Welcome to the Deep dive. You know the drill.
We take a stack of dense, often opaque source material,
articles, research or private notes, and we try to extract the
most important Nuggets of knowledge.
And today we have something truly extraordinary.
We really do. Today, we are undertaking a
well, a truly unprecedented deep dive.
We are pulling back the curtain on the hidden structures of
global power. Specifically, we're analyzing
the inner workings of elite, often secret organizations that
the source material claims, well, that it claims truly shape
history. Our sources are frankly
extraordinary. We're drawing from the
unfiltered philosophical analysis and some very candid
reflections of a figure who has operated at the very apex of
these worlds, both the esoteric and the political, in the West.
Former Grandmaster. A former grandmaster and a
profound critic of modern governance.
So you should think of this less as a historical report and more
as a complete reevaluation of Western democratic structures,
but viewed through the lens of ancient initiatic philosophy.
OK, so our mission today is to follow this philosopher's logic
wherever it leads, however provocative that might be.
We need to extract his core, his foundational argument, which is
that the structures designed for state governance, so
specifically modern representative democracy, and
those designed for the pursuit of esoteric knowledge like
Freemasonry, are not just, you know, difficult partners.
They're fundamentally incompatible.
And we're going to investigate how this deep structural
conflict fuel the crises we see bubbling up everywhere today, in
politics and religion and in geopolitics.
Exactly. Ultimately, we're asking a
classic question, but with a new, and I think for many, a
very unsettling answer. In the 21st century, who really
determines global outcomes? OK, so let's unpack this core
philosophical dilemma right out of the gate.
The source material begins by introducing A structural
distinction that is, and I think we need to stress this,
absolutely critical to understanding everything else
we're going to talk about, right?
This is the difference between what he calls monarchic or true
Freemasonry on the one hand, and democratic or false Freemasonry
on the other. And it's important to say this
isn't about whether you prefer kings or presidents, not at all.
It's about the fundamental origin and the flow of
authority, of knowledge, and what he calls light itself.
So how does he explain this? He uses an analogy.
Right, it does. A very powerful one.
The pyramid, the traditional monarchic model, which he argues
is the only true form of an esoteric order, is represented
by a pyramid with two distinct sides.
You have the profane side, which is the visible, the outward
facing structure that you know the public might see.
And then you have the esoteric side.
That's the internal, the initiatic, the ritualistic path.
And crucially, in this traditional model, sovereignty,
the ultimate authority, it belongs exclusively to the
grandmaster. He is the light at the apex.
Right. So knowledge is transmitted
downward. It flows only from the top to
those below who have, I guess, demonstrated the capacity and
the worthiness to receive it. It is by its very definition
exclusive, selective and top down.
This exclusive nature is it's fundamental to any initiatic
order. The philosopher illustrates this
perfectly by referencing operative Freemasonry during the
medieval construction. Boom.
So like the actual stonemasons building cathedrals?
Exactly. Think about the construction of
the great European cathedrals. The grand architect, the master,
possessed the secret knowledge, the entire design, the
structural secrets, the math. He transmitted that knowledge
only to his chosen successor. Whom he had spent years
preparing. Years, through rigorous testing
and trial, the stone Masons, the operae, the mass of workers at
the base of the pyramid. They did not participate in
selecting the next architect. They didn't know the deep
secrets. Their job was to execute, not to
lead. The sovereignty, the source of
the knowledge, resided only in the master.
So what happens when we introduce the democratic model
into this very rigid structure? This is where the source makes a
very, very strong claim. He says the Democratic model
literally flips the pyramid upside down.
It flips it. And in doing so, only the
profane outward facing side remains.
The esoteric side. It just collapses.
That's an enormous claim that the entire system just falls
apart if you flip the pyramid. But practically speaking, how
does electing a Grand Master you know, by a vote, how does that
fundamentally break the flow of light?
Well, it breaks it because the origin of sovereignty is moved
to the wrong place. Sovereignty is incorrectly
transferred to the Masonic people, to the mass at the base.
The Grand Master in this system becomes merely an elected
official. Philosophically, that means he
would receive his light and his knowledge from the people, from
the collective opinion, from the uninitiated majority.
Which is impossible in this framework.
It's a complete structural contradiction for any
organization founded on the transmission of esoteric
knowledge. If the light comes from the
uninitiated base, the organization ceases to be truly
initiatic. It just becomes a political
club, a social club. It's an empty vessel.
So the argument here is that the search for wisdom for truth is
by its very nature and elitist endeavor that just cannot be
subject to majority rule. Correct.
And he argues this inherent elitism isn't unique to
Freemasonry. It's the philosophical
foundation of human thought itself, going back millennia.
The entire history of human thought, myth, religion,
philosophy, it's always been structured around this idea of
intellectual elitism. It's the enduring maestro
student dynamic. The master is the one who has
successfully comprehended reality, the universe, often
through intense personal sacrifice.
That master then transmits that knowledge only to elected
initiates who have passed trials to prove their capacity.
I think the linguistic example the source uses is very telling.
They refer to the Upanishad, yes, one of the foundational
tests of Hindu philosophy. The word itself literally means
sitting under, which defines the position of the student, the
olivo, in relation to the master.
It implies a necessary submission to receive that
knowledge it. Speaks volumes about the value
placed on intellectual hierarchy.
You have to surrender your ignorance to the person who
possesses the light. But then the source identifies A
precise historical moment where this structure was, in his
words, violently interrupted. He calls it the Greek Incident.
This refers to 5th century BC Athens, right?
Yes, this is when the rise of democracy, driven by
philosophers known as the Sophists, asserted a completely
novel idea that knowledge must be public and must be subject to
debate, to popular consensus. By asserting that knowledge
belonged to the general population, it simultaneously
destroy the esoteric basis of philosophy.
Which relied on selection and initiation.
Exactly. And the source refers to this
moment with extreme severity. He calls it the first incident
that destroyed the splendor of civilization.
He specifically cites the great Bronze Age societies, the Indus,
the Nile, the Tigris, Euphrates. That is a massive claim.
It is. The idea is that the pursuit of
genuine wisdom requires rigor, capacity, and submission to the
truth. Democracy by its nature
undermines that rigor and substitutes majority consensus
with a SOF is called doxa, or opinion for a revealed truth.
And that set up a continuous, cascading series of structural
crises for the West. OK, so that's structural
contradiction. Esoteric elitism versus profane
democracy is key because the source links it directly to the
formal birth of the modern Western state, right?
We jump forward centuries from ancient Greece to the American
Revolution. The source argues this is where
that esoteric tradition was officially corrupted by the
democratic impulse. And the American experience is
crucial because it's where the Democrats state was formally
codified, written down. Precisely the initial Masonic
lodges in the 13 American colonies.
They were established under the English style, which at the time
still retain many of those monarchic traditional
structures. But those lodges became
intellectual hothouses. They were where figures like
Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, all Masons, all
Masons. This is where they absorb the
new principles of the French Enlightenment, liberty, equality
and most importantly, consensus. And this fusion of English
traditionalism and French democratic principles, it LED
directly to the Revolution. Those Enlightenment values were
then translated directly into the foundational legal document
of the new state, the US Constitution of 1787, and.
In building that constitution, the Founders adopted key
political theories that permanently reversed the flow of
authority. It went from top down to bottom
up. And the two major architects of
this structural reversal were Rousseau and Montesquieu.
Rousseau completely overturned the idea of sovereignty.
He declared it belongs solely to the people, the general will,
which they exercised indirectly by electing representatives and
then Montesquieu provided the essential operational structure.
Dissipation Power. The Tri partition separating
power into the executive, the legislative and the judicial.
The President, Congress, Supreme Court.
This balance was designed explicitly to prevent any single
power from becoming absolute. Now, here's the critical link
back to the lodges. The source argues that this
entire democratic state structure was adopted Pesu side
by side, exactly as it was into American Freemasonry.
Yes. The Masonic people elected the
Venerable Master of the local lodge, and then those Venerable
Masters elect the Grand Master. The state model became the
organizational structure of the Esoteric Mahdi.
Which, the philosopher asserts is a fundamental fatal error.
Because it forces an organization dedicated to
revealed truth to operate under the rules of political
consensus. And this leads to his highly
provocative critique of liberal democracy, where he argues that
democracy and liberalism or individualism are themselves
fundamentally contradictory. Exactly, He says they're
mutually exclusive ideals, ensuring the Western state
remains inherently unstable. This is where he references the
other incidents that followed that first one in Athens.
OK, can we pause and unpack those five incidents?
They're listed in the source, but they're really the backbone
of his entire critique. How did each one specifically
undermine that original, coherent, elitist structure?
Certainly. So we covered the 1st democracy
in Athens. It undermined the initiatic
tradition by making knowledge public.
The second is the individualism of liberalism.
What does that mean exactly? This incident shifts the moral
compass entirely inward. It asserts the supremacy of
individual rights and self-interest over, say, the
common good or an objective truth.
This directly opposes the traditional view that the
individual must submit to a higher objective ideal.
So if the truth is internal and subjective, there's no need for
an external master. OK, what about the third
incident? The third is the concept of
absolute truth. Now this sounds counter
intuitive. Right.
You think that's a good thing? But the philosopher suggests
that when a religious or philosophical dogma asserts an
absolute final truth, it halts the necessary continuous
philosophical search for deeper comprehension.
If everything is already known and codified, the esoteric
function the search for light, it just stops.
That's a fascinating inversion. Most people see absolute truth
as a structural strength, but here it's viewed as intellectual
stagnation. Precisely the 4th incident is
the unconscious. This references the theories
from psychoanalysis which suggests a huge part of our
behavior is determined by non rational unseen impulses.
So if our rational mind isn't really in control.
Then it undermines the central tenet of esoteric thought that
the initiate can rationally conquer the self and achieve
illumination. It diminishes man's capacity for
conscious moral improvement. And the final one, which we'll
get into later, is the Catholic Church losing its theological
doctrine. All five, he argues, just
systematically chip away at the coherence and rigor you need for
an elite, wise governance structure.
Absolutely. And this instability feeds right
back down into the selection process for leaders, creating a
a perverse incentive within this democratic Freemasonry.
This is where the source uses that famously harsh line about
the quality of the leaders chosen under this system.
The benefit of democracy, as he cynically notes, is that it
gives value and a voice to everyone, even the most
imbecilic of the imbeciles, LPU embassy.
The logic is simple. In a democracy, if you are a
member who doesn't count for much, your vote is still needed
to get a majority. This inevitably creates a system
where votes are exchanged for favors, prioritizing political
maneuvering over wisdom. So the very system designed to
promote inclusion instead guarantees that the selection
process for leadership prioritizes political
expediency, influence transactional relationships just
getting to half plus one over any genuine initiatic capacity,
city or merit. It's the ultimate dilution of
the elite ideal, and his entire critique is that this dilution
is fatal to any organization aspiring to genuine
illumination, whether it's a lodge or a state.
So moving from this abstract philosophy to, well, some very
acute political history, the Italian context provides a
perfect real world illustration of how this democratic contagion
caused internal crises that just fractured the esoteric world.
It really does. Today in Italy, we are told
there are three prime primary recognized obediences, the Grand
Orient of Italy or GOI, the Grand Logit Italia, Deadly Alum
or GLAA, and the Grand Loggia Regolar di Italia or GLRI.
And the splits incisions that created these three bodies are
the direct result of that structural incompatibility we
just discussed. The first major break happened
way back in 19 O 8. What was the issue then?
At that time, the GOI, under a grandmaster named Ferrari, had
become intensely political materialist and overtly atheist.
They went so far as to remove the Great Architect of the
Universe from their ritual, explicitly following the
politically aligned Grand Orient of France.
That is a fundamental departure. It strips the order of his
entire spiritual foundation. Completely so Severio Farah, the
leader of the Scottish Rite at the time, he found this
abandonment unacceptable. His decision led to the creation
of the GLIA and importantly, the GLIA managed to get swift
international recognition from major jurisdictions, the US,
Belgium, Turkey. Which confirmed that the GOI's
drift was recognized and well condemned by mainstream
international Freemasonry. Exactly, and this political
drift was only made worse after World War 2, when the US played
a direct role in shaping the political and therefore the
Masonic landscape of Italy. So after the war, US Masons
essentially imported the American democratic structure
into the Italian lodges. But the source identifies A
fatal error in this implementation, specifically
about the tenure of the Grandmaster.
The length of time they serve. Yes, in the US, grandmasters
typically serve only one or two years.
It's to strictly maintain the balance of powers and prevent
any one person from accumulating too much authority.
But in Italy, the norm was much longer.
Rafi served for 15 years. Fenzi served for over 30.
And this longevity just destroyed the entire Mondescu
Ian Tri partition within the Order.
The Grand Master became effectively the permanent master
of the entire organization. He could systematically subvert
the other two powers, the Judicial Court and the
Legislative Council, by packing them with his own people over
time. The democratic structure, which
relies on rotation and balance, was completely corrupted by
unjecked tenure. Which brings us to the most
significant split in recent Italian Masonic history, the
1993 decision led by our source Giuliano de Bernardo, who was
the Grand Master of the Goi at the time.
And he was specifically elected as a philosopher tasked with
restoring moral order after the chaos of the infamous Loja P2
scandal. He was elected to clean house,
but during his time he discovered that the systemic
corruption stretched back to his predecessors.
Specifically, he uncovered evidence of a secret covert
lodge created by the former GM Armando Corona.
Who was himself accused of some very serious crimes, arms
trafficking. Yes, by Judge Palermo.
For the philosopher who held coherence with the ideal as his
absolute value, this institutionalized corruption was
the complete antithesis of esoteric truth.
And this philosophical commitment demanded a
catastrophic personal choice resignation.
It was an enormous personal sacrifice.
It earned him the moniker The Traitor from the Establishment
he left Behind. But his aim wasn't just a quit.
It was to found a new organization built entirely on
moral and philosophical coherence.
And that organization was the Grand Lodge, a regular at
Italia, the GLRI. What was the masterstroke that
gave this new body instant, profound international
legitimacy? It was the direct backing of the
English Grand Lodge, the United Grand Lodge of England, or UGLE.
The Mother Lodge, essentially. The Mother Lodge and this move
had immediate and massive international repercussions.
UGLE operates under a strict rule of exclusivity in one
territory by recognizing the GLRIUGLE immediately withdrew
its recognition from the GOI. That is a swift and brutal
condemnation. It essentially branded the GOI
as an irregular, non mainstream body, confirming its moral and
structural bankruptcy on the international stage and, the
source notes, a kind of historical nemesis in the
present day. Many of the GOI leaders and
high-ranking Scottish Rite members who originally fought
the split and called him a traitor have since quietly
joined the GLRI. They were forced to seek refuge
in the very organization they once condemned.
Which for him, is the ultimate vindication.
It's proof that an organization built on integrity will
inevitably outlast a larger body built on corruption.
If the schisms show the internal failure of democratic
Freemasonry, the history of Loggia P2 reveals the
catastrophic result of this compromise organization being
used as a geopolitical instrument.
For decades, the prevailing narrative in Italy has been that
P2 was a deviated lodge. A rogue operation?
Rogue operation working outside of the Grand Orient of Italy.
The source completely debunks this.
The argument is unambiguous. P2 was not a deviated lodge.
It was the Logia propaganda do which was the Grandmaster's
personal lodge and it operated with the full consent and
knowledge of the successive Grand Massels Lino Salvini and
later Batelli. So why did the deviated lodge
myth become the accepted truth? Because it was a deliberate,
necessary false declaration made by GM Armando Corona to the
Anselmi Commission, the big investigation that brought P2 to
light. The purpose was institutional
protection. The sole purpose redirect the
the intense damaging scrutiny of the Commission on Telicio Jelly
alone and prevent the entire GOI institution from being brought
down. It successfully deflected the
focus from systemic corruption to a single rogue bad actor.
To understand P2's true function, we have to look at its
geopolitical origins, which, according to the source, are
intimately tied to US power and organized crime.
We have to go back to the Sicilian landing.
During WWII. the US government, specifically the OSS, the
precursor to the CIA, needed the invasion of Sicily to be swift
and painless. To do that, they struck a deal
with the New York Mafia, primarily through Frank Luciani,
who contacted the Sicilian boss Collegero Vizzini.
And the consequence of this tactical alliance?
The US rewarded these mafia leaders like Dizzini with high
positions in the new Italian state.
This act integrated organized crime directly into the
government structure from the very beginning.
The source uses the term connubio, this deep structural
link between state power and organized crime, which he argues
has continued to today. This historical backdrop sets
the stage for P2's main mission in the post war period, anti
communism. Exactly.
Italy had the largest Communist Party in Western Europe, the
PCI. It was the geopolitical
epicenter of the Cold War. So the US needed a strategic
asset within the deep state. Yes.
Frank Giglari, a high-ranking Scottish Rite Mason and
confirmed OSCIA operative, was tasked with preparing the GOI to
counter Soviet influence. The goal was to make it an
ideological instrument alongside NATO and Gladio, and this entire
project was expertly executed by Grandmaster Giordano Gambolini.
The source calls Gambolini's actions a Copernican revolution
within Italian Freemasonry. What specific steps did he take
to align the GOI with the US agenda?
He took three critical steps. First, he reconciled with the
Vatican because they shared the primary goal of countering
communism. Second, he reunified the Goi
with the GLIA to create a larger, more formidable power
base. And 3rd his masterpiece.
He obtained English recognition from UGLE in 1972.
Which allowed him to cut ties with the French.
To sever all the Geo eyes damaging ties with the overtly
political and secular Grand Orient of France.
Creating a strong internationally credible Masonic
body ready to serve the US anti communist agenda.
And the specific instrument Gambreni focused on was the
Loggia propaganda too. Propaganda Lodges, founded back
in 1877, were designed specifically to propagate
Masonic principles by placing elite members in key strategic
roles across society, politics, military, judiciary, finance.
P2 was the GM's personal lodge, but the geopolitical role was
too sensitive for the Grandmaster himself to manage
directly. So GM Salvini delegated the
operational power to Alicio Jelly.
Precisely in 1970 or 71, Salvini formally delegated his absolute
power within P2 to Jelly, making Jelly the Grandmaster's direct
agent. Jelly was explicitly tasked with
restructuring the Lodge to serve the specific geopolitical
purpose. And this is formalized.
It was formalized by the GM's decree Balostra 107 LS, which
formally abrogated the old lodge and created a new P2 with new
rules, including holding meetings outside official
headquarters. And crucially, as the source
notes, this decree, A fundamental act of the
Grandmaster, was read aloud in all lodges across Italy.
Meaning everyone knew P2 was not deviated, they knew it was
officially restructured and operational.
And Jelly's restructuring went far beyond logistics.
Oh yes, he connected the mafia and Indrangeda, transforming
them from local family operations into powerful
international organizations linked to global trafficking and
arms and drugs. P2 thus gained immediate
criminal and financial operational tools.
Which directly fed into the necessary banking
infrastructure, leading to the infamous Banco Ambrosiano and
Vatican financial connections. It all culminates in the
Aldamaro Affair, perhaps the most infamous event linked to
P2's deep state operations. The Piano Dirinichita
Democratica The plan for democratic rebirth.
This is presented as reflecting the vision of Henry Kissinger.
Yes. Was utterly intransigent about
Italy remaining firmly in the western anti communist sphere.
He could not accept Aldo Moro's historic compromise, which was
the attempt to bring the powerful Communist Party into
the government, thereby undermining Italy's NATO
alignment, the source claims. The.
Kidnapping and the subsequent fake trial were intended as a
brutal, visceral message, a message to all.
Italians the historic compromise must not be completed, and the
paradox here is devastating. The Communist Party leader
Berlinger was one of the most rigid figures against
negotiating with the Red Brigades for Morrow's release.
He insisted on the line. Of state severity, which
tragically. Played directly into the hands
of the Americans and P2, who also wanted the historic
compromise to fail decisively and irrevocably so.
P2. Alongside NATO and Gladio were
the three primary instruments used by the US government to
shape Italian domestic policy during the Cold War.
If it was so instrumental, why did it all fall apart in 1981?
Its purpose became obsolete. After the fall of the Berlin
Wall, communism vanished as a viable threat.
P2, having fulfilled its anti Soviet purpose, was simply
abandoned by the US government. The scrutiny began.
Jelly was exposed. Villawanda was searched in 81.
He was discarded like a dirty sock as.
The source puts it by the same geopolitical.
Power that created him. OK, before we move on.
Let's just nail down that central myth about the
suspension, because it underpins the entire full history.
What did the actual letters regarding P2 status in 1976
reveal? Right.
So Corona's. Public statement was that Jelly
requested and GM Salvini granted the suspension of the entire P2
lodge in 1976. This supposedly removed it from
GOI jurisdiction, but the actual.
Letters tell a different story. A completely different story.
Jelly requested the suspension of the ritual works, meaning the
initiations and formal meetings only until the end of October,
citing nervous exhaustion. Salvini responded by granting
the suspension of ritual works indefinitely, so he asked for a
short. Break from ritual work, and the
GM granted an indefinite break from ritual work, which confirms
the lives was still active, just not meaning formally it was
still under the GM's jurisdiction.
Precisely. Corona took those two letters
and falsely declared that Jelly had requested and Salvini had
granted the suspension of the entire logic.
The institutional falsehood became the official history
protecting the GOI from the scrutiny it deserved.
That history shows the. Failure of the western
democratic structure to contain corruption and maintain its
ideals but the philosopher doesn't just analyze the past,
he offers a stark, chilling prediction for the geopolitical
future, connecting the failure of this western structure
directly to a looming Total War scenario yes, following the
collapse of the. Soviet Union the US was briefly
the sole global empire driving the globalization project.
Today, however, we are seeing the formation of two
fundamentally distinct global alignments.
And crucially, the source argues, these are driven not
just by economics or military power, but by what he calls.
Philosophical anthropologies. Different conceptions of.
Man, life in the world. On one side, you have the
Western alignment, defined by liberalism and individualism
rooted in those incidents we discussed, and on the other
side, the Eastern alignment, characterized by strong
centralized totalitarianism encompassing major powers like
China, Russia, and India. The core of the prediction is
that the West is structurally and constitutionally weak for a
major confrontation against this emerging coalition.
Why? What is the?
Specific structural weakness of the West he describes western.
Democracy as being full of contradictions that conflict
between individual rights and majority rule governance is
executed by people of scarce value because the democratic
selection system prioritizes political expediency over true
merit and decision making is. Slow, paralyzed by internal.
Debates. Political gridlock, Judicial
review. It's a government by committee,
easily stalled and led by the politically savvy rather than
the wise. And conversely, the Eastern.
Governments are structurally strong.
They make decisions. Immediately and decisively.
They are not constrained by democratic checks and balances.
The source uses the China shock as his primary evidence.
The claim is severe. China has enormously, and he
says unparalleled, technologically surpassed the US
since 1985. He explicitly claims Silicon
Valley is now the tail light this claim is rooted in.
The velocity and centralized focus of development since 1985,
when China was still often referred to as millennial China
pre modern in many respects, its scientific and technological
advance has been breathtakingly fast because a centralized.
Authority and direct resources without political opposition.
Exactly. While the US system gets bogged
down in political squabbles and the market determines
priorities, the East can execute long term strategic
technological leaps given these inherent.
Structural weaknesses and this accelerating technological gap.
The prediction is stark. If a Total War is sparked, the
Eastern alignment will win decisively, and this victory
will. Usher in the philosophical
conclusion of history, the emergence of the Uno Dio, the
one God who will express the ruler of the entire planet.
This will be a singular absolute power governing all aspects of
human existence. Science, Technology, economy,
democracy in this. Future is seen as a retrograde
concept, something belonging to the past.
That's an experiment that. Failed, so the future will be
ruled. By a single global global
authoritative structure, what is the one remaining variable in
this prediction? The human element.
Free will. The only remaining question,
according to the source, is whether this absolute power
chooses the path of good or the path of evil.
For humanity, the structure itself is inevitable.
Only the moral orientation of the ruler remains undetermined.
This systemic crisis. Of structure isn't just confined
to politics in esoteric orders, the source argues the exact same
structural decay is happening within the ultimate spiritual
institution of the West, the Catholic Church right the.
Source views the current situation in Rome through a
distinctly geopolitical lens. He labels the current Pope and
American Pope representing the democratic America, not the
conservative America, but the bellicose war waging America
that aligns itself with current Western political conflicts.
And he refers to this. Papacy as bellashista bellicose
specifically because it has taken a clear side in the Russia
Ukraine conflict, labeling Russian actions as imperialist
and this alignment is. Demonstrated through subtle but
critical diplomatic language. When addressing peace in Israel
in the Middle East, the Pope requests simple peace, but when
addressing Ukraine, he demands a just peace that specific.
Difference in phrasing demanding justice which implies judgement,
and siding with one party shows a clear alignment in the
philosopher's. View It has cemented the
Catholic Church firmly back into the geopolitical Western
alignment, undermining its claim to universal spiritual
authority. But the deeper crisis.
Is internal and doctrinal, driven by what the source calls
the Church's path of permission ISM.
Permission ISM is the. Excessive focus on mercy and
forgiveness, often at the expense of rigorous adherence to
doctrine and moral law. While it sounds compassionate,
this trend is, according to the source, dissolving the Church's
fundamental theological doctrine.
It's putting it on a path toward potential extinction.
And the consequence of this? The priest is.
Transformed from a learned dispenser of faith and codified
doctrine into an unqualified psychoanalyst, the sacred
confessional becomes a secular psychological couch.
The Doctor becomes. Relative to the individual's
psychological state rather than an absolute truth from God.
Exactly and. The source traces the final
potential schism back to the origins of the faith itself,
rooted in an event from the Vatican Council, Addery, and
exacerbated by the current pontiff's intentions toward
ecumenism, the movement toward Christian unity.
This involves proposals. To set aside or even a null 2
key dogmas that are the theological bedrock of the
modern Catholic Church. Yes, this.
Is Poclio X's Apostolic letter which proposes setting aside 2
core dogmas established way back at the Council of Nicaea in
325AD. The 1st is the filioc, which is
the doctrine that the. Holy Spirit proceeds from the
Father and the Son, a key historical.
Schism point with the Eastern Orthodox Church the second is
the dogma of people infallibility defined in the
19th century so the willingness of the.
Current papacy to potentially set aside the very origins of
Catholic doctrine in the pursuit of broader ecumenism is seen as
a catastrophic failure of coherence it's causing massive.
Internal discontent among conservative elements.
It suggests the church is prioritizing political unity
over doctrinal purity, and the source definitively predicts a
schism is possible and he identifies.
A specific, powerful internal organization as the likely
executor of this split opaste. This organization would act as
the conservative corrective force attempting to rescue the
theological doctrine that the current path of permission, ISM
and acumenism is dissolving this entire deep.
Dive has been framed by the philosophical rigor and, well,
the harsh judgement of the former grandmaster.
In the final part of our source material, the focus shifts
inward, examining his personal history to reinforce his
ultimate defining value, coherence with the ideal and
this personal ideal. Has driven some truly
remarkable, even painful choices.
He has consistently prioritized moral and intellectual integrity
over power comforter influence. We see this pattern repeatedly.
His resignation from high. Posts in the Scottish Rite, the
GOI, the GLRI, all because he discovered contradictions yes
for instance, he. Resigned from the Scottish Rite
because he refused to submit to the Sovereign Commander when he
was also the Grandmaster of the GOI.
That dual submission was an unacceptable contradiction of
authority. He also sacrificed.
Significant life paths for this ideal, we learned he chose his
wife over a promising academic career in the US at the
University of Indianapolis. But even more telling is his
choice to abandon a foundation backed by the highest levels of
the global financial and esoteric elite.
This is the story. Of the Dignity Foundation.
During his time as GOI grandmaster, he was approached
by a delegation of top Jewish leaders from Europe, the US and
Israel. They wanted him to found and
preside over dignity, a foundation ostensibly for the
defense of human rights globally.
And this was not a minor. Organization.
Who are the people involved? We're talking about serious.
Coordinated global elite power. His board included Lord
Northampton, who is a Grand Master of the English Masons,
and Marc Rich, the legendary international commodities
trader. The proposed board was slated to
include 5 Nobel laureates. He was presented with the.
Potential to govern this massive organization representing Jewish
power globally with enormous financial and political
substance and he turned it down why?
Because he was simultaneously. Navigating the deep corruption
of the GOI and the urgent need to found a new coherent Masonic
obedience, the GLRI, to restore the true initiatic path, he
chose the ideal of Freemasonry, the pursuit of uncompromised
truth over the promise of immense global political
influence. He sacrificed enormous.
Privilege and material substance for philosophical coherence and
this existential. Struggle informs his
interpretation of life itself. Echoing Eastern philosophy, he
adopts the Buddhist. View that human life is a
continuous series of choices that shape and condition the
future right if a person faces. Two possibilities A&B and
chooses a possibility B remains as a mountain of possibility
abilities and here is the aha moment he found that these
unused possibility of this mountain of what could have been
can still influence real life through subtle sensations and
dreams that suggests that our. Life is influenced not just by
the paths we take, but by the paths we consciously reject.
Precisely. And the highest goal of this
life, defined by these rigorous choices, is the path to wisdom
to become better, truer, and more beautiful, culminating in
the state of total wisdom known as Nirvana.
But attaining this. Wisdom requires a condition that
the West has demonstrably rejected and lost, which is the
sense of sought a mission or submission.
This is the critical final. Point of the critique the West
struggles because it has lost the capacity for positive
submission. The philosopher clarifies that
the term sought a mission has 2 distinct meanings.
There's the negative, which is enslavement or involuntary
subjugation, and the positive meaning it.
Is the willing? Conscious and positive
submission of the student to the teacher.
It is the surrender of the ego and individual arrogance in
order to receive light and knowledge from a recognized
master, the democratic. Individualistic West actively
rejects this positive submission.
It sees it as weakness or an infringement on personal
liberty. And because of this.
Rejection. They are unable to build
coherent wise structures. The fundamental issue through
plaguing the contemporary West is the loss of this sense of
positive submission. So for those seeking.
The true order, like his reconstituted Order of the
Illuminati, they must first demonstrate the capacity and
willingness to submit to the light and authority of the
master, because as the source. Concludes history is only truly
made by the elites. Those few with light within the
masses are and always have been merely instruments of larger
forces. This has been an intensely.
Demanding and highly critical journey through the hidden
structures of power. Guided entirely by the rigorous,
uncompromising philosophical perspective of the former
Grandmaster, we've extracted the core argument that esoteric
authority and democratic governance are mutually
exclusive. Which leads inevitably to.
Internal payouts and the institutional collapse we saw in
organizations like the Grand Orient of Italy, we detailed how
this. Corrupted structure allowed
Loggia P2 to become an effective semi covert geopolitical weapon
for the US anti communist project, ensuring that organized
crime was integrated into the Italian state at the highest
level. A toxic legacy that persists.
And finally. We explored the radical
prediction of an inevitable shift towards Eastern strength
and the arrival of the absolute rule of the Uno dio fueled by
the structural decay and low quality leadership of the
democratic W What's fascinating here?
Is the sheer weight placed on the core structural failure of
the West tracing it all the way back to 5th century BC Athens,
it all comes back to the. Core contradiction that has
plagued Western civilization since the American Revolution
the irreconcilable conflict between democracy, the rule by
majority and liberalism, individualism, the absolute
rights of the individual, and finding a stable.
Equilibrium between those two has been the root cause of
continuous conflict in crisis. It creates a system.
That prizes the lowest common denominator over the highest
possible ideal. We've explored the philosopher.
'S deeply held argument that only the elite make history, and
that true progress requires a positive, voluntary submission
to knowledge and ideal leadership.
So here's the final thought. If the West continues to reject
this path, prioritizing individual license and the
flawed system of democratic consensus over coherent,
illuminated authority, how will it avoid becoming merely a tool
in the hands of the rising Eastern powers that value
centralized strength and rapid, decisive governance?
That is the ultimate profound challenge posed by this deep
dive.