,480 --> 00:36:27,720
kind of rock back before pushing
forward. 

665
00:36:28,240 --> 00:36:29,240
Yep. 
The Rebel. 

666
00:36:29,360 --> 00:36:32,160
Would that be AV4V Four? 
Yeah. 

667
00:36:33,360 --> 00:36:36,400
That's interesting. 
So This is why, by the way, so 

668
00:36:36,440 --> 00:36:38,480
I'm this is me telling you 
obvious because audience, 

669
00:36:38,480 --> 00:36:40,720
because you obviously know this.
This is why we talk about so 

670
00:36:40,720 --> 00:36:43,120
many of these what my people 
considered little things like 

671
00:36:43,120 --> 00:36:45,640
the soil width or the outsole 
coverage. 

672
00:36:45,640 --> 00:36:48,360
Because I'm wondering if another
reason I might perceive this as 

673
00:36:48,360 --> 00:36:51,000
being firmer is because a, I'm 
landing farther back than you. 

674
00:36:51,360 --> 00:36:56,280
I'm might be hitting a bit of 
the this outsole patch, but also

675
00:36:56,280 --> 00:36:59,160
where I'm landing the plate is 
much closer to my foot. 

676
00:36:59,640 --> 00:37:03,040
And so plate distance from the 
foot will also really change how

677
00:37:03,040 --> 00:37:04,320
a shoe feels. 
If the plate is sitting 

678
00:37:04,320 --> 00:37:07,600
underneath your foot, that's 
going to probably feel firmer. 

679
00:37:07,600 --> 00:37:10,040
If it's farther away, it might 
feel a little bit softer. 

680
00:37:10,040 --> 00:37:13,440
There's some variation in that. 
But all of these things are 

681
00:37:13,440 --> 00:37:17,800
going to combine and depending 
on how yours just respond, where

682
00:37:17,800 --> 00:37:21,320
you land your landing mechanics,
how you perceive things under 

683
00:37:21,320 --> 00:37:23,440
foot, that's going to create 
some differences. 

684
00:37:23,440 --> 00:37:27,440
So I'm hoping, and we're hoping 
that by talking through this, it

685
00:37:27,440 --> 00:37:30,600
helps you figure out, huh, if 
you see some of the and, and I 

686
00:37:30,600 --> 00:37:32,640
think we're getting better where
we can kind of look at a shoe 

687
00:37:32,640 --> 00:37:36,320
and you're like, I can almost 
fairly accurately predict how 

688
00:37:36,320 --> 00:37:38,360
this is going to feel. 
That's what our hope is for all 

689
00:37:38,360 --> 00:37:40,840
of you that are listening and 
watching is to go, you can look 

690
00:37:40,840 --> 00:37:43,320
at a shoe and be like, either I 
know it's going to work or I 

691
00:37:43,320 --> 00:37:44,960
don't. 
And we're still surprised all 

692
00:37:44,960 --> 00:37:46,200
the time. 
We're still learning. 

693
00:37:46,360 --> 00:37:50,200
But I hopefully that's a helpful
thing on understanding shoes are

694
00:37:50,200 --> 00:37:52,360
going to be perceived 
differently by each people, each

695
00:37:52,360 --> 00:37:56,200
person just because there's so 
much variability in landing 

696
00:37:56,200 --> 00:37:59,440
mechanics, loading mechanics, 
That's just how it goes, 

697
00:37:59,440 --> 00:38:02,360
definitely. 
And we're two good examples 

698
00:38:02,360 --> 00:38:04,960
because we are so different in 
our mechanics. 

699
00:38:05,240 --> 00:38:07,720
Yeah, yeah. 
Andrea actually looks nice when 

700
00:38:07,720 --> 00:38:09,120
she runs. 
I look like garbage. 

701
00:38:10,640 --> 00:38:13,080
Well, look, there's a runner. 
There's a what is he doing? 

702
00:38:13,120 --> 00:38:16,080
Like, wow. 
Except, you know, you're like 

703
00:38:16,920 --> 00:38:18,640
minutes ahead of me. 
It's OK. 

704
00:38:20,440 --> 00:38:21,880
What was? 
That I forget what was the 

705
00:38:21,880 --> 00:38:27,560
again, I can't remember anything
not is it Pablo, Pablo Dermy or 

706
00:38:27,560 --> 00:38:31,400
who is the the the Czech guy or 
the guy from Finland, which I 

707
00:38:31,400 --> 00:38:34,160
know are two completely 
different areas, who was like 

708
00:38:34,280 --> 00:38:37,880
run it here, like carry his wife
and like run laps and do all 

709
00:38:37,880 --> 00:38:39,480
this crazy stuff. 
And then he ran the five. 

710
00:38:39,480 --> 00:38:43,240
He won the 5K10K and the 
marathon in the Olympics. 

711
00:38:44,920 --> 00:38:47,840
Oh gosh. 
That was a long time ago, right?

712
00:38:47,840 --> 00:38:49,840
It was a lot, Yeah. 
This is like. 100 plus years, 

713
00:38:50,120 --> 00:38:52,120
but yeah, there was a yeah, 
there's a comment he won all 

714
00:38:52,120 --> 00:38:54,240
this stuff and people like oh, 
why don't you like you're 

715
00:38:54,240 --> 00:38:56,520
running from looks terrible and 
goes this is not this is not 

716
00:38:56,520 --> 00:38:58,160
ballet. 
This is running, this is what 

717
00:38:58,160 --> 00:39:04,400
looks trying not to die, but so 
different experiences for the 

718
00:39:04,400 --> 00:39:06,400
same shoe. 
And again, we're we're hoping is

719
00:39:06,400 --> 00:39:10,160
that you can look at learn from 
this and go, Oh, I want so the 

720
00:39:10,160 --> 00:39:12,360
people that you have similar 
mechanics to, that's somebody 

721
00:39:12,360 --> 00:39:14,520
that you should think about 
paying attention to when they do

722
00:39:14,520 --> 00:39:16,000
shoe reviews, because 
everybody's different. 

723
00:39:16,240 --> 00:39:18,800
And this is also the reason why 
you might watch 40 different 

724
00:39:18,800 --> 00:39:21,400
reviewers and people might have 
different experiences with it. 

725
00:39:21,400 --> 00:39:23,760
And that's why there's 
variability in human movement. 

726
00:39:24,560 --> 00:39:26,520
So the hopefully that's helpful.
We're going to continue doing 

727
00:39:26,520 --> 00:39:28,960
these because an interesting way
to review shoes, but also help 

728
00:39:28,960 --> 00:39:31,920
teach you at the same time. 
As always, you can find us on a 

729
00:39:31,920 --> 00:39:34,320
variety of places. 
So anywhere from YouTube, 

730
00:39:34,480 --> 00:39:37,680
Spotify, if you want to hear 
this stuff, watch it on YouTube.

731
00:39:37,880 --> 00:39:40,480
And of course you can see all of
our written content on Doctors 

732
00:39:40,480 --> 00:39:42,280
running. 
We are of course posting on 

733
00:39:42,280 --> 00:39:44,960
other social media sites like 
LinkedIn, Instagram and Have fun

734
00:39:44,960 --> 00:39:49,840
Reels and stuff like that. 
Very excited how well David and 

735
00:39:49,840 --> 00:39:54,200
BJ were in Japan for the ASICS 
Meta speed event and got some 

736
00:39:54,200 --> 00:39:56,520
really good content there that's
doing very, very well, which 

737
00:39:56,520 --> 00:39:58,920
always is very, very exciting, 
but also really cool stuff to 

738
00:39:58,920 --> 00:40:00,600
watch. 
So yes, lots of stuff in many 

739
00:40:00,600 --> 00:40:02,160
different areas. 
You can find us in all those 

740
00:40:02,160 --> 00:40:04,120
different places and obviously 
e-mail us at 

741
00:40:04,120 --> 00:40:07,240
doctorsrunning@gmail.com. 
Whether how quickly we can 

742
00:40:07,240 --> 00:40:09,760
respond to you will vary because
Please remember we have all have

743
00:40:09,760 --> 00:40:11,800
at least one full time job, if 
not more. 

744
00:40:12,000 --> 00:40:14,520
And we do this because we really
enjoy it, want to teach and hope

745
00:40:14,520 --> 00:40:16,600
you all understand what not 
only. 

746
00:40:16,680 --> 00:40:18,880
Work specs for you, but how to 
find that and be able to run 

747
00:40:18,880 --> 00:40:21,240
happy and healthy? 
And I know I just stole the old 

748
00:40:21,240 --> 00:40:25,000
Brooks tagline again, which I've
been made fun of, but 

749
00:40:25,000 --> 00:40:26,160
technically they don't own that 
anymore. 

750
00:40:26,160 --> 00:40:28,440
So we're going to end on that 
and then we will see you all 

751
00:40:28,440 --> 00:40:28,840
next time.
